Skip to main content
Log in

Aesthetic Breast Augmentation and Thoracic Deformities

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To ensure the best results from aesthetic breast augmentation, preoperative evaluation and adequate patient information are essential. However, assessment of the underlying thoracic shape often is neglected. Patients with obvious deformities are aware of the problematic reconstruction, whereas patients with mild or moderate deformities often are not aware of their condition and fail to see that standard breast augmentation will lead to unsatisfying results. The authors reviewed their charts for patients with breast augmentation and mild to moderate thoracic deformities, then compiled the therapeutic possibilities and the outcome. Of the 548 patients who underwent breast augmentation, 7.1% (n = 39) exhibited low- or midgrade thoracic wall deformities. Almost none of the patients were aware of their deformity. The patients were augmented with silicone-filled, textured round implants. Placement and volume were adapted to the anatomic situation. A reoperation was not performed in any case, and both patient and physician satisfaction was high. The percentage of patients with thoracic deformity in this group was high compared with an overall incidence of less than 2%. This emphasizes the need for cautious physical examination and preoperative documentation. By individualized surgical planning and diligent implant selection, optimal results and patient satisfaction can be achieved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alpert BS, Lalonde DH (2008) MOC-PS(SM) CME article: breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 121(4 Suppl):1–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cunningham B (2007) The Mentor Core Study on Silicone MemoryGel Breast Implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 120(7 Suppl 1):19S–29S discussion 30S–32S

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Handel N, Cordray T, Gutierrez J, Jensen JA (2006) A long-term study of outcomes, complications, and patient satisfaction with breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 117:757–767 discussion 768–772

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hodgkinson DJ (2002) The management of anterior chest wall deformity in patients presenting for breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 109:1714–1723

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Horch RE, Stoelben E, Carbon R, Sultan AA, Bach AD, Kneser U (2006) Pectus excavatum breast and chest deformity: Indications for aesthetic plastic surgery versus thoracic surgery in a multicenter experience. Aesthetic Plast Surg 30:403–411

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kelly RE Jr (2008) Pectus excavatum: Historical background, clinical picture, preoperative evaluation, and criteria for operation. Semin Pediatr Surg 17:181–193

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Margulis A, Sela M, Neuman R, Buller-Sharon A (2006) Reconstruction of pectus excavatum with silicone implants. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 59:1082–1086

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Marks MW, Iacobucci J (2000) Reconstruction of congenital chest wall deformities using solid silicone onlay prostheses. Chest Surg Clin North Am 10:341–355, vii

    Google Scholar 

  9. McLaughlin JK, Lipworth L, Murphy DK, Walker PS (2007) The safety of silicone gel-filled breast implants: a review of the epidemiologic evidence. Ann Plast Surg 59:569–580

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Momeni A, Padron NT, Fohn M, Bannasch H, Borges J, Ryu SM, Stark GB (2005) Safety, complications, and satisfaction of patients undergoing submuscular breast augmentation via the inframammary and endoscopic transaxillary approach. Aesthetic Plast Surg 29:558–564

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ohjimi Y, Shioya N, Ohjimi H, Kamiishi H (1989) Correction of a chest wall deformity utilizing latissimus dorsi with a turnover procedure. Aesthetic Plast Surg 13:199–202

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rebeis EB, Campos JR, Fernandez A, Moreira LF, Jatene FB (2007) Anthropometric index for pectus excavatum. Clinics 62:599–606

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rohrich RJ, Hartley W, Brown S (2003) Incidence of breast and chest wall asymmetry in breast augmentation: A retrospective analysis of 100 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 111:1153–1159 discussion 1520–1523

    Google Scholar 

  14. Schulman MR, Lipper J, Skolnik RA (2008) Correction of chest wall deformity after implant-based breast reconstruction using poly-L-lactic acid (Sculptra). Breast J 14:92–96

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Seyfer AE, Icochea R, Graeber GM (1988) Poland’s anomaly. Natural history and long-term results of chest wall reconstruction in 33 patients. Ann Surg 208:776–782

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Spear SL, Pelletiere CV, Lee ES, Grotting JC (2004) Anterior thoracic hypoplasia: a separate entity from Poland syndrome. Plast Reconstr Surg 113:69–77 discussion 78–79

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Williams AM, Crabbe DC (2003) Pectus deformities of the anterior chest wall. Paediatr Respir Rev 4:237–242

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. P. Wolter.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wolter, T.P., Lorenz, S. & Neuhann-Lorenz, C. Aesthetic Breast Augmentation and Thoracic Deformities. Aesth Plast Surg 34, 612–616 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-010-9520-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-010-9520-z

Keywords

Navigation