Abstract
Behaviours such as territorial defence represent functionally integrated traits that underlie multiple behavioural variables such as physical and acoustic responses. Characterizing the multivariate structure of such traits is fundamental to understand their evolution. In bird species that form stable pair bonds and are territorial year-round, both sexes are expected to defend their territory; however, the role that each sex plays in defending their shared territory remains largely unknown. Evidence for the sex-roles during territorial defence is mixed and sex- and context-specific characterizations of territorial defence embracing the multivariate nature of the trait are currently lacking. Here, we investigated sex- and context-specific variation in a hypothesised latent variable called ‘territorial defence’ and tested whether duets were part of territorial defence in a wild population of rufous hornero (Furnarius rufus). To do so, we combined a simulated territorial intrusion approach during nest building and provisioning contexts with a structural equation modelling approach. Our results showed that, in males and females, the six measured behavioural variables were linked by a single latent trait, territorial defence, in both contexts. Flights over the decoy and duet songs were equally good proxies of territorial defence. Although males were defending more the territory than females, pair members showed a positive correlation in their behaviour. The structural equation modelling framework enabled us to capture a complex correlation pattern among behavioural variables, expanding upon a classic body of research on territorial defence. Thus, the combination of classical behavioural approaches with sophisticated statistical analyses brings new exciting possibilities to the field of behavioural ecology.
Significance statement
Territorial defence is a key behaviour in territorial species as it plays a major role in an individual’s reproductive success and survival. Additionally, territorial defence has been proposed as one possible evolutionary driver of duetting behaviour, one of the most fascinating vocal behaviours in birds. As behaviours are evolutionary characters, they must be studied in a multivariate framework. In this study, we focused on characterizing territorial defence during a simulated territorial intrusion in an integrative manner using a structural equation modelling framework. We did so in male and female rufous horneros (Aves: Furnaridae) across two breeding contexts, while simultaneously testing theoretical predictions about the role of duetting behaviour as key part of territorial defence. Overall, our study provides for the first time a sex- and context-comparison of the multivariate, latent variable ‘territorial defence’ in duetting birds, while highlighting the potential of combining field behavioural approaches with structural equation modelling.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available in the open repository: Mendeley Data (https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/7ztwn539jd/1).
References
Adreani NM, Goymann W, Mentesana L (2018) Not one hormone or another: aggression differentially affects progesterone and testosterone in a South American ovenbird. Horm Behav 105:104–109
Apfelbeck B, Goymann W (2011) Ignoring the challenge? Male black redstarts (Phoenicurus ochruros) do not increase testosterone levels during territorial conflicts but they do so in response to gonadotropin-releasing hormone. Proc R Soc Lond B 278:3233–3242
Araya-Ajoy YG, Dingemanse NJ (2013) Characterizing behavioural “characters”: an evolutionary framework. Proc R Soc B 281:20132645
Bard SC, Hau M, Wikelski M, Wingfield JC (2002) Vocal distinctiveness and response to conspecific playback in the spotted antbird, a neotropical suboscine. Condor 104:387–394
Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2014) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lme4/index.html
Bollen KA (2002) Latent variables in psychology and the social sciences. Annu Rev Psychol 53:605–634
Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2004) Multimodel inference. Sociol Methods Res 33:261–304
Card NA, Little TD (2007) Studying agression with structural equation modeling. In: Flannery DJ, Vazsonyi AT, Waldman ID (eds) The Cambridge handbook of violent behavior and aggression. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 727–739
Carter AJ, Feeney WE (2012) Taking a comparative approach: analysing personality as a multivariate behavioural response across species. PLoS One 7:e42440
Clutton-Brock TH, Vincent ACJ (1991) Sexual selection and the potential reproductive rates of males and females. Nature 351:58–60
Demko AD, Mennill DJ (2018) Male and female signaling behavior varies seasonally during territorial interactions in a tropical songbird. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 72:84
