Colony-founding success of pleometrosis in a fungus-growing termite Odontotermes formosanus
- 141 Downloads
Cooperative colony foundation (pleometrosis) has evolved in independent groups of social insects and enhances the growth rate and survival of a colony, but it is associated with a cost because intracolonial aggression may be higher in pleometrotic than in haplometrotic colonies. We studied 647 colony-founding groups consisting of one to four pairs of reproductives of Odontotermes formosanus (Shiraki) in our laboratory to examine the benefits and costs of pleometrosis by analyzing its effects on nest excavation, degree of aggression, mortality, and colony growth. The results indicate that pleometrosis significantly reduced the time required for searching for a nesting site and increased the tunnel depth. Furthermore, the nest-excavation success rate was increased 35–50% in pleometrotic colonies. Pleometrosis also increased the fecundity and colony-survival rates. However, it increased individual mortality, probably because the reduction in the available space per individual intensified intracolonial aggression, particularly when more than three pairs of reproductives founded the colonies. Overall, the laboratory bioassays revealed that although pleometrosis benefited the colony-founding success of small groups (two pairs), it was costly for large groups (three pairs). The results are consistent with those of a field survey of O. formosanus, which showed that small pleometrotic groups (three or four reproductives) exhibit longevity, whereas large groups (more than four reproductives) are rare in the colony-founding stage. Hence, we conclude that the colony-founding success of pleometrosis depends on group size: pleometrosis benefits a small group but is costly for a large group.
The evolution of cooperative colony foundation (pleometrosis) in social insects is believed to have been favored because of its beneficial effects on the survival and growth of colonies. In this study, we demonstrated the costs and benefits of pleometrosis in colonies of O. formosanus, a fungus-growing termite. Pleometrosis benefits survival in the following three ways: improving performance in nest excavation, preventing colony collapse following the death of a single reproductive, and increasing the growth rate. However, colony-founding success depends on group size. Pleometrosis benefits small groups (two reproductive pairs) more than it does large groups (three reproductive pairs). We hypothesize that pleometrosis in termites evolved after eusociality was achieved because it represents a trait that is common in fungus-growing termites.
KeywordsPleometrosis Group selection Nest excavation Monogamy Polygamy
We thank all the collectors of termite alates from the 13 localities in Taiwan (ESM 1, Appendix S1), and Chi-Yung Lai (National Changhua University of Education) for suggestions regarding rearing methods and container design.
This study was supported by grants from the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (MOST 104-2311-B-005-002; MOST 105-2628-B-005-003-MY3).
- Abramoff MD, Magalhaes PJ, Ram SJ (2004) Image processing with ImageJ. Biophoton Int 11:36–42Google Scholar
- Alexander RD (1974) The evolution of social behavior. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 5(1):325–383. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.05.110174.001545 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bernasconi G, Strassmann JE (1999) Cooperation among unrelated individuals: the ant foundress case. Trends Ecol Evol 14:477–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(99)01722-X
- Boomsma JJ (2007) Kin selection versus sexual selection: why the ends do not meet. Curr Biol 17(16):R673–R683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2007.06.033
- Cahan S, Julian GE (1999) Fitness consequences of cooperative colony founding in the desert leaf-cutter ant Acromyrmex versicolor. Behav Ecol 10(5):585–591. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/10.5.585
- Collins MS (1969) Water relations in termites. In: Krishna K, Weesner FM (eds) Biology of termites. Academic Press, New York, pp 433–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-395529-6.50018-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Darlington JPEC (1988) Multiple reproductives in nests of Macrotermes herus (Isoptera: Termitidae). Sociobiology 14:347–351Google Scholar
- Ge Y-H, Ding B-R, Chen B, Yan J-C, Chen B-Y (2008) Nest distribution patterns of Odontotermes fontanellus Kemner in the dam of Maguantang reservoir. J Anhui Agric Univ 35:297–300Google Scholar
- Giraudoux P (2017) Pgirmess: data analysis in ecology. R package version 1.6.7. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=pgirmess
- Hartke TR (2010) Breeding strategies and the reproductive ecology of Nasutitermes corniger. Dissertation, Northeastern UniversityGoogle Scholar
- Inkscape Community Teams (2016) Inkscape 0.91. Inkscape Community Teams, Boston, USA. http://www.inkscape.org/
- Li H-F, Su N-Y (2008) Sand displacement during tunnel excavation by the Formosan subterranean termite. Ann Entomol Soc Am 101(2):456–462. https://doi.org/10.1603/0013-8746(2008)101[456:SDDTEB]2.0.CO;2
- Majolo B, de Vizioli A, Schino G (2008) Costs and benefits of group-living in primates: group size effects on behaviour and demography. Anim Behav 76(4):1235–1247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.06.008
- Molvar EM, Bowyer RT (1994) Costs and benefits of group living in a recently social ungulate: the Alaskan moose. J Mammal 75(3):621–630. https://doi.org/10.2307/1382509
- Nowak MA, Tarnita CE, Wilson EO (2010) The evolution of eusociality. Nature 466doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09205, 466, 7310, 1057, 1062
- Nutting WL (1969) Flight and colony foundation. In: Krishna K, Weesner FM (eds) Biology of termites. Academic Press, New York, pp 233–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-395529-6.50012-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- R Development Core Team (2013) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org
- Rissing SW, Pollock GB (1987) Queen aggression, pleometrotic advantage and brood raiding in the ant Veromessor pergandei (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Anim Behav 35(4):975–981. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(87)80154-9
- Rosengaus RB, Traniello JFA, Bulmer MS (2010) Ecology, behavior and evolution of disease resistance of termites. In: Bignell DE, Roisin Y, Lo N (eds) Biology of termites: a modern synthesis. Springer, NY, pp 165–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3977-4_7
- Sommer K, Holldobler B (1995) Colony founding by queen association and determinants of reduction in queen number in the ant Lasius niger. Anim Behav 50(2):287–294. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1995.0244
- Therneau TM (2015) Coxme: mixed effects Cox models. R package version 2.2–5, http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=coxme
- Thorne BL (1985) Termite polygyny: the ecological dynamics of queen mutualism. In: Hölldobler B, Lindauer M (eds) Experimental behavioral ecology and sociobiology. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart, Germany, pp 325–341Google Scholar
- Tsai P-H, Chen N-S, Chen A-K, Chen C-H (1965) Architecture and development of the termitarium of Odontotermes (O.) formosanus Shiraki. Acta Entomol Sin 14:53–70Google Scholar
- Wilson EO (2005) Kin selection as the key to altruism: its rise and fall. Soc Res 72:159–166Google Scholar