Mating in a bisexually philopatric society: bottlenose dolphin females associate with adult males but not adult sons during estrous

Original Article

Abstract

In fission-fusion societies, group size and composition change dynamically, reflecting social preferences and pressures. Most notably during reproduction, intersexual group dynamics reflect a balance between female choice for optimal mates and male competition for mating access. In systems where males and females remain in their natal area for life (bisexual philopatry), females can reduce the risk of incest by avoiding mating or associating with male kin. Shark Bay bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops aduncus) live in fission-fusion societies that enable them to exercise age, sex, and kin association biases. To determine how the balance between female choice and male competition is achieved, we examined adult female association with juvenile and adult males, including sons during female receptive periods, using 30 years of longitudinal data. Adult females demonstrated an increase in adult male association just prior to known conceptions, while juvenile male association consistently remained low. A decline in male association post-conception suggests that one or both sexes detect pregnancy early on. When we examined female association with juvenile and adult sons, a distinct pattern emerged. Adult females preferentially associated with sons compared to non-sons of the same age class post-weaning. Strikingly, females rarely associated with their adult sons when cycling. Our results suggest that (1) adult males either out-compete juvenile males in gaining access to fertile females or females prefer adult to juvenile males and (2) females mitigate the risk of close inbreeding by reducing association with sons when cycling.

Significance statement

No study has investigated behavioral strategies for reducing close inbreeding in bisexually philopatric, fluid mammal societies outside of humans. Using over 30 years of longitudinal data, we document how association dynamics change with female reproductive state. Post-weaning, mothers and sons associate, but almost never during conceptive periods. Adult male–female association is frequent during estrous, with a sharp decline after conception. Our study provides evidence for long-term kin recognition and detection of both estrous and early pregnancy among wild bottlenose dolphins. These findings have implications for the evolution of bisexual philopatry, fission-fusion dynamics, and infanticide—or lack thereof—in mammals.

Keywords

Bisexual philopatry Estrous Inbreeding Juvenile Pregnancy Tursiops 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank current and past members of the Shark Bay Dolphin Project, and numerous field assistants, for their efforts in data collection used for this project. In particular, we would like to acknowledge Ann-Marie Jacoby, Sara Eshleman, Jillian Wisse, Desirae Cambrelen, and Theodora Efthymiou. We are grateful to the Western Australia Department of Parks and Wildlife (DPaW) and the Monkey Mia Dolphin Resort for their logistical support in the field. We thank DPaW for contributing a portion of the life history data. We also thank two anonymous reviewers for their input on an earlier version of this manuscript. The study was funded by National Science Foundation grants 0941487, 0918308, 0316800, National Geographic Society Committee for Research and Exploration, ONR BAA 10230702, and Georgetown University.

Compliance with ethical standards

This work was approved by the Georgetown University Animal Care and Use Committee, permits #07–041, #10–023, #13-069, Western Australia Department of Parks and Wildlife permit #SF007418, #SF007975, #SF006897, #SF007457, #SF009311, #SF008076, #SF009876, and The University of Western Australia animal ethics permit #600-37. All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the aforementioned institutions and agencies. The study was funded by National Science Foundation grants 0941487, 0918308, 0316800, National Geographic Society Committee for Research and Exploration, ONR BAA 10230702, and Georgetown University.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

265_2017_2380_MOESM1_ESM.docx (479 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 478 kb)