Dingemanse NJ, Dochtermann NA (2013) Quantifying individual variation in behaviour: mixed-effect modelling approaches. J Anim Ecol 82:39–54
Diniz P, Ribeiro PHL, Rech GS, Macedo RH (2016) Monochromatism, cryptic sexual dimorphism and lack of assortative mating in the Rufous Hornero, Furnarius rufus albogularis. Emu 116:294–300
Diniz P, Júnior EF d S, Webster MS, Macedo RH (2018) Duetting behavior in a Neotropical ovenbird: sexual and seasonal variation and adaptive signaling functions. J Avian Biol 49:jav–01637
Diniz P, Macedo RH, Webster MS (2019) Duetting correlates with territory quality and reproductive success in a suboscine bird with low extra-pair paternity. Auk 136:1–13
Diniz P, Rech G, Ribeiro PH, Webster MS, Macedo RH (2020) Partners coordinate territorial defence against simulated intruders in a duetting ovenbird. Ecol Evol 10:81–89
Douglas SB, & Mennill DJ (2010) A review of acoustic playback techniques for studying avian vocal duets. J Field Ornithol 81(2):115–129
Dowling J, Webster MS (2016) An experimental test of duet function in a fairy-wren (Malurus) with moderate cuckoldry rates. Behav Ecol 27:228–236
Emlen ST, Oring LW (1977) Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science 197:215–223
Farabaugh SM (1982) The ecological and social significance of duetting. In: Kroodsma DE, Miller EH (eds) Acoustic communication in birds, vol 2. Academic Press, New York, pp 85–124
Fedy BC, Stutchbury BJM (2005) Territory defence in tropical birds: are females as aggressive as males? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 58:414–422
Fraga RM (1980) The breeding of Rufous Horneros (Furnarius rufus). Condor 82:58–68
Freeman BG, Montgomery GA, Schluter D (2017) Evolution and plasticity: divergence of song discrimination is faster in birds with innate song than in song learners in Neotropical passerine birds. Evolution 71:2230–2242
Garcia JT, Arroyo BE (2002) Intra- and interspecific agonistic behaviour in sympatric harriers during the breeding season. Anim Behav 64:77–84
Gelman A, Yu-Sung S (2015) arm: data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. R package version 1.8-5, https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/arm/arm.pdf
Gill SA, Alfson ED, Hau M (2007) Context matters: female aggression and testosterone in a year-round territorial neotropical songbird (Thyrothorus leucotis). Proc R Soc Lond B 274:2187–2194
Greenberg R, Gradwohl J (1983) Sexual roles in the dot-winged antwren (Microrhopias quixensis), a tropical forest passerine. Auk 100:920–925
Hall ML (2004) A review of hypotheses for the functions of avian duetting. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 55:415–430
Hall ML (2009) A review of vocal duetting in birds. Adv Study Behav 40:67–121
Hall ML, Peters A (2008) Coordination between the sexes for territorial defence in a duetting faire-wren. Anim Behav 76:65–73
Harris MR, Siefferman L (2014) Interspecific competition influences fitness benefits of assortative mating for territorial aggression in eastern bluebirds (Sialia sialis). PLoS One 9:e88668
Harrison XA (2009) Using observation-level random effects to model overdispersion in count data in ecology and evolution. PeerJ 2:e616
Houle D, Pélabon C, Wagner GP, Hansen TF (2011) Measurement and meaning in biology. Q Rev Biol 86:3–34
Huntingford FA (1976) An investigation of the territorial behaviour of the three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) using principal components analysis. Anim Behav 24:822–834
Koloff J, Mennill DJ (2013) The responses of duetting antbirds to stereo duet playback provide support for the joint territory defence hypothesis. Ethology 119:462–471
Korner-Nievergelt F, Roth T, von Felten S, Guélat J, Almasi B, Korner-Nievergelt P (2015) Bayesian data analysis in ecology using linear models with R, BUGS, and Stan. Academic Press, New York
Langmore NE (1998) Functions of duet and solo songs of female birds. Trends Ecol Evol 13:136–140
Logue DM (2005) Cooperative defence in duet singing birds. Cognition, Brain, Behavior
Massoni V, Reboreda JC, López GC, Aldatz MF (2012) High coordination and equitable parental effort in the Rufous Hornero. Condor 114:564–570
Mentesana L, Adreani NM (2020) Is aggression costly? Acute aggressive behavior increases oxidative stress independently of testosterone. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.06.027029
Morton ES, Derrickson KC (1996) Song ranging by the dusky antbird, Cercomacra tyrannina: ranging without song learning. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 39:195–201
Morton ES, Derrickson KC, Stutchbury BJM (2000) Territory switching behavior in a sedentary tropical passerine, the dusky antbird (Cercomacra tyrannina). Behav Ecol 11:648–653
