Abstract
Morphology in sexually dimorphic species is related to increased opportunity for sexual selection when traits reflect individual quality. In socially monogamous species, it may function to increase variance in reproductive success if exaggerated traits are related to the opportunity to engage in extra-pair paternity (EPP). Nonetheless, it is poorly understood if ornamental versus functional traits are differentially related to the distribution of paternity across individuals. We examined EPP in the Scissor-tailed Flycatcher (Tyrannus forficatus), a sexually dimorphic suboscine passerine, to determine how flight feather morphology (both ornamental and related to flight performance), ornamental coloration, and flight performance were related to paternity for males and females. We assessed paternity at 140 nests across 7 years and found that 73% of nests contained extra-pair young with 59% of nestlings resulted from extra-pair fertilizations. Males that secured paternity with their social mate had larger size (wing chord and tail length), better body condition, and more exaggerated ornamental traits (color, primary notch, and streamer length) than cuckolded males. When compared directly to the social males they cuckolded, however, cuckolders had shorter primary notches and had duller coloration. Elongated flight feather features were associated with greater maneuverability during flight, and longer primary notches and tail streamers were associated with maintenance of within-pair paternity, possibly via flight displays. Females that cuckolded their mates had less exaggerated flank coloration but better body condition than those that did not. We posit that in this system, there is a lack of strong selection on extra-pair mate morphology; rather, high-quality males maintained WPP while females in good condition were more likely to cuckold social males of poorer quality, signaling a role of reciprocal selection in extra-pair mate choice. Determinants of the frequency and extent of extra-pair paternity are central to our conception of mating systems, population genetics, and sexual selection. Morphological determinants can influence faithfulness to a mate and are a key aspect of locomotion, limiting or enhancing an individual’s ability to interact with others. We examined how ornamental (coloration and tail streamers) and functional traits involved in flight (wing and tail structure) correlated with cuckoldry. Male condition, size, and ornamental traits were negatively associated with cuckoldry; yet, social males were cuckolded by males of poorer quality. Flight feather characteristics were positively associated both with flight performance and maintenance of paternity, suggesting a role of flight in cuckoldry. Female body condition was related to cuckoldry and perhaps indicates reciprocal choice by males for healthy extra-pair mates. We posit a lack of strong selection on extra-pair mate morphology in this system; rather, high-quality males maintained WPP while females were more likely to cuckold social males of poorer quality.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References
Akçay E, Roughgarden J (2007) Extra-pair paternity in birds: review of the genetic benefits. Evol Ecol Res 9:855–868
Amundsen T, Forsgren E, Hansen LTT (1997) On the function of female ornaments: male bluethroats prefer colourful females. Proc R Soc Lond B 264:1579–1586. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1997.0220
Arct A, Drobniak SM, Cichoń M (2015) Genetic similarity between mates predicts extrapair paternity-a meta-analysis of bird studies. Behav Ecol 26:959–968. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arv004
Arnqvist G, Kirkpatrick M (2005) The evolution of infidelity in socially monogamous passerines: the strength of direct and indirect selection on extrapair copulation behavior in females. Am Nat 165:S26–S37
Beauchamp G (2003) Delayed plumage maturation in birds in relation to social foraging and breeding competition. Evol Ecol Res 5:589–596
Becker AJ, Roeder DV, Husak MS, Murphy MT (2018) Annual survival and breeding dispersal of a migratory passerine, the scissor-tailed flycatcher. J Field Ornithol 89:22–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofo.12239
Birkhead TR, Fletcher K (1995) Depletion determines sperm numbers in male zebra finches. Anim Behav 49:451–456. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1995.0058
Bitton PP, O’Brien EL, Dawson RD (2007) Plumage brightness and age predict extrapair fertilization success of male tree swallows, Tachycineta bicolor. Anim Behav 74:1777–1784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.03.018
Brown ME (1996) Assessing body condition in birds. Curr Ornithol 3:67–135
Brown CR, Brown MB (1998) Intense natural selection on body size and wing and tail asymmetry in cliff swallows during severe weather. Evolution 52:1461–1475. https://doi.org/10.2307/2411315
Chaine AS, Lyon BE (2009) Adaptive plasticity in female mate choice dampens sexual selection on male ornaments in the lark bunting. Science 319:459–462. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1149167
