Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 70, Issue 8, pp 1151–1159 | Cite as

Thermal dependence of signalling: do polymorphic wall lizards compensate for morph-specific differences in conspicuousness?

  • Guillem Pérez i de Lanuza
  • Miguel Ángel Carretero
  • Enrique Font
Original Article


Selection for signal efficacy (detectability) is an important factor driving the evolution of chromatic signals. Communication theory predicts that colour signals should evolve to show those properties that maximize their conspicuousness to receivers in their own visual environment. In the ventrally polymorphic lizard Podarcis muralis, visual modelling has shown morph-specific differences in chromatic conspicuousness (orange > yellow > white). Although this suggests that morphs may incur different detectability costs, the differences in conspicuousness could be compensated behaviourally if individuals of the more conspicuous morphs adopted postures that made their colour patches less visible. We quantified the degree of exposure of the lizard ventral and ventrolateral coloration in the field to investigate the relationship between body posture and colour morph. We used a classification based on four lizard postures, from ventral surface completely hidden to full exposure of the ventral and ventrolateral colour patches (when lizards extend their forelegs and raise the head). As these postures may have consequences for thermoregulation, we also recorded substrate and lizard body temperatures using a thermographic camera. Results did not reveal differences among morphs in the frequency with which they adopt postures that expose their colour patches. In contrast, we found a strong relationship between body temperature and lizard posture. Overall, our results support the view that, regardless of colour morph, perching wall lizards adopt the elevated postures that maximize exposure of their ventral colour patches only when their body temperature is high enough to allow for an efficient predator avoidance response.

Significance statement

Selection for effective communication favours flashy, highly conspicuous coloration, but conspicuousness also makes colour signals more detectable to unintended receivers (e.g. predators). Some animals offset the costs associated with conspicuous coloration by evolving compensatory traits. In the lizard P. muralis, ventral colour morphs differ in conspicuousness and we hypothesized that the most conspicuous morphs might compensate for their increased conspicuousness by adopting postures that minimize exposure of their conspicuous colour patches. Results show that the morph-specific differences in conspicuousness are not compensated behaviourally. In contrast, we found a strong relationship between body temperature and lizard posture, suggesting that lizards, regardless of colour morph, adopt postures exposing their conspicuous colour patches only when their body temperature allows for an efficient predator avoidance response.


Detectability Colour polymorphism Signal efficacy Thermal ecology Thermography Visual ecology 



The study was supported by FEDER through the COMPETE program (ref. 008929) and Portuguese national funds through the FCT (Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, Portugal) project PTDC/BIA-BEC/101256/2008 and a grant (CGL2011-23751) from the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación. GPL was supported by post-doctoral grant (SFRH/BPD/94582/2013) from FCT under the Programa Operacional Potencial Humano–Quadro de Referência Estratégico Nacional funds from the European Social Fund and Portuguese Ministério da Educação e Ciência. We thank the editor and two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments.

Compliance with ethical standards

An attempt was made to minimize lizard disturbance during observations. At worst, lizards avoided the observer by moving away. No lizards were captured or manipulated during the observations. The habitat (i.e. rocks, vegetation) was not altered in any way. Field work was performed under research permit number 2013095-0001 issued by the Préfecture des Pyrénées-Orientales (France). This research complied with the ASAB/ABS Guidelines for the Use of Animals in Research.

Supplementary material

265_2016_2123_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (251 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 251 kb)


