Skip to main content
Log in

The Owl Technique Combined with the Inferior Pedicle in Mastopexy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mastopexy patients usually are concerned with aesthetic outcomes, making the procedure a challenging one. Besides recreating a youthful, firm breast, a major concern is reducing the extent of scarring. Over recent decades, a number of short-scar techniques have emerged as alternatives. In 2002, Ramirez reported the owl technique, which combines the features of the periareolar and the vertical techniques. Nevertheless, the ideal technique also should improve shape and breast contour to withstand the test of time. The authors aim to show the results from combining the owl technique with the inferior pedicle for the treatment of patients who have mammary ptosis with or without hypertrophy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rohrich RJ, Thornton JF, Jakubietz RG, Jakubietz MG, Grunert JG (2004) The limited scar mastopexy: Current concepts and approaches to correct breast ptosis. Plast Reconstr Surg 114:1622–1630

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ramirez OM (2002) Reduction mammaplasty with the “owl” incision and no undermining. Plast Reconstr Surg 109:512–522

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Benelli L(1990) A new periareolar mammaplasty: The “round block” technique. Aesth Plast Surg 14:93

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lassus C (1987) Breast reduction: Evolution of a technique—a single vertical scar. Aesth Plast Surg 11:107–112

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lejour M (1994) Vertical mammaplasty and liposuction of the breast. Plast Reconstr Surg 94:100–114

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ribeiro L, Backer E (1973) Mastoplastia com pedículo de seguridad. Rev Esp Cir Plast 16:223

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ribeiro L (1989) Cirurgia plástica da mama. Medsi Ed. Médica e Científica Ltda.: Rio de Janeiro

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ribeiro L, Accorsi A Jr, Buss A, Marcal-Pessoa M (2002) Creation and evolution of 30 years of the inferior pedicle in reduction mammaplasties. Plast Reconstr Surg 110:960–970

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hammond D (1999) Short scar periareolar inferior pedicle reduction (SPAIR) mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 103:890

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hall-Findlay EJ (1999) A simplified vertical reduction mammaplasty: Shortening the learning curve. Plast Reconstr Surg 104:748–759

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mottura A (2000) Circumvertical reduction mammaplasty. Aesth Surg J 20:199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pitanguy I (1967) Surgical treatment of breast hypertrophy. Br J Plast Surg 20:78

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Goes JC, Landecker A, Lyra EC, Henriquez LJ, Goes RS, Godoy PM (2004) The application of mesh support in periareolar breast surgery: Clinical and mammographic evaluation. Aesth Plast Surg 28:268–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Graf R, Biggs TM (2002) In search of better shape in mastopexy and reduction mammoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 110:309–317

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hugo D. Loustau.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Loustau, H.D., Mayer, H.F. & Sarrabayrouse, M. The Owl Technique Combined with the Inferior Pedicle in Mastopexy. Aesth Plast Surg 32, 11–15 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-007-9032-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-007-9032-7

Keywords

Navigation