Abstract
Background
Implants with a polyurethane foam cover have been used by plastic surgeons since Ashley described them in 1970. Overwhelming evidence confirms the benefits of these implants, especially the extremely low incidence of capsular contracture (grades 3 and 4, Baker classification). On the other hand, except for a transient and self-limited rash, there is no evidence that polyurethane implants present more complications than texturized or smooth gel implants. Due to concerns of polyurethane-induced cancer, these implants were withdrawn in United States after approximately 110,000 American women had received them. This fact, together with the probability that these implants will be reintroduced in the United States, suggests that continued monitoring of their long-term safety and effectiveness is mandatory.
Methods
A retrospective study analyzed the outcomes of 996 implants inserted during a period of 15 years. The incidence of early and late complications was analyzed as well as the aesthetic outcome.
Results
The complications evaluated included hematoma (0.6%), infection (0.4%), seroma (0.8%), rash (4.3%), wound dehiscence (0%), capsular contracture (0.4%), implant malposition (0.8%), need for revisional surgery (1.2%), implant rupture (0.7%), rippling (1.8%), and polyurethane-related cancer (0%). Regarding the aesthetic outcome, 95% of the patients expressed satisfaction with their final result.
Conclusion
The polyurethane foam-covered implants have been proven safe for use in breast surgery. They provide the lowest rate of capsular contracture (0.4% in the current study) and excellent aesthetic results.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ashley F (1970) A new type of breast prosthesis. Plast Reconstr Surg 45:421
Ashley FL (1972) Further studies on the natural-Y breast prothesis. Plast Reconstr Surg 49:414–419
Barone F, Perry L, Keller T, Maxell P (1992) The biomechanical and histopathologic effects of surface texturing with silicone and polyurethane in tissue implantation and expansion. Plast Reconstr Surg 90:77
Batich C, Williams J (1989) Toxic hydrolysis product from biodegradable foam implant. J Biomed Mater Res 23:311–319
Berrino P, Galli A, Rainero ML, Santi PL (1986) Long-lasting complications with the use of polyurethane-covered breast implants. Br J Plast Surg 39:549
Brand G (1988) Foam-covered mammary implants. Clin Plast Surg 15:533
Brody GS (1984) Reconstruction of the breast using polyurethane-coated prostheses. Plast Reconstr Surg 73:420
Bruck HG (1990) Long-term results of polyurethane-covered prostheses. Aesthetic Plast Surg 14:85–86
Bucky L, Ehrlich P, Sohoni et al (1994) The capsular quality of the saline-filled smooth silicone, textured silicone, and polyurethane implants in rabbits: A long-term study. Plast Reconstr Surg 93:1123
Capozzi A (1982) Clinical experience with polyurethane-covered gel mammary implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 69:904
Capozzi A, Pennisi VR (1981) Clinical experience with polyurethane-covered gel-filled mammary prothesis. Plast Reconstr Surg 68:512
Cocke W, Leathers H, Lynch J (1975) Foreign body reactions to polyurethane cover of some breast prosthesis. Plast Reconstr Surg 56:527
Cohney B, Cohney T, Hearne V (1991) Nineteen years experience with polyurethane foam-covered mammary prosthesis: A preliminary report. Ann Plast Surg 27:27
Dolsky RL (1985) Inserting the Méme prosthesis. Plast Reconstr Surg 76:974
Eyssen JE, Von Werssowetz AJ, Middleton GD (1984) Reconstruction of the breast using polyurethane-covered prosthesis. Plast Reconstr Surg 74:415
Food and Drugs Administration (FDA): Update: Study of TDA Released From Polyurethane Foam-Covered Breast Implants. FDA: 27 June 1995
Gasperoni C, Salgarello M, Gargani G (1992) Polyurethane-covered mammary implants: A 12-year experience. Ann Plast Surg 29:303
Handel N (1991) Comparative experience with smooth and polyurethane breast implants using the Kaplan-Meier method survival analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 88:475
Handel N, Guitierrez J (2006) long-term safety and efficacy of polyurethane foam-covered breast implants. Aesthetic Surg J 26:265–274
Herman S (1984) The Méme implant. Plast Reconstr Surg 73:411
Hester R, Cukic J (1991) Use of stacked polyurethane-covered mammary implants in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 88:503
Hester R, Nahai F, Bostwick J et al (1988) A 5-year experience with polyurethane-covered mammary prosthesis for treatment of capsular contracture, primary augmentation mammoplasty, and the breast reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg 15:569
Hoefflin S (1997) Extensive experience with polyurethane breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 100:1291–1298
Hoffman S (1989) Correction of established capsule contracture with polyurethane implants. Aesthetic Plast Surg 13:33–40
Melmed EP (1988) Polyurethane implants: A 6-year review of 416 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 82:285–290
Melmed EP (1990) Treatment of breast contracture with open capsulectomy and replacement of gel prosthesis with polyuretjane-covered implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 86:270
Pennisi VR (1985) Polyurethane-covered silicone gel mammary prostheses for successful breast reconstruction. Aesthetic Plast Surg 9:73–77
Pennisi V (1990) Long-term use of polyurethane breast prostesis: A 14-year experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 86:386
Pitanguy I, Bretano J, CastroRanalho Mde, Porto MJ (1990) Implante de Silicone gel com revestimento de poliuretano. Rev Brasil Cirugía 80:119
Rebello C: Mamoplastía de aumento com próteses mamárias de silicone revestidas de poliuretano. Rev Brasil Cirurgía Plást Estét Reconstr 8:58, Janeiro/Dezembro, 1993
Santerre JP, Wang FGB, Labow RS: Biodegradation of Microthane Polyester Polyurethane by the Lysosomal Enzyme Cholesterol Esterase and Identification of Degradation Products. 24th Annual Meeting of the Society for Biomaterials, San Diego, CA, April 1998
Schatten W (1984) Reconstruction of breast following mastectomy with polyurethane-covered, gel-filled prosthesis. Ann Plast Surg 12:147
Sinclair T, Kerrigan C, Buntik R (1993) Biodegradation of the polyurethane foam covering of breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 92:1003
Smahel J (1987) Tissue reactions to breast implants coated with polyurethane. Plast Reconstr Surg 61:80
Spear SL (1999) Breast implant technology: What can we count on? Aesthetic Surg J 19:347–349
Szycher M, Lee SI, Siciliano A (1991) Breast prosthesis: A critical revew. J Biomat Appl 5:256
Vasquez G, Pellon A (2007) Polyurethane-coated silicone gel breast implants used for 18 years. Aesthetic Plast Surg 31:330–336
Vázquez G (1999) A ten-year experience using polyurethane-covered breast implants. Aesthetic Plast Surg 23:189–196
Vázquez G (2005) Modification of the anatomic silicone gel implant with polyurethane cover. Cir Plast Iberolatinamer 31:193–198
Zimman O, Robles JM, Lee J (1978) The fibrous capsule around mammary implants: An investigation. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2:217
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
de la Peña-Salcedo, J.A., Soto-Miranda, M.A. & Lopez-Salguero, J.F. Back to the Future: A 15-Year Experience With Polyurethane Foam-Covered Breast Implants Using the Partial-Subfascial Technique. Aesth Plast Surg 36, 331–338 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-011-9826-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-011-9826-5