Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Individual foraging preferences are linked to innovativeness and personality in the great tit

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Personality and innovativeness are predicted to drive important functional behaviours that can influence life history strategies within populations. For example, the reactive-proactive personality axis is thought to reflect the ‘pace of life’ syndrome and predicts correlation with foraging; empirical evidence also suggests a positive correlation with routine-like behaviour. Similarly, the adaptive innovation hypothesis predicts that innovators may have a higher food intake when novel foraging opportunities arise, and that they should have a more diverse range of foraging tactics. Experimental tests of these hypotheses are limited. We conducted standardized assays of exploratory behaviour (an index of the reactive-proactive axis) and innovative problem-solving performance on wild-captured great tits, Parus major, temporarily brought into captivity from different woodland types. To test for dietary preferences, birds were provided with three different types of food, and their daily energy intake measured. We found no evidence of a significant relationship between exploratory behaviour and the amount of calories ingested. However, fast-exploring great tits consumed a higher proportion of sunflower seeds, while slower individuals preferred peanuts. Problem-solving performance was positively correlated with energy intake but not food preference. Peanuts accounted for a larger proportion of total daily energy intake for coniferous birds, which also lost more weight on average. Our results illustrate that a complex array of factors can determine foraging behaviour and success, including personality, innovativeness, state variables, time, and habitat origin. This highlights the challenge of explaining how selection acts on foraging performance over time.

Significance statement

Experimental tests assessing how personality and innovativeness drive functional behaviour within populations are limited. We studied these links by means of exploratory behaviour and innovative problem-solving performance tests in relation to food preference and energy intake in wild-captured great tits, Parus major, from two different habitats. Personality was related to dietary preference (fast explorers consumed a higher proportion of sunflower seeds, while slower individuals preferred peanuts), and problem-solving was related to energy intake. Moreover, we found differential diet selection between coniferous and deciduous birds. Our results show that foraging behaviour and body mass are driven by multiple factors, including personality, innovativeness, and habitat origin.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alatalo R, Moreno J (1987) Body size, interspecific interactions, and use of foraging sites in tits (Paridae). Ecology 68:1773–1777

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Amador JA, Winiarski K, Sotomayor-Ramirez D (2013) Earthworm communities along a forest-coffee agroecosystem gradient: preliminary evidence supporting the habitat-dependent feeding hypothesis. Trop Ecol 54:365–374

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold KE, Ramsay SL, Donaldson C, Adam A (2007) Parental prey selection affects risk-taking behaviour and spatial learning in avian offspring. Proc R Soc Lond B 274:2563–2569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baugh AT, Van Oers K, Naguib M, Hau M (2013) Initial reactivity and magnitude of the acute stress response associated with personality in wild great tits (Parus major). Gen Comp Endocrinol 189:96–104

  • Bell AM, Hankison SJ, Laskowski KL (2009) The repeatability of behaviour: a meta-analysis. Anim Behav 77:771–783

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Biro PA, Stamps JA (2010) Do consistent individual differences in metabolic rate promote consistent individual differences in behavior? Trends Ecol Evol 25:653–659

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Biro D, Inoue-Nakamura N, Tonooka R, Yamakoshi G, Sousa C, Matsuzawa T (2003) Cultural innovation and transmission of tool use in wild chimpanzees: evidence from field experiments. Anim Cogn 6:213–223

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Black JM, Prop J, Larsson K (2006) Wild goose dilemmas: population consequences of individual decisions in Barnacle Geese. Branta Books, Groningen

    Google Scholar 

  • Bo L, Hussain A, Xue Y, Jun WJ, Tian W (2015) Effects of clinoptilolite on growth performance and antioxidant status in broilers. Pak J Zool 47:111–118

