Advertisement

The bone collector: temporal patterns of bone-gnawing behaviour define osteophagia as a female prerogative in a large rodent

  • Emiliano Mori
  • Sandro Lovari
  • Giuseppe Mazza
Original Article

Abstract

Calcium and phosphorous consumption is essential for bone development and maintenance throughout life, particularly to pregnant and lactating females. Bone consumption may provide mothers with the required supplemental amount of calcium and phosphorous. Osteophagia has been reported in a number of herbivore species as supplying such key mineral elements, although sound evidence is lacking for rodents. The diet of the crested porcupine is vegetarian and predominantly composed by roots and hypogeal storage organs. Gnawed bone residuals have often been observed in the surroundings of porcupine setts. This behaviour may have evolved to reduce the indefinite growth of incisor teeth, to increase calcium and phosphorous supply, or to fulfil both these functions. To clarify this issue, five setts were monitored for 3 years and bones in front of sett entries were counted and collected once a month. A total of 63 bones (mainly femurs and shins: 38.8%) was detected, mainly belonging to wild (46.03%) and domestic (28.57%) ungulates. The presence of gnawed bones in front of sett entries was recorded throughout the year, with a peak at the start of February. Camera-trapping data confirmed that areas surroundings house-farms, where most bones were probably collected, were only selected in the cold season. The peak of gnawed bone detection overlapped with the birth peak, suggesting that bones may be consumed by lactating females to increase the amount of minerals in their diet. This suggestion was further confirmed by the detection of no gnawed bones in front of the sett of the male-male pair.

Significance statement

Porcupines are known to collect and gnaw bones in the surroundings of their setts, but ecological explanations and temporal patterns of this behaviour are unknown. We monitored five setts for 3 years, measuring and identifying gnawed bones in front of sett entries once a month. We then conducted an intensive camera-trapping session to monitor areas surrounding house-farms. Bone collection occurred throughout the year, with a peak in February, coinciding with the birth peak of this species. We therefore suggested that bone consumption could be a female prerogative, related to a supply of minerals in diet, as no gnawed bone was observed at the sett of a male-male pair.

Keywords

Hystrix cristata Bone consumption Osteophagia Mineral supply Lactation period 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Dr. Francesco Ferretti kindly took the time to read and make comments on an earlier draft of this manuscript. EM and GM collected and analysed the data. Study design: EM and SL. Study conduct: EM, GM and SL. Data collection: EM. Data analysis: GM and EM. Data interpretation: SL, GM and EM. Drafting manuscript: SL and EM. Revising manuscript content: GM. Approving final version of manuscript: EM, SL and GM. EM takes responsibility for the integrity of the data analysis. Two anonymous referees improved greatly our manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Supplementary material

265_2018_2504_MOESM1_ESM.docx (26 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 25.6 kb)