Cleasby IR, Nakagawa S (2012) The influence of male age on within-pair and extra-pair paternity in passerines. Ibis 154:318–324. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.2011.01209.x
Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New York
Dawideit BA, Phillimore AB, Laube I, Leisler B, Böhning-Gaese K (2009) Ecomorphological predictors of natal dispersal distances in birds. J Anim Ecol 78:388–395. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01504.x
Dolan AC, Murphy MT, Redmond LJ, Sexton K, Duffield D (2007) Extrapair paternity and the opportunity for sexual selection in a socially monogamous passerine. Behav Ecol 18:985–993. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arm068
Dunn PO, Armenta JK, Whittingham LA (2015) Natural and sexual selection act on different axes of variation in avian plumage color. Sci Adv 1:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1400155
Eliassen S, Jørgensen C (2014) Extra-pair mating and evolution of cooperative neighbourhoods. PLoS One 9:e99878. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099878
Emlen ST, Oring LW (1977) Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science 197:215–223
Evans MR (1993) Fluctuating asymmetry and long tails: the mechanical effects of asymmetry may act to enforce honest advertisement. Proc R Soc Lond B 253:205–209. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1993.0104
Fridolfsson A, Ellegren H (1999) A simple and universal method for molecular sexing of non-ratite birds. J Avian Biol 30:116–121. https://doi.org/10.2307/3677252
Gerlach NM, McGlothlin JW, Parker PG, Ketterson ED (2012) Promiscuous mating produces offspring with higher lifetime fitness. Proc R Soc Lond B 279:860–866. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2011.1547
Green JD, Osmond LH, Double CM, Cockburn A (2000) Display rate by male fairy-wrens (Malurus cyaneus) during the fertile period of females has little influence on extra-pair mate choice. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 48:438–446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002650000258
Griffith SC, Owens IPF, Thuman KA (2002) Extra pair paternity in birds: a review of interspecific variation and adaptive function. Mol Ecol 11:2195–2212
Hawkins GL, Hill GE, Mercadante A (2012) Delayed plumage maturation and delayed reproductive investment in birds. Biol Rev 87:257–274
Hedenström A (1995) Swallows unhandicapped by long tails? Trends Ecol Evol 10:140–141
Hill GE (1993) Male mate choice and the evolution of female plumage coloration in the house finch. Evolution 47:1515–1525. https://doi.org/10.2307/2410164
Hoi H, Krištofík J, Darolová A (2013) Experimentally simulating paternity uncertainty: immediate and long-term responses of male and female reed warblers Acrocephalus scirpaceus. PLoS One 8:e62541. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062541
Hsu YH, Schroeder J, Winney I, Burke T, Nakagawa S (2014) Costly infidelity: low lifetime fitness of extra-pair offspring in a passerine bird. Evolution 68:2873–2884. https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.12475
Jennions MD, Petrie M (2000) Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits. Biol Rev 75:21–64. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0006323199005423
Kalinowski ST, Taper ML, Marshall TC (2007) Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Mol Ecol 16:1099–1106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03089.x
Kempenaers B, Congdon B, Boag P, Robertson RJ (1999) Extrapair paternity and egg hatchability in tree swallows: evidence for the genetic compatibility hypothesis? Behav Ecol 10:304–311. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/10.3.304
Kruschke JK (2013) Bayesian estimation supersedes the t test. J Exp Psychol Gen 142:573–603. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029146
Lebigre C, Arcese P, Reid JM (2013) Decomposing variation in male reproductive success: age-specific variances and covariances through extra-pair and within-pair reproduction. J Anim Ecol 82:872–883. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12063
Leisler B, Winkler H (1991) Results and concepts in the ecomorphology of birds. J Ornithol 132:373–425. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01640381
Leisler B, Winkler H (2003) Morphological consequences of migration in passerines. In: Berthold P, Gwinner E, Sonnenschein E (eds) Avian migration. Springer, Berlin, pp 175–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-05957-9_11
Longmire JL, Maltbie M, Baker RJ (1997) Use of “lysis buffer” in DNA isolation and its implication for museum collection. Occ Pap MusTexas Tech Univ 163:1–3
Low M (2005) Female resistance and male force: context and patterns of copulation in the New Zealand Stitchbird Notiomystis cincta. J Avian Biol 36:436–448. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0908-8857.2005.03460.x
Lyon BE, Montgomerie RD (1986) Delayed plumage maturation in passerine birds: reliable signaling by subordinate males? Evolution 40:605–615
Manica LT, Graves JA, Podos J, Macedo RH (2016) Multimodal flight display of a neotropical songbird predicts social pairing but not extrapair mating success. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 70:2039–2052. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-016-2208-x
Mays HL Jr, Hopper KR (2004) Differential responses of yellow-breasted chats, Icteria virens, to male and female conspecific model presentations. Anim Behav 67:21–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.01.003
McGraw KJ, Ardia DR (2003) Carotenoids, immunocompetence, and the information content of sexual colors: an experimental test. Am Nat 162:704–712. https://doi.org/10.1086/378904
Møller AP (1991) Sexual ornament size and the cost of fluctuating asymmetry. Proc R Soc Lond B 243:59–62. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1991.0010
Møller AP (1993) Female preference for apparently symmetrical male sexual ornaments in the barn swallow Hirundo rustica. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 32:371–376. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00168820
Møller AP, Höglund J (1991) Patterns of fluctuating asymmetry in avian feather ornaments: implications for models of sexual selection. Proc R Soc Lond B 24:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1991.0080
Møller AP, Brohede J, Cuervo JJ, de Lope F, Primmer C (2003) Extrapair paternity in relation to sexual ornamentation, arrival date, and condition in a migratory bird. Behav Ecol 14:707–712. https://doi.org/10.1083/beheco/arg051
Moreno J, Martínez JG, González-Braojos S, Cantarero A, Ruiz-de-Castañeda R, Precioso M, López-Arrabé J (2015) Extra-pair paternity declines with female age and wing length in the pied flycatcher. Ethology 121:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/eth.12364
Morrow EH, Arnqvist G, Pitcher TE (2002) The evolution of infertility: does hatching rate in birds coevolve with female polyandry? J Evol Biol 15:702–709. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1420-9101.2002.00445.x
Norberg R (1994) Swallow tail streamer is a mechanical device for self deflection of tail leading edge, enhancing aerodynamic efficiency and flight manoeuvrability. Proc R Soc Lond B 257:227–233. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1994.0119
Norberg UM (1995) How a long tail and changes in mass and wing shape affect the cost of flight in animals. Funct Ecol 9:48–54. https://doi.org/10.2307/2390089
Podmokła E, Dubiec A, Arct A, Drobniak SM, Gustafsson L, Cichoń M (2015) Malaria infection status predicts extra-pair paternity in the blue tit. J Avian Biol 46:303–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/jav.00599
Pryke SR, Andersson S (2005) Experimental evidence for female choice and energetic costs of male tail elongation in red-collared Widowbirds. Biol J Linn Soc 86:35–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2005.00522.x
Pryke SR, Griffith SC (2007) The relative role of male vs. female mate choice in maintaining assortative pairing among discrete colour morphs. J Evol Biol 20:1512–1521. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2007.01332.x
Pyle P (1997) Identification guide to North American birds, Part I. Slate Creek Press, Bolinas, CA
Ralph CJ, Geupel GR, Pyle P, Martin TE, DeSante DF (1993) Handbook of field methods for monitoring landbirds. Pacific Southwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service, Albany
Ramos AG, Nunziata SO, Lance SL, Rodríguez C, Faircloth BC, Gowaty PA, Drummond H (2014) Interactive effects of male and female age on extra-pair paternity in a socially monogamous seabird. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 68:1603–1609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-014-1769-9
R Core Team (2013) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. http://www.R-project.org/
Regosin JV (2003) Scissor-tailed Flycatcher. In: Poole A, Gill F (eds) The Birds of North America. The Birds of North America Inc, Philadelphia, PA, number 342
Regosin JV, Pruett-Jones S (1995) Aspects of breeding biology and social organization in the scissor-tailed flycatcher. Condor 97:154–164. https://doi.org/10.2307/1368993
Regosin JV, Pruett-Jones S (2001) Sexual selection and tail-length dimorphism in scissor-tailed flycatchers. Auk 118:167–175
Roeder DV, Husak MS, Murphy MT (2016) Frequency of extra-pair paternity in scissor-tailed flycatchers (Tyrannus forficatus) and other suboscines: are oscines and suboscines different? Wilson J Ornithol 128:494–502
Rohwer S (1978) Passerine subadult plumages and the deceptive acquisition of resources: test of a critical assumption. Condor 80:173–179
Rohwer S, Butcher GS (1988) Winter versus summer explanations of delayed plumage maturation in temperate passerine birds. Am Nat 131:556–572
Schuelke M (2000) An economic method for the fluorescent labeling of PCR fragments. Nat Biotechnol 18:233–234. https://doi.org/10.1038/72708
Sheldon BC (1993) Sexually transmitted disease in birds: occurrence and evolutionary significance. Proc R Soc Lond B 339:491–497
