To pee or not to pee: urine signals mediate aggressive interactions in the cooperatively breeding cichlid Neolamprologus pulcher

  • Dario-Marcos Bayani
  • Michael Taborsky
  • Joachim G. Frommen
Original Article

Abstract

The communication of aggressive propensity is an important component of agonistic interactions. For this purpose, animals use different sensory modalities involving visual, acoustical and chemical cues. While visual and acoustic communication used in aggressive encounters has been studied extensively in a wide range of taxa, the role of chemical communication received less attention. Here, we studied the role of chemical cues used during agonistic interactions of territory owners in the cooperative cichlid Neolamprologus pulcher. During staged encounters, we allowed either visual and chemical contact between two contestants or visual contact only. As chemical information in this species is most likely transferred via urine, we measured urination patterns using dye injections. Furthermore, we recorded aggressive and submissive behaviours of both contestants in response to the experimental treatment. Fish that had only visual contact with each other significantly increased their urination frequency and showed more aggressive displays compared to fish with both visual and chemical contact. Furthermore, appropriate agonistic responses appear to be dependent on available chemical information. This indicates that N. pulcher actively emits chemical signals to communicate their aggressive propensity via urine. Chemical communication thus plays a crucial role in multimodal communication of aggression in these fish, which highlights the need of studying the role of chemical communication during agonistic encounters in general, even if other signals are more obvious to the human observer.

Significance statement

The communication of aggressive tendencies can be achieved by transmitting visual, acoustical and chemical information. In this context chemical communication received less attention than other modalities thus far. We studied the importance of chemical information released via urine during agonistic encounters in the cooperatively breeding cichlid N. pulcher. Using dye injections, we measured urination patterns as well as the aggressive and submissive behaviours of two contestants. We show that N. pulcher actively signals aggressive tendencies via altered urination patterns. Furthermore, we show that appropriate agonistic responses appear to be dependent on the availability of such chemical information. Thus, our results suggest that chemical communication plays a crucial role in multimodal communication of aggression in these fish. These findings highlight the importance of chemical communication during agonistic encounters in general, even if other signals are more obvious to the human observer.

Keywords

Chemical communication Agonistic behaviour Cichlid fish Visual signal Chemical cues Aggression 

Supplementary material

265_2016_2260_MOESM1_ESM.docx (221 kb)
ESM 1(DOCX 221 kb)

References

  1. Almeida OG, Miranda A, Frade P, Hubbard PC, Barata EN, Canário AVM (2005) Urine as a social signal in the Mozambique tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus). Chem Senses 30:309–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Appelt CW, Sorensen PW (1999) Freshwater fish release urinary pheromones in a pulsatile manner. In: Johnston RE, Müller-Schwarze D, Sorensen PW (eds) Advances in chemical signals in vertebrates. Plenum Press, New York, pp 247–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arnott G, Elwood RW (2009) Gender differences in aggressive behaviour in convict cichlids. Anim Behav 78:1221–1227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. ASAB (2012) Guidelines for the treatment of animals in behavioural research and teaching. Anim Behav 83:301–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Auffarth B (2013) Understanding smell—the olfactory stimulus problem. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 37:1667–1679CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Aureli F, Cords M, van Schaik CP (2002) Conflict resolution following aggression in gregarious animals: a predictive framework. Anim Behav 64:325–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bakker TCM (1984) Two-way selection for aggression in juvenile female and male sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus), with some notes on hormonal factors. Behaviour 93:69–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Balshine S, Leach B, Neat F, Reid H, Taborsky M, Werner N (2001) Correlates of group size in a cooperatively breeding cichlid fish (Neolamprologus pulcher). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 50:134–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Balshine-Earn S, McAndrew BJ (1995) Sex-role reversal in the black-chinned tilapia, Sarotherodon melanotheron (Rüppel) (Cichlidae). Behaviour 132:861–874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Balzarini V, Taborsky M, Wanner S, Koch F, Frommen JG (2014) Mirror, mirror on the wall: the predictive value of mirror tests for measuring aggression in fish. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 68:871–878CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Balzarini V, Taborsky M, Villa F, Frommen JG (2016) Computer animations of color markings reveal the function of visual threat signals in Neolamprologus pulcher. Curr Zool (published online, doi: 10.1093/cz/zow086)
  12. Barata EN, Hubbard PC, Almeida OG, Miranda A, Canário AVM (2007) Male urine signals social rank in the Mozambique tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus). BMC Biol 5:54CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Barata EN, Fine JM, Hubbard PC, Almeida OG, Frade P, Sorensen PW, Canário AVM (2008) A sterol-like odorant in the urine of Mozambique tilapia males likely signals social dominance to females. J Chem Ecol 34:438–449CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker BM, Walker SC (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 67:1–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Beeching SC (1992) Visual assessment of relative body size in a cichlid fish, the Oscar, Astronotus ocellatus. Ethology 90:177–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bergmüller R, Heg D, Peer K, Taborsky M (2005) Extended safe havens and between-group dispersal of helpers in a cooperatively breeding cichlid. Behaviour 142:1643–1667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bolker BM, Skaug H, Laake J (2015) R2admb: “ADMB” to R interface functions. R package version:0.7.13 http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=R2admb
  18. Boyle KS, Tricas TC (2014) Discrimination of mates and intruders: visual and olfactory cues for a monogamous territorial coral reef butterflyfish. Anim Behav 92:33–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bryant BP, Atema J (1987) Diet manipulation affects social behavior of catfish: importance of body odor. J Chem Ecol 13:1645–1661CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Derex M, Godelle B, Raymond M (2014) How does competition affect the transmission of information? Evol Hum Behav 35:89–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Desjardins JK, Hazelden MR, Van der Kraak GJ, Balshine S (2005) Male and female cooperatively breeding fish provide support for the “Challenge Hypothesis.”. Behav Ecol 17:149–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dey CJ, Reddon AR, O’Connor CM, Balshine S (2013) Network structure is related to social conflict in a cooperatively breeding fish. Anim Behav 85:395–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Drews C (1993) The concept and definition of dominance in animal behaviour. Behaviour 125:283–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. East ML, Dehnhard M (eds) (2013) Chemical signals in vertebrates 12. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Engqvist L (2005) The mistreatment of covariate interaction terms in linear model analyses of behavioural and evolutionary ecology studies. Anim Behav 70:967–971CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Frade P, Hubbard PC, Barata EN, Canário AVM (2002) Olfactory sensitivity of the Mozambique tilapia to conspecific odours. J Fish Biol 61:1239–1254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Frostman P, Sherman PT (2004) Behavioral response to familiar and unfamiliar neighbors in a territorial cichlid, Neolamprologus pulcher. Ichthyol Res 51:283–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Galef BG, Giraldeau L-A (2001) Social influences on foraging in vertebrates: causal mechanisms and adaptive functions. Anim Behav 61:3–15CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Gese EM, Ruff RL (1997) Scent-marking by coyotes, Canis latrans: the influence of social and ecological factors. Anim Behav 54:1155–1166CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Giaquinto PC, Volpato GL (1997) Chemical communication, aggression, and conspecific recognition in the fish Nile tilapia. Physiol Behav 62:1333–1338CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Giaquinto PC, Volpato GL (2005) Chemical cues related to conspecific size in pintado catfish, Pseudoplatystoma coruscans. Acta Ethol 8:65–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Groenewoud F, Frommen JG, Josi D, Tanaka H, Jungwirth A, Taborsky M (2016) Predation risk drives social complexity in cooperative breeders. P Natl Acad Sci USA 113:4104–4109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hand JL (1986) Resolution of social conflicts: dominance, egalitarianism, spheres of dominance, and game theory. Q Rev Biol 61:201–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hardy IC, Briffa M (2013) Animal contests. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  35. Hasson O (1994) Cheating signals. J Theor Biol 167:223–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hauser MD (1996) Evolution of communication. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  37. Heymann EW (2006) Scent marking strategies of New World primates. Am J Primatol 68:650–661CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Hirschenhauser K, Taborsky M, Oliveira T, Canário AVM, Oliveira RF (2004) A test of the 'challenge hypothesis' in cichlid fish: simulated partner and territory intruder experiments. Anim Behav 68:741–750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hirschenhauser K, Canário AVM, Ros AFH, Taborsky M, Oliveira RF (2008) Social context may affect urinary excretion of 11-ketotestosterone in African cichlids. Behaviour 145:1367–1388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Huck UW, Banks EM, Wang SC (1981) Olfactory discrimination of social status in the brown lemming. Behav Neural Biol 33:364–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hurd PL, Enquist M (2001) Threat display in birds. Can J Zool 79:931–942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Jordan NR (2007) Scent-marking investment is determined by sex and breeding status in meerkats. Anim Behav 74:531–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Jordan NR, Cherry MI, Manser MB (2007) Latrine distribution and patterns of use by wild meerkats: implications for territory and mate defence. Anim Behav 73:613–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Keller-Costa T, Lopes O, Almeida O (2012) Muscular hypertrophy of urinary bladders in dominant tilapia facilitates the control of aggression through urinary signals. Behaviour 149:953–975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Keller-Costa T, Canario AVM, Hubbard PC (2015) Chemical communication in cichlids: a mini-review. Gen Comp Endocrinol 221:64–74CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Maruska KP, Fernald RD (2012) Contextual chemosensory urine signaling in an African cichlid fish. J Exp Biol 215:68–74CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Maynard Smith J, Harper D (2003) Animal Signals. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  48. Mehlis M, Bakker TCM, Frommen JG (2008) Smells like sib spirit: kin recognition in three-spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus) is mediated by olfactory cues. Anim Cogn 11:643–650CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Mehlis M, Bakker TCM, Langen K, Frommen JG (2009) Cain and Abel reloaded? Kin recognition and male-male aggression in three-spined sticklebacks Gasterosteus aculeatus L. J Fish Biol 75:2154–2162CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Otovic P, Partan S (2009) Multimodal signaling in animals. In: Squire LR (ed) Encyclopedia of neuroscience. Academic Press, Oxford, pp 1095–1105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pal SK (2003) Urine marking by free-ranging dogs (Canis familiaris) in relation to sex, season, place and posture. Appl Anim Behav Sci 80:45–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Parker GA (1974) Assessment strategy and the evolution of fighting behaviour. J Theor Biol 47:223–243CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Partan S, Marler P (1999) Communication goes multimodal. Science 283:1272–1273CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Péter A (2015) Solomon Coder© A simple and free solution for behavior coding, www.solomoncoder.com
  55. Riebli T, Avgan B, Bottini A-M, Duc C, Taborsky M, Heg D (2011) Behavioural type affects dominance and growth in staged encounters of cooperatively breeding cichlids. Anim Behav 81:313–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Robison RR, Fernald RD, Stacey NE (1998) The olfactory system of a cichlid fish responds to steroidal compounds. J Fish Biol 53:226–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Rowell TE (1974) The concept of social dominance. Behav Biol 11:131–154CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. RStudio Team (2015) RStudio: Integrated development for R. RStudio Inc., Boston, MA, http://ww.rstudio.com/
  59. Sorensen PW, Wisenden BD (2015) Fish pheromones and related cues. John Wiley & Sons Inc., LondonGoogle Scholar
  60. Taborsky M (1984) Broodcare helpers in the cichlid fish Lamprologus brichardi: their costs and benefits. Anim Behav 32:1236–1252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Taborsky M (1985) Breeder-helper conflict in a cichlid fish with broodcare helpers: an experimental analysis. Behaviour 95:45–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Taborsky M (2016) Cichlid fishes: a model for the integrative study of social behavior. In: Koenig WD, Dickinson JL (eds) Cooperative breeding in vertebrates: studies of ecology, evolution, and behavior. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 272–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Taborsky M, Grantner A (1998) Behavioural time-energy budgets of cooperatively breeding Neolamprologus pulcher (Pisces: Cichlidae). Anim Behav 56:1375–1382CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Taborsky M, Limberger D (1981) Helpers in fish. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 8:143–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Taves MD, Desjardins JK, Mishra S, Balshine S (2009) Androgens and dominance: sex-specific patterns in a highly social fish (Neolamprologus pulcher). Gen Comp Endocrinol 161:202–207CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. van Staaden MJ, Smith AR (2011) Cutting the Gordian knot: complex signaling in African cichlids is more than multimodal. Curr Zool 57:237–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. van Staaden MJ, Searcy WA, Hanlon RT (2011) Signaling aggression. Adv Genet 75:23–49PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Ward AJW, Currie S (2013) Shoaling fish can size-assort by chemical cues alone. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 67:667–673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wisenden BD (2000) Olfactory assessment of predation risk in the aquatic environment. Phil Trans R Soc B 355:1205–1208CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  70. Wong M, Balshine S (2010) Fight for your breeding right: hierarchy re-establishment predicts aggression in a social queue. Biol Lett 7:190–193CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  71. Zöttl M, Heg D, Chervet N, Taborsky M (2013) Kinship reduces alloparental care in cooperative cichlids where helpers pay-to-stay. Nat Commun 4:1341CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dario-Marcos Bayani
    • 1
  • Michael Taborsky
    • 1
  • Joachim G. Frommen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Behavioural Ecology, Institute of Ecology and EvolutionUniversity of Bern HinterkappelenSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations