Abstract
Conflicts of interest are part and parcel of living in a social group, yet actual conflict can be rare in established groups. Within limits, individuals can maximize the benefits of group living by resolving conflict with other group members. Thus, understanding what causes conflict, what determines its outcome, and how it is resolved holds the key to understanding the evolution and maintenance of sociality. Here, we investigate these questions using the clown anemonefish Amphiprion percula. Clownfish live in groups composed of a breeding pair and zero to four non-breeders that queue for breeding positions. Within groups, there is potential conflict over rank yet actual conflict is very rare. We staged contests in aquaria between pairs of non-breeding individuals over access to a key resource (an anemone), analogous to contests that would occur at the onset of group formation in the wild. The initial size ratio between individuals tended to predict the intensity, and predicted the outcome and resolution of conflict: conflict intensity was greater when individuals were more similar in size; the probability of the smaller individual winning was greater when individuals were more similar in size; and the loser of the contest grew less than the winner when individuals were more similar in size. These results provide a critical test of foundational assumptions upon which our understanding of clownfish and other fish societies has been built. More generally, the results show that one of the simplest and most effective ways for animals to resolve conflict is to modify the phenotype that triggers conflict.
Significance statement
The study provides a critical test of the foundational assumptions on which our understanding of conflict and its resolution in animal societies has been built. Importantly, this study highlights that four elements of conflict must be investigated for a complete understanding of societal maintenance, and broadens the taxonomic basis of empirical research of conflict (focused on terrestrial organisms) by examining these four elements in a fish society. Specifically, the study demonstrates the key importance of relative body size (competitive ability) in determining conflict intensity, contest outcome, and subsequent conflict resolution via the regulation of subordinate growth rates. The occurrence of strategic subordinate growth regulation is intriguing because it shows that the simplest and most effective way for animals to resolve conflict is to modify the phenotypes that trigger conflict in the first place.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen GR (1972) The anemonefishes: their classification and biology, 2nd edn. TFH Publications, Neptune City, NJ
Ang TZ, Manica A (2010a) Aggression, segregation and stability in a dominance hierarchy. Proc R Soc Lond B 277:1337–1343
Ang TZ, Manica A (2010b) Unavoidable limits on group size in a body size-based linear hierarchy. Behav Evol 21:819–825
Balshine-Earn S, Neat FC, Reid H, Taborsky M (1998) Paying to stay or paying to breed? Field evidence for direct benefits of helping behavior in a cooperatively breeding fish. Behav Ecol 9:432–438
Bourke AFG (2011) Principles of social evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Bridge C, Field J (2007) Queuing for dominance: gerontocracy and queue-jumping in the hover wasp Liostenogaster flavolineata. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61:1253–1259
Buston PM (2003a) Size and growth modification in clownfish. Nature 424:145–146
Buston PM (2003b) Forcible eviction and prevention of recruitment in the clown anemonefish. Behav Ecol 14:576–582
Buston PM (2004a) Does the presence of non-breeders enhance the fitness of breeders? An experimental analysis in the clown anemonefish Amphiprion percula. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 57:23–31
Buston PM (2004b) Territory inheritance in clownfish. Proc R Soc Lond B 271:S252–S254
Buston PM, Cant MA (2006) A new perspective on size hierarchies in nature: patterns, causes, and consequences. Oecologia 149:362–372
Buston PM, Wong MYL (2014) Decision making in complex animal societies: a tale of two fishes. Am Sci 102:290–297
Buston PM, Zink AG (2009) Reproductive skew and the evolution of conflict resolution: a synthesis of transactional and tug-of-war models. Behav Ecol 20:672–684
Cant MA (2000) Social control of reproduction in banded mongooses. Anim Behav 59:147–158
Cant MA (2011) The role of threats in animal cooperation. Proc R Soc Lond B 283:170–178
Cant MA, Johnstone RA (2009) Self-serving punishment and the evolution of cooperation. J Evol Biol 19:1383–1385
Chase ID, Tovey C, Sprangler-Martin D, Mnfredonia M (2002) Individual differences versus social dynamics in the formation of animal dominance hierarchies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:5744–5749
Clarke FM, Faulkes CG (1997) Dominance and queen succession in captive colonies of the eusocial naked mole-rat, Heterocephalus glaber. Proc R Soc Lond B 264:993–1000
Clarke FM, Faulkes CG (2001) Intracolony aggression in the eusocial naked mole-rat, Heterocephalus glaber. Anim Behav 61:311–324
Clutton-Brock TH (2002) Breeding together: kin selection and mutualism in cooperative vertebrates. Science 296:69–72
Clutton-Brock TH, Brotherton PNM, Smith R, McIlrath GM, Kansky R, Gaynor D, O-Riain MJ, Skinner JD (1998) Infanticide and expulsion of females in a cooperative mammals. Proc R Soc Lond B 265:2291–2295
Craig JV, Ortman LL, Guhl AM (1965) Genetic selection for social dominance ability in chicks. Anim Behav 13:114–131
Dugatkin LA (1997) Winner effects, loser effects and the structure of dominance hierarchies. Behav Ecol 8:583–587
Dugatkin LA, Earley RL (2004) Individual recognition, dominance hierarchies and winner and loser effects. Proc R Soc Lond B 271:1537–1549
East ML, Hofer H (2001) Male spotted hyenas (Crocuta crocuta) queue for status in social groups dominated by females. Behav Ecol 12:558–568
Elliott JK, Elliott JM, Mariscal RN (1995) Host selection, location and association behaviors of anemonefishes in field settlement experiments. Mar Biol 122:377–389
Fautin DG (1992) Anemonefish recruitment: the roles of order and chance. Symbiosis 14:143–160
Field J, Shreeves G, Sumner S (1999) Group size, queuing and helping decisions in facultatively eusocial hover wasps. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 45:378–385
Fournier F, Festa-Bianchet M (1995) Social dominance in adult female mountain goats. Anim Behav 49:1449–1459
Frank SA (1995) Mutual policing and repression of competition in the evolution of cooperative groups. Nature 377:520–522
Godfray HCJ (1995) Evolutionary theory of parent-offspring conflict. Nature 376:133–138
Hackländer K, Möstl E, Arnold W (2003) Reproductive suppression in female Alpine marmots, Marmota marmot. Anim Behav 65:1133–1140
Hamilton IM, Heg D, Bender N (2005) Size differences within a dominance hierarchy influence conflict and help in a cooperatively breeding cichlid. Behaviour 142:1591–1613
Heg D, Bender N, Hamilton IM (2004) Strategic growth decisions in helper cichlids. Proc R Soc Lond B 271:S505–S508
Johnstone RA, Cant MA (1999) Reproductive skew and the threat of eviction: a new perspective. Proc R Soc Lond B 266:275–279
Keane B, Waser PM, Creel SR, Creel NM, Elliott LF, Minchella DF (1994) Subordinate reproduction in dwarf mongooses. Anim Behav 47:65–75
Kikkawa J, Smith JNM, Prys-Jones R, Fisk P, Caterall CP (1986) Determinants of social dominance and inheritance of agonistic behavior in an island population of silvereyes, Zosterops lateralis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 19:165–169
Mariscal RN (1970) The nature of the symbiosis between IndoPacific anemonefishes and their sea anemones. Mar Biol 6:58–65
Maruska KP, Fernald RD (2010) Behavioral and physiological plasticity: rapid changes during social ascent in an African cichlid fish. Horm Behav 58:230–240
Matthews SA, Wong MYL (2015) Temperature-dependent resolution of conflict over rank within a size-based dominance hierarchy. Behav Ecol 26:947–958
Nelson JS, Chou LM, Phang Violet PE (1994) Pigmentation variation in the anemonefish Amphiprion ocellaris (Teleostei: Pomacentridae): type, stability and its usefulness for individual identification. Raffles B Zool 42:927–930
Nichols HS, Bell MBV, Hodge SJ, Cant MA (2012) Resource limitation moderates the adaptive suppression of subordinate breeding in a cooperatively breeding mongoose. Behav Ecol 23:635–642
O’Riain MJO, Jarvis JUM (1998) The dynamics of growth in naked mole-rats: the effects of litter order and changes in social structure. J Zool 246:49–60
O’Riain MJO, Jarvis JUM, Alexander R, Buffenstein R, Peeters C (2000) Morphological castes in a vertebrate. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97:13194–13197
Ratnieks FLW, Foster KR, Wenseleers T (2006) Conflict resolution in insect societies. Ann Rev Entomol 51:581–608
Reddon AR, Voisin MR, Menon N, Marsh-Rollo S, Wong MYL, Balshine S (2011) Rules of engagement for resource contests in a social fish. Anim Behav 82:93–99
Reeve HK, Ratnieks FLW (1993) Queen-queen conflict in polygynous societies: mutual tolerance and reproductive skew. In: Keller L (ed) Queen number and sociality in insects. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 45–85
