Abstract
Camouflage is a widespread strategy to avoid predation and is of particular importance for animals with reduced mobility or those in exposed habitats. Camouflage often relies on matching the visual appearance of the background, and selecting fine-scale backgrounds that complement an individual’s appearance is an effective means of optimising camouflage. We investigated whether there was an active selection of microhabitats and nest materials in three ground-nesting birds (pied avocet, Kentish plover, and little tern) to camouflage their eggs using avian visual modelling. Plovers and avocets selected substrates in which their eggs were better camouflaged, and that choice was done at an individual level. Terns have lighter, less spotted eggs, and while they did select lighter background than the other species, their eggs were a poor match to their backgrounds. The worse matching of the tern eggs was likely due to a compromise between thermal protection and camouflage because they breed later, when temperatures are higher. Finally, the addition of nest materials improved egg camouflage in terms of luminance, although the materials reduced pattern matching, which may be associated with the different roles that the nest materials play. Active selection of substrates at an individual level may be crucial to improve nest success in species that nest in exposed sites.
Significance statement
Many bird species nest on the ground at sites with no vegetation cover where their nests are exposed to visual predators. We studied whether individual females chose nest substrates that improved the camouflage of their eggs. Using images of nests and avian vision modelling, we found that the choice of nesting substrates in two species was done at the individual level, so that egg camouflage was optimised. In addition, such species were even able to improve egg camouflage by the addition of materials into the nests. However, this pattern was not observed in another species with paler and less spotted eggs, which may reflect a trade-off between camouflage and overheating of eggs because it breeds later in the season. Although individuals may try to choose substrates in which their eggs are better camouflaged, other factors that compromise offspring survival may hamper this.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amat JA, Masero JA (2004) Predation risk on incubating adults constrains the choice of thermally favourable sites in a plover. Anim Behav 67:293–300
Amat JA, Masero JA (2007) The functions of belly-soaking in Kentish plovers Charadrius alexandrinus. Ibis 149:91–97
Amat JA, Monsa R, Masero JA (2012) Dual function of egg-covering in the Kentish plover Charadrius alexandrinus. Behaviour 149:881–895
Amat JA, Gómez J, Liñán-Cembrano G, Rendón MA, Ramo C (2017) Incubating terns modify risk-taking according to diurnal variations in egg camouflage and ambient temperature. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 71:72
Bailey IE, Muth F, Morgan K, Meddle SL, Healy SD (2015) Birds build camouflaged nests. Auk 132:11–15
Baker AJ, Pereira SL, Paton TA (2007) Phylogenetic relationships and divergence times of Charadriiformes genera: multigene evidence for the Cretaceous origin of at least 14 clades of shorebirds. Biol Lett 3:205–210
Barbosa A, Allen JJ, Mäthger LM, Hanlon RT (2012) Cuttlefish use visual cues to determine arm postures for camouflage. Proc R Soc Lond B 279:84–90
Bowmaker JK (1977) The visual pigments, oil droplets and spectral sensitivity of the pigeon (Columba livia). Vis Res 17:1129–1138
Carroll JM, Davis CA, Elmore RD, Fuhlendorf SD (2015) A ground-nesting galliform’s response to thermal heterogeneity: implications for ground-dwelling birds. PLoS One 10:e0143676
Cherry MI, Gosler AG (2010) Avian eggshell coloration: new perspectives on adaptive explanations. Biol J Linn Soc 100:753–762
Colwell MA, Meyer JJ, Hardy MA, Mcallister SE, Transou AN, Levalley RR, Dinsmore SJ (2011) Western snowy plovers Charadrius alexandrinus nivosus select nesting substrates that enhance egg crypsis and improve nest survival. Ibis 153:303–311
Core Team R (2015) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria http://www.R-project.org/
Cunningham JA, Kesler DC, Lanctot RB (2016) Habitat and social factors influence nest-site selection in Arctic-breeding shorebirds. Auk 133:364–377
Cuthill IC (2006) Color perception. In: Hill GE, McGraw KJ (eds) Bird coloration, Mechanisms and measurements, vol I. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MS, pp 3–40
del Hoyo J, Elliott A, Sargatal J (1996) Handbook of the birds of the world, vol 3: Hoatzin to Auks. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona, Spain
Duarte RC, Flores AAV, Stevens M (2017) Camouflage through colour change: mechanisms, adaptive value, and ecological significance. Phil Trans R Soc B 372:20160342
Edelaar P, Baños-Villalba A, Escudero G, Rodríguez-Bernal C (2017) Background colour matching increases with risk of predation in a colour-changing grasshopper. Behav Ecol 28:698–705
