Skip to main content
Log in

Movement ecology during non-breeding season in a long-distance migratory shorebird: are space use and movement patterns sex-biased?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In many gregarious species, sex-specific differences can lead to significant variation in movement patterns and, consequently, to social and spatial segregation by sex within the population. Specifically, in several long-distance migratory shorebird species, reverse sexual dimorphism has been proposed as a driver of spatial segregation during the non-breeding season. Thus, sex-specific costs associated with space use during these stationary periods could differentially condition subsequent movement patterns between females and males in these species. Using satellite tracking technology, we analyzed the space use and movement patterns of a population of Hudsonian godwits (Limosa haemastica), a gregarious long-distance migratory shorebird, during the non-breeding season in Chiloé, Chile. We predicted that larger females would show more restricted movements and higher local site fidelity, while smaller males would be less competitive and more exploratory. Most individuals exhibited restricted space use (i.e., a home range), while a smaller fraction showed exploratory movements leading to a nomadic movement pattern. Most of these nomadic individuals subsequently oversummered in Argentina rather than migrating back to breeding areas. Contrary to our main prediction, none of the observed movement patterns were sex-biased. Recent evidence suggests that female and male godwits access prey of different sizes within the same foraging sites on Chiloé. Thus, in accordance with our results, and supported by recent additional findings, resource-partitioning within the same foraging patches could reduce interference competition between the sexes by offsetting the competitive advantage associated with the reversed sexual dimorphism of females over males. Finally, we propose these sex differences in foraging strategies could be advantageous for gregarious migratory shorebird populations that show strong connectivity and high site fidelity during and between non-breeding seasons.

Significance statement

Size differences between sexes in migratory birds may result in different energetic requirements and, consequently, different movement patterns. Many migratory shorebirds exhibit reverse sexual dimorphism, and evidence suggests temporal and spatial sex-differences in space use and movement patterns in these species. We tested whether space use and movement patterns could be sex-biased in Hudsonian godwits (Limosa haemastica), a long-distance migratory shorebird with reverse sexual dimorphism, during the non-breeding season. We found no evidence that space use and movement patterns differed between sexes. We found that individuals exhibited two clear movement patterns: range-residency and nomadism. We propose that godwits likely employ sex-specific foraging strategies to exploit the same resource within the same space, consequently minimizing interference competition. We also suggest that the contrast between movement patterns may be the result of factors such as experience, physiological state, and external environmental conditions, rather than sex.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during the current study are included in supplementary material.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank V. Araya, G. Biscarra, C. Gherardi-Fuentes, J. Gutiérrez, C. Navarrete, G. Torres-Fuentes, J. Masero and J. Vergara for fieldwork support. Special thanks to C. Verdugo for his essential contribution for fieldwork activities. Also, we thank J. P. Fuentes and family for their logistical collaboration in the Estación Experimental Quempillén. Finally, we thank two anonymous reviewers for valuable comments on an earlier version of the manuscript.

Funding

All fieldwork and analyses other than specified were funded by FONDECYT 1161224 (JGN). In addition, ANID grant 21181162 and ANID – Millennium Science Initiative Program – ICN2021_002 funded EB and JGN during writing, respectively.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

EB and JGN conceived the ideas and designed methodology. EB, JR, NRS, JAL, MW, BB and JGN collected the data. EB analyzed the data. EB and JGN contribute equally to the writing of the manuscript. All authors contributed critically to the drafts and gave final approval for publication.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Enzo Basso.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

Captures and tagging of godwits were made under bioethics approval 260/2016 from UACh and permissions 5932/2016 from SAG, Gobierno de Chile to JGN. All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the use of animals were followed.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Communicated by C. R. Brown.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Supplementary Material 2

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Basso, E., Ruiz, J., Linscott, J.A. et al. Movement ecology during non-breeding season in a long-distance migratory shorebird: are space use and movement patterns sex-biased?. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 78, 67 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-024-03484-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-024-03484-1

Keywords

Navigation