References

  1. Alberts SC, Watts HE, Altmann J (2003) Queuing and queue-jumping: long-term patterns of reproductive skew in male savannah baboons, Papio cynocephalus. Anim Behav 65:821–840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Altmann SA (1973) The pregnancy sign in savannah baboons. J Zoo Anim Med 4:8–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Altmann J (1974) Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. Behaviour 49:227–266CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Amann RP, Schanbacher BD (1983) Physiology of male reproduction. J Anim Sci 57:380–403CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Amaral RS (2010) Use of alternative matrices to monitor steroid hormones in aquatic mammals: a review. Aquat Mamm 36:162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Amos B, Schlötterer C, Tautz D (1993) Social structure of pilot whales revealed by analytical DNA profiling. Science 260:670–672CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Aureli F, Schaffner CM, Boesch C et al (2008) Fission-fusion dynamics. Curr Anthropol 49:627–654Google Scholar
  8. Ayres KL, Booth RK, Hempelmann JA, Koski KL, Emmons CK, Baird RW, Balcomb-Bartok K, Hanson MB, Ford MJ, Wasser SK (2012) Distinguishing the impacts of inadequate prey and vessel traffic on an endangered killer whale (Orcinus orca) population. PLoS One 7:e36842CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Baird RW, Whitehead H (2000) Social organization of mammal-eating killer whales: group stability and dispersal patterns. Can J Zool 78:2096–2105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Banes GL, Galdikas BM, Vigilant L (2015) Male orang-utan bimaturism and reproductive success at Camp Leakey in Tanjung Puting National Park, Indonesia. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 69:1785–1794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Barrows EM (2011) Animal behavior desk reference: a dictionary of animal behavior, ecology, and evolution. CRC press, Ann ArborCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bergfelt DR, Steinetz BG, Reif JS, Schaefer AM, Bossart GD, Mazzoil MS, Zolman E, Fair PA (2013) Evaluation of single-sample analysis of progesterone in combination with relaxin for diagnosis of pregnancy in wild bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus). Aquat Mamm 39:187–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Biancani B, Da Dalt L, Lacave G, Romagnoli S, Gabai G (2009) Measuring fecal progestogens as a tool to monitor reproductive activity in captive female bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus). Theriogenology 72:1282–1292CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Brook FM, Kinoshita R, Brown B, Metreweli C (2000) Ultrasonographic imaging of the testis and epididymis of the bottlenose dolphin, Tursiops truncatus aduncas. J Reprod Fertil 119:233–240CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Brown JL, Eklund A (1994) Kin recognition and the major histocompatibility complex: an integrative review. Am Nat 143:435–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B (1987) Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 18:237–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ciuti S, Apollonio M (2016) Reproductive timing in a lekking mammal: male fallow deer getting ready for female estrus. Behav Ecol 27:1522–1532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Clutton-Brock TH, Lukas D (2012) The evolution of social philopatry and dispersal in female mammals. Mol Ecol 21:472–492CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Connor RC, Krützen M (2015) Male dolphin alliances in Shark Bay: changing perspectives in a 30-year study. Anim Behav 103:223–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Connor RC, Smolker RA, Richards AF (1992a) Two levels of alliance formation among male bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops sp.) P Natl Acad Sci USA 89:987–990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Connor RC, Smolker RA, Richards AF (1992b) Dolphin alliances and coalitions. In: Harcourt AH, de Waal FBM (eds) Coalitions and alliances in humans and other animals. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 415–443Google Scholar
  22. Connor RC, Richards A, Smolker R, Mann J (1996) Patterns of female attractiveness in Indian Ocean bottlenose dolphins. Behaviour 133:37–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Connor RC, Wells RS, Mann J, Read AJ (2000) The bottlenose dolphin. Cetacean Societies, p 91–125Google Scholar
