Advertisement

Individual differences are consistent across changes in mating status and mediated by biogenic amines

  • Nicholas DiRienzo
  • Hitoshi Aonuma
Original Article

Abstract

Although aspects of an individual’s state are well-known to influence the expression of behavior, it is still unclear how elements of state affect consistent among-individual differences in behavior. With binary, irreversible elements of state, such as mating status, there may be optimal behavioral phenotypes before and after mating, with individuals often prioritizing mate acquisition before and resource acquisition after. Yet, limited plasticity may prevent optimal behavior in both contexts. Additionally, it remains largely unknown if some consistencies in neural or physiological traits may limit the ability of the organism to respond to state changes. In this study, we investigated how changes in a binary state variable, mating status, affected both the mean expression and among-individual variation in behavior and web structure of the redback spider, Latrodectus hasselti. Furthermore, we explored the role of biogenic amines in potentially mediating individual differences in behavior and web structure. We found that mated females were overall more aggressive than virgin females and also built webs structured primarily for capturing prey rather than safety. We also found that individual differences in behavior and web structure were maintained across mating statuses, which indicates the stability of these traits and may drive personality-specific state-dependent fitness trade-offs. Finally, we found that aggressive spiders had higher central nervous system dopamine levels. Interestingly, web structure was often correlated with a catabolite of tyramine (N-acetyltyramine), suggesting that variation in amine catabolism, and not the concentrations of the amines themselves, may drive individual differences in some traits.

Significance statement

Our results demonstrate that although individuals show plasticity in response to changes in state, specifically mating status, individuals also maintain among-individual differences across this state change. Thus, aggressive individuals before mating will tend to be aggressive after. This maintenance of individual differences across state may drive differential fitness benefits before and after mating for different behavioral phenotypes. Furthermore, we show that biogenic amines and their catabolites are related to individual differences, thus identifying a potential mechanism underlying consistent variation.

Keywords

Animal personality Latrodectus Widow spider State-dependent behavior Mechanisms Hormones 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Katrina Dlugosch for the use of her microbalance, as well as Pierre-Olivier Montiglio and Anna Dornhaus for comments on the original version of this manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Funding

ND was supported by the Japanese Society for the Promotion of Science Postdoctoral Fellowship and the University of Arizona Postdoctoral Excellence in Research and Teaching Fellowship (NIH No. 5K12GM000708-17). HA was supported by grants-in-aid for scientific research (KAKENHI) from the JSPS (15F15084).

Data availability

The data from this study have been deposited in the Dryad data repository: doi: 10.5061/dryad.8tf05.

Supplementary material

265_2017_2345_MOESM1_ESM.docx (178 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 178 kb)

