Skip to main content
Log in

Augmentation Mammoplasty Using the Retrofascia Approach

  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In augmentation mammoplasty, the selection of placement for implants is based on the characteristics of each patient and the tissue conditions to ensure an optimal covering of these. The location must not be arbitrarily based on the preferences of the surgeon and the patient, but must ensure adequate tissue covering, thus minimizing shorts and long-term risks. Retromammary, retropectoral, and total and mixed retromuscular implants have been used. The retrofascia location of the mammary prosthesis reported in this article was described for the first time in the year 2000. This retrofascia technique refers to the collocation of the implant behind the fascia and in front of the pectoralis major muscle with the goal of achieving proper covering and good support of the implant. This is a nonrandomized prospective study investigated 110 cases of mammary hypoplasia and ptosis levels 1 and 2 from October 2001 to October 2002 with an average follow-up period of 1  year. Periareolar incisions were used in the retrofascia collocation of the mammary implant. The types of implants used included texturized silicone gel (85%) and smooth silicone gel (15%). As demonstrated by the findings, this surgical technique can achieve a good support to keep the prosthesis in an adequate position, maintaining the superior pole with a very natural projection. The incidence of complications was 7.6%, the most frequent of which was capsular contracture (3.53%).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure  1
Figure  2
Figure  3
Figure  4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. L Benelli (1990) ArticleTitleA new periareolar mammaplasty: The round block Aesth Plast Surg 14 93–100 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By%2BB2c%2FhtlI%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bostwick J III: Tratado de mammaplasty. Secl-II, Tomol. 2 ° Ed. AMOLCA, p. 4360, 2001

  3. CD Clemente (1985) Gray’s anatomy of the human Body EditionNumber30th ed Lea & Febirger Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  4. A Fuente ParticleDe la M Yerro del (1992) ArticleTitlePeriareolar mastopexia con implantes mamarios aesthetic Plast Surg 16 337–342

    Google Scholar 

  5. WC Dempsey WD Latham (1968) ArticleTitleSubpectoral implants in augmentation in mammaplasty Plast Reconstr Surg 42 515 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:CCaD2M%2Fns1w%3D Occurrence Handle5722153

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. RM Graf A Bernades A Auervald R Costa (2000) ArticleTitleSubfascial endoscopic transaxillary: Aumentation mammaplasty Aesth Plast Surg 24 216–220 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s002660010036 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3czpvFGmtA%3D%3D

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. RM Graf A Bernardes R Rippel (2003) ArticleTitleSubfascial breast implant: A new procedure Plast Reconstr Surg 904 908

    Google Scholar 

  8. RP Gruber GD Friedman (1989) ArticleTitlePeriareolar subpectoral augmentation mammaplasty Plast Reconstr Surg 84 772 Occurrence Handle2813586

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. J McCarthy (1984) Plastic surgery, tomo IV Panamericana Argentina 158

    Google Scholar 

  10. D Mahler J Yakar D Hauben (1982) ArticleTitleThe retropectoral route for breast augmentation Aesth Plast Surg 6 227–242

    Google Scholar 

  11. A Mataraso O Hutchinso (2000) ArticleTitleAugmentation mammaplasty subpectoral augmentation using the periareolar or inframammary approach Operative Tech Plast Reconstr Surg 7 93

    Google Scholar 

  12. I Pitanguy C Barbato Degand C Triana (1979) ArticleTitleMamaplastia consideracoes sobre a retraccao capsular Revista Brasilera 69 237–250

    Google Scholar 

  13. S Spear S Davinson (2000) ArticleTitleBreast augmentation with periareolar mastopexy Operative Tech Plast Reconstr Surg 7 131

    Google Scholar 

  14. J Tebbetts (2001) ArticleTitleAlternatives and trade-off in breast augmentation Clin Plast Surg 28 485 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38%2FitlKnsQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11471956

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. J Tebbetts (2001) ArticleTitleA surgical perspective from two decades of breast augmentation: Towar state of the art in 2001 Clin Plast Surg 28 425–443 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38%2FitlKguw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11471952

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. J Tebbest (2001) ArticleTitleDual-plane breast augmentation: Optimizing implant–soft tissue relationship in a wide range breast augmentation Plast Reconstr Surg 107 1255 Occurrence Handle11373572

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. J Tebbetts (2001) ArticleTitlePatient evaluation, operative planing, and surgical techiniques to increase, control, and reduce morbility and reoperations in breast augmentation Clint Plast Surg 28 501 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38%2FitlKntg%3D%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carlos Barbato M.D..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barbato, C., Pena, M., Triana, C. et al. Augmentation Mammoplasty Using the Retrofascia Approach . Aesth. Plast. Surg. 28, 148–152 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-004-4014-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-004-4014-5

Keywords

Navigation