Occurrence of quiescence in free-ranging migratory songbirds
Quiescence is a period of inactivity that occurs before the onset of migratory activity in nocturnally migrating birds. This behavior has been observed in captive birds in migratory disposition, but its occurrence in free-ranging migratory birds has been documented only anecdotally, and causal factors and function(s), if any, are unknown. In this study, we documented and characterized quiescence in three migratory songbird species (red-eyed vireo [Vireo olivaceus], Swainson’s thrush [Catharus ustulatus], and wood thrush [Hylocichla mustelina]) by measuring movement and proportion of time spent inactive prior to departure from a stopover site during fall migration. Individuals of each species displayed a period of inactivity prior to departure which varied from less than 30 min to over 90 min with red-eyed vireos engaged in the longest, most pronounced quiescence. We also examined how quiescence was related to intrinsic and extrinsic factors known to influence the departure of migrating birds, and found some evidence for an effect of age and departure time but no effect of a migrant’s energetic condition, departure direction, atmospheric conditions around departure, or day of year on quiescence. Our novel application of an automated radiotelemetry system yielded a large amount of data to characterize quiescence in free-ranging migratory birds, and we provide guidance for future studies to tease apart the various causal factors and function(s) of this migratory behavior.
Quiescence is a poorly understood period of inactivity observed among captive and free-ranging migratory songbirds prior to the onset of nocturnal activity. Our novel use of automated radiotelemetry revealed quiescence among three intercontinental migratory songbirds. It also enabled us to ask how quiescence might be related to intrinsic and extrinsic factors known to influence the departure of migrating birds, and provided an opportunity to explore possible function(s), if any, of this intriguing behavior.
KeywordsQuiescence Migration Automated radiotelemetry Catharus ustulatus Hylocichla mustelina Vireo olivaceus
We thank our numerous field technicians at the University of Southern Mississippi (USM) Fort Morgan Peninsula Banding Station for their work and dedication as well as the USM radio tower crews and members of the USM Migratory Bird Research Group. We appreciate the Bon Secour National Wildlife Refuge for providing permission to conduct work on their property. We also thank Sarah Davidson and Rolf Weinzierl from Movebank.org, who assisted us in accessing atmospheric data. We thank Eben Paxton and two anonymous reviewers, who provided comments that substantially improved the quality of our paper. James Novak, Eric Bollinger, and Sean Peterson provided valuable feedback on the research and comments on earlier drafts. This work was supported by the National Science Foundation (IOS Award nos. 1146832, 1147096, and 1147022), National Geographic Society Committee on Research and Exploration (Award no. 8971-11), Eastern Illinois University (Research and Creative Activity Awards to JLD and LNS), University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, and University of Southern Mississippi. TJZ was supported by a National Science Foundation GK-12 Program Award (no. 0947944). Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the US Government.
Compliance with ethical standards
All research activities involving animals were approved by the University of Southern Mississippi Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (protocol no. 11092210), US Geological Survey Bird Banding Laboratory (permit no. 21221), and Bon Secour National Wildlife Refuge.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Able KP (1972) Fall migration in coastal Louisiana and the evolution of migration patterns in the Gulf region. Wilson Bull 84:231–242Google Scholar
- Berthold P (1996) Control of bird migration. Chapman and Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Bolshakov CV (1992) Evening movements and the start of nocturnal migratory flight in the fieldfare (Turdus pilaris): preliminary results. Proc Zool Inst 247:18–42 [Russian with English summary]Google Scholar
- Chernetsov N, Kishkinev D, Kosarev V, Bolshakov C V (2011) Not all songbirds calibrate their magnetic compass from twilight cues: a telemetry study. J Exp Biol 214:2540–2543Google Scholar
- Deppe JL, Ward MP, Bolus RT, Diehl RH, Celis-Murillo A, Zenzal TJ Jr, Moore FR, Benson TJ, Smolinsky JA, Schofield LN, Enstrom DA, Paxton EH, Bohrer G, Beveroth TA, Raim A, Obringer RL, Delaney D, Cochran WW (2015) Negotiating the Gulf of Mexico: fat, weather and date affect migratory songbirds’ departure decisions, routes, and crossing times. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112(46):E6331–E6338. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1503381112 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Dodge S, Bohrer G, Weinzierl R, Davidson SC, Kays R, Douglas D, Cruz S, Han J, Brandes D, Wikelski M (2013) The environmental-data automated track annotation (Env-DATA) system: linking animal tracks with environmental data. Mov Ecol 1(1):3. https://doi.org/10.1186/2051-3933-1-3 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Downey A (2013) Think Bayes. O'reilly Media, SebastopolGoogle Scholar
- Emlen S (1980) Decision making by nocturnal bird migrants: the integration of multiple cues. In: Nohring R (ed) Acta XVII International Ornithological Congress. Deutsche Ornithologen-Gesellschaft, Berlin, pp 553–560Google Scholar
- Emlen ST, Emlen JT (1966) A technique for recording orientation of captive birds. Auk 83:361–367Google Scholar
- Goymann W, Lupi S, Kaiya H, Cardinale M, Fusani L (2017) Ghrelin regulates migratory decisions in birds. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 114:1946–1951. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1619565114
- Kjos CG, Cochran WW (1970) Activity of migrant thrushes as determined by radio-telemetry. Wilson Bull 82:225–226Google Scholar
- Moore FR (1987) Sunset and the orientation behavior of migrating birds. Biol Rev 62(1):65–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.1987.tb00626.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Muheim R, Henshaw I, Sjӧberg S, Deutschlander ME (2014) BirdOriTrack: a new video-tracking program for orientation research with migratory birds. J Field Ornithol 85:91–105Google Scholar
- Pakhomov A, Chernetsov N (2014) Early evening activity of migratory Garden Warbler Sylvia borin: compass calibration activity? J Ornithol 155:621–630Google Scholar
- Pyle P (1997) Identification guide to north American birds. Slate Creek Press, BolinasGoogle Scholar
- Schmaljohann H, Rautenberg T, Muheim R, Naef-Daenzer B, Bairlein F (2013) Response of a freeflying songbird to an experimental shift of the light polarization pattern around sunset. J Exp Biol 216:1381–1387Google Scholar
- Smith AD, McWilliams S (2014) What to do when stopping over: behavioral decisions of a migrating songbird during stopover are dictated by initial change in their body condition and mediated by key environmental conditions. Behav Ecol 25:1423–1435. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/aru148
- Sjöberg S, Muheim R (2016) A new view on an old debate: type of cue-conflict manipulation and availability of stars can explain the discrepancies between cue-calibration experiments with migratory songbirds. Front Behav Neuosci 10:29Google Scholar
- Taylor PD, Crewe TL, Mackenzie SA, Lepage D, Aubry Y, Crysler Z, Finney G, Francis CM, Guglielmo CG, Hamilton DJ, Holberton RL, Loring PH, Mitchell GW, Norris DR, Paquet J, Ronconi RA, Smetzer JR, Smith PA, Welch LJ, Woodworth BK (2017) The motus wildlife tracking system: a collaborative research network to enhance the understanding of wildlife movement. Avian Cons and Ecol 12(1):8. https://doi.org/10.5751/ACE-00953-120108
- Yong W, Moore FR (2005) Long-distance bird migrants adjust their foraging behavior in relation to energy stores. Acta Zool Sin 51:12–23Google Scholar