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bolnick DI, Svanbäck R, Fordyce JA, Yang JA, Davies JM, Hulsey CD, Forister ML (2003) The ecology of individuals: incidence and implications of individual specialization. Am Nat 161:1–28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bouwhuis S, Quinn JL, Sheldon BC, Verhulst S (2014) Personality and basal metabolic rate in a wild bird population. Oikos 123:56–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2016) Multimodel Inference. Sociol Methods Res 33:261–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Careau V, Thomas D, Humphries MM, Réale D (2008) Energy metabolism and animal personality. Oikos 117:641–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charmantier A, McCleery RH, Cole LR, Perrins C, Kruuk LEB, Sheldon B (2008) Adaptive phenotypic plasticity in response to climate change in a in a wild bird population. Science 320:800–804

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Charnov EL (1976) Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem. Theor Popul Biol 9:129–136

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cole EF, Cram DL, Quinn JL (2011) Individual variation in spontaneous problem-solving performance among wild Great tits. Anim Behav 81:491–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole EF, Morand-Ferron J, Hinks AE, Quinn JL (2012) Cognitive ability influences reproductive life history variation in the wild. Curr Biol 22:1808–1812

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cole EF, Quinn JL (2012) Personality and problem-solving performance explain competitive ability in the wild. Proc R Soc Lond B 279:1168–1175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dall SRX, Houston AI, McNamara JM (2004) The behavioural ecology of personality: consistent individual differences from an adaptive perspective. Ecol Lett 7:734–739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • David M, Auclair Y, Giraldeau LA, Cézilly F (2011) Personality and body condition have additive effects on motivation to feed in Zebra Finches Taeniopygia guttata. Ibis 154:372–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davison AC, Hinkley DV (1997) Bootstrap methods and their application. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • De Jong A, Plat J, Bast A, Godschalk RWL, Basu S, Mensink RP (2007) Effects of plant sterol and stanol ester consumption on lipid metabolism, antioxidant status and markers of oxidative stress, endothelial function and lowgrade inflammation in patients on current statin treatment. Eur J Clin Nutr 62:263–273

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DeWitt TJ, Sih A, Wilson DS (1998) Costs and limits of phenotypic plasticity. Trends Ecol Evol 13:77–81

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dingemanse NJ, Both C, Drent PJ, Tinbergen JM (2004) Fitness consequences of avian personalities in a fluctuating environment. Proc R Soc Lond B 271:847–852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dingemanse NJ, Both C, Drent PJ, Van Oers K, Van Noordwijk AJ (2002) Repeatability and heritability of exploratory behaviour in great tits from the wild. Anim Behav 64:929–938

  • Dingemanse NJ, Both C, Van Noordwijk AJ, Rutten AL, Drent PJ (2003) Natal dispersal and personalities in great tits (Parus major). Proc R Soc Lond B 270:741–747

  • Dingemanse NJ, Bouwman KM, Van de Pol M, Van Overveld T, Patrick SC, Matthysen E, Quinn JL (2012) Variation in personality and behavioural plasticity across four populations of the great tit Parus major. J Anim Ecol 8:116–126

  • Dingemanse NJ, de Goede P (2004) The relation between dominance and exploratory behavior is context-dependent in the wild. Behav Ecol 15:1023–1030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dingemanse NJ, Dochtermann N (2013) Quantifying individual variation in behaviour: mixed-effect modelling approaches. J Anim Ecol 82:39–54

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gibb J (1957) Food requirements and other observations on captive tits. Bird Study 4:207–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González MA, Olea PP, Mateo-Tomás P, García-Tejero S, De Frutos A, Robles L, Purroy FJ, Ena V (2012) Habitat selection and diet of Western Capercaillie Tetrao urogallus in an atypical biogeographical region. Ibis 154:260–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gosling SD (2001) From mice to men: what can we learn about personality from animal research? Psychol Bull 127:45–86

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Greño JL, Belda J, Barba E (2007) Influence of temperatures during the nestling period on post-fledging survival of great tit Parus major in a Mediterranean habitat. J Avian Biol 39:41–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heise CD, Moore FR (2003) Age-related differences in foraging efficiency, molt, and fat deposition of Gray Catbirds prior to autumn migration. Condor 105:496–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holbrook SJ, Schmitt RJ (1992) Experimental analyses of patch selection by foraging black surfperch (Embiotoca jacksoni). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 79:39–64

