Energetics of trail clearing in the leaf-cutter ant Atta

Abstract

Few ant species construct cleared trails. Among those that do, leaf-cutting Atta ants build the most prominent networks, with single colonies clearing debris and obstructions from hundreds of meters of trails annually. Workers on cleared paths move at higher speed than they do over uncleared litter, and one measurement of the time and energetic costs of trail clearance suggests that benefits of trail usage far outweigh the investment costs of trail clearing. The ecological basis of trail clearing remains uncertain, however, because no full account has been made of benefits and costs in common units that allow comparison. We make such an account using a scalable, integrative model of trail investment and foraging energetics. Contrary to assumptions in previous work, we find that trail clearing needs not always be energetically profitable for leaf-cutting ants. Profitability depends on the workforce composition, specifically, on how many ants in a traffic stream act as maintenance workforce to respond to sudden and unpredictable obstructions, such as leaf fall. Such maintenance patrols have not previously been recognized as a cost of trail building. If the patrolling workforce is not too large, the energetic savings from foraging over cleared trails offset the investment and maintenance costs within a few days. Under some conditions, however, amortization can take weeks or months, or trail clearing can become unprofitable altogether. This suggests that Atta colonies must have a mechanism to regulate the intensity of their trail clearing behavior. We explore possible mechanisms and make testable predictions for future research.

Significance statement

Leaf-cutter ants build prominent, cleared trails of up to 200 m length through rainforest undergrowth. Construction of such trails appears costly, yet little is known about the energetics of cleared trails. No research exists on the benefits of their use, and only a single case study investigated parts of the construction costs. While this case study concludes that trail clearing is “relatively inexpensive,” we argue that it failed to include a deciding factor in the cost/benefit analysis: the cost of providing a standby clearing workforce, which is distinct from the foraging workers. We construct a full, scalable cost-benefit model from our own empirical measurements and literature. Contrary to previous results, we find that trail clearing is not always profitable, but profitability depends on the foraging conditions. This prediction offers a new perspective on the occurrence of uncleared trails in the field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

References

  1. Acosta FJ, López F, Serrano JM (1993) Branching angles of ant trunk trails as an optimization cue. J Theor Biol 160:297–310. doi:10.1006/jtbi.1993.1020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bollazzi M, Roces F (2011) Information needs at the beginning of foraging: grass-cutting ants trade off load size for a faster return to the nest. PLoS One 6:e17667–e17669. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0017667

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Bouchebti S (2015) Comportement d’approvisionnement des fourmis coupeuses de feuilles : de la piste chimique à la piste physique. Dissertation, Université Paul Sabatier

  4. Bruce AI, Burd M (2012) Allometric scaling of foraging rate with trail dimensions in leaf-cutting ants. P Roy Soc B-Biol Sci 279:2442–2447. doi:10.1098/rspb.2011.2583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Burd M (1996) Foraging performance by Atta colombica, a leaf-cutting ant. Am Nat 148:597. doi:10.1086/285942

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cherrett JM (1968) The foraging behaviour of Atta cephalotes L. (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). J Anim Ecol 37:387. doi:10.2307/2955

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cherrett JM (1972) Some factors involved in the selection of vegetable substrate by Atta cephalotes (L.) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in tropical rain forest. J Anim Ecol 41:647. doi:10.2307/3200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Da-Silva AC, Navas CA, Ribeiro PL (2012) Dealing with water deficit in Atta ant colonies: large ants scout for water while small ants transport it. Biol Open 1:827–830. doi:10.1242/bio.2012703

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Evison SEF, Hart AG, Jackson DE (2008) Minor workers have a major role in the maintenance of leafcutter ant pheromone trails. Anim Behav 75:963–969. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.07.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Farji-Brener AG, Barrantes G, Laverde O, Fierro-Calderón K, Bascopé F, López A (2007) Fallen branches as part of leaf-cutting ant trails: their role on resource discovery and on leaf transport rates in Atta cephalotes. Biotropica 39:211–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Farji-Brener AG, Chinchilla F, Umaña MN et al (2014) Branching angles reflect a tradeoff between reducing trail maintenance costs or travel distances in leaf-cutting ants. Ecology 96:510–517. doi:10.1890/14-0220.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Freeman B, Chaves-Campos J (2016) Branch width and height influence the incorporation of branches into foraging trails and travel speed in leafcutter ants Atta cephalotes (L.) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Neotrop Entomol 45:258–264. doi:10.1007/s13744-016-0362-5

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fewell JH (1988) Energetic and time costs of foraging in harvester ants, Pogonomyrmex occidentalis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 22:401–408. doi:10.1007/BF00294977

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gamboa GJ (1975) Foraging and leaf-cutting of the desert gardening ant Acromyrmex versicolor versicolor (Pergande) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Oecologia 20:103–110. doi:10.1007/BF00364324

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Greaves T, Hughes RD (1974) The population biology of the meat ant. Aust J Entomol 13:329–351. doi:10.1111/j.1440-6055.1974.tb02212.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Griffiths HM, Hughes WOH (2010) Hitchhiking and the removal of microbial contaminants by the leaf-cutting ant Atta colombica. Ecol Entomol 35:529–537. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2311.2010.01212.x

    Google Scholar 

  17. Herbers JM (1981) Reliability theory and foraging by ants. J Theoret Biol 89:175–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hodgson ES (1955) An ecological study of the behavior of the leaf-cutting ant Atta cephalotes. Ecology 36:293. doi:10.2307/1933235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Howard JJ (2001) Costs of trail construction and maintenance in the leaf-cutting ant Atta colombica. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 49:348–356. doi:10.1007/s002650000314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1990) The ants. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

  21. Leigh EG, Windsor DM (1982) Forest production and regulation of primary consumers on Barro Colorado Island. In: Leigh EG, Rand AS, Windsor DM (eds) The ecology of a tropical forest: seasonal rhythms and long-term changes. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, pp. 111–122

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lewis T, Pollard GV, Dibley GC (1974a) Rhythmic foraging in the leaf-cutting ant Atta cephalotes (L.) (Formicidae: Attini). J Anim Ecol 43:129. doi:10.2307/3162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lewis T, Pollard GV, Dibley GC (1974b) Micro-environmental factors affecting diel patterns of foraging in the leaf-cutting ant Atta cephalotes (L.) (Formicidae: Attini). J Anim Ecol 43:143. doi:10.2307/3163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lighton JRB, Bartholomew GA, Feener DH (1987) Energetics of locomotion and load carriage and a model of the energy cost of foraging in the leaf-cutting ant Atta colombica Guer. Physiol Zool 60:524–537. doi:10.2307/30156127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Littledyke M, Cherrett JM (1976) Direct ingestion of plant sap from cut leaves by the leaf-cutting ants Atta cephalotes (L.) and Acromyrmex octospinosus (Reich) (Formicidae, Attini). Bull Entomol Res 66:205–217. doi:10.1017/S0007485300006647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lugo AE, Farnworth EG, Pool D et al (1973) The impact of the leaf cutter ant Atta colombica on the energy flow of a tropical wet forest. Ecology 54:1292. doi:10.2307/1934191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lutz FE (1929) Observations on leaf-cutting ants. Am Mus Novit 388:1–21. doi:10.1206/0003-0082(2006)502[0001:NSAFRS]2.0.CO;2

    Google Scholar 

  28. Marlin JC (1971) The mating, nesting and ant enemies of Polyergus lucidus Mayr (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Am Midl Nat 86:181–189. doi:10.2307/2423698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Moll K, Federle W, Roces F (2012) The energetics of running stability: costs of transport in grass-cutting ants depend on fragment shape. J Exp Biol 215:161–168. doi:10.1242/jeb.063594

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Plowes NJ, Johnson RA, Hölldobler B (2013) Foraging behavior in the ant genus Messor (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Myrmicinae). Myrmecol News 18:33–49

    Google Scholar 

  31. Roces F, Lighton JRB (1995) Larger bites of leaf-cutting ants. Nature 373:392–393. doi:10.1038/373392a0

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Rockwood LL, Hubbell SP (1987) Host-plant selection, diet diversity, and optimal foraging in a tropical leafcutting ant. Oecologia 74:55–61. doi:10.1007/BF00377345

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Shepherd JD (1982) Trunk trails and the searching strategy of a leaf-cutter ant, Atta colombica. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 11:77–84. doi:10.2307/4599518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Theraulaz G, Bonabeau E, Deneubourg J-L (1998) Response threshold reinforcement and division of labour in insect societies. Proc R Soc Lond B 265:327–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Villesen P, Gertsch PJ, Frydenberg J et al (1999) Evolutionary transition from single to multiple mating in fungus-growing ants. Mol Ecol 8:1819–1825

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Wetterer JK (1995) Forager size and ecology of Acromyrmex coronatus and other leaf-cutting ants in Costa Rica. Oecologia 104:409–415. doi:10.1007/BF00341337

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Wirth R, Beyschlag W, Ryel RJ, Hölldobler B (2009) Annual foraging of the leaf-cutting ant Atta colombica in a semideciduous rain forest in Panama. J Trop Ecol 13:741. doi:10.1017/S0266467400010907

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Wirth R, Herz H, Ryel RJ, et al. (2003) The natural history of leaf-cutting ants. In: Herbivory of leaf-cutting ants. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 5–48

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute and its staff in Panama for providing research facilities, as well as the Neurobiology and Behavior workgroup at the University of Konstanz, Germany and its members for many stimulating discussions.

We are further grateful for the valuable input of two anonymous reviewers which helped us improve the quality of the submission.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Bochynek.

Ethics declarations

Funding

TB was supported by Monash University postgraduate scholarships and by CSIRO Data61. Model development and field work were partially supported by Australian Research Council grants A19800465 (to MB) and DP110101413 (to BM).

Additional information

Communicated by W. Hughes

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 1146 kb)

ESM 2

(XLSX 50 kb)

ESM 3

(ND 220 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bochynek, T., Meyer, B. & Burd, M. Energetics of trail clearing in the leaf-cutter ant Atta . Behav Ecol Sociobiol 71, 14 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-016-2237-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • Cleared trails
  • Trunk trails
  • Leaf-cutter ants
  • Atta
  • Cost/benefit model
  • Unladen workers