Abstract
Signals that occur in multiple contexts and evoke varied responses from receivers underscore the challenges of assessing a signal’s function (adaptive benefit to signaler) or relationships between receivers’ responses and their own fitness. Our study investigated the “pyow” loud call of male blue monkeys in a wild population in western Kenya. Using natural observation and playback experiments, we characterized pyow function based on behavioral responses by adult male and female receivers, and contextual, seasonal, and demographic variation in call usage. To identify associations between call features and traits of callers (signal concordance), we examined pyows’ usage patterns and acoustic structure in relation to attributes of callers. Pyows occurred in association with numerous stimuli and contexts, including predators, other males, intergroup aggression, and often “spontaneously,” and were more frequent in the mating season. Receivers consistently oriented toward calls and increased scanning, but other responses differed by sex—females moved toward and spent more time near the caller and groupmates, whereas males retreated. Pyows exhibited concordance with identity and social status, but were not associated with callers’ attention to any particular external entity. Results indicate pyows achieve multiple functions, including mate defense, group cohesion, and mate attraction. The call’s functional versatility appears best explained by its ability to draw attention and that receivers’ subsequent behavior is consistent with their own fitness priorities relevant to the caller’s identity, status, and context of calling.
Significance statement
To understand how selection favors a signal, it is important to acknowledge all the ways the signal is used, responses by multiple receivers, and that a signal’s fitness relevance might be different for different receivers. Our investigation of blue monkey pyows used natural observations and experiments to characterize variation in how males use the call and responses by male and female receivers. We also identified relationships between pyow features and attributes of callers—proposing the term “signal concordance”—as an objective basis for exploring receivers’ responses in relation to their own fitness. Our results demonstrate that pyows achieve multiple functions by evoking varying responses from receivers. We suggest that variation in responses relates to the pyow’s multiple concordance elements. Our study demonstrates how “generalist” signals can achieve specific outcomes and highlights the additive influence of multiple selection factors.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Altmann J (1974) Observational study of behaviour: sampling methods. Behaviour 49:267–277
Andersson M (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Bernal XE, Akre KL, Baugh AT, Rand AS, Ryan MJ (2009) Female and male behavioral response to advertisement calls of graded complexity in túngara frogs, Physalaemus pustulosus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 63:1269–1279
Blumstein DT (1999) The evolution of functionally referential alarm communication: multiple adaptations; multiple constraints. Evol Comm 3:135–147
Blumstein DT, Verneyre L, Daniel JC (2004) Reliability and the adaptive utility of discrimination among alarm callers. Proc R Soc Lond B 271:1851–1857
Boinski S, Garber PA (eds) (2000) On the move: how and why animals travel in groups. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Botero CA, Rossman RJ, Caro LM, Stenzler LM, Lovette IJ, de Kort SR, Vehrencamp SL (2009) Syllable type consistency is related to age, social status and reproductive success in the tropical mockingbird. Anim Behav 77:701–706
Bradbury JW, Vehrencamp SL (2011) Principles of animal communication, 2nd edn. Sinauer Associates Inc., Sunderland
Brown CH (1989) The active space of blue monkey and grey-cheeked mangabey vocalizations. Anim Behav 37:1023–1034
Butynski TM (1982) Harem-male replacement and infanticide in the blue monkey (Cercopithecus mitis stuhlmanni) in the Kibale Forest, Uganda. Int J Primatol 3:1–22
Butynski TM, Chapman CA, Chapman LJ, Weary DM (1992) Use of blue monkey “pyow” calls for long-term individual identification. Am J Primatol 28:183–189
Catchpole CK, Slater PJB (1995) Bird song: biological themes and variations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Charlton BD, Reby D, McComb K (2007) Female red deer prefer the roars of larger males. Biol Lett 3:382–385
Clutton-Brock TH, Albon SD (1979) The roaring of red deer and the evolution of honest advertisement. Behaviour 69:145–170
Cords M (2000) The number of males in guenon groups. In: Kappeler PM (ed) Primate males. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 84–96
Cords M (2002a) Friendship among adult female blue monkeys (Cercopithecus mitis). Behaviour 139:291–314
Cords M (2002b) When are there influxes in blue monkey groups? In: Glenn ME, Cords M (eds) The guenons: diversity and adaptation in African monkeys. Plenum Press, New York, pp. 189–201
