Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The response of social and non-social rodents to owl attack

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Studies with individual rodents have revealed that they display protean (unpredictable) behavior when attacked by an owl. Other studies have revealed that voles in groups reduce behavioral variability a short time after owl attack, as if adopting the behavior of the higher-mass and perhaps older and more experienced, individuals. Here, we tested groups of rodents under owl attack in order to track the behavior of individuals within the group and compare between the behaviors of social and non-social species. We found differential behavior between species, between groups of the same species, among individuals in the same group, and among the various phases of the owl attack. We also found that upon being exposed to an owl, social rodents tended to huddle together whereas solitary rodents tended to scatter across the available space. Other non-social but perhaps not necessarily solitary rodent species displayed a mixed spacing, with some huddling and some scattering. The findings of the present study shed light on the defensive dynamics of small groups of social and non-social rodent species when they were under owl attack.

Significance statement

Freezing and fleeing are defensive responses that span the animal kingdom, and rodents display various combinations of these in order to prevent predators from predicting their response. Groups of six voles or six spiny mice that were attacked by a barn owl differentially displayed these responses during various phases of the owl attack. Responses also varied among individuals of the same group and among different groups. Finally, we show that when exposed to an owl and displayed freeze response, individuals of social species tended to huddle together, whereas individuals of solitary species scattered over the arena.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abramsky Z, Rosenzweig ML, Brand S (1985) Habitat selection of Israel desert rodents—comparison of a traditional and a new method of analysis. Oikos 45:79–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alagaili AN, Mohammed OB, Bennett NC, Oosthuizen MK (2012) Lights out, let’s move about: locomotory activity patterns of Wagner’s gerbil from the desert of Saudi Arabia. Afr Zool 47:195–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacigalupe LD, Rezende EL, Kenagy GJ, Bozinovic F (2003) Activity and space use by degus: a trade-off between thermal conditions and food availability? J Mammal 84:311–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bednekoff P, Lima S (1998) Randomness, chaos and confusion in the study of antipredator vigilance. Trends Ecol Evol 13:284–287

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berger J (1979) “Predator harassment” as a defensive strategy in ungulates. Am Midl Nat 102:197–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertram BC (1978) Living in groups: predators and prey. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 64–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodek S, Eilam D (2015) Revisiting the “visible burrow system”: the impact of the group, social rank, and gender on voles under owl attack. Physiol Behav 146:79–85

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boesch C (1991) The effects of leopard predation on grouping patterns in forest chimpanzees. Behaviour 117:220–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen MT, Kevin RC, May M, Staples LG, Hunt GE, McGregor IS (2013) Defensive aggregation (huddling) in Rattus norvegicus toward predator odor: individual differences, social buffering effects and neural correlates. PLoS One 8:e68483

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Charter M, Izhaki I, Shapira L, Leshem Y (2007) Diets of urban breeding barn owls (Tyto alba) in Tel Aviv, Israel. Wilson J Ornithol 119:484–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charter M, Izhaki I, Meyrom K, Motro Y, Leshem Y (2009) Diets of barn owls differ in the same agricultural region. Wilson J Ornithol 121:378–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman RA, Browne M, Theobalds T (2004) Aggregation as a defense: limpet tenacity changes in response to simulated predator attack. Ecology 85:1153–1159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis M (1998) Are different parts of the extended amygdala involved in fear versus anxiety? Biol Psychiatry 44:1239–1247

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins R, Krebs JR (1978) Animal signals: information or manipulation. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach. Blackwell Scientific Publications, London, pp 282–309

  • Demirbaş Y, Pamukoğlu N (2008) The bioecology of Meriones tristrami Thomas, 1892 in Kirikkale province (Mammalia: Rodentia). Int J Nat Eng Sci 2:39–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Domenici P, Blagburn JM, Bacon JP (2011a) Animal escapology I: theoretical issues and emerging trends in escape trajectories. J Exp Biol 214:2463–2473

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Domenici P, Blagburn JM, Bacon JP (2011b) Animal escapology II: escape trajectory case studies. J Exp Biol 214:2474–2494

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Dugatkin LA, Godin J-GJ (1992) Prey approaching predators: a cost-benefit perspective. Ann Zool Fenn 29:233–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutour M, Lena J-P, Lengagne T (2016) Mobbing behaviour varies according to predator dangerousness and occurrence. Anim Behav 119:119–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edut S, Eilam D (2003) Rodents in open space adjust their behavioral response to the different risk levels during barn-owl attack. BMC Ecol 3:10

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Edut S, Eilam D (2004) Protean behavior under barn-owl attack: voles alternate between freezing and fleeing and spiny mice flee in alternating patterns. Behav Brain Res 155:207–216

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eilam D (2005) Die hard: a blend of freezing and fleeing as a dynamic defense—implications for the control of defensive behavior. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 29:1181–1191

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eilam D, Izhar R, Mort J (2011) Threat detection: behavioral consequences in animals and humans. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 35:999–1006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eilam D, Zadicario P, Genossar T, Mort J (2012) The anxious vole: the impact of group and gender on collective behavior under life-threat. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 66:959–968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elgar MA (1989) Predator vigilance and group size in mammals and birds: a critical review of the empirical evidence. Biol Rev 64:13–33

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gliwicz ZM, Maszczyk P, Jablonski J, Wrzosek D (2013) Patch exploitation by planktivorous fish and the concept of aggregation as an antipredation defense in zooplankton. Limnol Oceanogr 58:1621–1639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gromov VS, Krasnov BR, Shenbrot GI (2001) Behavioural correlates of spatial distribution in Wagner’s gerbil Gerbillus dasyurus (Rodentia, Gerbillinae). Mammalia 65:111–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton W (1971) Geometry for the selfish herd. J Theor Biol 31:295–311

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Handegard NO, Boswell KM, Ioannou CC, Leblanc SP, Tjostheim DB, Couzin ID (2012) The dynamics of coordinated group hunting and collective information transfer among schooling prey. Curr Biol 22:1213–1217

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haughton CL, Gawriluk TR, Seifert AW (2016) The biology and husbandry of the African spiny mouse (Acomys cahirinus) and the research uses of a laboratory colony. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci 55:9–17

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hausmann L, Plachta DT, Singheiser M, Brill S, Wagner H (2008) In-flight corrections in free-flying barn owls (Tyto alba) during sound localization tasks. J Exp Biol 211:2976–2988

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holand O, Weladji RB, Gjostein H, Kumpula J, Smith ME, Nieminen M, Roed KH (2004) Reproductive effort in relation to maternal social rank in reindeer (Rangifer tarandus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 57:69–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphries D, Driver P (1970) Protean defence by prey animals. Oecologia 5:285–302

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ilany A, Eilam D (2008) Wait before running for your life: defensive tactics of spiny mice (Acomys cahirinus) in evading barn owl (Tyto alba) attack. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62:923–933

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Izhar R, Eilam D (2010) Together they stand: a life-threatening event reduces individual behavioral variability in groups of voles. Behav Brain Res 208:282–285

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jaksić FM, Yáñez JL (1979) The diet of the barn owl in central Chile and its relation to the availability of prey. Auk 96:619–621

    Google Scholar 

  • Kikusui T, Winslow JT, Mori Y (2006) Social buffering: relief from stress and anxiety. Philos Trans R Soc B 361:2215–2228

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kleiman M, Bodek S, Eilam D (2014) Who are the bosses? Group influence on the behavior of voles following owl attack. Behav Process 108:183–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knudsen EI (2002) Instructed learning in the auditory localization pathway of the barn owl. Nature 417(6886):322–328

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krause J, Ruxton GD (2002) Living in groups. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Lay DM (1967) A study of the mammals of Iran: resulting from the street expedition of 1962–63. Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Lima SL, Dill LM (1990) Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation—a review and prospectus. Can J Zool 68:619–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maksimović N, Žujović M, Hristov S, Petrović M, Stanković B, Tomić Z, Stanišić N (2012) Association between the social rank, body mass, testicular circumference and linear body measures of rams. Biotechnol Anim Husb 28:253–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandelik Y (1999) Foraging microhabitat use and foraging efficiencies of the common spiny mouse, Acomys cahirinus. Master’s dissertation, Tel Aviv University

  • Mendelssohn H, Yom-Tov Y (1999) Fauna palaestina: mammalia of israel. Keterpress Enterprises, Jerusalem

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelletier F, Festa-Bianchet M (2006) Sexual selection and social rank in bighorn rams. Anim Behav 71:649–655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pusey AE, Packer C (1997) The ecology of relationships. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach, 4th edn. Wiley, NY, pp 254–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritz D (1994) Social aggregation in pelagic invertebrates. Adv Mar Biol 30:155–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roulin A (2004) Covariation between plumage colour polymorphism and diet in the barn owl Tyto alba. Ibis 146:509–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shargal E, Kronfeld-Schor N, Dayan T (2000) Population biology and spatial relationships of coexisting spiny mice (Acomys) in Israel. J Mammal 81:1046–1052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shifferman E, Eilam D (2004) Movement and direction of movement of a simulated prey affect the success rate in barn owl Tyto alba attack. J Avian Biol 35:111–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sillen-Tullberg B, Leimar O (1988) The evolution of gregariousness in distasteful insects as a defense against predators. Am Nat 132:723–734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szulkin M, Dawidowicz P, Dodson SI (2006) Behavioural uniformity as a response to cues of predation risk. Anim Behav 71:1013–1019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taillon J, Cote SD (2006) The role of previous social encounters and body mass in determining social rank: an experiment with white-tailed deer. Anim Behav 72:1103–1110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vine I (1973) Detection of prey flocks by predators. J Theor Biol 40:207–210

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vulinec K (1990) Collective security: aggregation by insects as a defense. In: Evans DL, Schmidt JO (eds) Insect defenses: adaptive mechanisms and strategies of prey and predators. State University of New York Press, Albany, pp 251–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson EO (2000) Sociobiology. Harvard University Press, NY

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Naomi Paz for language editing, and the anonymous reviewers for their thoughtful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Zoology, Tel-Aviv University, 69978, Ramat-Aviv, Israel

    Chen Rabi, Pazit Zadicario, Yael Mazon, Naama Wagner & David Eilam

Authors
  1. Chen Rabi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pazit Zadicario
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yael Mazon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Naama Wagner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. David Eilam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Eilam.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving animals were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Institutional Committee for Animal Experimentation at Tel-Aviv University (permit no. L-15-011).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Data availability

The datasets generated during the current study are available with no restriction, on request from the corresponding author.

Additional information

Communicated by E. Korpimäki

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(MP4 2213 kb).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rabi, C., Zadicario, P., Mazon, Y. et al. The response of social and non-social rodents to owl attack. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 71, 131 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-017-2359-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-017-2359-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation