Skip to main content
Log in

Extended Crescent Mastopexy with Augmentation

  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Problems with periareola or circumareolar mastopexy procedures include areola spreading, hypertrophic scar, and recurrence of the ptosis largely because of tension on the closure. To minimize this tension associated with a conventional crescent mastopexy procedure, the authors modified the operation by excising parenchyma with the crescent of skin as well as two small triangles of parenchyma on either side of the areola. Implant augmentation was performed at the same time. The described operation is indicated for patients who have a small to moderate amount of ptosis. The best candidate is the patient whose areola–inframammary distance is not excessive. Nine such patients received this “extended crescent mastopexy with augmentation” and were followed for up to 3 years. Areola spreading and hypertrophic scar were kept to a minimum. Although not the final answer for ptosis patients, the extended crescent mastopexy with augmentation has been a step in the right direction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aiache A: History of the circumareolar procedure. In: Wilkinson TS, Aiache AE, Toledo LS (eds) Circumareolar techniques for breast surgery. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 29–32, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baran CN, Peker F, Ortak T, Sensoz O, Baran NK: Unsatisfactory results of periareolar mastopexy with or without augmentation, reduction mammaplasty: Enlarged areola with flattened nipples. Aesth Plast Surg 25:286–289, 2001

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bartels RJ, Strickland DM, Douglas WM: A new mastopexy operation for mild or moderate breast ptosis. Plast Reconstr Surg 57:687, 1976

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Benelli L: A new perioareolar mammaplasty: The “round block” technique. Aesth Plast Surg 14:93, 1990

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Brink RR: Evaluating breast parenchymal maldistribution with regard to mastopexy and augmentation mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 106:491–496, 2000

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. De la Fuente A, Martin del Yerro JL: Periareolar mastopexy with mammary implants. Aesth Plast Surg 16:337–341, 1992

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dinner MI, Artz JS, Foglietti MA: Application and modification of the circular skin excision and purse-string procedures. Aesth Plast Surg 17:301–309, 1993

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Elliott LF: Circumareolar mastopexy with augmentation. Clin Plast Surg 29:337–347, 2002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gasperoni C, Salgarello M, Gargani G: Experience and technical refinements in the “donut” mastopexy with augmentation mammaplasty. Aesth Plast Surg 12:111–114, 1988

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Graf R, Biggs TM: In search of better shape in mastopexy and reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 110:309–317, 2002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gruber RP, Jones HW Jr: The “donut” mastopexy: Indications and complications. Plast Reconstr Surg 65:34–38, 1980

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hinderer U: Primera experiencia con una nueva tecnica de mastoplastia para ptosis ligeres. Presented at the sixth national reunion of Spanish Society of Plastic and Reparative Surgery, Madrid, 29–31 October 1969

  13. Hollander E: Die operation der mammahypertrophie under der haenge brust. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 41:1400, 1924

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Karnes J, Morrison W, Salisbury M, Schaeferle M, Beckham P, Ersek RA: Simultaneous breast augmentation and lift. Aesth Plast Surg 24:148–154, 2000

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Nigro DM: Crescent mastopexy and augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 76:802–803, 1985

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Peled IJ, Zagher U, Wexler MR: Purse-string suture for reduction and closure of skin defects. Ann Plast Surg 14:465, 1985

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Puckett CL, Meyer VH, Reinisch JF: Crescent mastopexy and augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 75:533–543, 1985

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rees TD, Aston SJ: The tuberous breast. Clin Plast Surg 3:339, 1976

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Regnault P: Crescent mastopexy and augmentation: Discussion. Plast Reconstr Surg 75:540, 1985

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Seitchik MW: Augmentation of the minimally ptotic breast. Ann Plast Surg 5:460–463, 1980

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Snow JW: Crescent mastopexy and augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 77:161–162, 1986

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Spear SL, Giese S, Ducic I: Concentric mastopexy revisited. Plast Reconstr Surg 107:1294–1299, 2001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Spear SL, Kassan M, Little JW: Guidelines in concentric mastopexy. Plast Reconstr Surg 85:961–966, 1990

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Spira M: Crescent mastopexy and augmentation: Discussion. Plast Reconstr Surg 75:542, 1985

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ronald Gruber M.D..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gruber, R., Denkler, K. & Hvistendahl, Y. Extended Crescent Mastopexy with Augmentation. Aesth Plast Surg 30, 269–274 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-005-0138-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-005-0138-5

Keywords

Navigation