Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 70, Issue 10, pp 1633–1641 | Cite as

Intra-sexual competition modulates calling behavior and its association with secondary sexual traits

  • Rocío Tarjuelo
  • Pablo Vergara
  • Jesús Martínez-Padilla
Original Article

Abstract

The expression of elaborate sexual displays is associated with individual quality ensuring reliable information about the bearers. However, the associated cost of expressing enhanced sexual traits is expected to change according to environmental circumstances. Specifically, the cost of maintaining or producing a signal is predicted to increase when environmental conditions are unfavorable, which may lead to a reduction in signal expression as shown in several species. Here, we compared the calling behavior of male red grouse Lagopus lagopus scoticus living in an area of experimentally increased intra-sexual competition to that of males living in a control area. Levels of intra-sexual competition were experimentally manipulated by testosterone implants in a subset of captured males. In addition, we compared the association between two sexual traits, calling behavior and comb size, of males living in these two areas. Although call frequency was not affected by different levels of intra-sexual competition, males from the control area performed shorter calls than individuals from the treatment area. Additionally, a positive association between comb size and call duration was found only for males in the area of lower aggressiveness. We suggest that environmental conditions influence the expression of multiple plastic sexual traits, depending on the costs and the information conveyed about different individual qualities.

Significance statement

Although sexual signals are considered reliable indicators of individual quality, environmental heterogeneity may modulate their expression and reliability. We experimentally manipulated levels of intra-sexual competition in a wild population of red grouse by increasing testosterone levels using implants in a subset of males. We observed that the social context shapes the expression of sexual traits. In less competitive conditions, males performed shorter calls and call length was positively related to the size of the supra-orbital comb, a relevant secondary sexual trait. Under higher intra-sexual competition, this relationship was decoupled and investment was directed at increasing call length.

Keywords

Intra-sexual competition Call Male red grouse Context dependent Testosterone 

Supplementary material

265_2016_2169_MOESM1_ESM.wav (1.8 mb)
Online resource 1(WAV 1808 kb)

References

  1. Andersson S, Pryke S, Örnborg J, Lawes MJ, Andersson M (2002) Multiple receivers, multiple ornaments, and a trade-off between agonistic and epigamic signaling in a widowbird. Am Nat 160:683–691CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Apfelbeck B, Kiefer S, Mortega KG, Goymann W, Kipper S (2012) Testosterone affects song modulation during simulated territorial intrusions in male black redstarts (Phoenicurus ochruros). PLoS ONE 7, e52009CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Candolin U (2000) Increased signalling effort when survival prospects decrease: male-male competition ensures honesty. Anim Behav 60:417–422CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Candolin U (2003) The use of multiple cues in mate choice. Biol Rev 78:575–595CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Candolin U (2005) Why do multiple traits determine mating success? Differential use in female choice and male competition in a water boatman. Proc R Soc Lond B 272:47–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chaine AS, Lyon BE (2008) Adaptive plasticity in female mate choice dampens sexual selection on male ornaments in the lark bunting. Science 319:459–462CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. R Core Team (2014) R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, www.r-project.org
  8. Cornwallis CK, Uller T (2009) Towards an evolutionary ecology of sexual traits. Trends Ecol Evol 25:145–152CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Cothran RD, Jeyasingh PD (2010) Condition dependence of a sexually selected trait in a crustacean species complex: importance of the ecological context. Evolution 64:2535–2546CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Cotton S, Fowler K, Pomiankowski A (2004a) Do sexual ornaments demonstrate heightened condition-dependent expression as predicted by the handicap hypothesis? Proc R Soc Lond B 271:771–783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cotton S, Fowler K, Pomiankowski A (2004b) Condition dependence of sexual ornament size and variation in the stalkeyed fly Cyrtodiopsis dalmanni (Diptera: Diopsidae). Evolution 58:1038–1046CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. de Kort SR, Eldermire ERB, Cramer ERA, Vehrencamp SL (2009) The deterrent effect of bird song in territory defense. Behav Ecol 20:200–206CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Fox A, Hudson PJ (2001) Parasites reduce territorial behaviour in red grouse (Lagopus lagopus scoticus). Ecol Lett 4:139–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fusani L, Beani L, Dessì-Fulgheri F (1994) Testosterone affects the acoustic structure of the male call in the grey partridge (Perdix perdix). Behaviour 128:301–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Galeotti P, Saino N, Sacchi R, Møller AP (1997) Song correlates with social context, testosterone and body condition in male barn swallows. Anim Behav 53:687–700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Garant D, Sheldon BC, Gustafsson L (2004) Climatic and temporal effects on the expression of secondary sexual characters: genetic and environmental components. Evolution 58:634–644CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Gil D, Gahr M (2002) The honesty of bird song: multiple constraints for multiple traits. Trends Ecol Evol 17:133–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grafen A (1990) Biological signals as handicaps. J Theor Biol 144:517–546CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Hardouin LA, Reby D, Bavoux C, Burneleau G, Bretagnolle V (2007) Communication of male quality in owl hoots. Am Nat 169:552–562CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Karubian J, Swaddle JP, Varian-Ramos CW, Webster MS (2009) The relative importance of male tail length and nuptial plumage on social dominance and mate choice in the red-backed fairy-wren Malurus melanocephalus: evidence for the multiple receiver hypothesis. J Avian Biol 40:559–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kipper S, Mundry R, Sommer C, Hultsch H, Todt D (2006) Song repertoire size is correlated with body measures and arrival date in common nightingales, Luscinia megarhynchos. Anim Behav 71:211–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Leitão A, Riebel K (2003) Are good ornaments bad armaments? Male chaffinch perception of songs with varying flourish length. Anim Behav 66:161–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Martínez-Padilla J, Pérez-Rodríguez L, Mougeot F, Redpath SM (2014a) Intra-sexual competition alters the relationship between testosterone and ornament expression in a wild territorial bird. Horm Behav 65:435–444Google Scholar
  24. Martínez-Padilla J, Redpath SM, Zeineddine M, Mougeot F (2014b) Insights into population ecology from long-term studies of red grouse Lagopus lagopus scoticus. J Anim Ecol 83:85–98Google Scholar
  25. Martínez-Padilla J, Pérez-Rodríguez L, Mougeot F, Ludwig SC, Redpath SM (2014c) Experimentally elevated levels of testosterone at independence reduce fitness in a territorial bird. Ecology 95:1033–1044Google Scholar
  26. Martín-Vivaldi M, Palomino JJ, Soler M (1998) Song structure in the Hoopoe (Upupa epops) - Strophe length reflects male condition. J Ornithol 139:287–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Møller AP, Pomiankowski A (1993) Why have birds got multiple sexual ornaments? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 32:167–176Google Scholar
  28. Morales MB, Casas F, García de la Morena E, Ponjoan A, Calabuig G, Martínez-Padilla J, García JT, Mañosa S, Viñuela J, Bota G (2014) Density dependence and habitat quality modulate the intensity of display territory defence in an exploded lekking species. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 68:1493–1504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Moss R, Kolb HH, Marquiss M, Watson A, Treca B, Watt D, Glennie W (1979) Aggressiveness and dominance in captive cock red grouse. Aggress Behav 5:59–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Moss R, Parr R, Lambin X (1994) Effects of testosterone on breeding density, breeding success and survival of red grouse. Proc R Soc Lond B 258:175–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mougeot F, Redpath SM, Leckie F, Hudson PJ (2003a) The effect of aggressiveness on the population dynamics of a territorial bird. Nature 421:737–739CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Mougeot F, Redpath SM, Moss R, Matthiopoulos J, Hudson PJ (2003b) Territorial behaviour and population dynamics in red grouse Lagopus lagopus scoticus. I. Population experiments. J Anim Ecol 72:1073–1082CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mougeot F, Irvine JR, Seivwright L, Redpath SM, Piertney S (2004) Testosterone, immunocompetence, and honest sexual signaling in male red grouse. Behav Ecol 15:930–937CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mougeot F, Dawson A, Redpath SM, Leckie F (2005a) Testosterone and autumn territorial behavior in male red grouse Lagopus lagopus scoticus. Horm Behav 47:576–584CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Mougeot F, Evans SA, Redpath SM (2005b) Interactions between population processes in a cyclic species: parasites reduce autumn territorial behaviour of male red grouse. Oecologia 144:289–298CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Mougeot F, Piertney SB, Leckie F, Evans S, Moss R, Redpath SM, Hudson PJ (2005c) Experimentally increased aggressiveness reduces population kin structure and subsequent recruitment in red grouse Lagopus lagopus scoticus. J Anim Ecol 74:488–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Penteriani V (2003) Breeding density affects the honesty of bird vocal displays as possible indicators of male/territory quality. Ibis 145:E127–E135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Piertney SB, Lambin X, Maccoll ADC et al (2008) Temporal changes in kin structure through a population cycle in a territorial bird, the red grouse Lagopus lagopus scoticus. Mol Ecol 17:2544–2551CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Price JJ, Earnshaw SM, Webster MS (2006) Montezuma oropendolas modify a component of song constrained by body size during vocal contests. Anim Behav 71:799–807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Redpath SM, Mougeot F, Leckie FM, Elston DA, Hudson PJ (2006a) Testing the role of parasites in driving the cyclic population dynamics of a gamebird. Ecol Lett 9:410–418CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Redpath SM, Mougeot F, Leckie FM, Evans SA (2006b) The effects of autumn testosterone on survival and productivity in red grouse, Lagopus lagopus scoticus. Anim Behav 71:1297–1305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Robinson MR, Pilkington JG, Clutton-Brock TH, Pemberton JM, Kruuk LEB (2008) Environmental heterogeneity generates fluctuating selection on a secondary sexual trait. Curr Biol 18:751–757CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Vergara P, Martínez-Padilla J (2012) Social context decouples the relationship between a sexual ornament and testosterone levels in a male wild bird. Horm Behav 62:407–412CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Vergara P, Martinez-Padilla J, Mougeot F, Leckie F, Redpath SM (2012a) Environmental heterogeneity influences the reliability of secondary sexual traits as condition indicators. J Evol Biol 25:20–28CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Vergara P, Redpath SM, Martinez-Padilla J, Mougeot F (2012b) Environmental conditions influence red grouse ornamentation at a population level. Biol J Linn Soc 107:788–798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Watson A, Moss R (2008) Grouse. Collins, LondonGoogle Scholar
  47. Wingfield J (1984) Environmental and endocrine control of reproduction in the song sparrow, Melospiza melodia: 2. Agonistic interactions as environmental information stimulating secretion of testosterone. Gen Comp Endocrinol 56:417–424CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Zahavi A (1993) The fallacy of conventional signalling. Philos T Roy Soc B 340:227–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rocío Tarjuelo
    • 1
  • Pablo Vergara
    • 2
  • Jesús Martínez-Padilla
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Terrestrial Ecology Group (TEG), Department of EcologyUniversidad Autónoma de MadridMadridSpain
  2. 2.Department of Evolutionary EcologyMuseo Nacional de Ciencias NaturalesMadridSpain
  3. 3.UMIB—Research Unit of Biodiversity (CSIC/UO/PA)University of OviedoMieresSpain
  4. 4.Centre d’Etudes Biologiques de Chizé (CEBC)UMR 7372 CNRS-Université de La RochelleVilliers-en-BoisFrance

Personalised recommendations