References

  1. Adamo S, Linn C, Hoy R (1995) The role of neurohormonal octopamine during ‘fight or flight’ behaviour in the field cricket Gryllus bimaculatus. J Exp Biol 198:1691–1700PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Amrhein V, Korner P, Naguib M (2002) Nocturnal and diurnal singing activity in the nightingale: correlations with mating status and breeding cycle. Anim Behav 64:939–944CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andrade M (1996) Sexual selection for male sacrifice in redback spiders. Science 271:70–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anton S, Dufour MC, Gadenne C (2007) Plasticity of olfactory-guided behaviour and its neurobiological basis: lessons from moths and locusts. Entomol Exp Appl 123:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aonuma H, Watanabe T (2012) Changes in the content of brain biogenic amine associated with early colony establishment in the queen of the ant, Formica japonica. PLoS One 7:e43377CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Arnqvist G, Henriksson S (1997) Sexual cannibalism in the fishing spider and a model for the evolution of sexual cannibalism based on genetic constraints. Evol Ecol 11:255–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baruffaldi L, Andrade MC (2015) Contact pheromones mediate male preference in black widow spiders: avoidance of hungry sexual cannibals? Anim Behav 102:25–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2013) lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1Google Scholar
  9. Belgrad BA, Griffen BD (2016) Predator–prey interactions mediated by prey personality and predator hunting mode. Proc R Soc B 283:1828. The Royal SocietyGoogle Scholar
  10. Bell AM, Hankison SJ, Laskowski KL (2009) The repeatability of behaviour: a meta-analysis. Anim Behav 77:771–783CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Bergström J, Wiklund C, Kaitala A (2002) Natural variation in female mating frequency in a polyandrous butterfly: effects of size and age. Anim Behav 64:49–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Blackledge TA, Zevenbergen JM (2007) Condition-dependent spider web architecture in the western black widow, Latrodectus hesperus. Anim Behav 73:855–864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Blackledge TA, Coddington JA, Gillespie RG (2003) Are three-dimensional spider webs defensive adaptations? Ecol Lett 6:13–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Blount JD, Surai PF, Nager RG, Houston DC, Møller AP, Trewby ML, Kennedy MW (2002) Carotenoids and egg quality in the lesser black-backed gull Larus fuscus: a supplemental feeding study of maternal effects. Proc Roy Soc Lond B Biol Sci 269:29–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2003) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer Science & Business MediaGoogle Scholar
  16. Clotfelter ED, O'Hare EP, McNitt MM, Carpenter RE, Summers CH (2007) Serotonin decreases aggression via 5-HT 1A receptors in the fighting fish Betta splendens. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 87:222–231CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Coats J, Poulin R, Nakagawa S (2010) The consequences of parasitic infections for host behavioural correlations and repeatability. Behaviour 147:367–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. David M, Auclair Y, Giraldeau LA, Cézilly F (2012) Personality and body condition have additive effects on motivation to feed in zebra finches Taeniopygia guttata. Ibis 154:372–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dierick HA (2008) Fly fighting: octopamine modulates aggression. Curr Biol 18:R161–R163CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Dill LM (1983) Adaptive flexibility in the foraging behavior of fishes. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 40:398–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dingemanse NJ, Both C, Drent PJ, Tinbergen JM (2004) Fitness consequences of avian personalities in a fluctuating environment. Proc Roy Soc Lond B Biol Sci 271:847–852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. DiRienzo N, Montiglio PO (2016a) Linking consistent individual differences in web structure and behavior in black widow spiders. Behav Ecol 27(5):1424–1431Google Scholar
  23. DiRienzo N, Montiglio PO (2016b) The contribution of developmental experience vs. condition to life history, trait variation and individual differences. J Anim Ecol 85:915–926CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. DiRienzo N, Pruitt JN, Hedrick AV (2013) The combined behavioural tendencies of predator and prey mediate the outcome of their interaction. Anim Behav 86:317–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. DiRienzo N, McDermott DR, Pruitt JN (2015) Testing the effects of biogenic amines and alternative topical solvent types on the behavioral repertoire of two web-building spiders. Ethology 121:801–812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. DiRienzo N, Niemelä PT, Hedrick AV, Kortet R (2016) Adult bacterial exposure increases behavioral variation and drives higher repeatability in field crickets. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 70:1941–1947CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Downes MF (1985) Fecundity and fertility in Latrodectus hasselti (Araneae: Theridiidae). Aust J Ecol 10:261–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Duckworth RA (2008) Adaptive dispersal strategies and the dynamics of a range expansion. The Am Nat 172:S4–S17CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Duckworth RA, Badyaev AV (2007) Coupling of dispersal and aggression facilitates the rapid range expansion of a passerine bird. Proc Nat Acad Sci 104:15017–15022CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Fauvergue X, Genco AL, Pinto ML (2008) Virgins in the wild: mating status affects the behavior of a parasitoid foraging in the field. Oecologia 156:913–920Google Scholar
