Skip to main content
Log in

The eavesdropping risk of conspicuous sexual signaling in humpback whales

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Conspicuous signals, such as acoustic sexual signals, can be “risky” in that they may be overheard by competitors. This means the signaller must balance the benefits of signaling to the intended receiver with the costs of providing information to these competitors. Depending on the signaller context, this balance may change. Male humpback whales produce long, high amplitude songs. This conspicuous sexual signal is presumably used for advertisement when alone and possibly aimed at females when escorting. Regardless of which animal is the intended receiver, as it is conspicuous, it also available to multiple eavesdropping competitors. Here, we show a singing behavior in humpback whales that comprises of a series of “decisions” which depend on the singer’s context (advertising alone versus escorting a female) and the eavesdropping risk. In lone males not with a female, eavesdropping risk was not a significant factor in determining the “decision” to start singing and for how long. Escorting singers, however, were presumably at risk of losing a female to a competitor and were less likely to invest effort into singing as eavesdropping risk increased. Results suggest signaling males seem to be capable of assessing eavesdropping risk, and modifying their signaling behavior, according to the trade-off between the costs and benefits of signaling within each context. Given male humpback whales are using long-range communication signals available to a network of competitors, these trade-off “decisions” are likely to be complex.

Significance statement

Humpback whale males use song as a long-range sexual signal. However, for any long-range conspicuous sexual signal, there is a direct trade-off between the advantages of using a conspicuous signal, with the cost of signaling to eavesdroppers such as rival males. Here, we showed that the “decisions” made by humpback whale singers depended on a combination of social factors including a social “trigger,” eavesdropping risk, and whether the singer was escorting a female. Results suggest male humpback whales are selecting the most appropriate singing strategy based on their assessment of a constantly changing, complex social environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from eSpace at The University of Queensland https://doi.org/10.14264/0a11259.

References

  • Baker CS, Herman LM (1984) Aggressive behavior between humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) wintering in Hawaiian waters. Can J Zool 62:1922–1937

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergman TJ, Beehner JC (2015) Measuring social complexity. Anim Behav 103:203–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury J, Vehrencamp S (2011) Principles of animal communication, 2nd edn. Sinauer Associates Inc, Sunderland, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown M, Corkeron P (1995) Pod characteristics of migrating humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) off the east Australian coast. Behaviour 132:163–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown MR, Corkeron PJ, Hale PT, Schultz KW, Bryden MM (1995) Evidence for a sex-segregated migration in the humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae). Proc R Soc Lond B 259:229–234

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cerchio S, Jacobsen JK, Cholewiak DM, Falcone EA, Merriwether DA (2005) Paternity in humpback whales, Megaptera novaeangliae: assessing polygyny and skew in male reproductive success. Anim Behav 70:267–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cholewiak D, Clark CW, Ponirakis D, Frankel A, Hatch LT, Risch D, Stanistreet JE, Thompson M, Vu E, Van Parijs SM (2018) Communicating amidst the noise: modeling the aggregate influence of ambient and vessel noise on baleen whale communication space in a national marine sanctuary. Endanger Species Res 36:59–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clapham PJ (1996) The social and reproductive biology of humpback whales: an ecological perspective. Mammal Rev 26:27–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clapham PJ, Palsboll PJ, Mattila DK, Vasquez O (1992) Composition and dynamics of humpback whale competitive groups in the West Indies. Behaviour 122:182–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dabelsteen T, McGregor PK, Holland J, Tobias JA, Pedersen SB (1997) The signal function of overlapping singing in male robins. Anim Behav 53:249–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darling JD, Bérubé M (2001) Interactions of singing humpback whales with other males. Mar Mammal Sci 17:570–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darling JD, Jones ME, Nicklin CP (2006) Humpback whale songs: do they organize males during the breeding season? Behaviour 143:1051–1101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doutrelant C, McGregor P (2000) Eavesdropping and mate choice in female fighting fish. Behaviour 137:1655–1668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doutrelant C, McGregor PK, Oliveira RF (2001) The effect of an audience on intrasexual communication in male Siamese fighting fish, Betta splendens. Behav Ecol 12:283–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunlop RA (2018) The communication space of humpback whale social sounds in wind-dominated noise. J Acoust Soc Am 144:540–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunlop RA, Cato DH, Noad MJ (2008) Non-song acoustic communication in migrating humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae). Mar Mammal Sci 24:613–629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunlop RA, Cato DH, Noad MJ, Stokes DM (2013) Source levels of social sounds in migrating humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae). J Acoust Soc Am 134:706–714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunlop RA, Noad MJ (2016) The “risky” business of singing: tactical use of song during joining by male humpback whales. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 70:2149–2160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankel A, Clark C, Herman L, Gabriele C (1995) Spatial distribution, habitat utilization, and social interactions of humpback whales, Megaptera novaeangliae, off Hawai’i, determined using acoustic and visual techniques. Can J Zool 73:1134–1146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeberg TM, Dunbar RI, Ord TJ (2012) Social complexity as a proximate and ultimate factor in communicative complexity. Phil Trans R Soc B 367:1785–1801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Girola E, Noad MJ, Dunlop RA, Cato DH (2019) Source levels of humpback whales decrease with frequency suggesting an air-filled resonator is used in sound production. J Acoust Soc Am 145:869

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helweg DA, Frankel AS, Mobley JR, Herman LM (1992) Humpback whale song - our current understanding. Marine Mammal Sensory Systems 459–483

  • Hobson EA, Ferdinand V, Kolchinsky A, Garland J (2019) Rethinking animal social complexity measures with the help of complex systems concepts. Anim Behav 155:287–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kareklas K, Wilson J, Kunc HP, Arnott G (2019) Signal complexity communicates aggressive intent during contests, but the process is disrupted by noise. Biol Lett 15:20180841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klump G (1996) Bird communication in the noisy world. In: Kroodsma D, Miller E (eds) Ecology and evolution of acoustic communication in birds. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, pp 321–338

    Google Scholar 

  • McGregor PK (1993) Signalling in territorial systems: a context for individual identification, ranging and eavesdropping. Phil Trans R Soc B 340:237–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mingramm F, Keeley T, Whitworth D, Dunlop R (2019) The influence of physiological status on the reproductive behaviour of humpback whales (Megapteranovaeangliae). Horm Behav 117:104606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mobley JR, Herman LM (1985) Transience of social affiliations among humpback whales (Megaptera-novaeangliae) on the Hawaiian wintering grounds. Can J Zool 63:762–772

  • Murray A, Dunlop RA, Noad MJ, Goldizen AW (2018) Stereotypic and complex phrase types provide structural evidence for a multi-message display in humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae). J Acoust Soc Am 143:980–994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noad MJ, Cato DH (2007) Swimming speeds of singing and non-singing humpback whales during migration. Mar Mammal Sci 23:481–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noad MJ, Cato DH, Stokes MD (2004) Acoustic tracking of humpback whales: measuring interactions with the acoustic environment. In: Proceedings of acoustics. Australian Acoustical Society, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia, pp 353–358

  • Otter K, McGregor PK, Terry AMR, Burford FR, Peake TM, Dabelsteen T (1999) Do female great tits (Parus major) assess males by eavesdropping? A field study using interactive song playback. Proc R Soc Lond B 266:1305–1309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peake T, Terry AMR, McGregor PK, Dabelsteen T (2001) Male great tits eavesdrop on simulated male–to–male vocal interactions. Proc R Soc Lond B 268:1183–1187

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2017) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, http://www.R-project.org. Accessed 19 June 2020

  • Smith JN, Goldizen AW, Dunlop RA, Noad MJ (2008) Songs of male humpback whales, Megaptera novaeangliae, are involved in intersexual interactions. Anim Behav 76:467–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ten Cate C, Slabbekoorn H, Ballintijn MR (2002) Birdsong and male–male competition: causes and consequences of vocal variability in the collared dove (Streptopelia decaocto). Adv Stud Behav 31:31–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyack P (1981) Interactions between singing Hawaiian humpback whales and conspecifics nearby. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 8:105–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyack P (1983) Differential response of humpback whales, Megaptera novaeangliae, to playback of song or social sounds. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 13:49–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyack P, Whitehead H (1983) Male competition in large groups of wintering humpback whales. Behaviour 83:132–154

  • Winn H, Winn L (1978) The song of the humpback whale Megaptera novaeangliae in the West Indies. Mar Biol 47:97–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank everyone involved in the Humpback Acoustic Research Collaboration (HARC), in particular the many volunteers who donated their time and energy to this project. We also thank David Paton for his invaluable field expertise and Eric Kniest for his continued support in the development of Cyclopes. The authors would particularly like to acknowledge Dr. Douglas Cato for his continued advice and guidance. Finally, the authors would like to thank the reviewers for taking the time to carefully review and improve this paper.

Funding

This work was funded by The US Office of Naval Research (2002–2004) and the Australian Defence Science and Technology Organisation (2002–2008).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rebecca A. Dunlop.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the use of animals were followed. All work was carried out under permits from the Australian government Department of Environment and Water Resources (permit E 2002/00030) and the Queensland Environmental Protection Agency (permits WISP00476602 and WITK00478202) and with animal ethics approval from the University of Queensland (certificate ZOO/ENT/216/03/UNNR/DSTO).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Communicated by J. Mann.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (217 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dunlop, R.A., Noad, M.J. The eavesdropping risk of conspicuous sexual signaling in humpback whales. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 75, 124 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-021-03048-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-021-03048-7

Keywords