Behavioral response to conspecific songs on foraging territories of the heart-nosed bat
- 426 Downloads
Singing to create and defend territory boundaries is common among birds but rare in mammals. The African heart-nosed bat, Cardioderma cor, is hypothesized to use loud, low-frequency songs to reestablish foraging territories nightly. Territoriality can be defined ecologically, whereby an individual exclusively uses an area repeatedly, and behaviorally, through defense of an area. C. cor males sing on tightly abutting, exclusive areas nightly, which they return to throughout the season and sometimes across seasons. C. cor meets the ecological determinants of territoriality, but assessments of the use of song to maintain territories are lacking. We explore the singing behavior in this species by conducting song playback experiments within the borders of singing areas of 10 target individuals, with echolocation playbacks conducted as a control. In addition, we further explore the influence of song metrics on the behavioral response. Song playbacks prompted investigative and aggressive behavior, including passing by, approaching, and in one case, attacking the speaker, whereas echolocation did not. Additional post hoc analyses suggested that major song parameters, including song length, syllable frequency, intersyllable interval, and the number of double syllables comprising song stimuli influenced the level of response. For five bats we assessed whether their songs changed in response to the playback, and found that they sang faster, lower-frequency songs. These results are consistent with observations in other territorial animals including birds and gibbons, and provide a basis for further exploration of the territory defense hypothesis in the heart-nosed bat. We conclude that C. cor song features likely play an important role in mediating behavioral interactions within signaling networks of foraging bats.
It has been hypothesized that birdsong first evolved in support of territorial defense because it offered a cost-effective alternative to patrolling large spaces by flight. Singing-like behaviors have also been documented in several species of bats but never as a tool for maintaining foraging territories. However, evidence of foraging territoriality is scarce for bats, likely due to technical challenges associated with documenting such behaviors for a small, flying animal that may travel large distances at night. Here, we show for the first time that a bat responds to conspecific songs in a manner strikingly similar to many songbirds, providing support from outside songbirds for the hypothesis that territorial defense is a key selective pressure for singing in small, flying animals. This work provides the important basis for continuing to explore the role of singing, including song variability, in natural bat behavior outside of the roost.
KeywordsBats Singing behavior Territoriality Acoustic playback experiments Cardioderma cor
We thank the reviewers for their critical assessments of this work. We feel that their suggestions have greatly improved this manuscript. We thank Felix Mpelembwa, Nuhu Bahaty Mhapa, Alfred Absolem Mollel, and Nickodemasy Obeid for their assistance in field work. We thank the officers of Kikavuchini, Mkalama, and Longoi Villages, the Machame Weru Weru Ward, and the Hai District for their cooperation. Dassa Nkini of the Tanzania Conservation Resource Centre assisted with permit acquisition. We thank Brian Pierce, Thomas DeWitt, David Jones, Mirjam Knörnschild, and Kirsten Bohn for advice and discussion on statistics and experimental design. This research was funded by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program, Bat Conservation International, and Wildlife Acoustics.
Compliance with ethical standards
All applicable international, national, and institutional guidelines for the use of animals were followed. We acquired all necessary permits and permissions to work with this species and in these regions: Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, AUP 2012-087; Tanzania Commission for Science and Technology, 2014-53-ER-2012-58, 2013-65-NA-2012-58, and NA-2012-58.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
The datasets analyzed from the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
- Abdi H (2003) Partial least squares (PLS) regression. In: Lewis-Beck M, Bryman A, Futing T (eds) Encylopedia of social sciences research methods. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp 792–795Google Scholar
- Bastian A, Schmidt S (2009) Individual communication affects ritualized courtship: a case study in the bat (Megaderma lyra). In: Abstracts 31th International Ethological Conference, Rennes, France, p 140Google Scholar
- Beecher MD, Campbell ES, Nordby JC (1998) The cognitive ecology of song communication and song learning in the song sparrow. In: Dukas R (ed) Cognitive ecology: the evolutionary ecology of information processing and decision making. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 175–196Google Scholar
- Bradbury JW, Vehrencamp SL (2011) Principles of animal communication, 2nd edn. Sinauer Associates Inc., Massachusetts, pp 397–462Google Scholar
- Brockelman WY (2009) Ecology and the social systems of gibbons. In: Lappan S, Whittaker D (eds) The gibbons: new perspectives on small ape socioecology and population biology. Springer, New York, pp 217–223Google Scholar
- Dhondt A (1966) A method to establish boundaries of bird territories. Gerfaut-Giervalk 56:404–408Google Scholar
- Fichtel C, Hilgartner R (2013) Noises in the dark: vocal communication in Lepilemur ruficaudatus and other nocturnal pair-living primates. In: Masters J, Gamba M, Genin F (eds) Leaping ahead: advances in prosimian biology. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 297–304Google Scholar
- Fitch WT, Hauser MD (2002) Unpacking ‘honest’: vertebrate vocal production and the evolution of acoustic signals. In: Simmons AM, Fay RR, Popper AN (eds) Acoustic communication. Springer, New York, pp 65–137Google Scholar
- Guppy A, Coles RB, Pettigrew JD (1985) Echolocation and acoustic communication in the Australian ghost bat, Macroderma gigas (Microchiroptera: Megadermatidae). Aust Mammal 8:299–308Google Scholar
- Jones DL (2015) Fathom toolbox for Matlab: software for multivariate ecological and oceanographic data analysis. College of Marine Science, University of Florida, St. Petersburg, FL, USAGoogle Scholar
- Kroodsma DE (1989) Suggested experimental designs for song playbacks. Auk 37:600–609Google Scholar
- Kulzer E, Nelson JE, McKean JL, Mohres FP (1984) Prey-catching behaviour and echolocation in the Australian ghost bat, Macroderma gigas (Microchiroptera: Megadermatidae). Austr Mammal 7:37–50Google Scholar
- Langmore NE (2000) Why female birds sing. In: Espmark Y, Amundsen T, Rosenqvist G (eds) Animal signals: signalling and signal design in animal communication. Tapir Academic Press, Trondheim, pp 317–327Google Scholar
- Richards DG (1981) Estimation of distance of singing conspecifics by the Carolina wren. Auk 98:127–133Google Scholar
- Smarsh GC, Smotherman M (2015a) Singing away from home: songs are used on foraging territories in the heart-nosed bat, Cardioderma cor. In: Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics, vol. 25 010002. Acoustical Society of America, JacksonvilleGoogle Scholar