Advertisement

The pace-of-life syndrome revisited: the role of ecological conditions and natural history on the slow-fast continuum

  • Pierre-Olivier Montiglio
  • Melanie Dammhahn
  • Gabrielle Dubuc Messier
  • Denis Réale
Original Article
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Pace-of-life syndromes: a framework for the adaptive integration of behaviour, physiology and life-history

Abstract

The pace-of-life syndrome (i.e., POLS) hypothesis posits that behavioral and physiological traits mediate the trade-off between current and future reproduction. This hypothesis predicts that life history, behavioral, and physiological traits will covary under clearly defined conditions. Empirical tests are equivocal and suggest that the conditions necessary for the POLS to emerge are not always met. We nuance and expand the POLS hypothesis to consider alternative relationships among behavior, physiology, and life history. These relationships will vary with the nature of predation risk, the challenges posed by resource acquisition, and the energy management strategies of organisms. We also discuss how the plastic response of behavior, physiology, and life history to changes in ecological conditions and variation in resource acquisition among individuals determine our ability to detect a fast-slow pace of life in the first place or associations among these traits. Future empirical studies will provide most insights on the coevolution among behavior, physiology, and life history by investigating these traits both at the genetic and phenotypic levels in varying types of predation regimes and levels of resource abundance.

Significance statement

We revisit the pace-of-life syndrome hypothesis, suggesting that behaviors involving a risk of death or injury should coevolve with higher metabolic rates, higher fecundity, faster growth, and heightened mortality rates. Empirical support for this hypothesis is mixed. We show how relaxing some of the assumptions underlying the pace-of-life syndrome hypothesis allows us to consider alternative relationships among behavior, physiology, and life history, and why we fail to meet the predictions posed by the pace-of-life syndrome hypothesis in some populations. Our discussion emphasizes the need to re-integrate the role of the species’ natural history, ecological conditions, and phenotypic plasticity in shaping relationships among behavior, physiology, and life history.

Keywords

Behavior Immunity Life history strategies Metabolism Personality Trait interaction 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank all the participants of the two workshops Towards a general theory of the pace-of-life syndrome, held in Hannover in 2015 and 2016, for inspiring discussions as well as the Volkswagen Stiftung (Az. 89905) for generously funding these workshops. We thank Jonathan Wright and coauthors for providing us an unpublished manuscript. Members of DR’s laboratory provided constructive comments during the preparation of this manuscript. We also thank two anonymous reviewers for their comments on the initial version of this manuscript.

