Skip to main content
Log in

Factors Affecting Symmetrization of the Contralateral Breast: A 7-Year Unilateral Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction Experience

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although a number of studies compare different techniques of breast reconstruction, information documenting the factors that affect breast symmetry after unilateral mastectomy and reconstruction seems to be scarce. A statistical analysis of 606 patients undergoing unilateral mastectomy and breast reconstruction performed during a 7 year period was undertaken in an endeavor to identify these factors. Patients were classified according to time of reconstruction, method of reconstruction, type of implant, and mastectomy type. Contralateral procedures included mastopexy, augmentation, and reduction mammaplasty. Delayed reconstruction more frequently required a symmetrization than an immediate reconstruction. The percentage of contralateral procedures was higher for implant reconstructions than for autologous reconstructions, and the type of mastectomy was significantly associated with the symmetrization procedure. The findings showed that non–skin-sparing mastectomy (non-SSM) needed symmetrization surgery more frequently than did SSM procedures. The data suggest a preoperative collaboration and case study between oncologic and plastic surgeons to apply, when possible, SSM with immediate implant breast reconstruction, resulting in fewer symmetrization procedures and the best aesthetic follow-up result. These factors need to be considered when mastectomy and reconstruction are planned in order to optimize the aesthetic result together with the development of breast surgery specialty units.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kroll SS, Baldwin B (1992) A comparison of outcomes using three different methods of breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 90(3):455−462

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lejour M, Jabri M, Deraemaecker R (1988) Analysis of long-term results of 326 breast reconstructions. Clin Plast Surg 15:689

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Nahabedian MY (2003) Symmetrical breast reconstruction: analysis of secondary procedures after reconstruction with implants and autologous tissue. Plast Reconstr Surg 112:1582

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Leone MS, Perniciaro G, Franchelli S, Santi PL (1994) Considerations in immediate and delayed breast reconstruction (Italian). Minerva Chir 49:671–675

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Carlson GW, Bostwich J III, Styblo TM et al (1997) Skin-sparing mastectomy: oncological and reconstruction considerations. Ann Surg 225:570

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Madden JL, Kandalaft S, Bourque RA (1972) Modified radical mastectomy. Ann Surg 175:624

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Carlson GW (1996) Skin-sparing mastectomy: anatomic and technical considerations. Am Surg 62:151

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Losken A, Carlson GW, Bostwick J III et al (2002) Trends in unilateral breast reconstruction and management of the controlateral breast: the Emoroy experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 110:89

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hudson D (2004) Factors determining shape and symmetry in immediate breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 52:15–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Stevenson TR, Goldstein JA (1993) TRAM flap breast reconstruction and contralateral reduction of mastopexy. Plast Reconstr Surg 92:118

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors express their special thanks to the surgeons who contributed with their clinical cases, namely, Pietro Berrino MD, Marisa Muggianu MD (Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Unit IST Genoa), Adami Michaela MD (Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Unit IST Genoa), Francesco Filippi MD.

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Maria Stella Leone or Virginia Priano.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Leone, M.S., Priano, V., Franchelli, S. et al. Factors Affecting Symmetrization of the Contralateral Breast: A 7-Year Unilateral Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction Experience. Aesth Plast Surg 35, 446–451 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-010-9622-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-010-9622-7

Keywords

Navigation