Abstract
Consistent inter-individual differences in behaviour are thought to be related to consistency in social network position. There is also evidence that network structures can show predictable temporal dynamics, suggesting that consistency in social network position across time does not preclude some form of plasticity in response to environmental variation. To better consider variation in network position and plasticity simultaneously, we investigate the extension of the behavioural reaction norm (BRN) to dynamic social networks. Our aim is to estimate both an individual’s position and plasticity within a network across an environmental gradient (i.e. to generate a network reaction norm (NRN)). We show that it is possible to account for the non-independence of network measures using covariance structures but that, in cases where the independent variables are group-level environmental measures, a standard multilevel model is sufficient. We therefore outline when a standard multilevel model is appropriate for NRNs and highlight the benefits and limitations to this approach. As an illustrative example, we used an NRN approach on 7 years of behavioural data on chacma baboons to quantify both the consistency with which individuals maintained social behaviour (node strength) and central positions (eigenvector centrality) within the social network. We found evidence for individual plasticity for node strength but little evidence for eigenvector centrality. Conversely, we found evidence of consistent individual differences in eigenvector centrality but not strength. These results suggest that individual node strengths are influenced by environmental changes, but the social structure of the group remains remarkably stable nevertheless. We suggest that expanding from measures of repeatability in social networks to network reaction norms will provide a more contextually nuanced way to investigate social phenotypes, leading to a better understanding of the development and maintenance of social structures in changing environments.
Significance statement
An individual’s position within a social network can have consequences for its fitness, resulting in great interest into how individuals develop and maintain particular network positions. Here, we extend the notion of behavioural reaction norms to include social network data. Given the non-independence of network data, however, the application of BRNs is not straightforward. Consequently, we have developed an alternative statistical extension that uses covariance structures to account for non-independence. Although we find that under one specific set of assumptions, it is possible to apply the standard BRN to network data. Applying this approach to data from a social group of chacma baboons, we found individual social behaviours shifted in response to environmental variables, yet the social structure of the group remained remarkably stable.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data and code used for this analysis are provided at https://github.com/tbonne/NRN.
References
Amat JA, Masero JA (2004) Predation risk on incubating adults constrains the choice of thermally favourable nest sites in a plover. Anim Behav 67:293–300
Aplin LM, Farine DR, Morand-Ferron J, Cole EF, Cockburn A, Sheldon BC (2013) Individual personalities predict social behaviour in wild networks of great tits (Parus major). Ecol Lett 16:1365–1372
Aplin LM, Firth JA, Farine DR, Voelkl B, Crates RA, Culina A, Garroway CJ, Hinde CA, Kidd LR, Psorakis I (2015) Consistent individual differences in the social phenotypes of wild great tits, Parus major. Anim Behav 108:117–127
Barrett L, Gaynor D, Henzi SP (2002) A dynamic interaction between aggression and grooming reciprocity among female chacma baboons. Anim Behav 63:1047–1053
Barrett L, Henzi SP (1998) Epidemic deaths in a chacma baboon population. S Afr J Sci 94:441
Barrett L, Henzi SP, Lycett JE (2006) Whose life is it anyway? Maternal investment, developmental trajectories, and life history strategies in baboons. In: Swedell L, Leigh SR (eds) Reproduction and fitness in baboons: behavioral, ecological, and life history perspectives. Springer, Cham, pp 199–224
Bierbach D, Laskowski KL, Wolf M (2017) Behavioural individuality in clonal fish arises despite near-identical rearing conditions. Nat Commun 8:15361
Blaszczyk MB (2018) Consistency in social network position over changing environments in a seasonally breeding primate. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 72:11
Bonnell TR, Vilette C (2021) Constructing and analysing time-aggregated networks: the role of bootstrapping, permutation and simulation. Methods Ecol Evol 12:114–126
Brent LJ (2015) Friends of friends: are indirect connections in social networks important to animal behaviour? Anim Behav 103:211–222
Brent LJ, Heilbronner SR, Horvath JE, Gonzalez-Martinez J, Ruiz-Lambides A, Robinson AG, Skene J, Platt ML (2013) Genetic origins of social networks in rhesus macaques. Sci Rep 3:1042
Bürkner P-C (2017) brms: an R package for Bayesian multilevel models using Stan. J Stat Softw 80:1–28
Caceres RS, Berger-Wolf T, Grossman R (2011) Temporal scale of processes in dynamic networks. In: 2011 IEEE 11th International Conference on Data Mining Workshops. IEEE, pp 925–932
Cantor M, Chaparro AAM, Beck K, Carter GG, He P, Hillemann F, Irby JK, Lang S, Ogino M, Papageorgiou D (2019) Animal social networks: revealing the causes and implications of social structure in ecology and evolution. EcoEvoRxiv Preprints. https://doi.org/10.32942/osf.io/m62gb
Croft DP, Krause J, Darden SK, Ramnarine IW, Faria JJ, James R (2009) Behavioural trait assortment in a social network: patterns and implications. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 63:1495–1503
Croft DP, Madden JR, Franks DW, James R (2011) Hypothesis testing in animal social networks. Trends Ecol Evol 26:502–507
Dall SR, Bell AM, Bolnick DI, Ratnieks FL (2012) An evolutionary ecology of individual differences. Ecol Lett 15:1189–1198
Dingemanse NJ, Kazem AJ, Réale D, Wright J (2010) Behavioural reaction norms: animal personality meets individual plasticity. Trends Ecol Evol 25:81–89
Dingemanse NJ, Wolf M (2013) Between-individual differences in behavioural plasticity within populations: causes and consequences. Anim Behav 85:1031–1039
Dutilleul PRL (2011) Spatio-temporal heterogeneity: concepts and analysis. Cambridge University Press, New York
Farine DR (2017) A guide to null models for animal social network analysis. Methods Ecol Evol 8:1309–1320
Farine DR, Carter GG (2022) Permutation tests for hypothesis testing with animal social network data: problems and potential solutions. Methods Ecol Evol 13:144–156
Firth JA, Sheldon BC, Brent LJ (2017) Indirectly connected: simple social differences can explain the causes and apparent consequences of complex social network positions. Proc R Soc B 284:20171939
Formica V, Wood C, Cook P, Brodie E III (2017) Consistency of animal social networks after disturbance. Behav Ecol 28:85–93
Hart JDA, Weiss MN, Brent LJN, Franks DW (2021) Common permutation methods in animal social network analysis do not control for non-independence. BioRxiv 2021.06.04.447124
Hart JDA, Weiss MN, Franks DW, Brent LJN (2022) BISoN: a Bayesian framework for inference of social networks. BioRxiv:2021.12.20.473541
Henzi SP, Forshaw N, Boner R, Barrett L, Lusseau D (2013) Scalar social dynamics in female vervet monkey cohorts. Phil Trans R Soc B 368:20120351
Henzi SP, Lusseau D, Weingrill T, van Schaik CP, Barrett L (2009) Cyclicity in the structure of female baboon social networks. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 63:1015–1021
Jacoby DM, Fear LN, Sims DW, Croft DP (2014) Shark personalities? Repeatability of social network traits in a widely distributed predatory fish. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 68:1995–2003
Jolles JW, King AJ, Killen SS (2020) The role of individual heterogeneity in collective animal behaviour. Trends Ecol Evol 35:278–291
Krackhardt D (1988) Predicting with networks: nonparametric multiple regression analysis of dyadic data. Soc Networks 10:359–381
Krause S, Wilson AD, Ramnarine IW, Herbert-Read JE, Clement RJ, Krause J (2017) Guppies occupy consistent positions in social networks: mechanisms and consequences. Behav Ecol 28:429–438
Leidner AK, Buchanan GM (2018) Satellite remote sensing for conservation action: case studies from aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
McElreath R (2020) Statistical rethinking: a Bayesian course with examples in R and Stan. Chapman and Hall/CRC, London
McFarland R, Barrett L, Boner R, Freeman NJ, Henzi SP (2014) Behavioral flexibility of vervet monkeys in response to climatic and social variability. Am J Phys Anthropol 154:357–364
Müller R, Pfeifroth U, Träger-Chatterjee C, Cremer R, Trentmann J, Hollmann R (2015) Surface Solar Radiation Data Set - Heliosat (SARAH) - Edition 1. Satell Appl Facility Clim Monit. https://doi.org/10.5676/EUM_SAF_CM/SARAH/V001
Nakagawa S, Schielzeth H (2010) Repeatability for Gaussian and non-Gaussian data: a practical guide for biologists. Biol Rev 85:935–956
Newman M (2018) Networks. Oxford University Press, Oxford
O’Brien PP, Webber QM, Vander Wal E (2018) Consistent individual differences and population plasticity in network-derived sociality: an experimental manipulation of density in a gregarious ungulate. PLoS ONE 13:e0193425
Pearl J, Mackenzie D (2018) The book of why: the new science of cause and effect. Basic Books, New York
Romano V, Duboscq J, Sarabian C, Thomas E, Sueur C, MacIntosh AJ (2016) Modeling infection transmission in primate networks to predict centrality-based risk. Am J Primatol 78:767–779
Ross CT, McElreath R, Redhead D (2022) Modelling human and non-human animal network data in R using STRAND. BioRxiv:2022.05.13.491798
Schradin C (2013) Intraspecific variation in social organization by genetic variation, developmental plasticity, social flexibility or entirely extrinsic factors. Phil Trans R Soc B 368:20120346
Sevi A, Annicchiarico G, Albenzio M, Taibi L, Muscio A, Dell’Aquila S (2001) Effects of solar radiation and feeding time on behavior, immune response and production of lactating ewes under high ambient temperature. J Dairy Sci 84:629–640
Sih A, Bell A, Johnson JC (2004) Behavioral syndromes: an ecological and evolutionary overview. Trends Ecol Evol 19:372–378
Sueur C, Romano V, Sosa S, Puga-Gonzalez I (2019) Mechanisms of network evolution: a focus on socioecological factors, intermediary mechanisms, and selection pressures. Primates 60:167–181
Tucker CB, Rogers AR, Schütz KE (2008) Effect of solar radiation on dairy cattle behaviour, use of shade and body temperature in a pasture-based system. Appl Anim Behav Sci 109:141–154
Turner W, Rondinini C, Pettorelli N, Mora B, Leidner AK, Szantoi Z, Buchanan G, Dech S, Dwyer J, Herold M (2015) Free and open-access satellite data are key to biodiversity conservation. Biol Conserv 182:173–176
van de Pol M, Wright J (2009) A simple method for distinguishing within-versus between-subject effects using mixed models. Anim Behav 77:753
Weiss MN, Franks DW, Brent LJ, Ellis S, Silk MJ, Croft DP (2021) Common datastream permutations of animal social network data are not appropriate for hypothesis testing using regression models. Methods Ecol Evol 12:255–265
Westneat DF, Hatch MI, Wetzel DP, Ensminger AL (2011) Individual variation in parental care reaction norms: integration of personality and plasticity. Am Nat 178:652–667
Westneat DF, Wright J, Dingemanse NJ (2015) The biology hidden inside residual within-individual phenotypic variation. Biol Rev 90:729–743
Wice EW, Saltz JB (2021) Selection on heritable social network positions is context-dependent in Drosophila melanogaster. Nat Commun 12:3357
Wilson AD, Krause S, Dingemanse NJ, Krause J (2013) Network position: a key component in the characterization of social personality types. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 67:163–173
Wolf M, Weissing FJ (2012) Animal personalities: consequences for ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 27:452–461
Acknowledgements
We thank Cape Nature for providing permission for the baboon research and a host of students and assistants who contributed to the long-term data set. We would also like to thank the anonymous reviewers whose efforts greatly improved this manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by the Leakey Foundation (USA), National Research Foundation (South Africa), and Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Discovery Grants to SPH and LB. LB is also supported by NSERC’s Canada Research Chairs Program (Tier 1). TB is supported by the Canada Research Chairs program (LB).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Communicated by D. Paul Croft
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Bonnell, T.R., Vilette, C., Henzi, S.P. et al. Network reaction norms: taking account of network position and plasticity in response to environmental change. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 77, 35 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-023-03300-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-023-03300-2