Skip to main content

Development of Eczematous Symptoms by the Implanted Breast Prosthesis

Abstract

A patient with an unidentified implanted breast prosthesis experienced eczematous symptoms 3 years after implantation, although prosthesis rapture and complications such as capsular contraction, hematoma, and seroma were not clinically observed. Surgical removal of the implanted prosthesis gradually improved the symptoms, suggesting that symptom development was likely due to the implanted prosthesis. Unidentified materials of the implanted breast prosthesis were investigated by chemical and medical analysis to determine how the developed eczematous symptoms were induced by the prosthesis. Through the investigation, not only the prosthesis materials but also the manufacturer of the implanted breast prosthesis was identified. On the basis of the results and the previous reports, a speculation was made as to a plausible explanation for the pathogenesis of the eczematous symptoms.

Level of Evidence V

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors at www.springer.com/00266.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

References

  1. Berry MG, Davies DM (2010) Breast augmentation: Part I. A review of the silicone prosthesis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 63:1761–1768

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Dunn KW, Hall PN, Khoo CT (1992) Breast implant materials: sense and safety. Br J Plast Surg 45:315–321

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Roucoules V, Ponche A, Geissler A, Siffer F, Vidal L et al (2007) Changes in silicon elastomeric surface properties under stretching induced by three surface treatments. Langmuir 23:13136–13145

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Henderson EJ, Veinot JGC (2008) From phenylsiloxane polymer composition to size-controlled silicon carbide nanocrystals. J Am Chem Soc 131:809–815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Robert Reeves AR, Lombardo L, Boyer R, Leach JB (2010) Synthesis and characterization of carboxymethylcellulose–methacrylate hydrogel cell scaffolds. Polymers 2:252–264

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Arion H (1997) Statistics and breast implants. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 42:194–198

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Arion H (2001) Carboxymethylcellulose hydrogel-filled breast implants. Our experience in 15 years. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 46:55–59

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bruining HG, Voest MI (2005) Rupture of a hydrogel-filled breast implant. Plast Reconstr Surg 116:73e–75e

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Brunner CA, Groner RW (2006) Carboxy-methyl-cellulose hydrogel-filled breast implants: an ideal alternative? A report of five years’ experience with this device. Can J Plast Surg 14:151–154

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gatti A (2004) Critical review of additive mastoplastic with Arion hydrogel prosthesis. Aesthet Plast Surg 28:54–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Brook MA (2006) Platinum in silicone breast implants. Biomaterials 27:3274–3286

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lykissa ED, Kala SV, Hurley JB, Lebovitz RM (1997) Release of low-molecular-weight silicones and platinum from silicone breast implants. Anal Chem 69:4912–4916

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Peters W, Smith D, Lugowski S (1999) Silicon assays in women with and without silicone gel breast implants: a review. Ann Plast Surg 43:324–330

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Teruo Okano or Hiroyuku Sakurai.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Akiyama, Y., Yamato, M., Higashimori, T. et al. Development of Eczematous Symptoms by the Implanted Breast Prosthesis. Aesth Plast Surg 36, 1155–1159 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-012-9946-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-012-9946-6

Keywords

  • Breast prosthesis
  • Carboxylmethyl cellulose
  • Eczematous symptoms
  • Polydimethylsiloxane