Sociodemographic variation in foraging behavior and the adaptive significance of worker production in the facultatively social small carpenter bee, Ceratina calcarata
- 184 Downloads
Provisioning for young offspring is an archetypical form of parental investment. Ceratina calcarata bees provide extended maternal care to their young and demonstrate an unusual strategy of dual-phase pollen provisioning. Most bees first gather provisions as they establish nests in spring. However, C. calcarata mothers will also feed their newly eclosed young a second time, perhaps ensuring their survival during a long winter diapause. Some mothers rear a small, worker-like daughter to assist them during this second provisioning phase. We studied provisioning behavior in C. calcarata to examine patterns of maternal investment and foraging dynamics throughout the breeding season. Mothers typically made a high number of short-duration foraging trips each day, whereas late-season females tended to make fewer and longer trips. This difference in foraging duration may indicate a lower risk of brood loss in those nests where mature offspring are present. Nest demographic data revealed that an offspring laid in the first brood cell position is typically female and usually smaller than her siblings. In 29% of the nests, this small daughter was observed to adopt a forager role at maturity and provisioned for her siblings. Dwarf daughters had a higher number of active days and foraging trips per day in orphaned nests than in nests where a mother was present. The foraging behaviors of worker-like daughters were similar in length of foraging trip and handling time to mothers during this second provisioning period. We hypothesize that incipiently social foraging by this smallest daughter may act as a form of insurance against brood loss during occasions when a mother is unable to sufficiently provision for her eclosed offspring during the second phase.
Parental investment in the size and sex of offspring is under strong selection for assured fitness returns. For example, many social insect mothers make an initial investment in small offspring to take on risky foraging behavior while they specialize on future reproduction. Solitary and facultatively social species provide an important baseline to understand the evolution of social complexity from natural variation in maternal care and foraging behavior. Here, we characterize the parental investment strategies of a subsocial small carpenter bee and reveal the potential adaptive significance of prolonged maternal care and worker production in this species. Mothers provide an initial investment that is extended by workers providing alloparental care to siblings. Maternal manipulation of dwarf eldest daughters may serve as an insurance mechanism in the event of maternal mortality to assure the survival of siblings.
KeywordsHymenoptera Parental investment Sex allocation Foraging ecology Maternal manipulation Overwintering survival
We thank Wyatt Shell and member of the Rehan lab for comments and suggestions on this manuscript.
Compliance with ethical standards
This work was supported by a mobility fund of Charles University of Prague and Integrative Animal Biology award no. SVV 260 434/2017 to MM. Additionally, this research was supported by NSF award no. 1456296 to SMR.
- Charnov EL (1982) The theory of sex allocation. Princeton University, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
- Crozier RH, Pamilo P (1996) Evolution of social insect colonies. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Maeta Y, Sakagami SF (1995) Oophagy and egg replacement in artificially induced colonies of a basically solitary bee, Ceratina (Ceratinidia) okinawana (hymenoptera, Anthophoridae, Xylocopinae), with a comparison of social behavior among Ceratina, Xylocopa and the halictine bees. Jpn J Entomol 63:347–375Google Scholar
- Maeta Y, Sugiura N, Goubara M (1992) Patterns of offspring production and sex allocation in the small carpenter bee, Ceratina flavipes smith (hymenoptera, Xylocopinae). Jpn J Ent 60:175–190Google Scholar
- Michener CD (2007) The bees of the world, 2nd edn. The Johns Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
- Michener CD (1974) The social behavior of the bees: a comparative study. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- R Development Core Team (2011) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
- Rehan SM, Richards MH (2010a) The influence of maternal quality on brood sex allocation in the small carpenter bee, Ceratina calcarata. Ethology 116:876–887Google Scholar
- Rehan SM, Sheffield CS (2011) Morphological and molecular delineation of a new species in the Ceratina dupla species-group (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Xylocopinae) of eastern North America. Zootaxa 2873:35–50Google Scholar
- Rehan SM, Richards MH (2013) Reproductive aggression and nestmate recognition in a subsocial bee. Anim Behav 85:733–741Google Scholar
- Sakagami SF, Maeta Y (1984) Multifemale nests and rudimentary castes in the normally solitary bee Ceratina japonica (Hymenoptera: Xylocopinae). J Kansas Entomol Soc 57:639–656Google Scholar
- Vickruck J (2010) The nesting biology of Ceratina (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in the Niagara region: new species, nest site selection and parasitism. Master's Thesis, Department of Biological Sciences, Brock University, St. CatharinesGoogle Scholar
- West-Eberhard MJ (1975) The evolution of social behavior by kin selection. Q Rev Biol 50:1–33Google Scholar
- Wilson EO (1971) The insect societies. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar