Skip to main content
Log in

“Reverse” Dual-Plane Mammaplasty

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The authors present a new type of dual-plane mammaplasty and preliminary results obtained with it. The technique is aimed at improving the final natural appearance of breasts without adding additional risks of dislocation.

Methods

The eligibility criteria specified patients with sufficient breast tissue to disguise the implant, patients with asymmetric hypoplasia, and patients with an intense workout activity. The exclusion criteria specified patients with very little breasts. The technique is based on combined subglandular positioning in the superior part of the breast and retrofascial–precostal positioning in the inferior part.

Results

Beginning in January 2000, 57 patients were recruited. No postoperative bleedings, hematomas, or seromas were observed. In 93% of cases, good final shapes were obtained. After 1 year of follow-up evaluation, no displacement, asymmetry, or rupture was recorded. Only three patients (5.3%) showed mild monolateral capsular contractures (Baker II type), which resolved using capsulotomy without prostheses removal.

Conclusions

“Reverse” dual-plane mammaplasty is a new technique that gives a good anatomic final appearance with no risk of displacement. The low risk of complications renders it feasible and safe for aesthetic breast augmentation. Further studies are necessary to compare this technique with retroglandular and retropectoral approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Biggs TM, Yarish RS: Augmentation mammaplasty: Retropectoral versus retromammary implantation. Clin Plast Surg 15:549–55, 1988

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Graf RM, Bernardes A, Auersvald A, Damasio RC: Subfascial endoscopic transaxillary augmentation mammaplasty. Aesth Plast Surg 24:216–220, 2000

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Graf RM, Bernardes A, Rippel R, et al.: Subfascial breast implant: A new procedure. Plast Reconstr Surg 111:904–908, 2003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Reynaud JP, Tassin X: Past, present, and future of breast implants. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 48:389–398, 2003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sarwer DB, Nordmann JE, Herbert JD: Cosmetic breast augmentation surgery: A critical overview. J Womens Health Gend Based Med 9:843–856, 2000

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Spear SL, Carter ME, Ganz JC: The correction of capsular contracture by conversion to “dual-plane” positioning: Technique and outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 112:456–466, 2003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tebbetts JB: Dual-plane breast augmentation: Optimizing implant–soft tissue relationships in a wide range of breast types. Plast Reconstr Surg 107:1255–1272, 2001

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Vazquez B, Given KS, Houston GC: Breast augmentation: A review of subglandular and submuscular implantation. Aesth Plast Surg 11:101–105, 1987

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Young VL, Watson ME: Breast implant research: Where we have been, where we are, where we need to go. Clin Plast Surg 28:451–483, 2001

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Gravante.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Esposito, G., Gravante, G., Marianetti, M. et al. “Reverse” Dual-Plane Mammaplasty. Aesth Plast Surg 30, 521–526 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-006-0066-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-006-0066-z

Keywords

Navigation