Naguib M, Mennill DJ (2010) The signal value of birdsong: empirical evidence suggests song overlapping is a signal. Anim Behav 80:e11–e15
Nilsson JÅ, Råberg L (2001) The resting metabolic cost of egg laying and nestling feeding in great tits. Oecologia 128:187–192
Odom KJ, Logue DM, Studds CE, Monroe MK, Campbell SK, Omland KE (2017) Duetting behavior varies with sex, season, and singing role in a tropical oriole (Icterus icterus). Behav Ecol 28:1256–1265
Owens IPF, Thompson DBA (1994) Sex differences, sex ratios and sex roles. Proc R Soc Lond B 258:93–99
Quinard A, Cézilly F (2012) Sex roles during conspecific territorial defence in the Zenaida dove, Zenaida aurita. Anim Behav 83:47–54
Quirós-Guerrero E, Janeiro MJ, Lopez-Morales M, Cresswell W, Templeton CN (2017) Riverside wren pairs jointly defend their territories against simulated intruders. Ethology 123:949–956
R Core Team (2013) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org
Robinson A (1949) The biological significance of bird song in Australia. Emu 48:291–315
Roper JJ (2005) Sexually distinct songs in the duet of the sexually monomorphic Rufous Hornero. J Ornithol 76:234–236
Schuett W, Tregenza T, Dall SRX (2010) Sexual selection and animal personality. Biol Rev 85:217–246
Searcy WA, Beecher MD (2009) Song as an aggressive signal in songbirds. Anim Behav 78:1281–1292
Smith BR, Blumstein DT (2008) Fitness consequences of personality: a meta-analysis. Behav Ecol 19:448–455
Sosa-López JR, Mennill DJ, Renton K (2017) Sexual differentiation and seasonal variation in response to conspecific and heterospecific acoustic signals. Ethology 123:460–466
Sprenger D, Dingemanse NJ, Dochtermann NA, Theobald J, Walker SP (2012) Aggressive females become aggressive males in a sex-changing reef fish. Ecol Lett 15:986–992
Stamps JA, Krishnan VV (1997) Functions of fights in territory establishment. Am Nat 150:393–405
Tobias JA, Sheard C, Seddon N, Meade A, Cotton AJ, Nakagawa S (2016) Territoriality, social bonds, and the evolution of communal signaling in birds. Front Ecol Evol 4:74
Topp SM, Mennill DJ (2008) Seasonal variation in the duetting behaviour of rufous-and-white wrens (Thryothorus rufalbus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62:1107–1117
Warner RR, Hoffman SG (1980) Population density and the economics of territorial defence in a coral reef fish. Ecology 61:772–780
Wickler W, Seibt U (1980) Vocal dueting and the pair bond. Z Tierpsychol 52:217–226
Willis EO (1972) The behavior of ocellated antbirds. Ornithol Monogr 10:1–162
Wingfield JC (1994) Regulation of territorial behavior in the sedentary song sparrow, Melospiza melodia morphna. Horm Behav 28:1–15
Acknowledgements
We thank Klaus Pichler for his help to prepare the STI and all the ‘INIA Las Brujas’ staff for supporting us with accommodation and equipment during fieldwork. We also thank Facultad de Ciencias and the Ethology lab from Universidad de la República and Juan Carlos Reboreda and the ‘Laboratorio de Ecología y Comportamiento Animal’ at the Universidad de Buenos Aires for the logistical support, and Pablo Tubaro from the Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales ‘Bernardino Rivadavia’ (MACN) for providing us with the mounted hornero. We are grateful to Manfred Gahr and Michaela Hau for their valuable support. We also thank Yimen Araya-Ajoy, Glenn Cockburn, Luke Eberhart-Phillips and Wolfgang Wickler for constructive criticism on previous versions of the manuscript. Finally, we want to thank the anonymous reviewers for constructive feedback on the manuscript.
Funding
This work was funded by the International Max Planck Research School (IMPRS) for Organismal Biology, and by Idea Wild that provided field equipment.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
NMA, LM and MM share first authorship and names are ordered at random. NMA and LM conceived the study and designed the study. BT provided logistic support. NMA, LM, EG and EC collected the data. NMA, LM and MM analysed the data. NMA, LM and MM wrote the manuscript with input from all authors.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
The experimental procedures of this study have approval by the Ethics Committee of Animal Experimentation (CEUA) of the Facultad de Ciencias of the Universidad de la República, Uruguay (Protocol number 186, file 2400-11000090-16).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Communicated by D. Rubenstein
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(DOCX 161 kb).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mentesana, L., Moiron, M., Guedes, E. et al. Defending as a unit: sex- and context-specific territorial defence in a duetting bird. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 74, 111 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-020-02891-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-020-02891-4