Russell AF, Carlson AA, McIlrath GM, Jordan NR, Clutton-Brock TH (2004a) Adaptive size modification by dominant female meerkats. Evolution 58:1600–1607
Russell AF, Carlson AA, McIlrath GM, Jordan NR, Clutton-Brock T (2004b) Adaptive size modification by dominant female meerkats. Evolution 58:1600–1607
Schuett GW (1997) Body size and agonistic experience affect dominance and mating success in male copperheads. Anim Behav 54:213–224
Silk JB, Alberts SC, Altmann J (2004) Patterns of coalition formation by adult female baboons in Amboseli, Kenya. Anim Behav 67:573–582
Spinks AC, Jarvis JUM, Bennett NC (2000) Comparative patterns of philopatry and dispersal in two common mole-rat populations: implications for the evolution of mole-rat sociality. J Anim Ecol 69:224–234
Sprague DS (1998) Age, dominance rank, natal status and tenure among male macaques. Am J Phys Anthropol 105:511–521
Stiver KA, Desjardins JK, Fitzpatrick JL, Neff B, Quinn S, Balshine S (2007) Evidence for size and sex-specific dispersal in a cooperatively breeding cichlid fish. Mol Ecol 16:2974–2984
Valderrabano-Ibarra C, Brumon I, Drummond H (2007) Development of a linear dominance hierarchy in nestling birds. Anim Behav 74:1705–1714
Wiley RH, Rabenold KN (1984) The evolution of cooperatively breeding by delayed reciprocity and queuing for favorable social positions. Evolution 38:97–107
Wittemyer G, Getz WM (2007) Hierarchical dominance structure and social organization in African elephants, Loxodonta africana. Anim Behav 73:671–681
Wolff JO, Dunlap AS, Ritchhart E (2001) Adult female prairie voles and meadow voles do not suppress reproduction in their daughters. Behav Process 55:157–162
Wong MYL (2011) Group size in animal societies: the potential role of social and ecological limitations in the group-living fish, Paragobiodon xanthosomus. Ethology 7:638–644
Wong MYL, Balshine S (2010) Fight for your breeding right: hierarchy re-establishment predicts aggression in a social queue. Biol Lett 7:190–193
Wong MYL, Buston PM (2013) Social systems in habitat specialist reef fishes: tests of key concepts in evolutionary ecology. Bioscience 63:453–463
Wong MYL, Buston PM, Munday PL, Jones GP (2007) The threat of punishment enforces peaceful cooperation and stabilizes queues in a coral-reef fish. Proc R Soc Lond B 274:1093–1099
Wong MYL, Medina A, Uppaluri C, Arnold S, Seymour J, Buston PM (2013) Consistent behavioural traits and behavioural syndromes in the false clown anemonefish, Amphiprion ocellaris. J Fish Biol 83:207–213
Wong MYL, Munday PL, Buston PM, Jones GP (2008) Fasting or feasting in a fish social hierarchy. Curr Biol 18:R372–R373
Woodroffe R, MacDonald DW (1995) Female/female competition in European badgers (Meles meles): effects on breeding success. J Anim Ecol 64:12–20
Young AJ, Bennett NC (2010) Morphological divergence of breeders and helpers in wild Damaraland mole-rat societies. Evolution 64:3190–3197
Young AJ, Clutton-Brock TH (2006) Infanticide by subordinates influences reproductive sharing in cooperatively breeding meerkats. Biol Lett 2:385–387
Young AJ, Jarvis JUM, Barnaville J, Bennett NC (2015) Workforce effects and the evolution of complex sociality in wild Damaraland mole rats. Am Nat 186:302–311
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Cassidy D’Aloia, John Majoris, and Alissa Rickborn for comments on earlier versions of this manuscript. We would also like to thank Stacy Arnold, Diana Acosta, Philip Schmiege, Derek Scolaro, and Josephine Eugene for their help in the laboratory. The research was supported by a start-up award to PMB from the Trustees of Boston University and made possible by awards to CU and AM from the Undergraduate Research Opportunities Program and the Summer Undergraduate Research Fellowship Program at Boston University. Finally, we thank two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
This study was funded by a start-up award to PMB from the Trustees of Boston University and made possible by awards to AM and CU from the Undergraduate Research Opportunities Program and the Summer Undergraduate Research Fellowship Program at Boston University. All applicable institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed (IACUC #11-013). All authors declare that no conflict of interest exists.
Additional information
Communicated by J. Lindström
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wong, M., Uppaluri, C., Medina, A. et al. The four elements of within-group conflict in animal societies: an experimental test using the clown anemonefish, Amphiprion percula . Behav Ecol Sociobiol 70, 1467–1475 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-016-2155-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-016-2155-6