Temperature alters multimodal signaling and mating success in an ectotherm

Abstract

Temperature affects ectotherms in a variety of ways. These effects can be especially complex in sexual behaviors, as different sexes may be affected differently by temperature. We examined this in the jumping spider, Habronattus clypeatus. In this species, males court females using visual and vibratory signals. We tested whether key intersexual behaviors would change with temperature in similar, predictable ways across males and females. We first measured temperature and apparent activity of individuals across the day. We found that H. clypeatus are active across a wide range of temperatures (11–56 °C) and are most active at times of day when temperature ranges from 13 to 46 °C. Next, we performed mating experiments across behaviorally relevant temperatures. Females were more likely to allow males to progress to later stages of courtship and had higher mating rates at higher temperatures. Male visual and vibratory courtship behaviors generally became faster, higher-pitched, and lower in amplitude at higher temperatures. This relationship between temperature and signal aspects attained a roughly curvilinear shape, with an asymptote around 40 °C. Intriguingly, mating rates in the lab were highest at temperatures potentially above those during peak spider activity in the field. Our results suggest that temperature’s effects on behavior are complex and can affect males and females differently. This work emphasizes that understanding temperature effects on mating is critical to understanding sexual selection patterns particularly in species which use complex signals.

Significance statement

Temperature affects communication in most ectothermic species. Previous research has shown that temperature changes courter signals and chooser choice. However, this has never been investigated in species that use multimodal signals. We investigate how signals and choice change across temperatures in a desert-dwelling jumping spider. Using field temperature/activity modeling and a series of courtship experiments in the lab, we show that male signals and female choice change with temperature across biologically relevant ranges. Our results suggest that the temperatures at which mating is most likely occur at times of the day when animals are least active. These counterintuitive results highlight the importance of understanding how behavior in a controlled lab environment corresponds to natural field conditions as well as the importance of examining the effects of naturally occurring environmental variation on behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Data Availability

Data are available upon request from the corresponding author.

References

  1. Abram PK, Boivin G, Moiroux J, Brodeur J (2017) Behavioural effects of temperature on ectothermic animals: unifying thermal physiology and behavioural plasticity. Biol Rev 92:1859–1876. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12312

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Allen BJ, Levinton JS (2014) Sexual selection and the physiological consequences of habitat choice by a fiddler crab. Oecologia 176:25–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-014-3002-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Angilletta MJ (2009) Looking for answers to questions about heat stress: researchers are getting warmer. Funct Ecol 23:231–232. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2009.01548.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bro-Jørgensen J (2010) Dynamics of multiple signalling systems: animal communication in a world in flux. Trends Ecol Evol 25:292–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2009.11.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Byers J, Hebets E, Podos J (2010) Female mate choice based upon male motor performance. Anim Behav 79:771–778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.01.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Carducci JP, Jakob EM (2000) Rearing environment affects behaviour of jumping spiders. Anim Behav 59:39–46. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1999.1282

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Carlson BE, Rowe MP (2009) Temperature and desiccation effects on the antipredator behavior of Centruroides vittatus (Scorpiones: Buthidae). J Arachnol 37:321–330. https://doi.org/10.1636/Hi09-06.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Casey TM (1981) Behavioral mechanisms of thermoregulation. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  9. Clissold FJ, Coggan N, Simpson SJ (2013) Insect herbivores can choose microclimates to achieve nutritional homeostasis. J Exp Biol 216:2089–2096. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.078782

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Clusella-Trullas S, van Wyk JH, Spotila JR (2007) Thermal melanism in ectotherms. J Therm Biol 32:235–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtherbio.2007.01.003

  11. Conrad T, Stöcker C, Ayasse M (2017) The effect of temperature on male mating signals and female choice in the red mason bee, Osmia bicornis (L.). Ecol Evol 7:8966–8975. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3331

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Cooper WE (2000) Effect of temperature on escape behaviour by an ectothermic vertebrate, the keeled earless lizard (Holbrookia propinqua). Behaviour 137:1299–1315. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853900501935

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Doherty JA (1985) Temperature coupling and trade-off phenomena in the acoustic communication-system of the cricket, Gryllus-Bimaculatus De Geer (Gryllidae). J Exp Biol 114:17–35

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dunlap KD, Smith GT, Yekta A (2000) Temperature dependence of electrocommunication signals and their underlying neural rhythms in the weakly electric fish, Apteronotus leptorhynchus. Brain Behav Evol 55:152–162. https://doi.org/10.1159/000006649

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Edmunds LN (1963) The relation between temperature and flashing intervals in adult male fireflies, Photinus pyralis. Ann Entomol Soc Am 56:716–718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Elias DO, Mason AC, Maddison WP, Hoy RR (2003) Seismic signals in a courting male jumping spider (Araneae: Salticidae). J Exp Biol 206:4029–4039. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.00634

