Advertisement

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery

, Volume 35, Issue 4, pp 475–479 | Cite as

Aesthetic Improvements of Skin Grafts in Nasal Tip Reconstruction

  • Stefan RimlEmail author
  • Heinz Wallner
  • Lorenz Larcher
  • Ulrich Amann
  • Peter Kompatscher
Original Article

Abstract

Defect closure on the nasal tip subunit still remains challenging. Full-thickness skin transplantation still is used despite its poor outcome in terms of the nasal tip contour caused by lack of dermal tissue. To avoid subsidence deformities associated with nasal tip reconstruction with skin transplants, this study analyzed methods using combined epidermal and dermal replacement. For 30 consecutive patients with a nasal tip defect, a retrospective comparison was made between conventional full-thickness skin transplantation, retroauricular perichondrodermal composite grafts, and skin transplantation supplemented with the collagen-elastin matrix, Matriderm, used as a dermal substitute (n = 10 per study group).The postoperative results were evaluated in a randomized and blind manner by external facial surgeons using the Manchester Scar Scale. The findings showed a marked improvement in nasal tip contour with combined epidermal/dermal replacement without any deterioration in other graft qualities, justifying the additional effort involved in this procedure. Two patients developed fistulae after Matriderm-aided skin transplantation. Therefore, the authors do not consider this a suitable method for nasal tip reconstruction.

Keywords

Composite graft Matriderm Nasal tip reconstruction Skin graft 

Notes

Acknowledgment

We thank PD Dr. G. Beer for her helpful advice, Dr. U. Obwegeser for collaboration in data mining, and R. Csordas-Iyer for editing the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Burget GC, Menick FJ (1985) The subunit principle in nasal reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 76:239–247PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dupertuis SM (1947) Free ear lobe grafts of skin and fat: their value in reconstruction about the nostril. Plast Recontr Surg 2:394Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brent B, Ott R (1978) Perichondrocutaneous graft. Plast Reconstr Surg 62:1–14PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kalbermatten DF, Haug M, Wettstein R, Schaefer DJ, Pierer G (2005) New posterior auricular perichondrial cutaneous graft for stable reconstruction of nasal defects. Aesthetic Plast Surg 29:489–495PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Haslik W, Kamolz LP, Nathschläger G, Andel H, Meissl G, Frey M (2007) First experiences with the collagen-elastin matrix Matriderm as a dermal substitute in severe burn injuries of the hand. Burns 33:364–368PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ryssel H, Gazyakan E, Germann G, Oelbauer M (2008) The use of MatriDerm in early excision and simultaneous autologous skin grafting in burns: a pilot study. Burns 34(1):93–97PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Golinski PA, Zöller N, Kippenberger S, Menke H, Bereiter-Hahn J, Bern A (2009) Development of an engraftable skin equivalen based on Matriderm with human keratinocytes and fibroblasts. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 41:327–332PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wetzig T, Gebhardt C, Simon JC (2009) New indications for artificial collagen-elastin matrices? Covering exposed tendons. Dermatology 219:272–273PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Boyce A, Atherton DD, Tang R, Jawad M (2010) The use of Matriderm in the management of an exposed Achilles tendon secondary to a burns injury. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 63(2):e206–e207PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Saour S, Atkins J, Healy CM (2009) Novel method of applying Matriderm and SSG as a composite unit, improving accuracy, speed and adherence to the recipient site. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 65(5):e77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lumenta DB, Kamolz LP, Frey M (2009) Adult burn patients with more than 60% TBSA involved: meek and other techniques to overcome restricted skin harvest availability: the Viennese concept. J Burn Care Res 30:231–242PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Haslik W, Kamolz LP, Manna F, Hladik M, Frey M (2010) Management of full-thickness skin defects in the hand and wrist region: first long-term experiences with the dermal matrix Matriderm. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 63:360–364PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schneider J, Biedermann T, Widmer D, Montano I, Meuli M, Reichmann E, Schiestl C (2009) Matriderm versus Integra: a comparative experimental study. Burns 35:51–57PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lamme EN, De Vries H, Van Veen H, Gabbiani G, Westerhof W, Middelkoop E (1996) Extracellular matrix characterization during healing of full-thickness wounds treated with a collagen/elastin dermal substitute shows improved skin regeneration in pigs. J Histochem Cytochem 44:1311–1322PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Duncan JAL, Bond JS, Mason T, Ludlow A, Cridland P, O’Kane S, Feruson MW (2006) Visual analogue scale scoring and ranking: a suitable and sensitive method for assessing scar quality? Plast Recontr Surg 15:909–918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Neville JA, Welch E, Leffell DJ (2007) Management of nonmelanoma skin cancer in 2007. Nat Clin Pract Oncol 4:462–469PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Beer GM, Bermoser K, Kompatscher P (1998) Closure of nasal defects after tumor excision with local flaps. Aesthetic Plast Surg 22:42–47PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stefan Riml
    • 1
    Email author
  • Heinz Wallner
    • 1
  • Lorenz Larcher
    • 1
  • Ulrich Amann
    • 2
  • Peter Kompatscher
    • 1
  1. 1.Department for Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive SurgeryAcademic Teaching Hospital FeldkirchFeldkirchAustria
  2. 2.Department for ENTAcademic Teaching Hospital FeldkirchFeldkirchAustria

Personalised recommendations