Cords M (2012) The thirty year blues: what we know and don’t know about life history, group size and group fission of blue monkeys in the Kakamega Forest, Kenya. In: Kappeler P, Watts D (eds) Long-term studies of primates. Springer, Berlin, pp. 289–311
Cords M, Chowdhury S (2010) Life history of Cercopithecus mitis stuhlmanni in the Kakamega Forest, Kenya. Int J Primatol 31:433–455
Cords M, Fuller JL (2010) Infanticide in Cercopithecus mitis stuhlmanni in the Kakamega Forest, Kenya: variation in the occurrence of an adaptive behavior. Int J Primatol 31:409–431
Cowlishaw G (1992) Song function in gibbons. Behaviour 121:131–153
da Cunha RGT, Byrne RW (2006) Roars of black howler monkeys (Alouatta caraya): evidence for a function in inter-group spacing. Behaviour 143:1169–1199
da Cunha RGT, Byrne RW (2009) The use of vocal communication in keeping the spatial cohesion of groups: intentionality and specific functions. In: Garber PA, Estrada A, Bicca-Marques JC, Heymann EW, Strier KB (eds) South American primates: comparative perspectives. Springer, New York, pp. 341–363
Dawkins R, Krebs JR (1978) Animal signals: information or manipulation? In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, pp. 282–309
Ducheminsky N, Henzi P, Barrett L (2014) Responses of vervet monkeys in large troops to terrestrial and aerial predator alarm calls. Behav Ecol 25:1474–1484
Ekernas LS, Cords M (2007) Social and environmental factors influencing natal dispersal in blue monkeys (Cercopithecus mitis stuhlmanni). Anim Behav 73:1009–1020
Fashing PJ, Nguyen N, Luteshi P, Opondo W, Cash JF, Cords M (2012) Evaluating the suitability of planted forests for African forest monkeys: a case study from Kakamega Forest, Kenya. Am J Primatol 74:77–90
Fichtel C, Manser MB (2010) Vocal communication in social groups. In: Kappeler P (ed) Animal behaviour: evolution and mechanisms. Springer, Heidelberg, pp. 29–54
Fisher J (1954) Evolution and bird sociality. In: Huxley J, Hardy AC, Ford EB (eds) Evolution as a process. Allen & Unwin, London, pp. 71–83
Fitch WT, Hauser MD (2003) Unpacking “honesty”: vertebrate vocal production and the evolution of acoustic signals. In: Simmons A, Fay RR, Popper AN (eds) Acoustic communication. Springer, New York, pp. 65–137
Fuller JL (2013) Diversity of form, content, and function in the vocal signals of adult male blue monkeys (Cercopithecus mitis Stuhlmanni): an evolutionary approach to understanding a signal repertoire. In: Dissertation. Columbia University, New York, NY
Fuller JL (2014) The vocal repertoire of adult male blue monkeys (Cercopithecus mitis stuhlmanni): a quantitative analysis of acoustic structure. Am J Primatol 76:203–216
Gautier J-P, Gautier A (1977) Communication in old world monkeys. In: Sebeok TA (ed) How animals communicate. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, pp. 890–964
Gerhardt HC, Huber F (2002) Acoustic communication in insects and anurans. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Gerhardt HC, Tanner SD, Corrigan CM, Walton HC (2000) Female preference functions based on call duration in the gray tree frog (Hyla versicolor). Behav Ecol 11:663–669
Gill SA, Bierema AM (2013) On the meaning of alarm calls: a review of functional reference in avian alarm calling. Ethology 119:449–461
Harrington FH, Mech LD (1983) Wolf pack spacing: howling as a territory-independent spacing mechanism in a territorial population. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 12:161–168
Hurlbert SH (1984) Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecol Monogr 54:187–211
Klecka W (1980) Discriminant analysis. SAGE Publications, Beverly Hills
Krause J, Ruxton GD (2002) Living in groups. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Krebs JR, Davies NB (1993) Introduction to behavioral ecology, 3rd edn. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford
Lawes MJ, Cords M, Lehn C (2013) Cercopithecus mitis species profile. In: Butynski TM, Kingdon J, Kalina J (eds) Mammals of Africa, Vol 2: primates. Bloomsbury Publishing, London
Macedonia JM, Evans CS (1993) Variation among mammalian alarm call systems and the problem of meaning in animal signals. Ethology 93:177–197
Majolo B, de Bortoli VA, Schino G (2008) Costs and benefits of group living in primates: group size effects on behaviour and demography. Anim Behav 76:1235–1247
Mathevon N, Koralek A, Weldele M, Glickman SE, Theunissen FE (2010) What the hyena's laugh tells: sex, age, dominance and individual signature in the giggling call of Crocuta crocuta. BMC Ecol 10:9
McComb K, Reby D (2005) Vocal communication networks in large terrestrial mammals. In: McGregor P (ed) Animal communication networks. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 372–389
McComb KE (1991) Female choice for high roaring rates in red deer, Cervus elaphus. Anim Behav 41:79–88
Murphy D, Lea SEG, Zuberbühler K (2013) Male blue monkey alarm calls encode predator type and distance. Anim Behav 85:119–125
Nakagawa S (2004) A farewell to Bonferroni: the problems of low statistical power and publication bias. Behav Ecol 15:1044–1045
Owings DH, Morton ES (1998) Animal vocal communication: a new approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Papworth S, Böse A-S, Barker J, Schel AM, Zuberbühler K (2008) Male blue monkeys alarm call in response to danger experienced by others. Biol Lett 4:472–475