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Elias DO, Hebets EA, Hoy RR, Mason AC (2005) Seismic signals are crucial for male mating success in a visual specialist jumping spider (Araneae: Salticidae). Anim Behav 69:931–938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.06.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Elias DO, Hebets EA, Hoy RR (2006a) Female preference for complex/novel signals in a spider. Behav Ecol 17:765–771. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arl005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Elias DO, Land BR, Mason AC, Hoy RR (2006b) Measuring and quantifying dynamic visual signals in jumping spiders. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol 192:785–797. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-006-0116-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Elias DO, Maddison WP, Peckmezian C et al (2012) Orchestrating the score: complex multimodal courtship in the Habronattus coecatus group of Habronattus jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae). Biol J Linn Soc 105:522–547. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2011.01817.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Enger PS, Szabo T (1968) Effect of temperature on the discharge rates of the electric organ of some gymnotids. Comp Biochem Physiol 27:625–627. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-406X(68)90263-6

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Friard O, Gamba M (2016) BORIS: a free, versatile open-source event-logging software for video/audio coding and live observations. Methods Ecol Evol 7:1325–1330. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gerhardt HC (1978) Temperature coupling in the vocal communication system of the gray tree frog, Hyla versicolor. Science 199:992–994. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.199.4332.992

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Gerhardt HC, Mudry KM (1980) Temperature effects on frequency preferences and mating call frequencies. J Comp Physiol 137:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gibson JS, Uetz GW (2008) Seismic communication and mate choice in wolf spiders: components of male seismic signals and mating success. Anim Behav 75:1253–1262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.09.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Girard MB, Kasumovic MM, Elias DO (2011) Multi-modal courtship in the peacock spider, Maratus volans (OP-Cambridge, 1874). PLoS One 6:e25390. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025390

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Girard MB, Elias DO, Kasumovic MM (2015) Female preference for multi-modal courtship: multiple signals are important for male mating success in peacock spiders. Proc R Soc B 282:20152222. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.2222

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Greenfield MD, Medlock C (2007) Temperature coupling as an emergent property: parallel thermal effects on male song and female response do not contribute to species recognition in an acoustic moth. Evolution 61:1590–1599. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00140.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Heath JE, Josephson RK (1970) Body temperature and singing in the katydid, Neoconocephalus robustus (Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae). Biol Bull 138:272–285. https://doi.org/10.2307/1540212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hebets EA, Papaj DR (2005) Complex signal function: developing a framework of testable hypotheses. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 57:197–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-004-0865-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Hedin M, Lowder MC (2009) Phylogeography of the Habronattus amicus species complex (Araneae: Salticidae) of western North America, with evidence for localized asymmetrical mitochondrial introgression. Zootaxa:39–60

  32. Hedrick A, Perez D, Lichti N, Yew J (2002) Temperature preferences of male field crickets (Gryllus integer) alter their mating calls. J Comp Physiol A 188:799–805. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-002-0368-9

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Higham JP, Hebets EA (2013) An introduction to multimodal communication. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 67:1381–1388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-013-1590-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Hochachka PW (2002) Biochemical adaptation: mechanism and process in physiological evolution, 1st edn. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  35. Huey RB, Kingsolver JG (1989) Evolution of thermal sensitivity of ectotherm performance. Trends Ecol Evol 4:131–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-5347(89)90211-5

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Iwasa Y, Pomiankowski A (1994) The evolution of mate preferences for multiple sexual ornaments. Evolution 48:853–867. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1994.tb01367.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Johnstone RA (1996) Multiple displays in animal communication: “backup signals” and “multiple messages”. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 351:329–338. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1996.0026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Kearney M, Shine R, Porter WP (2009) The potential for behavioral thermoregulation to buffer “cold-blooded” animals against climate warming. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106:3835–3840. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0808913106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Kotiaho J, Alatalo RV, Mappes J, Parri S (1996) Sexual selection in a wolf spider: male drumming activity, body size, and viability. Evolution 50:1977–1981. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1996.tb03584.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Kotiaho JS, Alatalo RV, Mappes J, Parri S (1999) Sexual signalling and viability in a wolf spider (Hygrolycosa rubrofasciata): measurements under laboratory and field conditions. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 46:123–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002650050601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Leduc-Robert G, Maddison WP (2018) Phylogeny with introgression in Habronattus jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae). BMC Evol Biol 18:24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-018-1137-x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Lim MLM, Land MF, Li D (2007) Sex-specific UV and fluorescence signals in jumping spiders. Science 315:481–481. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1134254

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Lim MLM, Li J, Li D (2008) Effect of UV-reflecting markings on female mate-choice decisions in Cosmophasis umbratica, a jumping spider from Singapore. Behav Ecol 19:61–66. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arm100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Maddison W, McMahon M (2000) Divergence and reticulation among montane populations of a jumping spider (Habronattus pugillis Griswold). Syst Biol 49:400–421