  24. Cooke SJ, Blumstein DT, Buchholz R, Caro T, Fernández-Juricic E, Franklin CE, Wikelski M (2014) Physiology, behavior, and conservation. Physiol Biochem Zool 87:1–14CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Cords M, Mann J (2014) Social conflict management in primates: is there a case for dolphins? In: Yamagiwa J, Karczmarski L (eds) Primates and cetaceans. Springer, Inuyama, pp 207–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Core Team R (2016) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna https://www.R-project.org/ Google Scholar
  27. Cox CR, Le Boeuf BJ (1977) Female incitation of male competition: a mechanism in sexual selection. Am Nat 111:317–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dobson FS (1982) Competition for mates and predominant juvenile male dispersal in mammals. Anim Behav 30:1183–1192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Dunbar RIM, Dunbar P (1974) The reproductive cycle of the gelada baboon. Anim Behav 22:203–210CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Dunn DG, Barco SG, Pabst DA, McLellan WA (2002) Evidence for infanticide in bottlenose dolphins of the western North Atlantic. J Wildlife Dis 38:505–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Frère CH, Krützen M, Kopps A, Ward P, Mann J, Sherwin WB (2010a) Inbreeding tolerance and fitness costs in wild bottlenose dolphins. Proc R Soc Lond B 277:2667–2673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Frère CH, Krützen M, Mann J, Connor RC, Bejder L, Sherwin WB (2010b) Social and genetic interactions drive fitness variation in a free-living dolphin population. P Natl Acad Sci USA 107:19949–19954CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Frère CH, Krützen M, Mann J, Watson-Capps JJ, Tsai YJ, Patterson EM, Connor RC, Bejder L, Sherwin WB (2010c) Home range overlap, matrilineal and biparental kinship drive female associations in bottlenose dolphins. Anim Behav 80:481–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gerald MS, Waitt C, Little AC (2009) Pregnancy coloration in macaques may act as a warning signal to reduce antagonism by conspecifics. Behav Process 80:7–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gero S, Bejder L, Whitehead H, Mann J, Connor RC (2005) Behaviourally specific preferred associations in bottlenose dolphins, Tursiops spp. Can J Zool 83:1566–1573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gibson QA, Mann J (2008a) Early social development in wild bottlenose dolphins: sex differences, individual variation and maternal influence. Anim Behav 76:375–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gibson QA, Mann J (2008b) The size, composition and function of wild bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops sp.) mother–calf groups in Shark Bay, Australia. Anim Behav 76:389–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Goffe AS, Zinner D, Fischer J (2016) Sex and friendship in a multilevel society: behavioural patterns and associations between female and male Guinea baboons. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 70:323–336CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Goymann W (2012) On the use of non-invasive hormone research in uncontrolled, natural environments: the problem with sex, diet, metabolic rate and the individual. Methods Ecol Evol 3:757–765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Heithaus M, Dill L (2002) Food availability and tiger shark predation risk influence bottlenose dolphin habitat use. Ecology 83:480–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hildebrandt TB, Lueders I, Hermes R, Goeritz F, Saragusty J (2011) Reproductive cycle of the elephant. Anim Reprod Sci 124:176–183CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Kaplan J, Lentell BJ, Lange W (2009) Possible evidence for infanticide among bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) off St. Augustine, Florida. Mar Mamm Sci 25:970–975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Karniski C, Patterson EM, Krzyszczyk E, Foroughirad V, Stanton MA, Mann J (2015) A comparison of survey and focal follow methods for estimating individual activity budgets of cetaceans. Mar Mamm Sci 31:839–852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Keller L, Waller D (2002) Inbreeding effects in wild populations. Trends Ecol Evol 17:230–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kemper CM, Trentin E, Tomo I (2014) Sexual maturity in male indo-Pacific bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops aduncus): evidence for regressed/pathological adults. J Mammal 95:357–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Krützen M, Barré LM, Connor RC, Mann J, Sherwin WB (2004) ‘O father: where art thou?’—paternity assessment in an open fission–fusion society of wild bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops sp.) in Shark Bay, Western Australia. Mol Ecol 13:1975–1990CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Krzyszczyk E, Mann J (2012) Why become speckled? Ontogeny and function of speckling in Shark Bay bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops sp.)1. Mar Mamm Sci 28(2):295–307Google Scholar
