Skip to main content
Log in

Rectus Diastasis Corrected with Absorbable Suture: A Long-Term Evaluation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Correction of rectus diastasis (RD) is performed during most abdominoplasties. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term result of RD correction when the plication of the anterior rectus sheath is performed with an absorbable suture.

Methods

Abdominoplasty was performed for 12 women who presented with Nahas’ type A musculoaponeurotic deformity. The RD was measured preoperatively with two computed tomography (CT) scan slices at two levels: 3 cm above and 2 cm below the umbilicus. The bony levels at which the slices were taken served as a reference for the postoperative CT scans. During the operation, the RD was measured with a ruler at the same levels as the preoperative CT scan slices. The force necessary to bring the medial edge of the rectus muscle to the midline was measured on both levels with a dynamometer. Plication of the anterior rectus sheath was performed using a double-layer 0-PDS (polydioxanone) suture. Postoperative CT scans were performed 3 weeks after the operation. A long-term follow-up CT scan was performed 32–48 months postoperatively for every patient.

Results

The 3-week postoperative CT scan proved that the correction of RD was achieved by the procedure. Despite the fact that there were different abdominal wall resistances and that the average weight gain during this period was 4.5 kg, the long-term CT-scans showed no recurrence of RD for any patient of this series in either the superior or inferior abdomen.

Conclusion

Plication of the anterior rectus sheath with PDS suture to correct RD seems to be a long-lasting procedure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Personal communication: Product management. Ethicon Division of Johnson & Johnson Professional Products from Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil, 2009.

References

  1. Nahas FX (1996) Studies on the endoscopic correction of diastasis recti. Oper Tech Plast Reconstr Surg 3:58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Nahas FX, Ferreira LM (2003) Experimental model to study correction of rectus diastasis by laparoscopy, in pigs. Acta Cir Bras 18:69

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ferreira LM, Castilho HT, Hochberg J et al (2001) Triangular mattress suture in abdominal diastasis to prevent epigastric bulging. Ann Plast Surg 46:130

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Birdsell DC, Gavelin GE, Kemsley GM, Hein KS (1981) “Staying power”: absorbable vs nonabsorbable. Plast Reconstr Surg 68:742

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nahas FX, Augusto SM, Ghelfond C (1997) Should diastasis recti be corrected? Aesthetic Plast Surg 21:285

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Nahas FX, Augusto SM, Ghelfond C (2001) Nylon versus PDS (polydioxanone) in the correction of rectus diastasis. Plast Reconstr Surg 107:700

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Van Uchelen JH, Kon M, Werker PM (2001) The long-term durability of plication of the anterior rectus sheath assessed by ultrasonography. Plast Reconstr Surg 107:1578

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nahas FX (2002) Pregnancy after abdominoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 26:284

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nahas FX, Ferreira LM, Augusto SM, Ghelfond C (2005) Long term follow-up of correction of rectus diastasis. Plast Reconstr Surg 115:1736–1741

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hodgson NC, Malthaner RA, Ostbye T (2000) The search for an ideal method of abdominal fascial closure: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg 231:436–442

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nahas FX (2001) An aesthetic classification of the abdomen based on the myoaponeurotic layer. Plast Reconstr Surg 108:1787

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chang TN (2006) Abdominoplasty techniques. In: Mathes SJ (ed) Plastic surgery, vol 6, 1st edn. Saunders Elsevier, Philadelphia, pp 119–191

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nahas FX, Barbosa MVJ, Ferreira LM (2009) Factors that may influence failure of the correction of the musculoaponeurotic deformities of the abdomen. Plast Reconstr Surg 124:334

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Brauman D (2008) Diastasis recti: clinical anatomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 122:1564–1569

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nahas FX, Ferreira LM, Mendes JA (2004) An efficient way to correct recurrent rectus diastasis. Aesthetic Plast Surg 28:189–196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mendes DA, Nahas FX, Veiga DF et al (2007) Ultrasonography for measuring rectus abdominis diastasis muscles. Acta Cir Bras 22:182–186

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The 0-PDS (polydioxanone) suture used in this study was provided by Ethicon, USA.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabio Xerfan Nahas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nahas, F.X., Ferreira, L.M., Ely, P.B. et al. Rectus Diastasis Corrected with Absorbable Suture: A Long-Term Evaluation. Aesth Plast Surg 35, 43–48 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-010-9554-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-010-9554-2

Keywords

Navigation