Abstract
Conspicuous signals, such as acoustic sexual signals, can be “risky” in that they may be overheard by competitors. This means the signaller must balance the benefits of signaling to the intended receiver with the costs of providing information to these competitors. Depending on the signaller context, this balance may change. Male humpback whales produce long, high amplitude songs. This conspicuous sexual signal is presumably used for advertisement when alone and possibly aimed at females when escorting. Regardless of which animal is the intended receiver, as it is conspicuous, it also available to multiple eavesdropping competitors. Here, we show a singing behavior in humpback whales that comprises of a series of “decisions” which depend on the singer’s context (advertising alone versus escorting a female) and the eavesdropping risk. In lone males not with a female, eavesdropping risk was not a significant factor in determining the “decision” to start singing and for how long. Escorting singers, however, were presumably at risk of losing a female to a competitor and were less likely to invest effort into singing as eavesdropping risk increased. Results suggest signaling males seem to be capable of assessing eavesdropping risk, and modifying their signaling behavior, according to the trade-off between the costs and benefits of signaling within each context. Given male humpback whales are using long-range communication signals available to a network of competitors, these trade-off “decisions” are likely to be complex.
Significance statement
Humpback whale males use song as a long-range sexual signal. However, for any long-range conspicuous sexual signal, there is a direct trade-off between the advantages of using a conspicuous signal, with the cost of signaling to eavesdroppers such as rival males. Here, we showed that the “decisions” made by humpback whale singers depended on a combination of social factors including a social “trigger,” eavesdropping risk, and whether the singer was escorting a female. Results suggest male humpback whales are selecting the most appropriate singing strategy based on their assessment of a constantly changing, complex social environment.

Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from eSpace at The University of Queensland https://doi.org/10.14264/0a11259.
References
Baker CS, Herman LM (1984) Aggressive behavior between humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) wintering in Hawaiian waters. Can J Zool 62:1922–1937
Bergman TJ, Beehner JC (2015) Measuring social complexity. Anim Behav 103:203–209
Bradbury J, Vehrencamp S (2011) Principles of animal communication, 2nd edn. Sinauer Associates Inc, Sunderland, MA
Brown M, Corkeron P (1995) Pod characteristics of migrating humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) off the east Australian coast. Behaviour 132:163–179
Brown MR, Corkeron PJ, Hale PT, Schultz KW, Bryden MM (1995) Evidence for a sex-segregated migration in the humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae). Proc R Soc Lond B 259:229–234
Cerchio S, Jacobsen JK, Cholewiak DM, Falcone EA, Merriwether DA (2005) Paternity in humpback whales, Megaptera novaeangliae: assessing polygyny and skew in male reproductive success. Anim Behav 70:267–277
Cholewiak D, Clark CW, Ponirakis D, Frankel A, Hatch LT, Risch D, Stanistreet JE, Thompson M, Vu E, Van Parijs SM (2018) Communicating amidst the noise: modeling the aggregate influence of ambient and vessel noise on baleen whale communication space in a national marine sanctuary. Endanger Species Res 36:59–75
Clapham PJ (1996) The social and reproductive biology of humpback whales: an ecological perspective. Mammal Rev 26:27–49
Clapham PJ, Palsboll PJ, Mattila DK, Vasquez O (1992) Composition and dynamics of humpback whale competitive groups in the West Indies. Behaviour 122:182–194
Dabelsteen T, McGregor PK, Holland J, Tobias JA, Pedersen SB (1997) The signal function of overlapping singing in male robins. Anim Behav 53:249–256
Darling JD, Bérubé M (2001) Interactions of singing humpback whales with other males. Mar Mammal Sci 17:570–584
Darling JD, Jones ME, Nicklin CP (2006) Humpback whale songs: do they organize males during the breeding season? Behaviour 143:1051–1101
Doutrelant C, McGregor P (2000) Eavesdropping and mate choice in female fighting fish. Behaviour 137:1655–1668
Doutrelant C, McGregor PK, Oliveira RF (2001) The effect of an audience on intrasexual communication in male Siamese fighting fish, Betta splendens. Behav Ecol 12:283–286
Dunlop RA (2018) The communication space of humpback whale social sounds in wind-dominated noise. J Acoust Soc Am 144:540–551
Dunlop RA, Cato DH, Noad MJ (2008) Non-song acoustic communication in migrating humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae). Mar Mammal Sci 24:613–629
Dunlop RA, Cato DH, Noad MJ, Stokes DM (2013) Source levels of social sounds in migrating humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae). J Acoust Soc Am 134:706–714
Dunlop RA, Noad MJ (2016) The “risky” business of singing: tactical use of song during joining by male humpback whales. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 70:2149–2160