  48. Lacave G, Eggermont M, Verslycke T, Brook F, Salbany A, Roque L, Kinoshita R (2004) Prediction from ultrasonographic measurements of the expected delivery date in two species of bottlenosed dolphin (Tursiops truncatus and Tursiops aduncus). Vet Rec 154:228–233CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Loy J (1974) Changes in facial color associated with pregnancy in patas monkeys. Folia Primatol 22:251–257CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Lu A, Beehner JC, Czekala NM, Borries C (2012) Juggling priorities: female mating tactics in Phayre’s leaf monkeys. Am J Primatol 74:471–481CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Lukas D, Huchard E (2014) The evolution of infanticide by males in mammalian societies. Science 346:841–844CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Mann J (1999) Behavioral sampling methods for cetaceans: a review and critique. Mar Mamm Sci 15:102–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Mann J (2006) Establishing trust: socio-sexual behaviour and the development of male-male bonds among Indian Ocean bottlenose dolphins. In: Sommer V, Vasey PL (eds) Homosexual behaviour in animals: an evolutionary perspective. Cambridge University press, pp 107–130Google Scholar
  54. Mann J, Sargeant B (2003) Like mother, like calf: the ontogeny of foraging traditions in wild Indian Ocean bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops sp.) In: Fragaszy D, Perry S (eds) The biology of traditions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 236–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Mann J, Smuts B (1999) Behavioral development in wild bottlenose dolphin newborns (Tursiops sp). Behaviour 136:529–566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Mann J, Connor RC, Barré LM, Heithaus MR (2000) Female reproductive success in bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops sp.): life history, habitat, provisioning, and group-size effects. Behav Ecol 11:210–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Mateo JM (2004) Recognition systems and biological organization: the perception component of social recognition. Ann Zool Fenn 41:729–745Google Scholar
  58. McHugh KA, Allen JB, Barleycorn AA, Wells RS (2011) Natal philopatry, ranging behavior, and habitat selection of juvenile bottlenose dolphins in Sarasota Bay, Florida. J Mammal 92:1298–1313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Millspaugh JJ, Washburn BE (2004) Use of fecal glucocorticoid metabolite measures in conservation biology research: considerations for application and interpretation. Gen Comp Endocrinol 138:189–199CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Möller LM, Beheregaray LB (2004) Genetic evidence for sex-biased dispersal in resident bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops aduncus). Mol Ecol 13:1607–1612CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Moore J, Ali R (1984) Are dispersal and inbreeding avoidance related? Anim Behav 32:94–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Muggeo VM (2003) Estimating regression models with unknown break-points. Stat Med 22:3055–3071CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Muggeo VM (2008) Segmented: an R package to fit regression models with broken-line relationships. R News 8:20–25Google Scholar
  64. Muller MN, Thompson ME, Kahlenberg SM, Wrangham RW (2011) Sexual coercion by male chimpanzees shows that female choice may be more apparent than real. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65:921–933CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Muraco HS (2015) Reproductive biology of the female bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus). Dissertation, Mississippi State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  66. Muraco H, Kuczaj SA (2015) Conceptive estrus behavior in three bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus). Anim Behav Cogn 2:30–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Nuuttila HK, Courtene-Jones W, Baulch S, Simon M, Evans PG (2017) Don’t forget the porpoise: acoustic monitoring reveals fine scale temporal variation between bottlenose dolphin and harbour porpoise in Cardigan Bay SAC. Mar Biol 164:50CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  68. O’Brien JK, Robeck TR (2012) The relationship of maternal characteristics and circulating progesterone concentrations with reproductive outcome in the bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) after artificial insemination, with and without ovulation induction, and natural breeding. Theriogenology 78:469–482CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Ottensmeyer CA, Whitehead H (2003) Behavioural evidence for social units in long-finned pilot whales. Can J Zool 8:1327–1338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Pagel MD, Harvey PH (2002) Evolution of the juvenile period in mammals. In: Pereira ME, Fairbanks LA (eds) Juvenile primates: life history, development, and behavior. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 28–37Google Scholar
