Leadership of old females in collective departures in wild bonobos (Pan paniscus) at Wamba

Abstract

Group-living animals need to coordinate their activity in order to maintain gregariousness. Although individuals have their own nutritional, social, and reproductive needs, they have to reach consensus to decide where and when to travel. Collective movements are the outcome of one individual’s departure, who is then followed by other group members. We investigated departure initiation in a group of bonobos at Wamba, DR Congo, to determine the distribution of leadership among group members. If three or more bonobos started moving more than 30 m, we assigned the individual who moved first as the one who initiated the movement. Two hundred and fifty-four departures were observed. First, we examined whether the frequency of initiation differed according to the following attributes of individuals: sex, age, stage in sexual swelling cycle, dominance, and affiliative relationship. We also examined whether one or more individual(s) initiate departure more or less frequently than expected by chance. A significant interaction between sex and age was found, indicating that the effect of age was greater among females than among males. Individuals who were more central to the grooming network initiated departures more frequently. The three oldest females initiated more often than expected. Old females may be followed because of coalitionary supports they often give to younger females, and of their greater knowledge about ranging area. Leadership in bonobos was not equally shared among group members, and old females were “key individuals” who helped to maintain cohesiveness in their fission-fusion society.

Significance statement

When group-living animals travel from one location to another, they must coordinate when and where to travel; otherwise, they might spread apart. Bonobos are one of our closest living relatives and have a fission-fusion social system. We investigated the initiation of group departure in wild bonobos to determine the distribution of leadership among group members. We found that the frequency of initiation was associated with the individual’s age, affiliative relationships, and male dominance rank. The three oldest females initiated departures more frequently than expected, suggesting that these individuals were habitual initiators and took an important role to preserve cohesiveness. We discuss how this “old female leadership” may emerge in a male-philopatric society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Altmann J (1974) Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. Behaviour 49:227–267

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Aplin LM, Farine DR, Morand-Ferron J, Cockburn A, Thornton A, Sheldon BC (2015) Experimentally induced innovations lead to persistent culture via conformity in wild birds. Nature 518:538–541

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Aureli F, Schaffner CM, Boesch C, Bearder SK, Call J, Chapman CA, Connor R, Fiore AD, Dunbar RIM, Henzi SP, Holekamp K, Korstjens AH, Layton R, Lee P, Lehmann J, Manson JH, Ramos-Fernandez G, Strier KB, van Schaik CP (2008) Fission-fusion dynamics: new research frameworks. Curr Anthropol 49:627–654

    Google Scholar 

  4. Barelli C, Boesch C, Heistermann M, Reichard UH (2008) Female white-handed gibbons (Hylobates lar) lead group movements and have priority of access to food resources. Behaviour 145:965–981

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Belle SV, Estrada A, Garber PA (2013) Collective group movement and leadership in wild black howler monkeys (Alouatta pigra). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 67:31–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Berry PSM, Bercovitch FB (2015) Leadership of herd progressions in the Thornicroft’s giraffe of Zambia. Afr J Ecol 53:175–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Boesch C, Boesch-Achermann H (2000) The chimpanzees of the Taï forest: behavioural ecology and evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  8. Boesch C, Hohmann G, Marchant LF (2002) Behavioral diversity in chimpanzees and bonobos. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  9. Boinski S (1991) The coordination of spatial position: a field study of the vocal behaviour of adult female squirrel monkeys. Anim Behav 41:89–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bonnani R, Cafazzo S, Valsecchi P, Natoli E (2010) Effect of affiliative and agonistic relationships on leadership behaviour in free-ranging dogs. Anim Behav 79:981–991

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bourjade M, Sueur C (2010) Shared or unshared consensus for collective movement? Towards methodological concerns. Behav Process 84:648–652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Brent LJN, Franks DW, Foster EA, Balcomb KC, Cant MA, Croft DP (2015) Ecological knowledge, leadership, and the evolution of menopause in killer whales. Curr Biol 25:746–750

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Childress MJ, Lung MA (2003) Predation risk, gender and the group size effect: does elk vigilance depend upon the behaviour of conspecifics? Anim Behav 66:389–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Conradt L, Roper TJ (2003) Group decision-making in animals. Nature 421:155–158

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Conradt L, Roper TJ (2005) Consensus decision making in animals. Trends Ecol Evol 20:449–456

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Conradt L, Roper TJ (2007) Democracy in animals: the evolution of shared group decisions. Proc R Soc Lond B 274:2317–2326

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Couzin I, Krause J (2003) Self-organization and collective behavior in vertebrates. Adv Stud Behav 32:1–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. de Waal FBM (1997) Bonobo, the forgotten ape. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles

    Google Scholar 

  19. Douglas PH, Hohmann G, Murtagh R, Thiessen-Bock R, Deschner T (2016) Mixed messages: wild female bonobos show high variability in the timing of ovulation in relation to sexual swelling patterns. BMC Evol Biol 16:140

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Douglas PH, Ngonga Ngomo AC, Hohmann G (2017) A novel approach for dominance assessment in gregarious species: ADAGIO. Anim Behav 123:21–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Erhart EM, Overdorff DJ (1999) Female coordination of group travel in wild Propithecus and Eulemur. Int J Primatol 20:927–940

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Eriksson J, Heike S, Dieter L, Kayser M, Erler A, Hashimoto C, Hohmann G, Boesch C, Vigilant L (2006) Y-chromosome analysis confirms highly sex-biased dispersal and suggests a low male effective population size in bonobos (Pan paniscus). Mol Ecol 15:939–949

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Fashing PJ (2001) Male and female strategies during intergroup encounters in guerezas (Colobus guereza): evidence for resource defense mediated through males and a comparison with other primates. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 50:219–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Fernández VA, Kowalewski M, Zunino GE (2013) Who is coordinating collective movements in black and gold howler monkeys? Primates 54:191–199

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Fischhoff IR, Sundaresan SR, Cordingley J, Larkin HM, Sellier MJ, Rubenstein DI (2007) Social relationships and reproductive state influence leadership roles in movements of plains zebra, Equus burchellii. Anim Behav 73:825–831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Flack A, Pettit B, Freeman R, Guilford T, Biro D (2012) What are leaders made of? The role of individual experience in determining leader–follower relations in homing pigeons. Anim Behav 83:703–709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Flack A, Ákos Z, Nagy M, Vicsek T, Biro D (2013) Robustness of flight leadership relations in pigeons. Anim Behav 86:723–732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Furrer RD, Kunc HP, Manser MB (2012) Variable initiators of group departure in a cooperative breeder: the influence of sex, age, state and foraging success. Anim Behav 84:205–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Furuichi T (1987) Sexual swelling, receptivity and grouping of wild pygmy chimpanzee females at Wamba, Zaire. Primates 28:309–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Furuichi T (1989) Social interactions and the life history of female Pan paniscus in Wamba, Zaire. Int J Primatol 10:173–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Furuichi T (1997) Agonistic interactions and Matrifocal dominance rank of wild bonobos (Pan paniscus) at Wamba. Int J Primatol 18:855–875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Furuichi T (2009) Factors underlying party size differences between chimpanzees and bonobos: a review and hypotheses for future study. Primates 50:197–209

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Furuichi T (2011) Female contributions to the peaceful nature of bonobo society. Evol Anthropol 20:131–142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Hare B, Melis AP, Woods V, Hastings S, Wrangham R (2007) Tolerance allows bonobos to outperform chimpanzees on a cooperative task. Curr Biol 17:619–623

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Hashimoto C, Furuichi T, Tashiro Y (2001) What factors affect the size of chimpanzee parties in the Kalinzu Forest, Uganda? Examination of fruit abundance and number of estrous females. Int J Primatol 22:947–959

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Hohmann G, Fruth B (2002) Dynamics in social organization in bonobos (Pan paniscus). In: Boesch C, Hohmann G, Marchant LF (eds) Behavioral diversity in chimpanzees and bonobos. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 138–155

    Google Scholar 

  37. Idani G (1991) Social relationships between immigrant and resident bonobo (Pan paniscus) females at Wamba. Folia Primatol 51:83–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Ingmanson EJ (1996) Tool-using behavior in wild Pan paniscus: social and ecological considerations. In: Russon AE, Kim AB, Sue TP (eds) Reaching into thought: the minds of the great apes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 190–210

    Google Scholar 

  39. Kaburu SSK, Newton-Fisher NE (2015) Egalitarian despots: hierarchy steepness, reciprocity and the grooming-trade model in wild chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes. Anim Behav 99:61–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Kano T (1982) The social group of pygmy chimpanzees (Pan paniscus) of Wamba. Primates 23:171–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Kano T (1992) The last ape: pygmy chimpanzee behavior and ecology. Stanford University Press, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  42. Kano T, Mulavwa M (1984) Feeding ecology of the pygmy chimpanzees (Pan paniscus) of Wamba. In: Susman RL (ed) The pygmy chimpanzee. Springer, New York, pp 233–274

    Google Scholar 

  43. King AJ (2010) Follow me! I’m a leader if you do; I’m a failed initiator if you don’t? Behav Process 84:671–674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. King AJ, Sueur C (2011) Where next? Group coordination and collective decision making by primates. Int J Primatol 6:1245–1267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. King AJ, Douglas CMS, Huchard E, Isaac NJB, Cowlishaw G (2008) Dominance and affiliation mediate despotism in a social primate. Curr Biol 18:1833–1838