  • Ings TC, Schikora J, Chittka L (2005) Bumblebees, humble pollinators or assiduous invaders? A population comparison of foraging performance in Bombus terrestris. Oecologia 144:508–516

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kidawa D, Kowalczyk R (2011) The effects of sex, age, season and habitat on diet of the red fox Vulpes vulpes in northeastern Poland. Acta Theriol 56:209–218

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Korsten P, Van Overveld T, Adriaensen F, Matthysen E (2013) Genetic integration of local dispersal and exploratory behaviour in a wild bird. Nat Commun 4:2362

  • Lefebvre L (2011) Taxonomic counts of cognition in the wild. Biol Lett 7:631–633

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre L, Reader SM, Sol D (2004) Brains, innovations and evolution in birds and primates. Brain Behav Evol 63:233–246

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre L, Whittle P, Lascaris E, Finkelstein A (1997) Feeding innovations and forebrain size in birds. Anim Behav 53:549–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li B, Yang X, Li M (2011) The physiological function of phytosterols and its application in animal production. Feed Rev 1:42–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Milinski M (1982) Optimal foraging: the influence of intraspecific competition on diet selection. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 11:109–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitschunas N, Wagner M (2015) Diet of the lesser horseshoe bat (Rhinolophus Hipposideros) in central Germany and its seasonal and site-specific variation. Acta Chiropt 17:379–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morand-Ferron J, Cole EF, Quinn JL (2015a) Studying the evolutionary ecology of cognition in the wild: a review of practical and conceptual challenges. Biol Rev 91:367–389

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morand-Ferron J, Cole EF, Rawles JEC, Quinn JL (2011) Who are the innovators? A field experiment with two passerine species. Behav Ecol 22:1241–1248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morand-Ferron J, Hamblin S, Cole EF, Aplin L, Quinn JL (2015b) Taking the operant paradigm into the field: associative learning in wild great tits. PLoS One 10:e0133821

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mulungu LS, Themb'alilahlwa AM, Massawe AW et al (2011) Dietary differences of the multimammate mouse, Mastomys natalensis (Smith, 1834), across different habitats and seasons in Tanzania and Swaziland. Wildlife Res 38:640–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murakami M, Hirao T, Ichie T (2007) Comparison of lepidopteran larval communities among tree species in a temperate deciduous forest, Japan. Ecol Entomol 32:613–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musseau C, Vincenzi S, Jesenšek D, Cantera I, Boulêtreau S, Santoul F, Crivelli AJ (2015) Direct and indirect effects of environmental factors on dietary niches in size-structured populations of a wild salmonid. Ecosphere 6:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Navalpotro H, Núñez EP, Gómez SH, Senar JC (2016) Comparing prey composition and prey size delivered to nestlings by great tits (Parus major) and blue tits (Cyanistes caeruleus) in a Mediterranean sclerophyllous mixed forest. Anim Biodivers Conserv 39:129–139

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Shea W, Serrano-Davies E, Quinn JL (2017) Do personality and innovativeness influence competitive ability? An experimental test in the great tit. Behav Ecol (published online). doi:10.1093/beheco/arx104

  • Otter KA (2007) The ecology and behavior of chickadees and titmice: an integrated approach. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Overington SE, Morand-Ferron J, Boogert NJ, Lefebvre L (2009) Technical innovations drive the relationship between innovativeness and residual brain size in birds. Anim Behav 78:1001–1010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pagani-Núñez E, Senar JC (2013) One hour of sampling is enough: Great Tit Parus major parents feed their nestlings consistently across time. Acta Ornithol 48:194–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Partridge L (1976) Individual differences in feeding efficiencies and feeding preferences of captive great tits. Anim Behav 24:230–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patrick SC, Browning LE (2011) Exploration behaviour is not associated with chick provisioning in great tits. PLoS One 6:e26383

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Perrins CM (1991) Tits and their caterpillar food supply. Ibis 133:49–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petelle MB, Martin JGA, Blumstein DT (2015) Heritability and genetic correlations of personality traits in a wild population of yellow-bellied marmots (Marmota flaviventris). J Evol Biol 28:1840–1848

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pravosudov VV, Grubb TC (1997) Energy management in passerine birds during the nonbreeding season. A review. Curr Ornithol 14:189–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pyke GH (1984) Optimal foraging theory: a critical review. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 15:523–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn JL, Cole EF, Bates J, Payne RW, Creswell W (2012) Personality predicts individual responsiveness to the risks of starvation and predation. Proc R Soc Lond B 279:1919–1926

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn JL, Cole EF, Patrick SC, Sheldon BC (2011) Scale and state dependence of the relationship between personality and dispersal in a great tit population. J Anim Ecol 80:918–928

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn JL, Cole E, Reed T, Morand-Ferron J (2016) Environmental and genetic effects on innovativeness in a natural population of birds. Philos T Roy Soc B 371:20150184

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn JL, Cresswell W (2005) Personality, anti-predation behaviour and behavioural plasticity in the chaffinch Fringilla coelebs. Behaviour 142:1377–1402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn JL, Patrick SC, Bouwhuis S, Wilkin TA, Sheldon B (2009) Heterogeneous selection on a heritable temperament trait in a variable environment. J Anim Ecol 78:1203–1215

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2016) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria

  • Reader SM, Hagerm Y, Laland KN (2011) The evolution of primate general and cultural intelligence. Philos T Roy Soc B 366:1017–1027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reader SM, Laland KN (2003) Animal innovation: an introduction. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Réale D, Dingemanse NJ, Kazem AJN, Wright J (2010) Evolutionary and ecological approaches to the study of personality. Philos T Roy Soc B 365:3937–3946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reif J, Hořák D, Krištín A, Kopsová L, Devictor V (2015) Linking habitat specialization with species’ traits in European birds. Oikos 125:405–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson H, Verbeek NAM (1987) Diet selection by yearling northwestern crows (Corvus caurinus) feeding on littleneck clams (Venerupis japonica). Auk 104:263–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Riebli T, Avgan B, Bottini AM, Duc C, Taborsky M, Heg D (2011) Behavioural type affects dominance and growth in staged encounters of cooperatively breeding cichlids. Anim Behav 81:313–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth G, Dicke U (2005) Evolution of the brain and intelligence. Trends Cogn Sci 9:250–257

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roth TC, LaDagem LD, Pravosudovm VV (2010) Learning capabilities enhanced in harsh environments: a common garden approach. Proc R Soc Lond B 277:3187–3193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubis B, Polrolniczak A, Knula H, Potapinska O, Kaczmarek M, Rybczynska M (2010) Phytosterols in physiological concentrations target multidrug resistant cancer cells. Med Chem 6:184–190

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rudkowska I (2010) Plant sterols and stanols for healthy ageing. Maturitas 66:158–162

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sasvári L (1988) Food selection by tits on an artificial winter food supply. J Appl Ecol 25:807–817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuett W, Dall SRX (2009) Sex differences, social context and personality in Zebra Finches, Taeniopygia guttata. Anim Behav 77:1041–1050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shettleworth SJ (2003) Memory and hippocampal specialization in food-storing birds: challenges for research on comparative cognition. Brain Behav Evol 62:108–116

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shettleworth SJ, Westwood RP (2002) Divided attention, memory, and spatial discrimination in food-storing and nonstoring birds, black-capped chickadees (Poecile atricapilla) and dark-eyed Juncos (Junco hyemalis). J Exp Psychol Anim B 28:227–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sih A, Bell AM, Johnson JC, Ziemba RE (2004) Behavioral syndromes: an integrative overview. Q Rev Biol 79:241–277

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Slagsvold T, Wiebe KL (2011) Social learning in birds and its role in shaping a foraging niche. Philos T Roy Soc B 366:969–977

