Skip to main content

Allomaternal care, brains and fertility in mammals: who cares matters

Abstract

The expensive brain hypothesis predicts that the lowest stable level of energy input sets the upper limit to a species’ brain size. This prediction receives comparative support from the effects of experienced seasonality (including hibernation) and diet quality on mammalian brain size. Here, we test another prediction, which concerns the temporal stability of energy inputs. Allomaternal care in mammals can be provided by breeding males or other helpers (usually earlier offspring). Male care should be stable and reliable since otherwise no breeding would occur. Care by others, in contrast, should fluctuate, as the availability of helpers often varies. One would therefore predict, other things being equal, that the presence of male care in addition to maternal care should show positive correlated evolution with brain size, whereas care by others would not. However, because females can readily respond through litter size adjustments to variable amounts of energy inputs, helper inputs may be used to increase fertility. A detailed comparative analysis of a large sample of mammals (N = 478 species) showed that male help is correlated with the evolution of larger brains, whereas alloparental help is correlated with higher fertility, but only in species where male care is also present (as in cooperative breeders). Humans evolved an unusual form of multi-family cooperative breeding, which involves stable and reliable care by both fathers and alloparents. This combination helps to explain why humans differ from the other apes in having both an extremely large brain and a relatively high reproductive output.

Significance statement

Allomaternal care provides breeding females with energy, directly or indirectly, and so would be expected to affect fertility and/or brain size. Which path evolution actually took remains controversial, partly because previous studies did not separate between care provided by the breeding male (paternal care) and care by non-breeding helpers (alloparental care). We distinguish between them because we expect that selection only favours increased brain size if the increase in energy available to the female is predictable and constant. Using a sample of 478 mammals, we show that paternal care, which is both reliable and stable, shows correlated evolution with brain size, whereas alloparental care, which fluctuates with varying availability of helpers, is correlated with higher fertility. Thus, constraints on brain size, imposed by its high-energy costs, may predict brain size better than the fitness benefits of improved cognitive abilities per se.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are thankful to the editor and the two anonymous reviewers for their constructive and thoughtful comments on previous versions of the manuscript.

Funding

Financial support was provided by the Swiss National Science Foundation grant no. 31003A-144210, the A.H. Schultz Foundation and the University of Zurich.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sandra A. Heldstab.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Ethical statement

All sources of data were from the literature or the web and did not involve ethical approval.

Data availability

The dataset and all additional analyses supporting the conclusions of this article are available in this published article and in the supplementary information files.

Additional information

Communicated by M. Raymond

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic Supplementary Material

ESM 1

(XLSX 80.2 kb)

ESM 2

(PDF 501  kb)

ESM 3

(DOCX 123 kb)

ESM 4

(PDF 239 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Heldstab, S.A., Isler, K., Burkart, J.M. et al. Allomaternal care, brains and fertility in mammals: who cares matters. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 73, 71 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-019-2684-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-019-2684-x

Keywords

  • Allomaternal care
  • Paternal care
  • Cooperative breeding
  • Brain size
  • Fertility
  • Reproduction