  71. Patterson IAP, Reid RJ, Wilson B, Grellier K, Ross HM, Thompson PM (1998) Evidence for infanticide in bottlenose dolphins: an explanation for violent interactions with harbour porpoises? Proc R Soc Lond B 265:1167–1170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Penn DJ (2002) The scent of genetic compatibility: sexual selection and the major histocompatibility complex. Ethology 108:1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Perez S, Garcia-Lopez A, De Stephanis R, Gimenez J, Garcia-Tiscar S, Verborgh P, Mancera JM, Martinez-Rodriguez G (2011) Use of blubber levels of progesterone to determine pregnancy in free-ranging live cetaceans. Mar Biol 158:1677–1680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Perrtree RM, Sayigh LS, Williford A, Bocconcelli A, Curran MC, Cox TM (2016) First observed wild birth and acoustic record of a possible infanticide attempt on a common bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus). Mar Mamm Sci 32:376–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Pilot M, Dahlheim ME, Hoelzel AR (2010) Social cohesion among kin, gene flow without dispersal and the evolution of population genetic structure in the killer whale (Orcinus orca). J Evol Biol 23:20–31CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Preis A, Mugisha L, Hauser B, Weltring A, Deschner T (2011) Androgen and androgen metabolite levels in serum and urine of east African chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii): comparison of EIA and LC–MS analyses. Gen Comp Endocrinol 174:335–343CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Pusey AE, Packer C (1987) Dispersal and philopatry. In: Smuts BB, Cheney DL, Seyfarth RM, Wrangham RW, Struhsaker TT (eds) Primate Societies. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 250–266Google Scholar
  78. Pusey A, Wolf M (1996) Inbreeding avoidance in animals. Trends Ecol Evol 11:201–206CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Read AJ, Wells RS, Hohn AA, Scott MD (1993) Patterns of growth in wild bottlenose dolphins, Tursiops truncatus. J Zool 231:107–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Robeck TR, Schneyer AL, McBain JF, Dalton LM, Walsh MT, Czekala NM, Kraemer DC (1993) Analysis of urinary immunoreactive steroid metabolites and gonadotropins for characterization of the estrous cycle, breeding period, and seasonal estrous activity of captive killer whales (Orcinus orca). Zoo Biol 12:173–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Robeck TR, Steinman KJ, Yoshioka M, Jensen E, O’Brien JK, Katsumata E, Gili C, McBain JF, Sweeney J, Monfort SL (2005) Estrous cycle characterisation and artificial insemination using frozen–thawed spermatozoa in the bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus). Reproduction 129:659–674CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Robinson KP (2014) Agonistic intraspecific behavior in free-ranging bottlenose dolphins: calf-directed aggression and infanticidal tendencies by adult males. Mar Mamm Sci 30:381–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Rolland RM, Hunt KE, Kraus SD, Wasser SK (2005) Assessing reproductive status of right whales (Eubalaena glacialis) using fecal hormone metabolites. Gen Comp Endocrinol 142:308–317CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Rowell TE, Chalmers NR (1970) Reproductive cycles of the mangabey Cercocebus albigena. Folia Primatol 12:264–272CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Sandel AA, Reddy RB, Mitani JC (2017) Adolescent male chimpanzees do not form a dominance hierarchy with their peers. Primates 58:39–49CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. Sargeant BL, Mann J (2009) Developmental evidence for foraging traditions in wild bottlenose dolphins. Anim Behav 78:715–721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Sargeant BL, Wirsing AJ, Heithaus MR, Mann J (2007) Can environmental heterogeneity explain individual foraging variation in wild bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops sp.)? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61:679–688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Schroeder PJ (1990) Breeding bottlenose dolphins in captivity. In: Leatherwood S, Reeves RR (eds) The bottlenose dolphin. Academic Press, New York, pp 435–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Scott E, Mann J, Watson-Capps JJ (2005) Aggression in bottlenose dolphins: evidence for sexual coercion, male-male competition, and female tolerance through analysis of tooth-rake marks and behaviour. Behaviour 142:21–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Setchell JM, Wickings EJ, Knapp LA (2006) Signal content of red facial coloration in female mandrills (Mandrillus sphinx). Proc R Soc Lond B 273:2395–2400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Smolker RA, Richards AF, Connor RC, Pepper JW (1992) Sex differences in patterns of association among Indian Ocean bottlenose dolphins. Behaviour 123:38–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Stanton MA, Mann J (2012) Early social networks predict survival in wild bottlenose dolphins. PLoS One 7:e47508CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  93. Szulkin M, Stopher KV, Pemberton JM, Reid JM (2013) Inbreeding avoidance, tolerance, or preference in animals? Trends Ecol Evol 28:205–211CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. Tsai YJ, Mann J (2013) Dispersal, philopatry, and the role of fission-fusion dynamics in bottlenose dolphins. Mar Mamm Sci 29:261–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. van Schaik CP, Pradhan GR, van Noordwijk MA (2004) Mating conflict in primates: infanticide, sexual harassment and female sexuality. In: Kappeler PM, van Schaik CP (eds) Sexual selection in primates: new and comparative perspectives. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 131–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Wallen MM, Patterson EM, Krzyszczyk E, Mann J (2016) The ecological costs to females in a system with allied sexual coercion. Anim Behav 115:227–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Watson-Capps JJ (2005) Female mating behavior in the context of sexual coercion and female ranging behavior of bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops sp.) in Shark Bay, Western Australia. Dissertation, Georgetown UniversityGoogle Scholar
  98. Watts DP (2015) Mating behavior of adolescent male chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) at Ngogo, Kibale National Park, Uganda. Primates 56:163–172CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. Wells RS (1991) The role of long-term study in understanding the social structure of a bottlenose dolphin community. In: Pryor K, Norris KS (eds) Dolphin societies: discoveries and puzzles. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 199–225Google Scholar
  100. Wells RS (2014) Social structure and life history of common bottlenose dolphins near Sarasota Bay, Florida: insights from four decades and five generations. In: Yamigawa J, Karczmarski L (eds) Primates and cetaceans: field research and conservation of complex mammalian societies. Springer Press, Tokyo, pp 149–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Wells RS, Scott MD (1990) Estimating bottlenose dolphin population parameters from individual identification and capture-release techniques. In: Hammond PS, Mizroch SA, Donovan GP (eds) Individual recognition of cetaceans: use of photo-identification and other techniques to estimate population parameters. Report of the international whaling commission, special issue 12, Cambridge, pp 407–415Google Scholar
  102. Wells RS, Scott MD, Irvine AB (1987) The social structure of free-ranging bottlenose dolphins. In: Genoways HH (ed) Current Mammalogy. Springer US, pp 247–305Google Scholar
  103. Wells RS, Rhinehart HL, Hansen LJ, Sweeney JC, Townsend FI, Stone R, Casper DR, Scott MD, Hohn AA, Rowles TK (2004) Bottlenose dolphins as marine ecosystem sentinels: developing a health monitoring system. EcoHealth 1:246–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Whitehead H, Christal J, Tyack PL (2000) Studying cetacean social structure in space and time. In: Mann J, Connor RC, Tyack PL, Whitehead H (eds) Cetacean Societies. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 65–87Google Scholar
  105. Wilson B, Thompson PM, Hammond PS (1997) Habitat use by bottlenose dolphins: seasonal distribution and stratified movement patterns in the moray firth, Scotland. J Appl Ecol 34:1365–1374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Wright BM, Stredulinsky EH, Ellis GM, Ford JKB (2016) Kin-directed food sharing promotes lifetime natal philopatry of both sexes in a population of 2 fish-eating killer whales (Orcinus orca). Anim Behav 115:81–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Xu R (2003) Measuring explained variation in linear mixed effects models. Stat Med 22:3527–3541CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  108. Yuen WHQ (2007) An assessment of reproductive development of the male indo-Pacific bottlenose dolphin, Tursiops aduncus, in captivity. Dissertation, The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BiologyGeorgetown UniversityWashington D.C.USA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyGeorgetown UniversityWashington D.C.USA

Personalised recommendations