Pazol K (2003) Mating in the Kakamega Forest blue monkeys (Cercopithecus mitis): does female sexual behavior function to manipulate paternity assessment? Behaviour 140:473–499
Pitcher TJ, Parrish JK (1993) Functions of shoaling behaviour in teleosts. In: Pitcher TJ (ed) Behaviour of teleost fishes. Chapman & Hall, London, pp. 363–439
Price T, Arnold K, Zuberbühler K, Semple S (2009) Pyow but not hack calls of male putty-nosed monkey (Cercopithcus nictitans) convey information about caller identity. Behaviour 146:871–888
Price T, Fischer J (2014) Meaning attribution in the West African green monkey: influence of call type and context. Anim Cogn 17:277–286
R Core Team (2014) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for statistical computing, Vienna, Austria, version 3.1.2., https://cran.r-project.org/
Reby D, McComb K, Cargnelutti B, Darwin C, Fitch WT, Clutton-Brock TH (2005) Red deer stags use formants as assessment cues during intrasexual agonistic interactions. Proc R Soc Lond B 272:941–947
Roberts S, Cords M (2015) Life as a bachelor: quantifying the success of an alternative reproductive tactic in male blue monkeys. PeerJ 3:e1043
Roberts SJ, Nikitopoulos E, Cords M (2014) Factors affecting low resident male siring success in one-male groups of blue monkeys. Behav Ecol 25:852–861
Rohwer S, Ewald PW (1981) The cost of dominance and advantage of subordination in a badge signaling system. Evolution 35:441–454
Rubenstein D, Hack M (1992) Horse signals: sounds and scents of fury. Evol Ecol 6:254–260
Scarantino A, Clay Z (2015) Contextually variable signals can be functionally referential. Anim Behav 100:e1ee8
Searcy WA, Nowicki S (2000) Male-male competition and female choice in the evolution of vocal signaling. In: Espmark Y, Amundsen T, Rosenquist G (eds) Animal signals: signaling and signal design in animal communication. Tapir Academic Press, Trondheim, pp. 301–315
Searcy WA, Anderson RC, Nowicki S (2006) Bird song as a signal of aggressive intent. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 60:234–241
Setia TM, van Schaik CP (2007) The response of adult orang-utans to flanged male long calls: inferences about their function. Folia Primatol 78:215–226
Shimmura T, Ohashi S, Yoshimura T (2015) The highest-ranking rooster has priority to announce the break of dawn. Sci Rep 5:11683
Silk JB (2002) Grunts, girneys, and good intentions: the origins of strategic commitment in nonhuman primates. In: Nesse R (ed) Commitment: evolutionary perspectives. Russell Sage Press, New York, pp. 138–157
Snowdon CT (2004) Sexual selection and communication. In: Kappeler P, van Schaik CP (eds) Sexual selection in primates: new and comparative perspectives. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 57–70
Street SE, Cross CP, Brown GR (2016) Exaggerated sexual swellings in female nonhuman primates are reliable signals of female fertility and body condition. Anim Behav 112:203–212
Terry MR, Peake TM, McGregor PK (2005) The role of vocal individuality in conservation. Front Zool 2:10
Tibbetts EA, Dale J (2007) Individual recognition: it is good to be different. Trends Ecol Evol 22:529–537
Tinbergen N (1963) On aims and methods of ethology. Z Tierpsychol 20:410–433
Tsingalia HM, Rowell TE (1984) The behaviour of adult male blue monkeys. Z Tierpsychol 64:253–268
Waser PM (1975) Experimental playback show vocal mediation of intergroup avoidance in a forest monkey. Nature 255:56–58
Wheeler BC, Fischer J (2012) Functionally referential signals: a promising paradigm whose time has passed. Evol Anthropol 21:195–205
Zuur A, Ieno EN, Walker N, Saveliev AA, Smith GM (2009) Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY
Acknowledgments
We thank the government of Kenya for permission to conduct fieldwork, the forester and staff of the Kakamega Forest Station for cooperation, and the Center for Kakamega Tropical Forest Studies at Masinde Muliro University of Science & Technology for local sponsorship. Field assistants vital to this study included M. Atamba, E. Imboma, S. Khamusini, C. Makalasia, J. Munayi, H. Musonye, C. Oduor, E. Shikanga, C. Shikuyenze, D. Shilabiga, and E. Widava. We thank K. Klass and K. Sabbi for research support, L. Quade for assistance with acoustic analysis, and reviewers for helpful comments. This study was supported by the National Science Foundation (IGERT: 03-33415; BCS: 05–54747; BCS: 10-28471).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
This study complied with all relevant laws of Kenya, and all procedures were in accordance with and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Columbia University.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Responsible editor: R. I. M. Dunbar
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fuller, J.L., Cords, M. Multiple functions and signal concordance of the pyow loud call of blue monkeys. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 71, 19 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-016-2230-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-016-2230-z