Funding information

POM was supported by post-doctoral fellowships from the Fonds de Recherche Québec: Nature et Technologies (FRQNT) and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC). GDM was supported by a FRQNT and a NSERC doctoral fellowship. MD was supported by a DFG research fellowship (DA 1377/2-1) and DFG return fellowship (DA 1377/2-2). This research was supported by an NSERC Discovery grant to DR.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Adriaenssens B, Johnsson JI (2009) Personality and life-history productivity: consistent or variable associations? Trends Ecol Evol 24:179–180CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bergeron P, Montiglio P-O, Réale D, Humphries MM, Gimenez O, Garant D (2013) Disruptive viability selection on adult exploratory behaviour in eastern chipmunks. J Evol Biol 26:766–774CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bergmüller R, Taborsky M (2010) Animal personality due to social niche specialisation. Trends Ecol Evol 25:504–511CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bijleveld AI, Massourakis G, van der Marel A, Dekinga A, Spaans B, van Gils JA, Piersma T (2014) Personality drives physiological adjustments and is not related to survival. Proc R Soc Lond B 281:20133135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Binder TR, Wilson ADM, Wilson SM, Suskic SD, Godin J-G, Cooke SJ (2016) Is there a pace-of-life syndrome linking boldness and metabolic capacity for locomotion in bluegill sunfish? Anim Behav 121:175–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Biro PA, Adriaenssens B, Sampson P (2014) Individual and sex-specific differences in intrinsic growth rate covary with consistent individual differences in behaviour. J Anim Ecol 83:1186–1195CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Biro PA, Stamps JA (2008) Are animal personality traits linked to life-history productivity? Trends Ecol Evol 23:361–368CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Biro PA, Stamps JA (2010) Do consistent individual differences in metabolic rate promote consistent individual differences in behavior? Trends Ecol Evol 25:653–659CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Bridger D, Bonner SJ, Briffa M (2015) Individual quality and personality: bolder males are less fecund in the hermit crab Pagurus bernhardus. Proc R Soc Lond B 282:20142492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brommer JE (2013) On between-individual and residual (co)variances in the study of animal personality: are you willing to take the “individual gambit”? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 67:1027–1032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brommer JE, Karell P, Ahola K, Karstinen T (2014) Residual correlations, and not individual properties, determine a nest defense boldness syndrome. Behav Ecol 25:802–812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brommer JE, Kluen E (2012) Exploring the genetics of nestling personality traits in a wild passerine bird: testing the phenotypic gambit. Ecol Evol 2:3032–3044CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Careau V, Bininda ORP, Thomas DW, Réale D, Humphries MM (2009) Exploration strategies map along fast-slow metabolic and life-history continua in muroid rodents. Funct Ecol 23:150–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Careau V, Garland T (2012) Performance, personality, and energetics: correlation, causation, and mechanism. Physiol Biochem Zool 85:543–571CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Careau V, Réale D, Garant D, Pelletier F, Speakman JR, Humphries MM (2013) Context-dependent correlation between resting metabolic rate and daily energy expenditure in wild chipmunks. J Exp Biol 216:418–426CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Careau V, Thomas D, Humphries MM, Réale D (2008) Energy metabolism and animal personality. Oikos 117:641–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Careau V, Thomas D, Pelletier F, Turki L, Landry F, Garant D, Réale D (2011) Genetic correlation between resting metabolic rate and exploratory behaviour in deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus). J Evol Biol 24:2153–2163CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Charmantier A, Mccleery RH, Cole LR, Perrins C, Kruuk LEB (2008) Adaptive phenotypic plasticity in response to climate change in a wild bird population. Science 320:800–804CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Cutts CJ, Metcalfe NB, Taylor AC (1998) Aggression and growth depression in juvenile Atlantic salmon: the consequences of individual variation in standard metabolic rate. J Fish Biol 52:1026–1037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dammhahn M, Dingemanse NJ, Niemelä PT, Réale D (2018) Pace-of-life syndromes : a framework for the adaptive integration of behaviour, physiology and life history. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 72:62–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dammhahn M, Landry-cuerrier M, Réale D, Garant D, Humphries MM (2017) Individual variation in energy-saving heterothermy affects survival and reproductive success. Funct Ecol 31:866–875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dingemanse NJ, Both C, Drent PJ, Tinbergen JM (2004) Fitness consequences of avian personalities in a fluctuating environment. Proc R SocLond B 271:847–852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dingemanse NJ, Bouwman KM, van de Pol M, van Overveld T, Patrick SC, Matthysen E, Quinn JL (2012a) Variation in personality and behavioural plasticity across four populations of the great tit Parus major. J Anim Ecol 81:116–126CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Dingemanse NJ, Dochtermann NA, Nakagawa S (2012b) Defining behavioural syndromes and the role of “syndrome deviation” in understanding their evolution. Behav Ecol 66:1543–1548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dingemanse NJ, Wolf M (2013) Between-individual differences in behavioural plasticity within populations: causes and consequences. Anim Behav 85:1031–1039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dixon SM, Baker RL (1987) Effects of fish on feeding and growth of larval Ischnura verticalis (Coenagrionidae: Odonata). Can J Zool 65:2276–2279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Dosmann A, Brooks KC, Mateo JM (2015) Evidence for a mechanism of phenotypic integration of behaviour and innate immunity in a wild rodent: implications for animal personality and ecological immunology. Anim Behav 101:179–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dubuc Messier G, Réale D, Perret P, Charmantier A (2016) Environmental heterogeneity and population differences in blue tits personality traits. Behav Ecol 28:arw148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ellis BJ, Del Giudice M, Shirtcliff EA (2013) Beyond allostatic load: The stress response system as a mechanism of conditional adaptation. Dev Psychopathol 26:1–20CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Fitzpatrick BM Underappreciated consequences of phenotypic plasticity for ecological speciation. Int J Ecol 2012, 2012:32–37Google Scholar
  31. Fraser DF, Gilliam JF (1987) Feeding under predation hazard: response of the guppy and Hart’s rivulus from sites with contrasting predation hazard. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 21:203–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gifford ME, Clay TA, Careau V (2014) Individual (co)variation in standard metabolic rate, feeding rate, and exploratory behavior in wild-caught semiaquatic salamanders. Physiol Biochem Zool 87:384–396CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Glazier DS (2015) Is metabolic rate a universal “pacemaker” for biological processes? Biol Rev 90:377–407CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Gluckman PD, Hanson MA, Spencer HG, Bateson P (2005) Environmental influences during development and their later consequences for health and disease: implications for the interpretation of empirical studies. Proc R Soc LondB 272:671–677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Guenther A, Trillmich F (2013) Photoperiod influences the behavioral and physiological phenotype during ontogeny. Behav Ecol 24:402–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Heads PA (1986) The costs of reduced feeding due to predator avoidance: potential effects on growth and fitness in Ischnura elegans larvae (Odonata: Zygoptera). Ecol Entomol 11:369–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hoogenboom MO, Armstrong JD, Groothuis TGG, Metcalfe NB (2013) The growth benefits of aggressive behavior vary with individual metabolism and resource predictability. Behav Ecol 24:253–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Husby A, Nussey DH, Visser ME, Wilson AJ, Sheldon BC, Kruuk LE (2010) Contrasting patterns of phenotypic plasticity in reproductive traits in two great tit (Parus major) populations. Evolution 64:2221–2237PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Jablonszky M, Szász E, Krenhardt K, Markó G, Hegyi G, Herényi M, Laczi M, Nagy G, Rosivall B, Szöllősi E, Török J, Garamszegi LZ (2018) Unravelling the relationships between life history, behaviour and condition under the pace-of-life syndomes hypothesis using long-term data from a wild bird. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 72:52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kontiainen P, Pietiäinen H, Huttunen K, Karell P, Kolunen H, Brommer JE (2009) Aggressive ural owl mothers recruit more offspring. Behav Ecol 20:789–796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Krebs JR (1980) Optimal foraging, predation risk and territory defense. Ardea 68:83–90Google Scholar
  42. Lahti K, Huuskonen H, Laurila A, Piironen J (2012) Metabolic rate and aggressiveness between brown trout populations. Funct Ecol 16:167–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lima SL (1988) Vigilance and diet selection: a simple example in the dark-eyed junco. Can J Zool 66:593–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lima SL, Dill LM (1990) Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Can J Zool 68:619–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Luttbeg B, Sih A (2010) Risk, resources and state-dependent adaptive behavioural syndromes. Phil Trans R Soc B 365:3977–3990CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Macarthur RH, Pianka ER (1966) On optimal use of a patchy environment. Am Nat 100:603–609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Martin JGA, Festa-Bianchet M (2011) Age-independent and age-dependent decreases in reproduction of females. Ecol Lett 14:576–581CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Martin LB II, Hasselquist D, Wikelski M (2006) Investment in immune defense is linked to pace of life in house sparrows. Oecologia 147:565–575CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Mathot