Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Direct Skin Excision Fat Reshaping and Repositioning for Correction of Prominent Nasolabial Fold

  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In addition to all the consequences mentioned elsewhere in the literature, the aging process causes the most dramatic changes in the midface and nasolabial complex. Genetic predisposition also plays a role in the final appearance of this area. The nasolabial complex in the aged face generally is accepted as a “hard-to-treat area” for which many different techniques have been described. Among the techniques described to date, direct excision still keeps its popularity for selected patients. However, some controversies in the technique are open to discussion. To overcome these problems, we did skin excision, reshaping and repositioning the fibrofatty tissue lateral to the fold, which is contrary to fat excision in the classical technique. It seems to be a better approach to reshape and reposition the ptotic tissue so as not to obliterate but rather to smooth out the nasolabial area. Excision of fat would decrease the amount of tissue in the already atrophic and ptotic face. This technique offers a new approach to nasolabial complex problems. The most significant drawback is the scar, which usually is imperceptible in selected patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. SR Baker (1997) ArticleTitleTriplane rhytidectomy Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 123 1167–1172

    Google Scholar 

  2. K Conrad MR MacDonald (1996) ArticleTitleWide polytef (Goretex) implants in lip augmentation and nasolabial groove correction Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 122 664–670

    Google Scholar 

  3. K Conrad E Reifen (1992) ArticleTitleGoretex implant as tissue filler in cheek–lip groove rejuvenation J Otolaryngol 21 218–222

    Google Scholar 

  4. DAF Ellis CD Bakala JN Harlock (1997) ArticleTitleAnalysis of the perioral complex Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 5 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  5. S Eremia N Newman (2000) ArticleTitleLong-term follow-up after autologous fat grafting: Analysis of results from 116 patients followed at least 12 months after receiving the last of a minimum of two treatments Dermatol Surg 26 1150–1158

    Google Scholar 

  6. MS Freeman (1997) ArticleTitleEndoscopic malar pad lift Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 5 29–42

    Google Scholar 

  7. DW Furnas (1995) ArticleTitleStrategies for nasolabial levitation Clin Plast Surg 22 265–278

    Google Scholar 

  8. B Guyuron (1995) ArticleTitleThe armamentarium to battle recalcitrant nasolabial fold Clin Plast Surg 22 253–264

    Google Scholar 

  9. B Guyuron B Michelow (1994) ArticleTitleThe nasolabial fold: A challenge, a solution Plast Reconstr Surg 93 522–529 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByuC2MbnsVM%3D Occurrence Handle8115507

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. JN Harlock DAF Ellis (1997) ArticleTitleEffacement of the deep lip–cheek groove with Goretex Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 5 7–11

    Google Scholar 

  11. FM Kamer AS Frankel (1997) ArticleTitleDeep plane face-lift for improvement of the lateral oral groove Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 5 23–28

    Google Scholar 

  12. GS Keller J Cray (1996) ArticleTitleSuprafibromuscular face-lifting with periosteal suspension of the superficial musculoaponeurotic system and fat pad of Bichat rotation Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 122 377–384

    Google Scholar 

  13. C Lassus (1996) ArticleTitleA surgical solution to the deep nasolabial fold Plast Reconstr Surg 97 1473–1478

    Google Scholar 

  14. JR Lupton TS Alster (2000) ArticleTitleCutaneous hypersensitivity reaction to injectable hyaluronic acid gel Dermatol Surg 26 135–137

    Google Scholar 

  15. DR Millard RTW Yuan JW Devine (1987) ArticleTitleA challenge to the undefeated nasolabial folds Plast Reconstr Surg 80 37–46

    Google Scholar 

  16. H Mittelman (1997) ArticleTitleAnatomically designed silastic implants for the melolabial groove Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 5 13–22

    Google Scholar 

  17. G Rudkin T Miller (1999) ArticleTitleAging nasolabial fold and treatment by direct excision Plast Reconstr Surg 104 1502–1505 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1Mvkt1Sqtg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10513936

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. S Singh JL Baker (2000) ArticleTitleUse of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene in aesthetic surgery of the face Clin Plast Surg 27 579–593

    Google Scholar 

  19. LF Smith MJ Hoff (1996) ArticleTitleA new procedure for improvement of the ptotic melolabial fold Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 122 1088–1093

    Google Scholar 

  20. C Wolf (1997) ArticleTitleExcision of the nasolabial fold Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 5 43–46

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cenk Sen M.D..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sen, C., Cek, D.I. & Reis, M. Direct Skin Excision Fat Reshaping and Repositioning for Correction of Prominent Nasolabial Fold. Aesth Plast Surg 28, 307–311 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-004-3133-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-004-3133-3

Keywords

Navigation