Skip to main content
Log in

A good day to die: bridging the gap between costs and benefits of parental care

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In species that provide parental care, offspring survival is often completely dependent on protection and resources afforded by the parents. Therefore, parents gain no fitness unless they raise offspring to a critical point of independence. In these species, selection should shape parental life history to increase their chances of surviving to this critical point. We test this hypothesis using females of two species of burying beetles, Nicrophorus orbicollis and N. marginatus. Burying beetles breed on small, vertebrate carcasses, and reproduction can be divided into two stages: carcass preparation and larva provisioning. Females were allowed to reproduce repeatedly until they died, and the stage in which each female died was recorded. Most females died while waiting for another carcass for their next reproductive bout or during carcass preparation, which indicates that females may have a physiological mechanism that allows them to delay death until their final brood is independent of parental care.

Significance statement

In this paper, we show that female burying beetles of two species do not die at random times during reproduction, but instead die after they have finished caring for their offspring. This is the first time that non-random death has been shown in burying beetles. We show that females that die after offspring care is complete have a higher fitness than females that die at random because offspring in many species of burying beetles depend on parental care for food provisioning and protection. We also propose a hormonal mechanism through which females might extend their lives to allow them to finish caring for their offspring.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Charlesworth B (1994) Evolution in age-structured populations, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock TH (1991) The evolution of parental care. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole LC (1954) The population consequences of life history phenomena. Quart Rev Bio 29:103–137

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman RM, Gross MR, Sargent RC (1985) Parental investment decision rules: a test in bluegill fish. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 18:59–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotter SC, Topham E, Price AJP, Kilner RM (2010) Fitness costs associated with mounting a social immune response. Ecol Let 13:1114–1123

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Creighton JC (2005) Population density, body size, and phenotypic plasticity of brood size in a burying beetle. Behav Ecol 16:1031–1036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creighton JC, Heflin ND, Belk MC (2009) Cost of reproduction, resource quality, and terminal investment in a burying beetle. Am Nat 174:673–684

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eggert AK, Reinking M, Müller JK (1998) Parental care improves offspring survival and growth in burying beetles. Anim Behav 55:97–107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fetherston IA, Scott MP, Traniello JFA (1990) Parental care in burying beetles: the organization of male and female brood-care behavior. Ethol 85:177–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert LI (ed) (1976) The juvenile hormones. Plenum, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • González-Tokman D, González-Santoyo I, Munguía-Steyer R, Córdoba-Aguilar A (2013) Effect of juvenile hormone on senescence in males with terminal investment. J Evol Biol 26:2458–2466

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klug H, Bonsall MB (2014) What are the benefits of parental care? The importance of parental effects on developmental rate. Ecol Evol 4:2330–2351

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Müller JK, Eggert AK, Sakaluk SK (1998) Carcass maintenance and biparental brood care in burying beetles: are males redundant? Ecol Entom 23:195–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Partridge L, Barton NH (1993) Optimality, mutation and the evolution of ageing. Nature 362:305–311

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rauter CM, Moore AJ (1999) Do honest signalling models of offspring solicitation apply to insects? Proc Roy Soc Lond B 266:1691–1696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rauter CM, Moore AJ (2004) Time constraints and trade-offs among parental care behaviours: effects of brood size, sex and loss of mate. Anim Beh 68:695–702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rolff J, Siva-Jothy MT (2002) Copulation corrupts immunity: a mechanism for a cost of mating in insects. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:9916–9918

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Rose MR (1991) The evolutionary biology of aging. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott MP (1990) Brood guarding and the evolution of male parental care in male burying beetles. Beh Ecol Sociobiol 26:31–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott MP (1998) The ecology and behavior of burying beetles. Ann Rev Entom 43:595–618

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scott MP, Traniello JFA (1990) Behavioural and ecological correlates of male and female parental care and reproductive success in burying beetles (Nicrophorus spp.). Anim Beh 39:274–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott MP, Trumbo ST, Neese PA, Bailey WD, Roe RM (2001) Changes in biosynthesis and degradation of juvenile hormone during breeding by burying beetles: a reproductive or social role? J Ins Phys 47:295–302

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, AN, Creighton JC, Belk MC (in prep) Why does it take two to tango? Lifetime fitness consequences of biparental care in a burying beetle.

  • Smith AN, Belk MC, Creighton JC (2014) Residency time as an indicator of reproductive restraint in male burying beetles. PLoS One 9, e109165

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Smith AN, Creighton JC, Belk MC (2015) Differences in patterns of reproductive allocation between the sexes in Nicrophorus orbicollis. PLoS One 10, e0143762

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Steiger S, Meier T, Müller JK (2012) Fitness costs associated with chemical signaling. Comm Integ Biol 5:57–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trumbo ST (1992) Monogamy to communal breeding: exploitation of a brood resource base by burying beetles (Nicrophorus). Ecol Entom 17:289–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trumbo ST (2006) Infanticide, sexual selection, and task specialization in a biparental burying beetle. Anim Beh 72:1159–1167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trumbo ST, Rauter CM (2014) Juvenile hormone, metabolic rate, body mass and longevity costs in parenting burying beetles. Anim Behav 92:203–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trumbo ST, Borst DW, Robinson GE (1995) Rapid elevation of juvenile hormone titer during behavioral assessment of the breeding resource by the burying beetle, Nicrophorus orbicollis. J Ins Phys 41:535–543

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by a graduate research grant from Purdue University Calumet and a Graduate Research Fellowship from Brigham Young University. We thank Amy Shoup for her assistance with this project, and Jane and Stefan Shoup for allowing us to collect beetles on their property.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ashlee N. Smith.

Additional information

Communicated by S. Sakaluk

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Smith, A.N., Creighton, J.C. & Belk, M.C. A good day to die: bridging the gap between costs and benefits of parental care. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 70, 1397–1401 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-016-2149-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-016-2149-4

Keywords

Navigation