Skip to main content
Log in

A Retrospective Study Examining the Socioeconomic Backgrounds of Women Undergoing Bilateral Breast Augmentation at a Private Independent Hospital in the United Kingdom

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cosmetic breast augmentation is becoming increasingly popular and acceptable to women in the United Kingdom. This study examined the socioeconomic backgrounds of women undergoing breast augmentation who live in North Warwickshire in the Midlands. The case notes of 98 consecutive breast augmentations performed at a private independent hospital were retrospectively reviewed. The average age of the patient was 34 years (range, 17–53 years). They were requesting, on the average, an increase of 2 bra cup sizes (range, 1–3 cup sizes). The preoperative bra cup size was A/B (range, AA–C), and the postoperative bra cup size was C/D (range, B–E). The average size of the implant used was 270 ml (range, 160–410 ml). The average implant size used currently is considerably larger than that reported in studies 30 years ago. What women perceive as a “natural-appearing” breast has changed over time. The findings show that women from all across the socioeconomic spectrum are undergoing breast augmentation. In particular, the authors found that the largest proportion (34%) of their patients have come from social class IIIn. This is particularly interesting in that this social class is not overrepresented in North Warwickshire. The findings of this study may have implications for cosmetic surgery providers and may document the change in the attitudes of the authors’ society toward cosmetic breast augmentation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Collis N, Coleman D, Foo IT, Sharpe DT (2000) Ten-year review of a prospective randomized controlled trial of textured versus smooth subglandular silicone gel breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 106:786–791

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Courtiss EH, Goldwyn RM, Anastasi GW (1979) The fate of breast implants with infections around them. Plast Reconstr Surg 63:812–816

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Czerny V (1895) Plastic replacement of the breast with a lipoma. Chir Kong Verhandl 2:216

    Google Scholar 

  4. Duncan CO, Ho-Asjoe M, Hittinger R, Nishikawa H, Waterhouse N, Coghlan B, Jones B (2004) Demographics and macroeconomic effects in aesthetic surgery in the UK. Br J Plast Surg 57:561–566

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kilmann PR, Sattler JI, Taylor J (1993) The impact of augmentation mammaplasty: A follow-up study. Plast Reconstr Surg 91:404–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. OPCS (1991) Standard occupational classification, Vol. 3. HMSO, London

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pollock H (1993) Breast capsular contracture: A retrospective study of textured versus smooth silicone implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 91:404–407

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rose D (1995) Social research update, Issue 9. Department of Sociology, University of Surrey, England

  9. UK Breast implant registry annual report 2005. Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency of the UK Department of Health, 2006, London, England, UK

  10. UK Census 2001 Office for National Statistics, Newport

  11. Williams JE (1972) Experiences with a large series of silastic breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 49:253–258

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew Wong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wong, M., Moledina, J. & Park, A. A Retrospective Study Examining the Socioeconomic Backgrounds of Women Undergoing Bilateral Breast Augmentation at a Private Independent Hospital in the United Kingdom. Aesth Plast Surg 31, 566–569 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-006-0226-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-006-0226-1

Keywords

Navigation