References

  1. Agostinelli C, Lund U (2013) R package ‘circular’: circular statistics (version 0.4-7), https://r-forge.r-project.org/projects/circular/
  2. Akram F, Ilyas O (2016) Den-site selection of Indian porcupine and its physical characteristics in Central India landscape. Int J Ecol Environ Sci 42:295–302Google Scholar
  3. Atwood TC, Weeks HP Jr (2002) Sex and age-specific patterns of mineral lick use by white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus). Am Midl Nat 148:289–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Batschelet E (1981) Circular statistics in biology. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. Beisaw AM (2013) Identifying and interpreting animal bones: a manual (No. 18). Texas A&M University Press, AustinGoogle Scholar
  6. Best DA, Lynch GM, Rongstad OJ (1977) Annual spring movements of moose to mineral licks in Swan Hills Alberta. Trans N Am Moose Conf Workshop 13:215–228Google Scholar
  7. Borges RM (1990) Sexual and site differences in calcium consumption by the Malabar giant squirrel Ratufa indica. Oecologia 85:80–86CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Brain CK (1976) Some criteria for the recognition of bone collecting agencies in African caves. Berg Wartenstein Symposium No. 69. Wenner-Gren Foundation, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Bredin IP, Skinner JD, Mitchell G (2008) Can osteophagia provide giraffes with phosphorous and calcium? Onderstepoort J Vet 75:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brown CJ, Plug I (1990) Food choice and diet of the bearded vulture Gypaetus barbatus in southern Africa. S Afr J Zool 25:169–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Càceres I, Esteban-Nadal M, Bennàsar M, Fernàndez-Jalvo Y (2011) Was it the deer or the fox. J Archaeol Sci 38:2767–2774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Càceres I, Esteban-Nadal M, Bennàsar M, Marìn Monfort MD, Pesquero MD, Fernàndez-Jalvo Y (2013) Osteophagia and dental wear in herbivores: actualistic data and archaeological evidence. J Archaeol Sci 40:3105–3116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Carbyn LN (1975) Factors influencing activity patterns of ungulates at mineral licks. Can J Zool 53:378–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Carlson AJ (1940) Eating of bone by the pregnant and lactating gray squirrel. Science 91:573CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Ceacero F, Landete-Castillejos T, Miranda M, García AJ, Martínez A, Gallego L (2014) Why do cervids feed on aquatic vegetation? Behav Process 103:28–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Corbet NU, van Aarde RJ (1996) Social organization and space use in the Cape porcupine in a southern African savanna. Afr J Ecol 34:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Corsini MT, Lovari S, Sonnino S (1995) Temporal activity patterns of crested porcupines Hystrix cristata. J Zool 236:43–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dart RA (1958) Bone tools and porcupine gnawing. Am Anthropol 60:715–724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Denton DA, Blair-West JR, McKinley MJ, Nelson JF (1986) Problems and paradigms: physiological analysis of bone appetite (osteophagia). BioEssays 4:40–43CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Duthie AG, Skinner JD (1986) Osteophagia in the Cape porcupine Hystrix africaeaustralis. S Afr J Zool 21:316–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Farida WR, Ridwan R (2011) Giving of formulated pellet on Javan porcupine (Hystrix javanica F. Cuvier, 1823): effects on feed intake, feed conversion, and digestibility in pre-domestication condition. J Biol Inddonesia 7:157–170Google Scholar
  22. Ferretti MP (2007) Evolution of bone-cracking adaptations in hyaenids (Mammalia, Carnivora). Swiss J Geosci 100:41–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gambìn P, Ceacero F, Garcia AJ, Landete-Castillejos T, Gallego L (2017) Patterns of antler consumption reveal osteophagia as a natural mineral resource in key periods for red deer (Cervus elaphus). Eur J Wildlife Res 63:39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gow CE (1992) Gnawing of rock outcrop by porcupines. S Afr J Geol 95:74–75Google Scholar
  25. De Graaf G (1981) The rodents of Southern Africa. Butterworths Eds, DurbanGoogle Scholar
  26. Grasman BT, Hellgren EC (1993) Phosophorus nutrition in white-tailed deer: nutrient balance, physiological responses, and antler growth. Ecology 74:2279–2296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Henschel JR, Skinner JD (1990) The diet of the spotted hyaenas Crocuta crocuta in Kruger National Park. Afr J Ecol 28:69–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hillson S (2016) Mammal bones and teeth: an introductory guide to methods of identification. Routledge Publisher Editions, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hutson JM, Burke CB, Haynes G (2013) Osteophagia and bone modifications by giraffe and other large ungulates. J Archaeol Sci 40:4139–4149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ivlev VS (1961) Experimental ecology of the feeding of fishes. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  31. Kerbis-Peterhans JC, Horwitz LK (1992) A bone assemblage from a striped hyaena (Hyaena hyaena) den in the Negev desert, Israel. Isr J Zool 37:225–245Google Scholar
  32. Kibii JM (2009) Taphonomic aspects of African porcupines (Hystrix cristata) in the Kenyan highlands. J Taphon 7:21–27Google Scholar
  33. Klippel WE, Synstelien JA (2007) Rodents as taphonomic agents: bone gnawing by brown rats and gray squirrels. J Forensic Sci 52:765–773CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Kruuk H (1989) The social badger: ecology and behaviour of group living carnivore (Meles meles). Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  35. Laurenzi A, Bodino N, Mori E (2016) Much ado about nothing: assessing the impact of a problematic rodent on agriculture and native trees. Mammal Res 61:65–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lovari S, Sforzi A, Mori E (2013) Habitat richness affects home range size in a monogamous large rodent. Behav Process 99:42–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lovari S, Corsini MT, Guazzini B, Romeo G, Mori E (2017) Suburban ecology of the crested porcupine in a heavily poached area: a global approach. Eur J Wildlife Res 63:10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Maguire JM, Pemberton D, Collet MH (1980) The Makapansgat limeworks grey breccia: hominids, hyaenas, hysticids or hillwash? Palaeontol Afr 23:75–98Google Scholar