KJ, Dingemanse NJ (2015) Energetics and behavior: unrequited needs and new directions. Trends Ecol Evol 30:199–206CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Mathot KJ, van den Hout PJ, Piersma T, Kempenaers B, Réale D, Dingemanse NJ (2011) Disentangling the roles of frequency-vs. state-dependence in generating individual differences in behavioural plasticity. Ecol Lett 14:1254–1262CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Mathot KJ, Wright J, Kempenaers B, Dingemanse NJ (2012) Adaptive strategies for managing uncertainty may explain personality-related differences in behavioural plasticity. Oikos 121:1009–1020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Miller JRB, Ament JM, Schmitz OJ (2014) Fear on the move: predator hunting mode predicts variation in prey mortality and plasticity in prey spatial response. J Anim Ecol 83:214–222CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Monaghan P (2008) Early growth conditions, phenotypic development and environmental change. Phil Trans R Soc B 363:1635–1645CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Montiglio P-O, Ferrari C, Réale D (2013) Social niche specialization under constraints: personality, social interactions and environmental heterogeneity. Phil Trans R Soc B 368:20120343CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  55. Montiglio P-O, Garant D, Bergeron P, Dubuc Messier G, Réale D (2014) Pulsed resources and the coupling between life-history strategies and exploration patterns in eastern chipmunks (Tamias striatus). J Anim Ecol 83:720–728CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Müller T, Müller C (2015) Behavioural phenotypes over the lifetime of a holometabolous insect. Front Zool 12:S8CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  57. Nicolaus M, Tinbergen JM, Bouwman KM, Michler SP, Ubels R, Both C, Kempenaers B, Dingemanse NJ (2012) Experimental evidence for adaptive personalities in a wild passerine bird. Proc R Soc LondB 279:4885–4892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Niemelä PT, Dingemanse NJ (2017) Individual versus pseudo-repeatability in behaviour: lessons from translocation experiments in a wild insect. J Anim Ecol 86:1033–1043CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Niemelä PT, Dingemanse NJ, Alioravainen N, Vainikka A, Kortet R (2013) Personality pace-of-life hypothesis: testing genetic associations among personality and life history. Behav Ecol 24:935–941CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Nussey DH, Wilson AJ, Brommer JE (2007) The evolutionary ecology of individual phenotypic plasticity in wild populations. J Evol Biol 20:831–844CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Pfennig DW, Wund MA, Snell-Rood EC, Cruickshank T, Schlichting CD, Moczek AP (2010) Phenotypic plasticity’s impacts on diversification and speciation. Trends Ecol Evol 25:459–467CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Pigliucci M (2005) Evolution of phenotypic plasticity: where are we going now? Trends Ecol Evol 20:481–486CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Promislow DEL, Harvey PH (1990) Living fast and dying young: a comparative analysis of life-history variation among mammals. J Zool 220:417–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Pruitt J, Ferrari M (2011) Intraspecific trait variants determine the nature of interspecific interactions in a habitat-forming species. Ecology 92:1902–1908CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Quinn JL, Cole EF, Patrick SC, Sheldon BC (2011) Scale and state dependence of the relationship between personality and dispersal in a great tit population. J Anim Ecol 80:918–928CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Réale D, Festa-Bianchet M (2003) Predator-induced natural selection on temperament in bighorn ewes. Anim Behav 65:463–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Réale D, Gallant BY, Leblanc M, Festa-Bianchet M (2000) Consistency of temperament in bighorn ewes and correlates with behaviour and life history. Anim Behav 60:589–597CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Réale D, Garant D, Humphries MM, Bergeron P, Careau V, Montiglio P-O (2010) Personality and the emergence of the pace-of-life syndrome concept at the population level. Phil Trans R Soc B 365:4051–4063CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  69. Réale D, Martin J, Coltman DW, Poissant J, Festa-Bianchet M (2009) Male personality, life-history strategies and reproductive success in a promiscuous mammal. J Evol Biol 22:1599–1607CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Ricklefs RE, Wikelski M (2002) The physiology/life-history nexus. Trends Ecol Evol 17:462–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Robinson MR, Wilson AJ, Pilkington JG, Clutton-Brock TH, Pemberton JM, Kruuk LEB (2009) The impact of environmental heterogeneity on genetic architecture in a wild population of soay sheep. Genetics 181:1639–1648CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  72. Roff D, Fairbairn DJ (2007) The evolution of trade-offs: where are we? J Evol Biol 20:433–447CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Royauté R, Berdal MA, Garrison CR, Dochtermann NA (2018) Paceless life? A meta-analysis of the pace-of-life syndrome hypothesis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 72:64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Royauté R, Greenlee K, Baldwin M, Dochtermann NA (2015) Behaviour, metabolism and size: phenotypic modularity or integration in Acheta domesticus? Anim Behav 110:163–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Santostefano F, Wilson AJ, Niemelä PT, Dingemanse NJ (2017) Behavioural mediators of genetic life-history trade-offs: a test of the pace-of-life syndrome hypothesis in field crickets. Proc R Soc Lond B 284:20171567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Scheiner SM (1993) Genetics and evolution of phenotypic plasticity. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 24:35–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Schmitz OJ, Krivan V, Ovadia O (2004) Trophic cascades: the primacy of trait-mediated indirect interactions. Ecol Lett 7:153–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Speakman JR (1997) Factors influencing the daily energy expenditure of small mammals. Proc Nutr Soc 56:119–1136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Stamps JA (2007) Growth-mortality tradeoffs and “personality traits” in animals. Ecol Lett 10:355–363CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Stearns SC (1983) The influence of size and phylogeny on patterns of cavariation among life-history traits in the mammals. Oikos 41:173–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Stearns SC (1989) Trade-offs in life-history evolution. Funct Ecol 3:259–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Stearns SC (1992) The evolution of life histories. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  83. Sultan SE, Spencer HG (2002) Metapopulation structure favors plasticity over local adaptation. Am Nat 160:271–283CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Thomas DW, Dorais M, Bergeron J (1990) Winter energy budget and cost of arousals for hibernating little brown bats, Myotis lucifugus. J Mammal 71:475–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Tieleman B, Williams J, Ricklefs R, Klasing K (2005) Constitutive innate immunity is a component of the pace-of-life syndrome in tropical birds. Proc R Soc Lond B 272:1715–1720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Timonin ME, Carrière CJ, Dudych AD, Latimer JGW, Unruh ST, Willis CKR (2011) Individual differences in the behavioural responses of meadow voles to an unfamiliar environment are not correlated with variation in resting metabolic rate. J Zool 284:198–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Turbill C, Bieber C, Ruf T (2011) Hibernation is associated with increased survival and the evolution of slow life histories among mammals. Proc R Soc Lond B 278:3355–3363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Urszán TJ, Török J, Hettyey A, Garamszegi LZ, Herczeg G (2015) Behavioural consistency and life history of Rana dalmatina tadpoles. Oecologia 178:129–140CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Vaanholt LM, de Jong B, Garland T, Daan S, Visser GH (2007) Behavioural and physiological responses to increased foraging effort in male mice. J Exp Biol 210:2013–2024CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. van Noordwijk AJ, de Jong G (1986) Acquisition and allocation of resources: their influence on variation in life history tactics. Am Nat 128:137–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Vuarin P, Dammhahn M, Henry P (2013) Individual flexibility in energy saving: body size and condition constrain torpor use. Funct Ecol 27:793–799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Walther GR, Post E, Convey P, Menzel A, Parmesan C, Beebee TJC, Fromentin J-M, Hoegh-Guldberg O, Bairlein F (2002) Ecological responses to recent climate change. Nature 416:389–395CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Wang IJ, Bradburd GS (2014) Isolation by environment. Mol Ecol 23:5649–5662CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. West-Eberhard M (2003) Developmental plasticity and evolution. Oxford University Press. In: OxfordGoogle Scholar
  95. White SJ, Kells TJ, Wilson AJ (2016) Metabolism, personality and pace of life in the Trinidadian guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Behaviour 153:1517–1543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Wiersma P, Verhulst S (2005) Effects of intake rate on energy expenditure, somatic repair and reproduction of zebra finches. J Exp Biol 208:4091–4098CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. Wikelski M, Ricklefs RE (2001) The physiology of life histories. Trends Ecol Evol 16:479–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Wolf M, van Doorn GS, Leimar O, Weissing FJ (2007) Life-history trade-offs favour the evolution of animal personalities. Nature 447:581–584CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. Ydenberg RC, Dill LM (1986) The economics of fleeing from predators. Adv Stud Behav 16:229–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Zylberberg M, Klasing KC, Hahn TP (2014) In house finches, Haemorhous mexicanus, risk takers invest more in innate immune function. Anim Behav 89:115–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Département des Sciences BiologiquesUniversité du Québec à MontréalMontrealCanada
  2. 2.Department of Biology & Redpath MuseumMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada
  3. 3.Animal Ecology, Institute for Biochemistry and BiologyUniversity of PotsdamPotsdamGermany
  4. 4.Centre d’Écologie Fonctionnelle et Évolutive (CEFE)Montpellier Cedex 5France

Personalised recommendations