Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Augmentation–Mastopexy Using an Autologous Parenchymal Sling

  • Case Report
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Mastopexy–augmentation is an important treatment to address breast deflation. Combining these two procedures is technique-sensitive, with a reported high revision rate and propensity for complications. We describe an approach to achieve aesthetic breast correction in an effective, reproducible, and safe manner while minimizing untoward sequela.

Methods

A vertical mastopexy, using a superior dermoglandular pedicle, is coupled with a subpectoral breast implant with the support of a longitudinal autologous sling of breast fascia, termed autologous sling augmentation–mastopexy.

Results

Twenty consecutive patients, aged 25-49 years, were treated by this technique, with a follow-up period of at least 1 year. Aesthetic improvement of breast shape, projection, and nipple position were achieved in all patients. No major complications, including infection, necrosis, or implant exposure, occurred. Minor wound-healing deficits at the inferior aspect of the vertical resection occurred in three patients. One patient required implant exchange early postoperatively because of saline leakage. No revisions were necessary to adjust breast symmetry or nipple position.

Conclusion

We describe a mastopexy–augmentation technique, based on patient selection, mastopexy resection pattern, and implant size and position, to improve breast aesthetics safely and reproducibly while minimizing complications and the need for near-term revision.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

References

  1. Gonzalez-Ulloa M (1960) Correction of hypertrophy of the breast by exogenous material. Plast Reconstr Surg Transplant Bull 25:15–26

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Regnault P (1966) The hypoplastic and ptotic breast: a combined operation with prosthetic augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 37(1):31–37

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Spear S (2003) Augmentation/mastopexy: “surgeon beware”. Plast Reconstr Surg 112(3):905–906

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Spear SL, Low M, Ducic I (2003) Revision augmentation mastopexy: indications, operations, and outcomes. Ann Plast Surg 51(6):540–546

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Spear SL, Pelletiere CV, Menon N (2004) One-stage augmentation combined with mastopexy: aesthetic results and patient satisfaction. Aesthetic Plast Surg 28:259–267

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Spear SL, Giese SY (2000) Simultaneous breast augmentation and mastopexy. Aesthet Surg J 20:155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Karnes J, Morrison W, Salisbury M, Schaeferle M, Beckham P, Ersek RA (2000) Simultaneous breast augmentation and lift. Aesthetic Plast Surg 24:148–154

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Handel N (2006) Secondary mastopexy in the augmented patient: a recipe for disaster. Plast Reconstr Surg 118(7S):152S–163S

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Derek M. Steinbacher.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Steinbacher, D.M., Singh, N., Katz, R. et al. Augmentation–Mastopexy Using an Autologous Parenchymal Sling. Aesth Plast Surg 34, 664–671 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-010-9517-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-010-9517-7

Keywords

Navigation