  39. Margalida A, Bertran J (2001) Function and temporal variation in use of ossuaries by bearded vultures (Gypaetus barbatus) during the nestling period. Auk 118:785–789CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Matsubayashi H, Lagan P, Majalap N, Tangah J, Sukor JRA, Kitayama K (2007) Importance of natural licks for the mammals in Bornean inland tropical rain forests. Ecol Res 22:742–748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McDonald P, Edwards RA, Greenhalgh JFD (1973) Animal nutrition. Longman Eds, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  42. McEvoy TG, Robinson JJ (2003) Nutrition and its interaction with reproductive process. In: Holt WV, Pickard AR, Rodger JC, Wildt DE (eds) Reproductive science and integrated conservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 42–56Google Scholar
  43. Mendelssohn H, Yom Tov Y (1987) Plants and animals of the land of Israel, vol 7: Mammals. Ministry of Defence and Society for the Protection of Nature, Alon Editions, Tel AvivGoogle Scholar
  44. Mitchell G, van Schalkwyk OL, Skinner JD (2005) The calcium and phosphorous content of giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis) and buffalo (Syncerus caffer) skeletons. J Zool 267:55–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mohr E (1965) Altweltliche Stachelschweine. A. Ziemsen Verlag, Wittenburg LutherstadtGoogle Scholar
  46. Mori E (2017) Porcupines in the landscape of fear: effects of hunting with dogs on the behaviour of a non-target species. Mammal Res 62:251–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mori E, Lovari S (2014) Sexual size monomorphism in the crested porcupine (Hystrix cristata). Mammal Biol 79:157–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mori E, Menchetti M, Dondini G, Biosa D, Vergari S (2014a) Theriofauna of site of community importance Poggi di Prata (Grosseto, Central Italy): terrestrial mammals and preliminary data on Chiroptera. Check-List 10:718–723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mori E, Lovari S, Sforzi A, Romeo G, Pisani C, Massolo A, Fattorini L (2014b) Patterns of spatial overlap in a monogamous large rodent, the crested porcupine. Behav Process 107:112–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mori E, Nourisson DH, Lovari S, Romeo G, Sforzi A (2014c) Self-defence may not be enough: moonlight avoidance in a large, spiny rodent. J Zool 294:31–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mori E, Menchetti M, Balestrieri A (2015) Interspecific den sharing: a study on European badger setts using camera traps. Acta Ethol 18:121–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mori E, Menchetti M, Lucherini M, Sforzi A, Lovari S (2016) Timing of reproduction and paternal cares in the crested porcupine. Mammal Biol 81:345–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Nichols CP, Gregory NG, Goode N, Gill RMA, Drewe JA (2017) Regulation of bone mineral density in the grey squirrel, Sciurus carolinensis: bioavailability of calcium oxalate, and implications for bark stripping. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (published online), doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.12740
  54. Pillay KR, Wilson A-L, Ramesh T, Downs CT (2015) Digestive parameters and energy assimilation of Cape porcupine on economically important crops. Afr Zool 50:321–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Rabinowitch R, Horwitz LK (1994) An experimental approach to the study of porcupine damage to bones: a gnawing issue. In: Patou-Matis M (ed) Outillage peu èlaborè en os en bois de Cervidès IV: Taphonomie. Editions du CEDARC, Treignes, pp 97–118Google Scholar
  56. Riccardi C, Bruno E (1996) Food intake of captive porcupines Hystrix cristata (Rodentia, Hystricidae). Atti Soc Tosc Sci Nat 103:81–83Google Scholar
  57. Robbins CT (1983) Wildlife feeding and nutrition. Academic Press, OrlandoGoogle Scholar
  58. Russel AJF, Doney JM, Gunn GB (1969) Subjective assessment of body fat in live sheep. J Agr Sci 72:451–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Santini L (1980) The habits and influence on the environment of the old world porcupine Hystrix cristata L. in the northernmost part of its range. In: Proceedings of the 9th Vertebrate Pest Conference. University of Nebraska, Lincoln, pp 149–153Google Scholar
  60. Schmidt CM, Hood WR (2012) Calcium availability influences litter size and sex ratio in white-footed mice (Peromyscus leucopus). PLoS One 7:e41402CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  61. Sever S (1985) Studies on the biology of the Indian crested porcupine (Hystrix indica) in the coastal plain of Israel. University of Tel Aviv, MSc ThesisGoogle Scholar
  62. Skinner JD, Davis S, Ilani G (1980) Bone collecting by striped hyaenas, Hyaena hyaena, in Israel. Paleont Afr 23:99–104Google Scholar
  63. Skinner JD, Henschel JR, van Jaarsveld AS (1986) Bone-collecting habits of spotted hyaenas Crocuta crocuta in the Kruger National Park. S Afr J Zool 21:303–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Sonnino S (1998) Spatial activity and habitat use of crested porcupine, Hystrix cristata L., 1758 (Rodentia, Hystricidae) in central Italy. Mammalia 62:175–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. van Jaarsveld AS (1983) Aspects of the digestion in the Cape porcupine. S Afr J Anim Sci 13:31–33Google Scholar
  66. Vaughan TA, Czaplewski NJ (1985) Reproduction in Stephens’ woodrat: the wages of folivory. J Mammal 66:429–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Warnes GR, Bolker B, BonebakkerLet al (2014) gplots: various R programming tools for plotting data, http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=gplots
  68. Więckowski W, Cohen S, Mienis HK, Horwitz LK (2013) The excavation and analysis of porcupine dens and burrowing on ancient and recent faunal and human remains at Tel Zahara (Israel). Bioarchaeol Near East 7:3–20Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dipartimento di Scienze della VitaUniversità di SienaSienaItaly
  2. 2.Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, Palazzo CorsiniRomeItaly
  3. 3.Museo di Storia Naturale della MaremmaGrossetoItaly
  4. 4.Dipartimento di BiologiaUniversità di FirenzeFirenzeItaly
  5. 5.Consiglio per la Ricerca in Agricoltura e l’Analisi dell’Economia Agraria (CREA), Research Centre for Plant Protection and Certification (CREA-DC)FlorenceItaly

Personalised recommendations