Energetics of trail clearing in the leaf-cutter ant Atta
- 532 Downloads
Few ant species construct cleared trails. Among those that do, leaf-cutting Atta ants build the most prominent networks, with single colonies clearing debris and obstructions from hundreds of meters of trails annually. Workers on cleared paths move at higher speed than they do over uncleared litter, and one measurement of the time and energetic costs of trail clearance suggests that benefits of trail usage far outweigh the investment costs of trail clearing. The ecological basis of trail clearing remains uncertain, however, because no full account has been made of benefits and costs in common units that allow comparison. We make such an account using a scalable, integrative model of trail investment and foraging energetics. Contrary to assumptions in previous work, we find that trail clearing needs not always be energetically profitable for leaf-cutting ants. Profitability depends on the workforce composition, specifically, on how many ants in a traffic stream act as maintenance workforce to respond to sudden and unpredictable obstructions, such as leaf fall. Such maintenance patrols have not previously been recognized as a cost of trail building. If the patrolling workforce is not too large, the energetic savings from foraging over cleared trails offset the investment and maintenance costs within a few days. Under some conditions, however, amortization can take weeks or months, or trail clearing can become unprofitable altogether. This suggests that Atta colonies must have a mechanism to regulate the intensity of their trail clearing behavior. We explore possible mechanisms and make testable predictions for future research.
Leaf-cutter ants build prominent, cleared trails of up to 200 m length through rainforest undergrowth. Construction of such trails appears costly, yet little is known about the energetics of cleared trails. No research exists on the benefits of their use, and only a single case study investigated parts of the construction costs. While this case study concludes that trail clearing is “relatively inexpensive,” we argue that it failed to include a deciding factor in the cost/benefit analysis: the cost of providing a standby clearing workforce, which is distinct from the foraging workers. We construct a full, scalable cost-benefit model from our own empirical measurements and literature. Contrary to previous results, we find that trail clearing is not always profitable, but profitability depends on the foraging conditions. This prediction offers a new perspective on the occurrence of uncleared trails in the field.
KeywordsCleared trails Trunk trails Leaf-cutter ants Atta Cost/benefit model Unladen workers
The authors would like to thank the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute and its staff in Panama for providing research facilities, as well as the Neurobiology and Behavior workgroup at the University of Konstanz, Germany and its members for many stimulating discussions.
We are further grateful for the valuable input of two anonymous reviewers which helped us improve the quality of the submission.
Compliance with ethical standards
TB was supported by Monash University postgraduate scholarships and by CSIRO Data61. Model development and field work were partially supported by Australian Research Council grants A19800465 (to MB) and DP110101413 (to BM).
- Bouchebti S (2015) Comportement d’approvisionnement des fourmis coupeuses de feuilles : de la piste chimique à la piste physique. Dissertation, Université Paul SabatierGoogle Scholar
- Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1990) The ants. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
- Leigh EG, Windsor DM (1982) Forest production and regulation of primary consumers on Barro Colorado Island. In: Leigh EG, Rand AS, Windsor DM (eds) The ecology of a tropical forest: seasonal rhythms and long-term changes. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, pp. 111–122Google Scholar
- Plowes NJ, Johnson RA, Hölldobler B (2013) Foraging behavior in the ant genus Messor (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Myrmicinae). Myrmecol News 18:33–49Google Scholar
- Wirth R, Herz H, Ryel RJ, et al. (2003) The natural history of leaf-cutting ants. In: Herbivory of leaf-cutting ants. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 5–48Google Scholar