Sheldon BC (1994) Male phenotype, fertility, and the pursuit of extra-pair copulations by female birds. Proc R Soc Lond B 257:25–30. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1994.0089
Slatyer RA, Mautz BS, Backwell PRY, Jennions MD (2011) Estimating genetic benefits of polyandry from experimental studies: a meta-analysis. Biol Rev 87:1–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.2011.00132.x
Smith WJ (1966) Communications and relationships in the genus Tyrannus. Publications of the Nuttall Ornithological Club, no. 6. Cambridge, MA
Swaddle JP, Lockwood R (2003) Wingtip shape and flight performance in the European Starling Sturnus vulgarus. Ibis 145:457–464. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1474-919X.2003.00189.x
Swaddle JP, Witter MS, Cuthill IC, Budden A, McCowen P (1996) Plumage condition affects flight performance in common starlings: implications for developmental homeostasis, abrasion and moult. J Avian Biol 27:103–111. https://doi.org/10.2307/3677139
Tarof SA, Kramer PM, Tautin J, Stutchbury BJM (2012) Effects of known age on male paternity in a migratory songbird. Behav Ecol 23:313–321. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arr188
Thomas ALR (1993) The aerodynamic costs of asymmetry in the wings and tail of birds: asymmetric birds can’t fly round tight corners. Proc R Soc Lond B 254:181–189. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1993.0144
Weaver RJ, Santos ESA, Tucker AM, Wilson AE, Hill GE (2018) Carotenoid metabolism strengthens the link between feather coloration and individual quality. Nat Commun 9:37. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-0249-z
Webster MS, Tarvin KA, Tuttle EM, Pruett-Jones S (2007) Promiscuity drives sexual selection in a socially monogamous bird. Evolution 61:2205–2210. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00208.x
Westneat DF, Rambo TB (2000) Copulation exposes female red-winged blackbirds to bacteria in male semen. J Avian Biol 31:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-048X.2000.310101.x
Westneat DF, Stewart IRK (2003) Extra-pair paternity in birds: causes, correlates, and conflict. Annu Rev Ecol Evol S 34:365–396. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132439
Whittingham LA, Freeman-Gallant CR, Taff CC, Dunn PO (2015) Different ornaments signal male health and MHC variation in two populations of a warbler. Mol Ecol 24:1584–1595. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.13130
Wolfenbarger LL (1999) Red coloration of male northern cardinals correlates with mate quality and territory quality. Behav Ecol 10:80–90
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to C.M. Curry, K.A. Roeder, L. Weider, J. Kelly, E.S.A. Santos, and an anonymous reviewer for critiques that improved this manuscript. We also thank personnel at the Wichita Mountains Wildlife Refuge (particularly T. Booth, D. McDonald, W. Munsterman, and S. Hodge) and Fort Sill Natural Resources Division (particularly G. Wampler and T. Hodgkins) for access to field sites and guidance when working on an active artillery base. We are particularly grateful to D. Winters, A.J. Becker, A.C. Dolan, and A. Harris for superb field and lab assistance, to T. Steil and R. Madding for logistical support, and to M. and B. Roeder for additional support.
Funding
DVR was supported by a Department of Education Graduate Assistance in Areas of National Need Fellowship. Funding for field and lab work was provided to DVR by the George Miksch Sutton Scholarship in Ornithology, Sigma Xi, Oklahoma Ornithological Society, M. Blanche and M. Frances Adams Research Scholarship, and the OU Graduate Student Senate and Graduate College; to MSH by Cameron University; and to MTM by the National Science Foundation (IOS-0439370).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare they have no conflicts of interest.
Ethical approval
All applicable international, national, and institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed. All procedures performed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institution at which the studies were conducted. The study was conducted under the United States Department of the Interior Federal Bird Banding permit #23215 and University of Oklahoma Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee protocols R09-024, R12-101, and R15-006. All necessary permissions and permits were provided by the Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation, Wichita Mountains Wildlife Refuge, and Fort Sill Artillery Base.
Additional information
Communicated by A. Pilastro
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(DOCX 15 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Roeder, D.V., Husak, M.S., Murphy, M.T. et al. Size, ornamentation, and flight feather morphology promote within-pair paternity in a sexually dimorphic passerine. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 73, 90 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-019-2704-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-019-2704-x
Keywords
- Cuckoldry
- Sexual selection
- Flight performance
- Asymmetry
- Color
- Tyrannus forficatus