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Manica LT, Macedo RH, Graves JA, Podos J (2017) Vigor and skill in the acrobatic mating displays of a Neotropical songbird. Behav Ecol 28:164–173. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arw143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Martin TL, Huey RB (2008) Why “suboptimal” is optimal: Jensen’s inequality and ectotherm thermal preferences. Am Nat 171:E102–E118. https://doi.org/10.1086/527502

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Masta SE, Maddison WP (2002) Sexual selection driving diversification in jumping spiders. PNAS 99:4442–4447. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.072493099

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Menda G, Shamble PS, Nitzany EI, Golden JR, Hoy RR (2014) Visual perception in the brain of a jumping spider. Curr Biol 24:2580–2585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2014.09.029

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Michaelidis CI, Demary KC, Lewis SM (2006) Male courtship signals and female signal assessment in Photinus greeni fireflies. Behav Ecol 17:329–335. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arj035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Moller AP, Pomiankowski A (1993) Why have birds got multiple sexual ornaments? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 32:167–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00173774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Partan S, Marler P (1999) Communication goes multimodal. Science 283:1272–1273. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.283.5406.1272

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Partan SR, Marler P (2005) Issues in the classification of multimodal communication signals. Am Nat 166:231–245. https://doi.org/10.1086/431246

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Pires A, Hoy RR (1992) Temperature coupling in cricket acoustic communication. J Comp Physiol A 171:69–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00195962

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Podos J (1997) A performance constraint on the evolution of trilled vocalizations in a songbird family (Passeriformes: Emberizidae). Evolution 51:537–551. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1997.tb02441.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Ritchie MG, Saarikettu M, Livingstone S, Hoikkala A (2001) Characterization of female preference functions for Drosophila montana courtship song and a test of the temperature coupling hypothesis. Evolution 55:721–727

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Shimizu I, Barth FG (1996) The effect of temperature on the temporal structure of the vibratory courtship signals of a spider (Cupiennius salei Keys.). J Comp Physiol A 179:363–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00194990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Symes LB, Rodríguez RL, Höbel G (2017) Beyond temperature coupling: effects of temperature on ectotherm signaling and mate choice and the implications for communication in multispecies assemblages. Ecol Evol 7:5992–6002. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3059

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Taylor LA, Clark DL, McGraw KJ (2014) Natural variation in condition-dependent display colour does not predict male courtship success in a jumping spider. Anim Behav 93:267–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.05.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Ueda I, Shinoda F, Kamaya H (1994) Temperature-dependent effects of high-pressure on the bioluminescence of firefly luciferase. Biophys J 66:2107–2110

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Uhl G, Elias DO (2011) Communication. In: Herberstein ME (ed) Spider behaviour flexibility and versatility. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 127–189

  61. van Doorn GS, Weissing FJ (2004) The evolution of female preferences for multiple indicators of quality. Am Nat 164:173–186. https://doi.org/10.1086/422203

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Weatherhead P, Robertson I (1992) Thermal constraints on swimming performance and escape response of northern water snakes (Nerodia sipedon). Can J Zool Rev Can Zool 70:94–98. https://doi.org/10.1139/z92-014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Wilson AJ, Dean M, Higham JP (2013) A game theoretic approach to multimodal communication. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 67:1399–1415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-013-1589-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Wood S (2006) Generalized additive models: an introduction with R, 1st edn. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  65. Zurek DB, Nelson XJ (2012a) Saccadic tracking of targets mediated by the anterior-lateral eyes of jumping spiders. J Comp Physiol A 198:411–417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-012-0719-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Zurek DB, Nelson XJ (2012b) Hyperacute motion detection by the lateral eyes of jumping spiders. Vis Res 66:26–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2012.06.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank everyone involved in the lengthy temperature and activity surveys (Maddie Girard, Chrissy Rivera, and Chung-Huey Wu). Desdeneyra Elias, Frank Sanchez, and Gabriela Sanchez graciously provided housing during field studies, and undergraduates Karena Tang and Gordon Lau helped with feeding spiders. Masami Amakawa performed many of the room temperature mate choice trials and provided vital logistical support throughout. We would also like to thank all members of the Lacey and Elias lab groups for helpful comments and criticisms, particularly Malcolm Rosenthal. We also thank two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on this manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation (award no. IOS-1556421 to DOE), by the Hellman Family Faculty Fund to JPK, and by the NSF CiBER-IGERT (award no. 0903711 to EEB).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erin E. Brandt.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Communicated by J. Pruitt

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(PDF 249 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brandt, E.E., Kelley, J.P. & Elias, D.O. Temperature alters multimodal signaling and mating success in an ectotherm. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 72, 191 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-018-2620-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • Communication
  • Temperature
  • Thermal ecology
  • Salticidae
  • Sexual selection
  • Multimodal signals
  • Vibratory communication
  • Biotremology