Individual differences are consistent across changes in mating status and mediated by biogenic amines
- 235 Downloads
Although aspects of an individual’s state are well-known to influence the expression of behavior, it is still unclear how elements of state affect consistent among-individual differences in behavior. With binary, irreversible elements of state, such as mating status, there may be optimal behavioral phenotypes before and after mating, with individuals often prioritizing mate acquisition before and resource acquisition after. Yet, limited plasticity may prevent optimal behavior in both contexts. Additionally, it remains largely unknown if some consistencies in neural or physiological traits may limit the ability of the organism to respond to state changes. In this study, we investigated how changes in a binary state variable, mating status, affected both the mean expression and among-individual variation in behavior and web structure of the redback spider, Latrodectus hasselti. Furthermore, we explored the role of biogenic amines in potentially mediating individual differences in behavior and web structure. We found that mated females were overall more aggressive than virgin females and also built webs structured primarily for capturing prey rather than safety. We also found that individual differences in behavior and web structure were maintained across mating statuses, which indicates the stability of these traits and may drive personality-specific state-dependent fitness trade-offs. Finally, we found that aggressive spiders had higher central nervous system dopamine levels. Interestingly, web structure was often correlated with a catabolite of tyramine (N-acetyltyramine), suggesting that variation in amine catabolism, and not the concentrations of the amines themselves, may drive individual differences in some traits.
Our results demonstrate that although individuals show plasticity in response to changes in state, specifically mating status, individuals also maintain among-individual differences across this state change. Thus, aggressive individuals before mating will tend to be aggressive after. This maintenance of individual differences across state may drive differential fitness benefits before and after mating for different behavioral phenotypes. Furthermore, we show that biogenic amines and their catabolites are related to individual differences, thus identifying a potential mechanism underlying consistent variation.
KeywordsAnimal personality Latrodectus Widow spider State-dependent behavior Mechanisms Hormones
We thank Dr. Katrina Dlugosch for the use of her microbalance, as well as Pierre-Olivier Montiglio and Anna Dornhaus for comments on the original version of this manuscript.
Compliance with ethical standards
ND was supported by the Japanese Society for the Promotion of Science Postdoctoral Fellowship and the University of Arizona Postdoctoral Excellence in Research and Teaching Fellowship (NIH No. 5K12GM000708-17). HA was supported by grants-in-aid for scientific research (KAKENHI) from the JSPS (15F15084).
The data from this study have been deposited in the Dryad data repository: doi: 10.5061/dryad.8tf05.
- Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2013) lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1Google Scholar
- Belgrad BA, Griffen BD (2016) Predator–prey interactions mediated by prey personality and predator hunting mode. Proc R Soc B 283:1828. The Royal SocietyGoogle Scholar
- Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2003) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer Science & Business MediaGoogle Scholar
- DiRienzo N, Montiglio PO (2016a) Linking consistent individual differences in web structure and behavior in black widow spiders. Behav Ecol 27(5):1424–1431Google Scholar
- Fauvergue X, Genco AL, Pinto ML (2008) Virgins in the wild: mating status affects the behavior of a parasitoid foraging in the field. Oecologia 156:913–920Google Scholar
- Fisher DN, David M, Tregenza, T, Rodríguez-Muñoz R (2015) Dynamics of among-individual behavioral variation over adult lifespan in a wild insect. Behav Ecol 26(4):975–985Google Scholar
- Lüpold S, Manier MK, Ala-Honkola O, Belote JM, Pitnick S (2010) Male Drosophila melanogaster adjust ejaculate size based on female mating status, fecundity, and age. Behav Ecol 22(1):184–191Google Scholar
- Montiglio PO, DiRienzo N (2016) There’s no place like home: the contribution of direct and extended phenotypes on the expression of spider aggressiveness. Behav Ecol 27(6):1880–1888. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arw094
- Myles-Gonzalez E, Burness G, Yavno S, Rooke A, Fox MG (2015) To boldly go where no goby has gone before: boldness, dispersal tendency, and metabolism at the invasion front. Behav Ecol 26(4):1083–1090Google Scholar
- Nakagawa S, Schielzeth H (2010) Repeatability for Gaussian and non-Gaussian data: a practical guide for biologists. Biol Rev 85(4):935–956. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2010.00141.x
- R Core Team (2015) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. In. Available from CRAN sites. https://cran.r-project.org/
- Ross K, Smith RL (1979) Aspects of the courtship behavior of the black widow spider, Latrodectus hesperus (Araneae: Theridiidae), with evidence for the existence of a contact sex pheromone. J Arachnol 69–77Google Scholar
- Shulov A (1940) On the biology of two Latrodectus spiders in Palestine. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of London. Vol. 152. No. 3. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
- Walcott C (1963) The effect of the web on vibration sensitivity in the spider, Achaearanea tepidariorum (Koch). J Exp Biol 40:595–611Google Scholar
- Wingfield JC, Ball GF, Dufty AM, Hegner RE, Ramenofsky M (1987) Testosterone and aggression in birds. Am Sci 75:602–608Google Scholar