Abstract
Background
Aesthetic reduction of the labia minora has gained popularity, and a number of different techniques have been described. Each procedure has its own set of advantages and disadvantages. However, no algorithm has been defined for pairing the degree of deformity with the optimal surgical procedure.
Methods
Patients were stratified into one of four groups based on labial size. The surgeon chose one of three reduction techniques based on the degree of labial hypertrophy and the patient’s aesthetic preferences for labial edge color and contour. Three reduction techniques were used including the edge excision technique, the inferior wedge resection technique, and deepithelialization reduction labioplasty. The success of aesthetic reduction was evaluated, as was symptomatic relief.
Results
The 12 procedures performed included five deepithelialization techniques, four edge excision techniques, and three inferior wedge resection techniques. As reported, 92% of the patients were “very satisfied” with their aesthetic and functional results. The complications were minimal, with three patients experiencing minor wound healing difficulties that resolved spontaneously. One patient who underwent the edge excision technique was “not satisfied” and complained of overreduction.
Conclusion
The authors found all three techniques for labia minora reduction to be useful in different clinical situations. A novel algorithm is described for matching the optimal surgical technique for each patient based on her degree of hypertrophy and aesthetic goals.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Fitzpatrick L (19 November 2008) Plastic surgery below the belt. TIME Magazine (Wednesday)
Hodgkinson DJ, Hait G (1984) Aesthetic vaginal labioplasty. Plas Reconstr Surg 74:414
Kato K, Tanaka J, Kondo A et al (1988) Hypertrophy of labia minora in myelodysplastic women: Labioplasty to ease clean intermittent catheterization. Urology 31:294
Caparo VJ (1971) Congenital anomalies. Clin Obstet Gynecol 14:988
Felicio Y (2007) Labial surgery. Aesth Surg J 27:322
Choi HY, Kim KT (2000) A new method for aesthetic reduction to the labia minora (the deepithelialized reduction labioplasty). Plast Reconstr Surg 105:419
Alter GJ (1998) A new technique for aesthetic labia minora reduction. Ann Plast Surg 40:287
Rouzier R, Louis-Sylvestre C, Paniel BJ, Haddad B (2000) Hypertrophy of the labia minora: experience with 163 reductions. Am J Obstet Gynecol 182:35
Munhoz AM, Filassi JR, Ricci MD, Aldrighi C, Ferreira MC (2006) Aesthetic labia minora reduction with the inferior wedge resection and superior pedicle flap reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 118:1237
Chavis WM, LaFerla JJ, Niccolini R (1989) Plastic repair of elongated hypertrophic labia minora: a case report. J Reprod Med 34:373
Friedrich EG (1983) Special problems in vulvar disease, 2nd ed. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 237–247
Franco T, Franco D (1993) Hipertrofia de Ninfas. J Bras Ginecol 103:163–165
Gowen RM, Martin VL (1988) Labia minora reduction in an iron-lung disabled woman. Obstet Gynecol 71:488
Radman HM (1976) Hypertrophy of the labia minora. Obstet Gynecol 48(Suppl):78S
Alter GJ (2008) Aesthetic labia minora and clitoral hood reduction using extended central wedge resection. Plast Reconstr Surg 122:1780
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ellsworth, W.A., Rizvi, M., Lypka, M. et al. Techniques for Labia Minora Reduction: An Algorithmic Approach. Aesth Plast Surg 34, 105–110 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-009-9454-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-009-9454-5