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sol D, Timmermans S, Lefebvre L (2002) Behavioural flexibility and invasion success in birds. Anim Behav 63:495–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spaethe J, Weidenmüller A (2002) Size variation and foraging rate in bumblebees (Bombus terrestris). Insect Soc 49:142–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephens DW, Krebs JR (1986) Foraging theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Suorsa P, Huhta E, Nikula A, Nikinmaa M, Jäntti A, Helle H, Hakkarainen H (2003) Forest management is associated with physiological stress in an old–growth forest passerine. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:963–969

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svensson L (1992) Identification guide to European passerines. British Trust for Ornithology, Thetford

    Google Scholar 

  • Toscano BJ, Gownaris NJ, Heerhartz SM, Monaco CJ (2016) Personality, foraging behavior and specialization: integrating behavioral and food web ecology at the individual level. Oecologia 182:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Balen JH (1980) Population fluctuations of the great tit and feeding conditions in winter. Ardea 68:143–164

  • Van Buskirk J, Smith DC (1989) Individual variation in winter foraging of black-capped chickadees. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 24:257–263

  • Van Oers K, Drent PJ, de Goede P, Van Noordwijk AJ (2004) Realized heritability and repeatability of risk-taking behaviour in relation to avian personalities. Proc R Soc Lond B 271:65–73

  • Van Oers K, Drent PJ, Dingemanse NJ, Kempenaers B (2008) Personality is associated with extrapair paternity in great tits, Parus major. Anim Behav 76:555–563

  • Veľký M, Kaňuch P, Krištín A (2011) Food composition of wintering great tits (Parus major): habitat and seasonal aspects. Folia Zool 60:228–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vestjens JPM (1983) Is the beech nut as winter food for the great tit (Parus major) a free choice? Institut voor Oecologisch Onderzock, Arnhem

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbeek MEM, Drent PJ, Wiepkema PR (1994) Consistent individual differences in early exploratory behaviour of male great tits. Anim Behav 48:1113–1121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warton DI, Hui FKC (2011) The arcsine is asinine: the analysis of proportions in ecology. Ecology 92:3–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wetzel DP, Stewart IRK, Westneat DF (2012) Heterozygosity predicts clutch and egg size but not plasticity in a house sparrow population with no evidence of inbreeding. Mol Ecol 21:406–420

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf M, Van Doorn GS, Leimar O, Weissing FJ (2007) Life-history trade-offs favour the evolution of animal personalities. Nature 447:581–584

  • Wolf M, Weissing FJ (2010) An explanatory framework for adaptive personality differences. Philos T Roy Soc B 365:3959–3968

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Barry O’Mahony for assistance in catching birds. Thanks also to Ned Dochtermann and two anonymous referees for commenting on the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by a Marie Curie Career Integration Grant (334383) to JLQ. ES-D was funded by a short stay grant (EEBB-I-15-EEBB-10364) from Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, and WOS was supported by Thomas Crawford Hayes fund for Biological Sciences.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Departamento de Ciencias Ambientales, Facultad de Ciencias Ambientales y Bioquímica, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Avenida Carlos III s/n, 45071, Toledo, Spain

    Eva Serrano-Davies

  2. School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University College Cork, Distillery Fields, North Mall, Cork, Ireland

    William O’Shea & John L. Quinn

Authors
  1. Eva Serrano-Davies
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. William O’Shea
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. John L. Quinn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Eva Serrano-Davies or John L. Quinn.

Ethics declarations

Trapping and ringing activities were licensed by the British Trust for Ornithology (BTO) and the National Parks and Wildlife Services (NPWS), Ireland, and ethical and experimental approval was from the Health Products Regulatory Authority of Ireland (HPRA). All birds were housed under license from the HPRA and the NPWS.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Data availability

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Additional information

Communicated by N. A. Dochtermann

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 33 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Serrano-Davies, E., O’Shea, W. & Quinn, J.L. Individual foraging preferences are linked to innovativeness and personality in the great tit. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 71, 161 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-017-2389-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-017-2389-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation