Abstract
Digital photography and spectrometry are widely used for colour measurement, but both methods have a number of advantages and disadvantages. Comparative studies can help determine the most appropriate method for quantifying animal colour perception, but few have attempted to compare them based on colour model conversion. Here we compare colour measurements from digital photography and spectrometry in a controlled standard experimental environment using the three-dimensional colour space model CIE L*a*b* which is designed to approximate colour perception in humans and assess the repeatability and agreement of the two methods. For digital photography, we first extracted RGB values from each colour patch and transferred these to L*a*b* values using colour model conversion. For spectrometry, we measured the spectral reflectance (SR) value and subsequently transferred SR values to L*a*b* values. Using a consensus of correlation analysis, intraclass correlation coefficients, concordance correlation coefficients, and Bland-Altman analysis, we found that although spectrometry showed a slightly higher repeatability than photography, both methods were highly repeatable and showed a strong agreement. Furthermore, we used Bland-Altman analysis to derive the limits of agreement, which can be used as criteria for identifying when photography and spectrometry could be as a suitable alternative for measuring colour perception in humans and other trichromatic species. We suggest that our workflow offers a practical and logical approach that could improve how we currently study colour perception in trichromats.
Significance statement
Measuring colour efficiently and accurately is necessary for investigating the evolutionary biology of colour perception in animals. Digital photography and spectrometry are two methods widely used for colour measurement, but there are benefits and limitations to using either method. Comparative studies based on colour model conversion are therefore critical for helping researchers determine which method is most appropriate. Here we test the repeatability and agreement of the two measuring methods using standard colour patches, as a comparative case study of broader interest in measuring colour perception in humans and similar primates. Our results demonstrate that both methods are highly repeatable, and the two methods may be used interchangeably to measure colour perception in humans under experimental conditions.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of data and materials
The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available in the Baidu Netdisk repository [https://pan.baidu.com/s/14udE-lK0odDSiAYE0wqMMg] (Password: 8nsm).
Abbreviations
- SR :
-
Spectral reflectance
- ICC :
-
Intraclass correlation coefficient
- CCC :
-
Concordance correlation coefficient
- LoA :
-
Limits of agreement
- CR :
-
Coefficient of repeatability
References
Akkaynak D, Allen JJ, Mäthger LM, Chiao C-C, Hanlon RT (2013) Quantification of cuttlefish (Sepia officinalis) camouflage: a study of color and luminance using in situ spectrometry. J Comp Physiol A 199:211–225
Barchard K A (2012) Examining the reliability of interval level data using root mean square differences and concordance correlation coefficients. Psychol Methods 17(2):294–308. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023351
Bergeron ZT, Fuller RC (2018) Using human vision to detect variation in avian coloration: how bad is it? Am Nat 191:269–276
Altman DG, Bland JM (1983) Measurement in medicine: the analysis of method comparison studies. J Roy Stat Soc D-Sta 32:307–317
Bland JM, Altman D (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 327:307–310
Bland JM, Altman DG (1999) Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res 8:135–160
Bland JM, Altman DG (2007) Agreement between methods of measurement with multiple observations per individual. J Biopharm Stat 17:571–582
Braždžionytė J, Macas A (2007)Bland–Altman analysis as an alternative approach for statistical evaluation of agreement between two methods for measuring hemodynamics during acute myocardial infarction. Medicina 43:208
Buchelt B, Wagenführ A (2012) Evaluation of colour differences on wood surfaces. Eur J Wood Prod 70:389–391
