An individual’s contest history can have a significant effect on their probability of winning a future contest. These winner–loser effects are likely to be mediated by the level of escalation in a contest, although this is rarely considered in the contest literature. We staged contests between size-matched male water skinks (Eulamprus quoyii) in a tournament design to investigate how prior contest success indirectly affected contest outcome through its effects on contest behavior. Moreover, we predicted that the effect of behavioral traits on contest outcome would depend on the level of escalation reached by contestants (non-escalated versus escalated contests). Contest initiation was the best predictor of contest outcome in both non-escalated and escalated contests, and whether an individual initiated a contest depended on prior contest experience. Prior winners were more likely to initiate subsequent aggressive encounters, and by doing so, initiators had an 88 % probability of winning compared to non-initiators in non-escalated contests. However, this effect was mediated by the level of escalation. Initiators in escalated contests had only a 59 % probability of winning compared to non-initiators. These results suggest that the strength of the effect of prior contest experience on behavioral traits varies across contest stages and is consistent with the hypothesis that prior contest experience alters an individual’s perception of its own fighting ability. Our study highlights the importance of considering the level of contest escalation when examining winner–loser effects in predicting contest outcome.
Our results show that the effect of prior contest experience on contest initiation varies depending on the level of escalation reached by the contestants. We emphasize the importance of considering the level of contest escalation when examining the influence of prior contest experience on contest outcome.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Adamo SA, Hoy RR (1995) Agonistic behaviour in male and female field crickets, Gryllus bimaculatus, and how behavioural context influences its expression. Anim Behav 49:1491–1501
Agresti A (2002) Categorical data analysis, 2 edn. John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken
Baird TA (2013) Lizards and other reptiles as model systems for the study of contest behaviour. In: ICW H, Briffa M (eds) Animal contests. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 258–286
Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 67:1–48
Beaugrand JP, Goulet C (2000) Distinguishing kinds of prior dominance and subordination experiences in males of green swordtail fish (Xiphophorus helleri). Behav Process 50:131–142
Enquist M, Leimar O (1983) Evolution of fighting behaviour: decision rules and assessment of relative strength. J Theor Biol 102:387–410
Garcia MJ, Murphree J, Wilson J, Earley RL (2014) Mechanisms of decision making during contests in green anole lizards: prior experience and assessment. Anim Behav 92:45–54
Garcia MJ, Paiva L, Lennox M, Sivaraman B, Wong SC, Earley RL (2012) Assessment strategies and the effects of fighting experience on future contest performance in the green anole (Anolis carolinensis). Ethology 118:821–834
Hsu Y, Earley RL, Wolf LL (2006) Modulation of aggressive behaviour by fighting experience: mechanisms and contest outcomes. Biol Rev 81:33–74
Hsu Y, Wolf LL (2001) The winner and loser effect: what fighting behaviours are influenced? Anim Behav 61:777–786
Husak JF, Lappin AK, Fox SF, Lemos-Espinal JA (2006) Bite-force performance predicts dominance in male venerable collared lizards (Crotaphytus antiquus). Copeia 2:301–306
Jackson WM (1991) Why do winners keep winning? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 28:271–276
Law BS, Bradley R (1990) Habitat use and basking site selection in the water skink, Eulamprus quoyii. J Herpetol 24:235–240
Martínez-Cotrina J, Bohórquez-Alonso ML, Molina-Borja M (2014) Morphological and behavioural correlates of contest success in male yellow-headed geckos, Gonatodes albogularis: sequential assessment or self-assessment? Behaviour 151:1535–1554
McLean CA, Stuart-Fox DM (2014) Rival assessment and comparison of morphological and performance-based predictors of fighting ability in Lake Eyre dragon lizards, Ctenophorus maculosus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 69:523–531
