Effects of acoustic environment on male calling activity and timing in Neotropical forest katydids
Many characteristics of signals can convey information, but the exact timing of the signal often matters as well. The timing of signals is shaped by selective pressures including mate preferences, predation, and competition. In many insect communities, male calling to attract females is persistent and pervasive, and signal timing interactions among individuals are relatively common. In Neotropical forests, many katydid species are represented in the acoustic environment, but calls are usually short (<40 ms) and infrequent (<10 s of sound per individual per night), characteristics that have likely evolved in response to intense predation by insectivorous bats. We test two alternative hypotheses about signal timing in environments where signaling is rare and costly, either that timing is absent due to the unpredictable nature of the signals or that the rarity of signals places a premium on signal timing and attention to the acoustic environment. We tested these hypotheses by broadcasting conspecific calls, heterospecific calls, and silence to eight species of katydids and measuring calling activity and call timing in each playback treatment. All species changed the amount or timing of calling (or both) as a result of the playbacks, but species responded differently to playbacks, with some calling more or less during specific treatments and some showing differences in the timing of calls relative to playbacks. Although short latency signal timing was not observed, this study shows that Neotropical forest katydids are responsive to their acoustic environment despite an exceptionally low rate of signaling.
In many species, males produce signals to attract females, and studies show that the timing of these signals relative to other stimuli can play an important role in mate attraction and predator avoidance. Most of these studies have investigated species that are prolific signalers, due to the ease of collecting data. Here, we extend these theories and test them in Neotropical forest katydids, which produce very short and sporadic acoustic signals. We find that these insects do not display the fast competitive interactions seen in more prolific signalers, but still adjust both the timing and amount of calling in response to what they hear. These findings reveal that insects that signal rarely are still attending to the signaling of others and that their behavior can be strongly affected by the signals of other insects, including insects of other species.
KeywordsCopiphorinae Orthoptera Phaneropterinae Pseudophyllinae
Funding and logistical support was provided by the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute to LBS and RAP and by Dartmouth College to HMtH. Full permits for the project were obtained through the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute. Thank you to L. Höger for assistance with data analysis. Thank you to the staff at Barro Colorado Island for logistical and administrative support.
- Belwood JJ (1988) The influence of bat predation on calling behavior in neotropical forest katydids (Insecta: Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae). PhD Thesis, University of FloridaGoogle Scholar
- Eades D, Otte D, Cigliano M, Braun H (2016) Orthoptera species file online. Version 2.0/4.0 [WWW document]. URL http://Orthoptera.SpeciesFile.org
- Gerhardt HC, Huber F (2002) Acoustic communication in insects and anurans: common problems and diverse solutions. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
- Greenfield MD (1994) Cooperation and conflict in the evolution of signal interactions. Annu Rev Ecol Syst:97–126Google Scholar
- Greenfield MD, Tourtellot MK, Snedden WA (1997) Precedence effects and the evolution of chorusing. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 264:1355–1361Google Scholar
- Gwynne DT (2001) Katydids and bush-crickets: reproductive behavior and evolution of the Tettigoniidae. Cornell University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Heller K, Hemp C (2014) Fiddler on the tree—A bush-cricket species with unusual stridulatory organs and song.Google Scholar
- Lehmann GU (2003) Review of biogeography, host range and evolution of acoustic hunting in Ormiini (Insecta, Diptera, Tachinidae), parasitoids of night-calling bushcrickets and crickets (Insecta, Orthoptera, Ensifera). Zoologischer Anzeiger-A Journal of Comparative Zoology 242:107–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lloyd JE (1984) Evolution of a firefly flash code. Fla Entomol:228–239Google Scholar
- Montealegre-Z F, Morris GK (1999) Songs and systematics of some Tettigoniidae from Colombia and Ecuador I. Pseudophyllinae (Orthoptera). Journal of Orthoptera Research:163–236Google Scholar
- Nickle DA, Quintero D, Aiello A (1992) Katydids of Panama (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) insect of Panama and Mesoamerica. Oxford Science Publications:142–184Google Scholar
- R Core Team (2015) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3–900051–07-0, URL http://www. R-project. org/Google Scholar
- Rentz D (1975) Two new katydids of the genus Melanonotus from Costa Rica with comments on their life history strategies (Tettigoniidae: Pseudophyllinae). Entomol News 86:129–140Google Scholar
- Sarria-S F, Morris G, Windmill J (2014) Shrinking wings for ultrasonic pitch production: hyperintense ultra-short-wavelength calls in a new genus of neotropical katydids. Tettigoniidae, OrthopteraGoogle Scholar
- Shaw KC, Galliart P (1987) Acoustic and mating behavior of a Mexican katydid, Pterophylla beltrani (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae). Fla Entomol:354–368Google Scholar
- Walker TJ, Moore TE (2013) Singing insects of North America. University of Florida. http://entnemdept.ifas.ufl.edu/walker/Buzz/crickets.htm