Bybee SM, Yuan F, Ramstetter MD, Llorente-Bousquets J, Reed RD, Osorio D, Briscoe AD (2012) UV photoreceptors and UV-yellow wing pigments in heliconius butterflies allow a color signal to serve both mimicry and intraspecific communication. Am Nat 179:38–51
Cageao RP, Blavier J-F, McGuire JP, Jiang Y, Nemtchinov V, Mills FP, Sander SP (2001)High-resolution Fourier-transform ultraviolet–visible spectrometer for the measurement of atmospheric trace species: application to OH. Appl Opt 40:2024–2030
Carkeet A (2015) Exact parametric confidence intervals for Bland-Altman limits of agreement. Optom Vis Sci 92:e71–e80
Caro T, Stoddard MC, Stuart-Fox D (2017) Animal coloration research: why it matters. Philos Trans R Soc B 372:20160333
Donekal S, Ambale-Venkatesh B, Berkowitz S, Wu CO, Choi EY, Fernandes V, Yan R, Harouni AA, Bluemke DA, Lima JAC (2013)Inter-study reproducibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance tagging. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 15:37
Douglas RD, Steinhauer TJ, Wee AG (2007) Intraoral determination of the tolerance of dentists for perceptibility and acceptability of shade mismatch. J Prosthet Dent 9:200–208
Eeva T, Sillanpää S, Salminen J-P, Nikkinen L, Tuominen A, Toivonen E, Pihlaja K, Lehikoinen E (2008) Environmental pollution affects the plumage color of great tit nestlings through carotenoid availability. EcoHealth 5:328–337
Endler JA, Mielke PW Jr (2005) Comparing entire colour patterns as birds see them. Biol J Linn Soc 86:405–431
Endler JA, Mappes J (2017) The current and future state of animal coloration research. Philos Trans R Soc B 372:20160352
Fairchild MD (2013) Color appearance models. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken
Fairhurst GD, Dawson RD, van Oort H, Bortolotti GR (2014) Synchronizing feather-based measures of corticosterone and carotenoid-dependent signals: what relationships do we expect? Oecologia 174:689–698
Gerke O (2020) Reporting standards for a Bland–Altman agreement analysis: a review of methodological reviews. Diagnostics 10:334
Giavarina D (2015) Understanding Bland Altman analysis. Biochem Med 25:141–151
Giraudeau M, Chavez A, Toomey MB, McGraw KJ (2015) Effects of carotenoid supplementation and oxidative challenges on physiological parameters and carotenoid-based coloration in an urbanization context. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 69:957–970
Hunt RWG, Pointer MR (2011) Measuring colour, 4th edn. Wiley, New York
Johnsen S (2016) How to measure color using spectrometers and calibrated photographs. J Exp Biol 219:772–778
Kawchuk G, Herzog W (1996) A new technique of tissue stiffness (compliance) assessment: its reliability, accuracy and comparison with an existing method. J Manip Physiol Ther 19:13–18
Koo TK, Li MY (2016) A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chromatogr Sci 15:155–163
Labiris G, Gkika M, Katsanos A, Fanariotis M, Alvanos E, Kozobolis V (2009) Anterior chamber volume measurements with Visante optical coherence tomography and Pentacam: repeatability and level of agreement. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 37:772–774
Langkilde T, Boronow KE (2012) Hot boys are blue: temperature-dependent color change in male eastern fence lizards. J Herpetol 46:461–465
León K, Mery D, Pedreschi F, León J (2006) Color measurement in L∗a∗b∗ units from RGB digital images. Food Res Int 39:1084–1091
Li G, Song G, Yao Z, Jian H (2008) Fiber optical spectrometer and its applications in on-line color measurement. Guangdong Chem Ind 35:112–116
Lawrence IKL (1989) A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics 45:255–268
Ligon RA, McGraw KJ (2018) A chorus of color: hierarchical and graded information content of rapid color change signals in chameleons. Behav Ecol 29:1075–1087
Mani SA, Naing L, John J, Samsudin AR (2008) Comparison of two methods of dental age estimation in 7-15-year-old Malays. Int J Parallel Prog 18:380–388
McKay BD (2013) The use of digital photography in systematics. Biol J Linn Soc 110:1–13
Mollon JD (1999) Specifying, generating and measuring colours. In: Robson J, Carpenter R (eds) A practical guide to visual research. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 106–128
Montgomerie R (2006) Analysing colors. In: Hill GE, McGraw KJ (eds) Bird coloration. Harvard University Press, Boston, pp 90–147
Ohta N, Robertson A (2006) Colorimetry: fundamentals and applications. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester
Osorio D, Vorobyev M (2008) A review of the evolution of animal colour vision and visual communication signals. Vis Res 48:2042–2051
Peneaux C, Hansbro PM, Griffin AS (2021) The potential utility of carotenoid-based coloration as a biomonitor of environmental change. Ibis 163:20–37
Pike TW (2011) Using digital cameras to investigate animal colouration: estimating sensor sensitivity functions. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65:849–858
Potash AD, Greene DU, Foursa GA, Mathis VL, Conner LM, McCleery RA (2020) A comparison of animal color measurements using a commercially available digital color sensor and photograph analysis. Curr Zool 66:601–606
Schanda J (2007) Colorimetry: understanding the CIE system. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken
Simons MJP, Briga M, Koetsier E, Folkertsma R, Wubs MD, Dijkstra C, Verhulst S (2012) Bill redness is positively associated with reproduction and survival in male and female zebra finches. PLoS One 7:e40721
Smith KR, Cadena V, Endler JA, Porter WP, Kearney MR, Stuart-Fox D (2016) Colour change on different body regions provides thermal and signalling advantages in bearded dragon lizards. Proc R Soc B 283:20160626
Stevens M, Cuthill IC (2005) The unsuitability of html-based colour charts for estimating animal colours – a comment on Berggren and Merilä (2004). Front Zool 2:14
Stevens M, Párraga CA, Cuthill IC, Partridge JC, Troscianko TS (2007) Using digital photography to study animal coloration. Biol J Linn Soc 90:211–237
Tkalcic M, Tasic JF (2003) Colour spaces: perceptual, historical and applicational background. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. Ljubljana, Slovenia
Troscianko J, Stevens M (2015) Image calibration and analysis toolbox – a free software suite for objectively measuring reflectance, colour and pattern. Methods Ecol Evol 6:1320–1331
van den Berg CP, Troscianko J, Endler JA, Marshall NJ, Cheney KL (2020) Quantitative colour pattern analysis (QCPA): a comprehensive framework for the analysis of colour patterns in nature. Methods Ecol Evol 11:316–332
Vik M (2017) Colorimetry in textile industry. VÚTS, a.s., Svárovská
Villafuerte R, Negro JJ (1998) Digital imaging for colour measurement in ecological research. Ecol Lett 1:151–154
Wee AG, Lindsey DT, Kuo S, Johnston WM (2007) Color accuracy of commercial digital cameras for use in dentistry. J Prosthet Dent 97:178
Weir JP (2005) Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. J Strength Cond Res 19:231–240
Westland S, Ripamonti C, Cheung V (2012) Computational colour science using MATLAB. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester
Wulf DM, Wise JW (1999) Measuring muscle color on beef carcasses using the L*a*b* color space. J Anim Sci 77:2418–2427
Yam KL, Papadakis SE (2004) A simple digital imaging method for measuring and analyzing color of food surfaces. J Food Eng 61:137–142
Zheng YL, Zhou SS (2013) Printing chromatics (Third Edition). Cultural Development Press, Beijing
Acknowledgements
We would like to extend our sincere thanks to Yupei Yan for their help on the sample collection. We thank Dr. Guangzhan Fang for his support on data analysis. We thank Dr. Raul E. Diaz for his help in improving the English writing of this manuscript. We also sincerely thank two anonymous referees for reviewing the manuscript and their helpful comments.
Funding
This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 31500316 to CY and 32070448 to NL). The funders had no role in the design of the study, the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
CY and NL conceived the ideas and designed methodology; CY and JW collected the data; CY and JW analysed the data; and CY, JW, NL, and HL led the writing of the manuscript. All authors contributed to drafts and gave final approval for publication.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Communicated by K. McGraw
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yang, C., Wang, J., Lyu, N. et al. Comparison of digital photography and spectrometry for evaluating colour perception in humans and other trichromatic species. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 75, 151 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-021-03071-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-021-03071-8