Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Another Look at Breast Projection After Breast Reduction

  • Editorial
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A controversy exists between vertical mammoplasty and the “traditional” keyhole\inferior pedicle method of breast reduction. This article examines factors affecting breast projection by considering the difference in concept between vertical mammaplasty (using the modification proposed by Hall-Findley as an example) and the inferior pedicle\keyhole pattern. This article is not about “how to do” but rather about “why” things are done in a certain way. The emphasis is on understanding what is done and its effects rather than on technique. The breast can be considered a cone. Breast projection then is the ratio between the nipple projection and the breast base. Two key concepts need to be considered: the orientation of the ellipses during excision of breast tissue in breast reduction and the role of the breast base\inframammary fold. Breast projection is not determined by the scars. After an examination of each technique, methods to enhance projection are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Robeiro L (1975 ) A new technique for reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 55:330–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. McCulley SJ, Hudson DA (2001) Short scar breast reduction: why all the fuss? Plast Reconstr Surg 107:965–969

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hall-Findley EJ (1999) A simplified vertical reduction mammaplasty: shortening the learning curve. Plast Reconstr Surg 104:748–759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Georgiade GS, Riefkohl RE, Georgiade NG (1989) The inferior dermal-pyramidal type breast reduction: long term evaluation. Ann Plast Surg 23:203–211

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Courtess EH, Goldwyn RM (1977) Reduction mammaplasty by the inferior pedicle technique. Plast Reconstr Surg 59:500–507

    Google Scholar 

  6. McCulley SJ, Rousseau TE (1999) A modified Chiari short scar mammaplasty: the technique and results. Br J Plast Surg 52:112–117

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Beer GM, Spicher I, Cierpka KA, Meyer VE (2004) Benefits and pitfalls of vertical scar breast reduction. Br J Plast Surg 57:12–19

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hudson DA (1998) Some thoughts on choosing a technique in breast reduction. Plast Reconstr Surg 102:554–557

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hidalgo D (2005) Vertical mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 115:1179

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Muntan CD, Sundine M, Rink RD, Acland RD (2000) Inframammary fold: a histologic reappraisal. Plast Reconstr Surg 105:549–556

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Pickford MA, Boorman JG (1993) Early experience with the Lejour vertical scar mammaplasty technique. Br J Plast Surg 46:516–522

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. A. Hudson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hudson, D.A., Geldenhuys, S., Duminy, F. et al. Another Look at Breast Projection After Breast Reduction. Aesth Plast Surg 32, 928–932 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-008-9134-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-008-9134-x

Keywords

Navigation