Abstract
In augmentation mammoplasty, the selection of placement for implants is based on the characteristics of each patient and the tissue conditions to ensure an optimal covering of these. The location must not be arbitrarily based on the preferences of the surgeon and the patient, but must ensure adequate tissue covering, thus minimizing shorts and long-term risks. Retromammary, retropectoral, and total and mixed retromuscular implants have been used. The retrofascia location of the mammary prosthesis reported in this article was described for the first time in the year 2000. This retrofascia technique refers to the collocation of the implant behind the fascia and in front of the pectoralis major muscle with the goal of achieving proper covering and good support of the implant. This is a nonrandomized prospective study investigated 110 cases of mammary hypoplasia and ptosis levels 1 and 2 from October 2001 to October 2002 with an average follow-up period of 1 year. Periareolar incisions were used in the retrofascia collocation of the mammary implant. The types of implants used included texturized silicone gel (85%) and smooth silicone gel (15%). As demonstrated by the findings, this surgical technique can achieve a good support to keep the prosthesis in an adequate position, maintaining the superior pole with a very natural projection. The incidence of complications was 7.6%, the most frequent of which was capsular contracture (3.53%).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
L Benelli (1990) ArticleTitleA new periareolar mammaplasty: The round block Aesth Plast Surg 14 93–100 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By%2BB2c%2FhtlI%3D
Bostwick J III: Tratado de mammaplasty. Secl-II, Tomol. 2 ° Ed. AMOLCA, p. 4360, 2001
CD Clemente (1985) Gray’s anatomy of the human Body EditionNumber30th ed Lea & Febirger Philadelphia
A Fuente ParticleDe la M Yerro del (1992) ArticleTitlePeriareolar mastopexia con implantes mamarios aesthetic Plast Surg 16 337–342
WC Dempsey WD Latham (1968) ArticleTitleSubpectoral implants in augmentation in mammaplasty Plast Reconstr Surg 42 515 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:CCaD2M%2Fns1w%3D Occurrence Handle5722153
RM Graf A Bernades A Auervald R Costa (2000) ArticleTitleSubfascial endoscopic transaxillary: Aumentation mammaplasty Aesth Plast Surg 24 216–220 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s002660010036 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3czpvFGmtA%3D%3D
RM Graf A Bernardes R Rippel (2003) ArticleTitleSubfascial breast implant: A new procedure Plast Reconstr Surg 904 908
RP Gruber GD Friedman (1989) ArticleTitlePeriareolar subpectoral augmentation mammaplasty Plast Reconstr Surg 84 772 Occurrence Handle2813586
J McCarthy (1984) Plastic surgery, tomo IV Panamericana Argentina 158
D Mahler J Yakar D Hauben (1982) ArticleTitleThe retropectoral route for breast augmentation Aesth Plast Surg 6 227–242
A Mataraso O Hutchinso (2000) ArticleTitleAugmentation mammaplasty subpectoral augmentation using the periareolar or inframammary approach Operative Tech Plast Reconstr Surg 7 93
I Pitanguy C Barbato Degand C Triana (1979) ArticleTitleMamaplastia consideracoes sobre a retraccao capsular Revista Brasilera 69 237–250
S Spear S Davinson (2000) ArticleTitleBreast augmentation with periareolar mastopexy Operative Tech Plast Reconstr Surg 7 131
J Tebbetts (2001) ArticleTitleAlternatives and trade-off in breast augmentation Clin Plast Surg 28 485 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38%2FitlKnsQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11471956
J Tebbetts (2001) ArticleTitleA surgical perspective from two decades of breast augmentation: Towar state of the art in 2001 Clin Plast Surg 28 425–443 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38%2FitlKguw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11471952
J Tebbest (2001) ArticleTitleDual-plane breast augmentation: Optimizing implant–soft tissue relationship in a wide range breast augmentation Plast Reconstr Surg 107 1255 Occurrence Handle11373572
J Tebbetts (2001) ArticleTitlePatient evaluation, operative planing, and surgical techiniques to increase, control, and reduce morbility and reoperations in breast augmentation Clint Plast Surg 28 501 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38%2FitlKntg%3D%3D
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Barbato, C., Pena, M., Triana, C. et al. Augmentation Mammoplasty Using the Retrofascia Approach . Aesth. Plast. Surg. 28, 148–152 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-004-4014-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-004-4014-5