Task partitioning in ants lacking discrete morphological worker subcastes

Abstract

Task partitioning allows for efficient coordination of behavior in social insect colonies. Many task allocation studies focus on social insect species with discrete morphological worker subcastes, such as those possessing major and minor workers with strongly differentiated body plans. Much less is known about task partitioning among size-variable workers lacking discrete morphological subcastes. We investigated task fidelity and its correlation with worker size in Formica species with differing degrees of body size variation. During a mark-recapture study that focused on three worker tasks (honeydew collection, nest building, and protein foraging) across 2 days, 98.6% of 3570 recaptured workers exhibited task fidelity. In species with high levels of worker size variation, worker size is strongly correlated with task performance. This size-task correlation is weaker, but still present, in species with less variably sized workers. Our results suggest that Formica use size-based task partitioning, a form of morphological polyethism. We expect social insects with and without discrete morphological worker subcastes to differ in ontogeny, evolutionary history, and degree of behavioral flexibility. Identifying the scope of variation in task partitioning mechanisms will facilitate comparative studies, thereby elucidating evolutionary histories and outcomes of alternative strategies.

Significance statement

Division of labor is thought to increase the efficiency and success of animal societies by allowing the performance of multiple tasks in parallel, rather than sequentially. We investigated the task partitioning strategy employed by an ecologically dominant ant genus characterized by continuous worker size variation but lacking discrete morphological worker subcastes. We show that several species employ a form of morphological polyethism, wherein individuals specialize in tasks according to body size. Size-mediated morphological polyethism in the absence of discrete morphological worker subcastes has been demonstrated in a few other social insects. However, this task allocation strategy is likely more common than previously recognized, as most insect societies display natural worker size variation. Further, we argue that it is important to distinguish between size- and subcaste-based morphological polyethism. Alternative task partitioning strategies are likely to impact animal societies’ resilience to environmental perturbations, which are becoming increasingly common in the face of global change.