Ekanayake KB, Weston MA, Nimmo DG, Maguire GS, Endler JA, Küpper C (2015) The bright incubate at night: sexual dichromatism and adaptive incubation division in an open-nesting shorebird. Proc R Soc B 282:20143026
Endler JA (1978) A predator’s view of animal color patterns. Evol Biol 11:319–364
Figuerola J (2007) Climate and dispersal: black-winged stilts disperse further in dry springs. PLoS One 2:e539
Fontaine JJ, Martin TE (2006) Parent birds assess nest predation risk and adjust their reproductive strategies. Ecol Lett 9:428–434
Gómez J, Liñán-Cembrano G (2017) SpotEgg: an image-processing tool for automatised analysis of coloration and spottiness. J Avian Biol 48:502–512
Gómez J, Pereira AI, Pérez-Hurtado A, Castro M, Ramo C, Amat JA (2016) A trade-off between overheating and camouflage on shorebird eggshell coloration. J Avian Biol 47:346–353
Gosler AG, Barnett PR, Reynolds SJ (2000) Inheritance and variation in eggshell patterning in the great tit Parus major. Proc R Soc Lond B 267:2469–2473
Grant GS (1982) Avian incubation: egg temperature, nest humidity, and behavioral thermoregulation in a hot environment. Ornithol Monogr 30:1–75
Hart NS (2002) Vision in the peafowl (Aves: Pavo cristatus). J Exp Biol 205:3925–3935
Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1986) Soil-binding pilosity and camouflage in ants of the tribes Basicerotini and Stegomyrmecini (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Zoomorphology 106:12–20
Hultgren KM, Stachowicz JJ (2008) Alternative camouflage strategies mediate predation risk among closely related co-occurring kelp crabs. Oecologia 155:519–528
Kang C, Stevens M, Moon JY, Lee SI, Jablonski PG (2015) Camouflage through behavior in moths: the role of background matching and disruptive coloration. Behav Ecol 26:45–54
Kilner RM (2006) The evolution of egg colour and patterning in birds. Biol Rev 81:383–406
Lathi DC (2008) Population differentiation and rapid evolution of egg color in accordance with solar radiation. Auk 125:796–802
Lee WS, Kwon YS, Yoo JC (2010) Egg survival is related to the colour matching of eggs to nest background in black-tailed gulls. J Ornithol 151:765–770
Lee BY, Parra-Velandia FJ, Ng NK, Todd P (2014) An unusual form of camouflage in the mangrove crab Clistocoeloma merguiense. Bull Mar Sci 90:967–968
Lind O, Mitkus M, Olsson P, Kelber A (2014) Ultraviolet vision in birds: the importance of transparent eye media. Proc R Soc B 281:20132209
Lovell PG, Ruxton GD, Langridge KV, Spencer KA (2013) Egg-laying substrate selection for optimal camouflage by quail. Curr Biol 23:260–264
Manríquez PH, Lagos NA, Jara ME, Castilla JC (2009) Adaptive shell color plasticity during the early ontogeny of an intertidal keystone snail. P Natl Acad Sci USA 106:16298–16303
Marshall KL, Philpot KE, Stevens M (2016) Microhabitat choice in island lizards enhances camouflage against avian predators. Sci Rep 6:19815
Maurer G, Portugal SJ, Cassey P (2011) Review: an embryo’s eye view of avian eggshell pigmentation. J Avian Biol 42:494–504
Mayani-Parás F, Kilner RM, Stoddard MC, Rodríguez C, Drummond H (2015) Behaviorally induced camouflage: a new mechanism of avian egg protection. Am Nat 186:E91–E97
Mayer PM, Smith LM, Ford RG, Watterson DC, McCutchen MD, Ryan MR (2009) Nest construction by a ground-nesting bird represents a potential trade-off between egg crypticity and thermoregulation. Oecologia 159:893–901
Montevecchi WA (1976) Field experiments on the adaptive significance of avian eggshell pigmentation. Behaviour 58:26–39
Moreno J, Bustamante J, Viñuela J (1995) Nest maintenance and stone theft in the chinstrap penguin Pygoscelis antarctica. Polar Biol 15:533–540
Ödeen A, Håstad O (2013) The phylogenetic distribution of ultraviolet sensitivity in birds. BMC Evol Biol 13:36
Ödeen A, Håstad O, Almström P (2010) Evolution of ultraviolet vision in shorebirds (Charadriiformes). Biol Lett 6:370–374
Ortolani A (1999) Spots, stripes, tail tips and dark eyes: predicting the function of carnivore colour patterns using the comparative method. Biol J Linn Soc 67:433–476
Osorio D, Vorobyev M (2005) Photoreceptor spectral sensitivities in terrestrial animals: adaptations for luminance and colour vision. Proc R Soc Lond B 272:1745–1752
Pike TW (2011) Using digital cameras to investigate animal colouration: estimating sensor sensitivity functions. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65:849–858
Polo-Cavia N, Gomez-Mestre I (2017) Pigmentation plasticity enhances crypsis in larval newts: associated metabolic cost and background choice behaviour. Sci Rep 7:39739
Reid JM, Cresswell W, Holt S, Mallanby RJ, Whitfield DP, Ruxton GD (2002) Nest scrape design and clutch heat loss in pectoral sandpiper (Calidris melanotos). Funct Ecol 16:305–312
Ruxton GD, Stevens M (2015) The evolutionary ecology of decorating behaviour. Biol Lett 11:20150325
Ryer CH, Lemke JL, Boersma K, Levas S (2008) Adaptive coloration, behavior and predation vulnerability in three juvenile north Pacific flatfishes. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 359:62–66
Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW (2012) NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods 9:671–675
Siddiqi A, Cronin TW, Loew ER, Vorobyev M, Summers K (2004) Interspecific and intraspecific views of color signals in the strawberry poison frog Dendrobates pumilio. J Exp Biol 207:2471–2485
Skrade PD, Dinsmore SJ (2013) Egg crypsis in a ground-nesting shorebird influences nest survival. Ecosphere 4:1–9
Solís JC, de Lope F (1995) Nest and egg crypsis in the ground-nesting stone curlew Burhinus oedicnemus. J Avian Biol 26:135–138
Stachowicz JJ, Hay ME (2000) Geographic variation in camouflage specialization by a decorator crab. Am Nat 156:59–71
Stenzel LE, Warriner JC, Warriner JS, Wilson KS (1994) Long breeding dispersal of snowy plovers in western North America. J Anim Ecol 63:887–902
Stevens M, Cuthill IC (2006) Disruptive coloration, crypsis and edge detection in early visual processing. Proc R Soc Lond B 273:2141–2147
Stevens M, Merilaita S (2009) Animal camouflage: current issues and new perspectives. Phil Trans R Soc B 364:423–427
Stevens M, Merilaita S (2011) Animal camouflage: mechanisms and function. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
Stevens M, Párraga CA, Cuthill IC, Partridge JC, Troscianko TS (2007) Using digital photography to study animal coloration. Biol J Linn Soc 90:211–237
Stevens M, Broderick AC, Godley BJ, Lown AE, Troscianko J, Weber M, Weber SB (2015) Phenotype-environment matching in sand fleas. Biol Lett 11:20150494
Stevens M, Troscianko J, Wilson-Aggarwal JK, Spottiswoode CN (2017) Improvement of individual camouflage through background choice in ground-nesting birds. Nat Ecol Evol 1:1325–1333
Stoddard MC, Kupán K, Eyster HN, Rojas-Abreu W, Cruz-López M, Serrano-Meneses MA, Küpper C (2016) Camouflage and clutch survival in plovers and terns. Sci Rep 6:32059
Troscianko J, Stevens M (2015) Image calibration and analysis toolbox—a free software suite for objectively measuring reflectance, colour and pattern. Methods Ecol Evol 6:1320–1331
Troscianko J, Wilson-Aggarwal J, Spottiswoode CN, Stevens M (2016a) Nest covering in plovers: how modifying the visual environment influences egg camouflage. Ecol Evol 6:7536–7545
Troscianko J, Wilson-Aggarwal J, Stevens M, Spottiswoode CN (2016b) Camouflage predicts survival in ground-nesting birds. Sci Rep 6:19966
Troscianko J, Skelhorn J, Stevens M (2017) Quantifying camouflage: how to predict detectability from appearance. BMC Evol Biol 17:7
Underwood TJ, Sealy SG (2002) Adaptive significance of egg coloration. In: Deeming DC (ed) Avian incubation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 280–298
Uy FMK, Ravichandran S, Patel KS, Aresty J, Aresty PP, Audett RM, Chen K, Epple L, Jeffries SF, Serein GN, Tullis-Joyce P, Uy JAC (2017) Active background choice facilitates crypsis in a tropical crab. Biotropica 49:365–371
Vorobyev M, Osorio D (1998) Receptor noise as a determinant of colour thresholds. Proc R Soc Lond B 265:351–358
Wilson-Aggarwal JK, Troscianko JT, Stevens M, Spottiswoode CN (2016) Escape distance in ground-nesting birds differs with individual level of camouflage. Am Nat 188:231–239
Acknowledgments
Thanks to Antonio Gómez Ferrer for facilities at the study site and to the Consejería de Medio Ambiente of the Junta de Andalucía for authorising our study. Thanks to Robert G. Clark, Antón Pérez-Rodríguez, the editors, an anonymous reviewer, and Clemmes Küpper for comments on an earlier version.
Funding
JG was supported by a FPU predoctoral fellowship (FPU-12/01616) from Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte, Spain. Our project was funded by grant CGL2011-24230 from Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, Spain, with EU-ERDF financial support. JT and MS were funded by a Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) grant BB/J018309/1 to MS.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
JG designed the study and analysed the images. JT and MS contributed with materials and image analyses. JG, MC, AP-H, CR, and JAA collected the field data. JG analysed the dataset and wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed on later manuscript versions.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All applicable institutional and national guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed and approved by Comité Ético de Bienestar Animal from EBD-CSIC (reference CEBA-EBD_2011_01).
Additional information
Communicated by E. Fernandez-Juricic
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(DOCX 237 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gómez, J., Ramo, C., Troscianko, J. et al. Individual egg camouflage is influenced by microhabitat selection and use of nest materials in ground-nesting birds. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 72, 142 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-018-2558-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-018-2558-7