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. King AJ, Johnson DDP, van Vugt M (2009) The origins and evolution of leadership. Curr Biol 19:911–916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Kuroda S (1979) Grouping of the pygmy chimpanzees. Primates 20:161–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Lehmann J, Boesch C (2008) Sexual differences in chimpanzee sociality. Int J Primatol 29:65–81

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Lewis JS, Wartzok D, Heithaus MR (2011) Highly dynamic fission–fusion species can exhibit leadership when traveling. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65:1061–1069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Lewis JS, Wartzok D, Heithaus MR (2013) Individuals as information sources: could followers benefit from leaders’ knowledge? Behaviour 150:635–657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Manly BFJ (2006) Randomization, bootstrap and Monte Carlo methods in biology, 3rd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL

    Google Scholar 

  52. McComb K, Moss C, Durant SM, Baker L, Sayialel S (2001) Matriarchs as repositories of social knowledge in African elephants. Science 292:491–494

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. McComb K, Shannon G, Durant SM, Sayialel K, Slotow R, Poole J, Moss C (2011) Leadership in elephants: the adaptive value of age. Proc R Soc Lond B 278:3270–3276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Mulavwa M, Furuichi T, Yangozene K, Yamba-Yamba M, Motema-Salo B, Idani G, Ihobe H, Hashimoto C, Tahiro Y, Mwanza N (2008) Seasonal changes in fruit production and party size of bonobos at Wamba. In: Furuichi T, Thompson J (eds) The bonobos: behavior, ecology, and conservation. Springer, New York, pp 121–134

    Google Scholar 

  55. Nunn CL (1999) The evolution of exaggerated sexual swellings in primates and the graded-signal hypothesis. Anim Behav 58:229–246

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Parish AR (1994) Sex and food control in the ‘uncommon chimpanzee’: how bonobo females overcome a phylogenetic legacy of male dominance. Ethol Sociobiol 15:157–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Parish AR (1996) Female relationships in bonobos (Pan paniscus). Hum Nature-Int Bios 7:61–96

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Parish AR, de Waal FBM (2000) The other ‘closest living relative’: how bonobos (Pan paniscus) challenge traditional assumptions about females, dominance, intra- and intersexual interactions, and hominid evolution. Ann N Y Acad Sci 907:97–113

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Peterson RO, Jacobs AK, Drummer TD, Mech LD, Smith DW (2002) Leadership behavior in relation to dominance and reproductive status in gray wolves, Canis lupus. Can J Zool 80:1405–1412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Petit O, Bon R (2010) Decision-making processes: the case of collective movements. Behav Process 84:635–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Pyritz L, Fichtel C, Kappeler P (2010) Conceptual and methodological issues in the comparative study of collective group movements. Behav Process 84:681–684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Pyritz LW, King AJ, Sueur C, Fichtel C (2011) Reaching a consensus: terminology and concepts used in coordination and decision-making research. Int J Primatol 32:1268–1278

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. R Development Core Team (2008) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna http://www.R-project.org

    Google Scholar 

  64. Reichert KE, Heistermann M, Keith Hodges J, Boesch C, Hohmann G (2002) What females tell males about their reproductive status: are morphological and behavioural cues reliable signals of ovulation in bonobos (Pan paniscus)? Ethology 108:583–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Ryu H, Hill DA, Furuichi T (2015) Prolonged maximal sexual swelling in wild bonobos facilitates affiliative interactions between females. Behaviour 152:285–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Sakamaki T, Behncke I, Laporte M, Mulavwa M, Ryu H, Takemoto H, Tokuyama N, Yamamoto S, Furuichi T (2015) Intergroup transfer of females and social relationships between immigrants and residents in bonobo (Pan paniscus) societies. In: Furuichi T, Yamagiwa J, Aureli F (eds) Dispersing primate females. Springer, Tokyo, pp 127–164

    Google Scholar 

  67. Schaller GB (1963) The mountain gorilla: ecology and behavior. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  68. Smith JE, Kolowski JM, Graham KE, Dawes SE, Holekamp KE (2008) Social and ecological determinants of fission–fusion dynamics in the spotted hyaena. Anim Behav 76:619–636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Smith JE, Estrada JR, Richards HR, Dawes SE, Mitsos K, Holekamp KE (2015) Collective movements, leadership and consensus costs at reunions in spotted hyaenas. Anim Behav 105:187–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Squires VR, Daws GT (1975) Leadership and dominance relationships in Merino and Border Leicester sheep. Appl Anim Ethol 1:263–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Stevens JMG, Vervaecke H, de Vries H, van Elsacker L (2006) Social structures in Pan paniscus: testing the female bonding hypothesis. Primates 47:210–217

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Stevens JMG, Vervaecke H, Vries H, van Elsacker L (2007) Sex differences in the steepness of dominance hierarchies in captive bonobo groups. Int J Primatol 28:1417–1430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Stueckle S, Zinner D (2008) To follow or not to follow: decision making and leadership during the morning departure in chacma baboons. Anim Behav 75:1995–2004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Sueur C, Petit O (2008) Shared or unshared consensus decision in macaques? Behav Process 78:84–92

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Sueur C, King AJ, Pelé M, Petit O (2013a) Fast and accurate decisions as a result of scale-free network properties in two primate species. In: Gilbert T, Kirkilionis M, Nicolis G (eds) Proceedings of the European Conference on Complex Systems 2012. Springer, New York, pp 579–584

  76. Sueur C, MacIntosh AJJ, Jacobs AT, Watanabe K, Petit O (2013b) Predicting leadership using nutrient requirements and dominance rank of group members. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 67:457–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Sumpter DJT (2006) The principles of collective animal behaviour. Philos T Roy Soc B 361:5–22

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Surbeck M, Hohmann G (2013) Intersexual dominance relationships and the influence of leverage on the outcome of conflicts in wild bonobos (Pan paniscus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 67:1767–1780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Surbeck M, Mundry R, Hohhman G (2011) Mothers matter! Maternal support, dominance status and mating success in male bonobos (Pan paniscus). Proc R Soc Lond B 278:590–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Tokuyama N, Furuichi T (2016) Do friends help each other? Patterns of female coalition formation in wild bonobos at Wamba. Anim Behav 119:27–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Trivers RL (1972) Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell B (ed) Sexual selection and the descent of man 1871–1971. Aldine Press, Chicago, pp 136–179

    Google Scholar 

  82. Vervaecke H, de Vries H, van Elsacker L (2000) Dominance and its behavioral measures in a captive group of bonobos (Pan paniscus). Int J Primatol:2147–2168

  83. Vugt MV (2006) Evolutionary origins of leadership and followership. Personal Soc Psychol Rev 10:354–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Wang X, Sun L, Sheeran LK, Sun BH, Zhang QX, Zhang D, Xia DP, Li JH (2016) Social rank versus affiliation: which is more closely related to leadership of group movements in Tibetan macaques (Macaca thibetana)? Am J Primatol 78:816–824

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Watts DP (2000) Mountain gorilla habitat use strategies and group movements. In: Boinski S, Garber PA (eds) On the move. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 351–374

    Google Scholar 

  86. White FJ (1988) Party composition and dynamics in Pan paniscus. Int J Primatol 9:179–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. White FJ (1998) Seasonality and socioecology: the importance of variation in fruit abundance to bonobo sociality. Int J Primatol 19:1013–1027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. White FJ, Wood KD (2007) Female feeding priority in bonobos, Pan paniscus, and the question of female dominance. Am J Primatol 69:837–850

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Yamagiwa J, Kahekwa J, Basabose AK (2003) Intra-specific variation in social organization of gorillas: implications for their social evolution. Primates 44:359–369

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Research Centre for Ecology and Forestry and the Ministry of Scientific Research, Democratic Republic of the Congo. We especially thank our local assistants, Iyokango Bahanande, Emikei Besao, Bafike Batuafe, Isolumbo Batoafe, and Mboka Batondonga, for their help in the forest. We thank Tetsuya Sakamaki, Mbomba Bekeli, Takakazu Yumoto, Shinya Yamamoto, Cintia Garai, Heungjin Ryu, Kirsty Graham, Saeko Terada, and Kazuya Toda for their help during field research and for their fruitful discussions. We thank members of the Ecology and Social Behavior section of the Primate Research Institute, Kyoto University, and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nahoko Tokuyama.

Ethics declarations

Funding

This study was financially supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) ITP-HOPE Project (to NT), JSPS Research Fellowships for Young Scientist (to NT), and Global Leadership Training Program in Africa provided by United Nations University (to NT), and JSPS Grants-in-aid for Scientific Research (to TF).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

Our study was approved by the Ministry of Scientific Research, Democratic Republic of the Congo, and conformed to the Guidelines for Field Research established by the Ethics Committee of the Primate Research Institute, Kyoto University. Our investigation followed the International Primatological Society guidelines for the study of non-human primates.

Additional information

Communicated by M. A. van Noordwijk

Electronic supplementary material

Supplemental Table 1

(DOCX 16 kb).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tokuyama, N., Furuichi, T. Leadership of old females in collective departures in wild bonobos (Pan paniscus) at Wamba. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 71, 55 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-017-2277-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • Bonobos
  • Collective movement
  • Fission-fusion
  • Initiation
  • Leadership
  • Pan paniscus