  31. Fisher DN, David M, Tregenza, T, Rodríguez-Muñoz R (2015) Dynamics of among-individual behavioral variation over adult lifespan in a wild insect. Behav Ecol 26(4):975–985Google Scholar
  32. Grinsted L, Pruitt JN, Settepani V, Bilde T (2013) Individual personalities shape task differentiation in a social spider. Proc Roy Soc Lond B Biol Sci 280:20131407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hebets EA, Hansen M, Jones TC, Wilgers DJ (2015) Octopamine levels relate to male mating tactic expression in the wolf spider Rabidosa punctulata. Anim Behav 100:136–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Herberstein M, Schneider J, Elgar M (2002) Costs of courtship and mating in a sexually cannibalistic orb-web spider: female mating strategies and their consequences for males. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 51:440–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Höger U, Torkkeli PH, Seyfarth E-A, French AS (1997) Ionic selectivity of mechanically activated channels in spider mechanoreceptor neurons. J Neurophysiol 78:2079–2085PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Iba M, Nagao T, Urano A (1995) Effects of population density on growth, behavior and levels of biogenic amines in the cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus. Zool Sci 12:695–702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Isaac RE, Li C, Leedale AE, Shirras AD (2010) Drosophila male sex peptide inhibits siesta sleep and promotes locomotor activity in the post-mated female. Proc Roy Soc Lond B Biol Sci 277:65–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Johnson JC, Sih A (2005) Precopulatory sexual cannibalism in fishing spiders (Dolomedes triton): a role for behavioral syndromes. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 58:390–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jones TC, Akoury TS, Hauser CK, Neblett MF II, Linville BJ, Edge AA, Weber NO (2011) Octopamine and serotonin have opposite effects on antipredator behavior in the orb-weaving spider, Larinioides cornutus. J Comp Physiol A 197:819–825CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kasumovic MM, Andrade MC (2004) Discrimination of airborne pheromones by mate-searching male western black widow spiders (Latrodectus hesperus): species-and population-specific responses. Can J Zool 82:1027–1034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Katz K, Naug D (2015) Energetic state regulates the exploration–exploitation trade-off in honeybees. Behav Ecol 26:1045–1050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kekäläinen J, Lai Y-T, Vainikka A, Sirkka I, Kortet R (2014) Do brain parasites alter host personality?—experimental study in minnows. Behav Ecol Socibiol 68:197–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Larsen T (1991) Anti-predator behaviour and mating systems in waders: aggressive nest defence selects for monogamy. Anim Behav 41:1057–1062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Le Galliard J-F, Paquet M, Cisel M, Montes-Poloni L (2013) Personality and the pace-of-life syndrome: variation and selection on exploration, metabolism and locomotor performances. Funct Ecol 27:136–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lüpold S, Manier MK, Ala-Honkola O, Belote JM, Pitnick S (2010) Male Drosophila melanogaster adjust ejaculate size based on female mating status, fecundity, and age. Behav Ecol 22(1):184–191Google Scholar
  46. McNamara JM, Houston AI (1996) State-dependent life histories. Nature 380:215–221CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Miyatake T, Tabuchi K, Sasaki K, Okada K, Katayama K, Moriya S (2008) Pleiotropic antipredator strategies, fleeing and feigning death, correlated with dopamine levels in Tribolium castaneum. Anim Behav 75:113–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Møller AP, Alatalo RV (1999) Good-genes effects in sexual selection. Proc Roy Soc Lond B Biol Sci 266:85–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Montiglio PO, DiRienzo N (2016) There’s no place like home: the contribution of direct and extended phenotypes on the expression of spider aggressiveness. Behav Ecol 27(6):1880–1888. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arw094
  50. Moore AJ (1994) Genetic evidence for the “good genes” process of sexual selection. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 35:235–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Myles-Gonzalez E, Burness G, Yavno S, Rooke A, Fox MG (2015) To boldly go where no goby has gone before: boldness, dispersal tendency, and metabolism at the invasion front. Behav Ecol 26(4):1083–1090Google Scholar
  52. Nagao T, Tanimura T (1988) Distribution of biogenic amines in the cricket central nervous system. Anal Biochem 171:33–40CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Nagao T, Tanimura T (1989) Simultaneous determination of biogenic amines, their precursors and metabolites in a single brain of the cricket using high-performance liquid chromatography with amperometric detection. J Chromatogr B Biomed Sci Appl 496:39–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Nakagawa S, Schielzeth H (2010) Repeatability for Gaussian and non-Gaussian data: a practical guide for biologists. Biol Rev 85(4):935–956. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2010.00141.x