Molina-Borja M, Padron-Fumero M, Alfonso-Martin T (1998) Morphological and behavioural traits affecting the intensity and outcome of male contests in Gallotia galloti galloti (family Lacertidae). Ethology 104:314–322
Noble DW, Fanson KV, Whiting MJ (2014) Sex, androgens, and whole-organism performance in an Australian lizard. Biol J Linn Soc 111:834–849
Noble DWA, Keogh JS, Whiting MJ (2013b) Multiple mating in a lizard increases fecundity but provides no evidence for genetic benefits. Behav Ecol 24:1128–1137
Noble DW, Wechmann K, Keogh JS, Whiting MJ (2013a) Behavioral and morphological traits interact to promote the evolution of alternative reproductive tactics in a lizard. Am Nat 182:726–742
Olsson M (1992) Contest success in relation to size and residency in male sand lizards, Lacerta agilis. Anim Behav 44:386–388
Osborne L (2005) Information content of male agonistic displays in the territorial tawny dragon (Ctenophorus decresii). J Ethol 23:189–197
R Development Core Team (2010) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria https://cran.r-project.org/
Robson M, Miles D (2000) Locomotor performance and dominance in male tree lizards, Urosaurus ornatus. Funct Ecol 14:338–344
Schuett GW (1997) Body size and agonistic experience affect dominance and mating success in male copperheads. Anim Behav 54:213–224
Schwarzkopf L (2005) Sexual dimorphism in body shape without sexual dimorphism in body size in water skinks (Eulamprus quoyii). Herpetologica 61:116–123
Scott ML, Whiting MJ, Webb JK, Shine R (2013) Chemosensory discrimination of social cues mediates space use in snakes, Cryptophis nigrescens (Elapidae). Anim Behav 85:1493–1500
Smith JM, Parker GA (1976) The logic of asymmetric contests. Anim Behav 24:159–175
Stuart-Fox DM (2006) Testing game theory models: fighting ability and decision rules in chameleon contests. Proc R Soc Lond B 273:1555–1561
Stuart-Fox DM, Firth D, Moussalli A, Whiting MJ (2006) Multiple signals in chameleon contests: designing and analysing animal contests as a tournament. Anim Behav 71:1263–1271
Stuart-Fox DM, Johnston GR (2005) Experience overrides colour in lizard contests. Behaviour 142:329–350
Tokarz RR (1985) Body size as a factor determining dominance in staged agonistic encounters between male brown anoles Anolis sagrei. Anim Behav 33:746–753
Turner H, Firth D (2012) Bradley-Terry models in R: the Bradley Terry2 package. J Stat Softw 48:1–21
Veron J (1969) The reproductive cycle of the water skink, Sphenomorphus quoyii. J Herpetol 3:55–63
Whiting MJ, Nagy KA, Bateman PW (2003) Evolution and maintenance of social status-signaling badges. In: Fox S, McCoy J, Baird T (eds) Lizard social behaviour. The John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland, pp. 47–82
Whiting MJ, Stuart-Fox DM, O’Connor D, Firth D, Bennett NC, Blomberg SP (2006) Ultraviolet signals ultra-aggression in a lizard. Anim Behav 72:353–363
Zucker N, Murray L (1996) Determinants of dominance in the tree lizard Urosaurus ornatus: the relative importance of mass, previous experience and coloration. Ethology 102:812–825
We would like to thank the two anonymous reviewers for their constructive feedback on the earlier version of this manuscript. We are grateful for David Firth and Heather Turner for their statistical advice with the BT model. We would like to also thank the numerous members of the Lizard Lab that assisted us with lizard collection, husbandry, and experimental setup.
DWAN was supported by an Australian Research Council (DECRA DE150101774), and this work was also supported by Macquarie University and a Discovery grant (DP130102998) awarded by the Australian Research Council to MJW.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All protocols for this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Macquarie University Animal Ethics Committee (ARA 2014/036). A scientific permit for this study was granted by the New South Wales National Parks and Wildlife Service, Office of Environment and Heritage (SL100328).
Communicated by T. Madsen
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kar, F., Whiting, M.J. & Noble, D.W.A. Influence of prior contest experience and level of escalation on contest outcome. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 70, 1679–1687 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-016-2173-4
- Contest history
- Contest initiation
- Contest escalation
- Bradley-Terry model
- Tournament design