Frankel A, Clark C, Herman L, Gabriele C (1995) Spatial distribution, habitat utilization, and social interactions of humpback whales, Megaptera novaeangliae, off Hawai’i, determined using acoustic and visual techniques. Can J Zool 73:1134–1146
Freeberg TM, Dunbar RI, Ord TJ (2012) Social complexity as a proximate and ultimate factor in communicative complexity. Phil Trans R Soc B 367:1785–1801
Girola E, Noad MJ, Dunlop RA, Cato DH (2019) Source levels of humpback whales decrease with frequency suggesting an air-filled resonator is used in sound production. J Acoust Soc Am 145:869
Helweg DA, Frankel AS, Mobley JR, Herman LM (1992) Humpback whale song - our current understanding. Marine Mammal Sensory Systems 459–483
Hobson EA, Ferdinand V, Kolchinsky A, Garland J (2019) Rethinking animal social complexity measures with the help of complex systems concepts. Anim Behav 155:287–296
Kareklas K, Wilson J, Kunc HP, Arnott G (2019) Signal complexity communicates aggressive intent during contests, but the process is disrupted by noise. Biol Lett 15:20180841
Klump G (1996) Bird communication in the noisy world. In: Kroodsma D, Miller E (eds) Ecology and evolution of acoustic communication in birds. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, pp 321–338
McGregor PK (1993) Signalling in territorial systems: a context for individual identification, ranging and eavesdropping. Phil Trans R Soc B 340:237–244
Mingramm F, Keeley T, Whitworth D, Dunlop R (2019) The influence of physiological status on the reproductive behaviour of humpback whales (Megapteranovaeangliae). Horm Behav 117:104606
Mobley JR, Herman LM (1985) Transience of social affiliations among humpback whales (Megaptera-novaeangliae) on the Hawaiian wintering grounds. Can J Zool 63:762–772
Murray A, Dunlop RA, Noad MJ, Goldizen AW (2018) Stereotypic and complex phrase types provide structural evidence for a multi-message display in humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae). J Acoust Soc Am 143:980–994
Noad MJ, Cato DH (2007) Swimming speeds of singing and non-singing humpback whales during migration. Mar Mammal Sci 23:481–495
Noad MJ, Cato DH, Stokes MD (2004) Acoustic tracking of humpback whales: measuring interactions with the acoustic environment. In: Proceedings of acoustics. Australian Acoustical Society, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia, pp 353–358
Otter K, McGregor PK, Terry AMR, Burford FR, Peake TM, Dabelsteen T (1999) Do female great tits (Parus major) assess males by eavesdropping? A field study using interactive song playback. Proc R Soc Lond B 266:1305–1309
Peake T, Terry AMR, McGregor PK, Dabelsteen T (2001) Male great tits eavesdrop on simulated male–to–male vocal interactions. Proc R Soc Lond B 268:1183–1187
R Development Core Team (2017) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, http://www.R-project.org. Accessed 19 June 2020
Smith JN, Goldizen AW, Dunlop RA, Noad MJ (2008) Songs of male humpback whales, Megaptera novaeangliae, are involved in intersexual interactions. Anim Behav 76:467–477
ten Cate C, Slabbekoorn H, Ballintijn MR (2002) Birdsong and male–male competition: causes and consequences of vocal variability in the collared dove (Streptopelia decaocto). Adv Stud Behav 31:31–75
Tyack P (1981) Interactions between singing Hawaiian humpback whales and conspecifics nearby. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 8:105–116
Tyack P (1983) Differential response of humpback whales, Megaptera novaeangliae, to playback of song or social sounds. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 13:49–55
Tyack P, Whitehead H (1983) Male competition in large groups of wintering humpback whales. Behaviour 83:132–154
Winn H, Winn L (1978) The song of the humpback whale Megaptera novaeangliae in the West Indies. Mar Biol 47:97–114
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank everyone involved in the Humpback Acoustic Research Collaboration (HARC), in particular the many volunteers who donated their time and energy to this project. We also thank David Paton for his invaluable field expertise and Eric Kniest for his continued support in the development of Cyclopes. The authors would particularly like to acknowledge Dr. Douglas Cato for his continued advice and guidance. Finally, the authors would like to thank the reviewers for taking the time to carefully review and improve this paper.
Funding
This work was funded by The US Office of Naval Research (2002–2004) and the Australian Defence Science and Technology Organisation (2002–2008).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the use of animals were followed. All work was carried out under permits from the Australian government Department of Environment and Water Resources (permit E 2002/00030) and the Queensland Environmental Protection Agency (permits WISP00476602 and WITK00478202) and with animal ethics approval from the University of Queensland (certificate ZOO/ENT/216/03/UNNR/DSTO).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Communicated by J. Mann.
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dunlop, R.A., Noad, M.J. The eavesdropping risk of conspicuous sexual signaling in humpback whales. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 75, 124 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-021-03048-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-021-03048-7