  55. Nakagawa S, Schielzeth H (2013) A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods Ecol Evol 4:133–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Nishi Y, Sasaki K, Miyatake T (2010) Biogenic amines, caffeine and tonic immobility in Tribolium castaneum. J Insect Physiol 56:622–628CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Nonacs P (2001) State dependent behavior and the marginal value theorem. Behav Ecol 12:71–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Parry D (1965) The signal generated by an insect in a spider’s web. J Exp Biol 43:185–192CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Petelle MB, McCoy DE, Alejandro V, Martin JG, Blumstein DT (2013) Development of boldness and docility in yellow-bellied marmots. Anim Behav 86:1147–1154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Pruitt JN, Riechert SE, Jones TC (2008) Behavioural syndromes and their fitness consequences in a socially polymorphic spider, Anelosimus studiosus. Anim Behav 76:871–879CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Puiroux J, Moreau R, Gourdoux L (1990) Variations of biogenic amine levels in the brain of Pieris brassicae pupae during nondiapausing and diapausing development. Arch Insect Biochem 14:57–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Punzo F, Williams D (1994) Free amino acids and biogenic amines in the brain of the carpenter ant, Campanotus floridanus (Buckley)(Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Comp Biochem Physiol C Pharmacol Toxicol Endocrinol 107:387–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Réale D, Garant D, Humphries MM, Bergeron P, Careau V, Montiglio P-O (2010) Personality and the emergence of the pace-of-life syndrome concept at the population level. Phil trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 365:4051–4063CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. R Core Team (2015) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. In. Available from CRAN sites. https://cran.r-project.org/
  65. Richards SA (2005) Testing ecological theory using the information-theoretic approach: examples and cautionary results. Ecology 86:2805–2814CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Roeder T (2005) Tyramine and octopamine: ruling behavior and metabolism. Annu Rev Entomol 50:447–477CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Ross K, Smith RL (1979) Aspects of the courtship behavior of the black widow spider, Latrodectus hesperus (Araneae: Theridiidae), with evidence for the existence of a contact sex pheromone. J Arachnol 69–77Google Scholar
  68. Ruther J, Stahl LM, Steiner S, Garbe LA, Tolasch T (2007) A male sex pheromone in a parasitic wasp and control of the behavioral response by the female’s mating status. J Exp Biol 210:2163–2169CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Salomon M (2009) Social environment and feeding state influence movement decisions in a web-building spider. Ethology 115:916–927CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Sasaki K, Yamasaki K, Nagao T (2007) Neuro-endocrine correlates of ovarian development and egg-laying behaviors in the primitively eusocial wasp (Polistes chinensis). J Insect Physiol 53:940–949CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Shulov A (1940) On the biology of two Latrodectus spiders in Palestine. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of London. Vol. 152. No. 3. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  72. Sih A, Bell A, Johnson JC (2004) Behavioral syndromes: an ecological and evolutionary overview. Trends Ecol Evol 19:372–378CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Sinn DL, Gosling SD, Moltschaniwskyj NA (2008) Development of shy/bold behaviour in squid: context-specific phenotypes associated with developmental plasticity. Anim Behav 75:433–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Stevenson PA, Dyakonova V, Rillich J, Schildberger K (2005) Octopamine and experience-dependent modulation of aggression in crickets. J Neurosci 25:1431–1441CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Timonin M, Carriere C, Dudych A, Latimer J, Unruh S, Willis C (2011) Individual differences in the behavioural responses of meadow voles to an unfamiliar environment are not correlated with variation in resting metabolic rate. J Zool 284:198–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Vibert S, Scott C, Gries G (2014) A meal or a male: the ‘whispers’ of black widow males do not trigger a predatory response in females. Front Zool 11:1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Wada-Katsumata A, Yamaoka R, Aonuma H (2011) Social interactions influence dopamine and octopamine homeostasis in the brain of the ant Formica japonica. J Exp Biol 214:1707–1713CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Walcott C (1963) The effect of the web on vibration sensitivity in the spider, Achaearanea tepidariorum (Koch). J Exp Biol 40:595–611Google Scholar
  79. Watts JC, Ross CR, Jones TC (2015) Diel and life-history characteristics of personality: consistency versus flexibility in relation to ecological change. Anim Behav 101:43–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Wexler Y, Subach A, Pruitt JN, Scharf I (2016) Behavioral repeatability of flour beetles before and after metamorphosis and throughout aging. Behav Ecol and Sociobiol 70:745–753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Wingfield JC, Ball GF, Dufty AM, Hegner RE, Ramenofsky M (1987) Testosterone and aggression in birds. Am Sci 75:602–608Google Scholar
  82. Wuerz Y, Krüger O (2015) Personality over ontogeny in zebra finches: long-term repeatable traits but unstable behavioural syndromes. Front in zool 12:1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Zevenbergen JM, Schneider NK, Blackledge TA (2008) Fine dining or fortress? Functional shifts in spider web architecture by the western black widow Latrodectus hesperus. Anim Behav 76:823–829CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of ArizonaTucsonUSA
  2. 2.Hokkaido UniversitySapporoJapan
  3. 3.CREST, Japan Science and Technology AgencyKawaguchiJapan

Personalised recommendations