Abstract
Background
Long-term aesthetic results after reduction mammaplasty remain an important issue for evaluating the success of different techniques. Superior pedicled techniques are reported to maintain a better breast projection with less bottoming-out of the inferior mammary pole than inferior pedicled techniques.
Methods
The outcomes of 18 patients who had undergone the superior pedicled technique described by Pitanguy and 16 patients operated on using the inferior pedicled technique by Robbins were compared.
Results
The mean follow-up period was 49 months in the Pitanguy group and 35 months in the Robbins group. The distance between the inframammary crease and the inferior margin of the nipple–areola complex (NAC) showed a mean elongation of 3.3 cm (80.5 %) after the superior pedicled Pitanguy technique and 3.9 cm (92.9 %) after the inferior pedicled Robbins technique (p = 0.077). Using postoperative photographs, the overall aesthetic result after Pitanguy’s technique was judged significantly better than the result after Robbins’ technique (p = 0.002).
Conclusions
Distinct postoperative elongation of the inferior mammary pole length must be considered in the preoperative marking for inferior and superior pedicled reduction mammaplasty. Guide values for the elongation can be used for planning unilateral adjustment reduction mammaplasty. To avoid bottoming-out of the inferior mammary pole, the NAC should be located at the level of the inframammary crease and the distance between the inframammary crease and the inferior border of the NAC should not exceed 4–4.5 cm. The definite position of the NAC should be decided after final shaping of the reduced breast toward the end of the operation.
Level of Evidence III
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahmad J, Lista F (2008) Vertical scar reduction mammaplasty: the fate of nipple-areola complex position and inferior pole length. Plast Reconstr Surg 121(4):1084–1091
Akpuaka FC, Jiburum BC (1998) Reduction mammaplasty by the inferior pedicle technique: experience with moderate to severe breast enlargement. West Afr J Med 17(3):199–201
Erdogan B, Ayhan M, Deren O, Tuncel A (2002) Importance of pedicle length in inferior pedicle technique and long-term outcome of areola-to-fold distance. Aesthetic Plast Surg 26:436–443
Ferreira MC (2000) Evaluation of results in aesthetic plastic surgery: preliminary observations on mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 106:1630–1635
Foustanos A, Panagiotopoulos K, Skouras G (2011) Intraoperative modification of Pitanguy technique of reduction mammaplasty for elevation of the nipple-areola complex in case of severe breast ptosis. Aesthetic Plast Surg 35(1):55–60
Georgiade N, Serafin D, Morris R, Georgiade G (1979) Reduction mammaplasty utilizing an inferior pedicle nipple-areolar flap. Ann Plast Surg 3:211–218
Godwin Y, Wood SH, O’Neill TJ (1998) A comparison of the patient and surgeon opinion on the long-term aesthetic outcome of reduction mammaplasty. Br J Plast Surg 51:444–449
Gonzalez F, Brown F, Gold M, Walton R, Shafer B (1993) Preoperative and postoperative nipple-areola sensibility in patients undergoing reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 92:809–814
Pitanguy I (1967) Surgical treatment of breast hypertrophy. Br J Plast Surg 20:78–85
Puelzl P, Schoeller T, Wechselberger G (2006) Simplification of reduction mammaplasty using a specially designed ruler. Aesthetic Plast Surg 30:622–624
Reus WF, Mathes SJ (1988) Preservation of projection after reduction mammaplasty: long-term follow-up of the inferior pedicle technique. Plast Reconstr Surg 82:644–652
Robbins TH (1977) A reduction mammaplasty with the areola-nipple based on an inferior dermal pedicle. Plast Reconstr Surg 59:64–67
Sandsmark M, Amland PF, Abyholm F, Traaholt L (1992) Reduction mammaplasty. A comparative study of the Orlando and Robbins methods in 292 patients. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 26(2):203–209
Sarhadi N, Dunn J, Lee F, Soutar D (1996) An anatomical study of the nerve supply of the breast, including the nipple and areola. Br J Plast Surg 49:156–164
Small KH, Tepper OM, Unger JG, Kumar N, Feldman DL, Choi M, Karp NS (2010) Re-defining pseudoptosis from a 3D perspective after short scar-medial pedicle reduction mammaplasty. J Plast Reconst Aesthet Surg 63(2):346–353
Tairych G, Worseg A, Kuzbari R, Deutinger M, Holle J (2000) A comparison of long-term outcome of 6 techniques of breast reduction. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 32:159–165
Temple C, Hurst L (1999) Reduction mammaplasty improves breast sensibility. Plast Reconstr Surg 104:72–76
Wechselberger G, Stoß S, Schoeller T, Oehlbauer M, Piza-Katzer H (2001) An analysis of breast sensation following inferior pedicle mammaplasty and the effect of the volume of resected tissue. Aesthetic Plast Surg 25:443–446
Wettstein R, Christofides E, Pittet B, Psaras G, Harder Y (2011) Superior pedicle breast reduction for hypertrophy with massive ptosis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 64(4):500–507
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Sarah Zehm and Petra Pülzl contributed equally to this work.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zehm, S., Puelzl, P., Wechselberger, G. et al. Inferior Pole Length and Long-term Aesthetic Outcome after Superior and Inferior Pedicled Reduction Mammaplasty. Aesth Plast Surg 36, 1128–1133 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-012-9938-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-012-9938-6