  1. Avery RA (1991) Temporal dynamics of a vigilance posture in the ruin lizards Podarcis sicula. Amphibia-Reptilia 12:352–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bartholomew GA (1966) A field study of temperature relations in the Galapagos marine iguana. Copeia 1966:241–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bauwens D, Garland T Jr, Castilla AM, Van Damme R (1995) Evolution of sprint speed in lacertid lizards: morphological, physiological, and behavioral covariation. Evolution 49:848–863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bauwens D, Castilla AM, Mouton PFN (1999) Field body temperatures, activity levels and opportunities for thermoregulation in an extreme microhabitat specialist, the girdled lizard Cordylus macropholis. J Zool 249:11–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Belliure J, Carrascal LM (2002) Influence of heat transmission mode on heating rates and on the selection of patches for heating in a Mediterranean lizard. Physiol Biochem Zool 75:369376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Braña F (1991) Summer activity patterns and thermoregulation in the wall lizard Podarcis muralis. Herpetol J 1:544–549Google Scholar
  7. Brattstrom BH (1971) Social and thermoregulatory behavior of the bearded dragon, Amphibolurus barbatus. Copeia 1971:484–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Caetano MH, Castanet J, Crespo EG (1986) Estimation à l’aide de la squelettochronologie de l’âge de Podarcis hispanica, (Steindacher, 1870), Sauria, Lacertidae, provenant d’une population portugaise. Rev Suisse Zool 93:117–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carretero MA (2008) How rigid are preferred temperatures in lacertids? An evolutionary survey in Podarcis, 6th Symposium on the Lacertids of the Mediterranean Basin. Abstract book, Mythimna, Lesvos (Greece), p 25, 23-27 June 2008Google Scholar
  10. Carretero MA, Vasconcelos R, Fonseca M, Kaliontzopoulou A, Brito JC, Harris DJ, Perera A (2006) Escape tactics of two syntopic forms of the Lacerta perspicillata complex with different colour patterns. Can J Zool 84:1594–1603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Castilla AM, Van Damme R, Bauwens D (1999) Field body temperatures, mechanisms of thermoregulation and evolution of thermal characteristics in lacertid lizards. Nat Croat 8:253–274Google Scholar
  12. Cooper WE Jr, Greenberg N (1992) Reptilian coloration and behavior. In: Gans C, Crews D (eds) Biology of the Reptilia, vol 18, Physiology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 298–422Google Scholar
  13. Forsman A, Appelqvist S (1999) Experimental manipulation reveals differential effects of colour pattern on survival in male and female grasshoppers. J Evol Biol 12:391–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Greenberg N (1976) Thermoregulatory aspects of behavior in the blue spiny lizard Sceloporus cyanogenys (Sauria, Iguanidae). Behaviour 59:1–21CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Hedrick AV (2000) Crickets with extravagant mating songs compensate for predation risk with extra caution. Proc R Soc Lond B 267:671–675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hensley NM, Drury JP, Garland T, Blumstein DT (2015) Vivid birds do not initiate flight sooner despite their potential conspicuousness. Curr Zool 61:773–780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hertz PE, Huey RB, Nevo E (1982) Fight versus flight: body temperature influences defensive responses of lizards. Anim Behav 30:676–679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hertz PE, Huey RB, Stevenson RD (1993) Evaluating temperature regulation by field-active ectotherms: the fallacy of the inappropriate question. Am Nat 142:796–818CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Huey RB (1982) Temperature, physiology, and the ecology of reptiles. In: Gans C, Pough FH (eds) Biology of the Reptilia, vol 12, Physiology C. Physiological ecology. Academic Press, NY, pp 25–91Google Scholar
  20. Husak JF, Lailvaux SP (2014) An evolutionary perspective on conflict and compensation in physiological and functional traits. Curr Zool 60:755–767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Husak JF, Swallow JG (2011) Compensatory traits and the evolution of male ornaments. Behaviour 148:1–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Husak JF, Macedonia JM, Fox SF, Sauceda RC (2006) Predation cost of conspicuous male coloration in collared lizards (Crotaphytus collaris): an experimental test using clay‐covered model lizards. Ethology 112:572–580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Husak JF, Henningsen JP, Vanhooydonck B, Irschick DJ (2015) A performance-based approach to studying costs of reliable signals. In: Irschick DJ, Briffa M, Podos J (eds) Animal signaling and function: an integrative approach. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, pp 47–74Google Scholar
  24. Journey L, Drury JP, Haymer M, Rose K, Blumstein DT (2013) Vivid birds respond more to acoustic signals of predators. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 67:1285–1293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kwiatkowski MA, Guyer C (2003) Variation in conspicuousness among populations of an iguanid lizard, Sauromalus obesus. Copeia 2003:481–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lattanzio MS, Metro KJ, Miles DB (2014) Preference for male traits differ in two female morphs of the tree lizard, Urosaurus ornatus. PLoS One 9, e101515CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Lazić MM, Carretero MA, Mihailov-Krstev T, Lazarević-Macanović M, Krstić N, Crnobrnja-Isailović J (2012) Incidence patterns of ectodermal lesions in wild populations of Common wall lizard (Podarcis muralis). Amphibia-Reptilia 33:327–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Luna S, Pérez i de Lanuza G, Font E (2013) Use of an infrared thermographic camera to measure field body temperatures of small lacertid lizards. Herpetol Rev 44:59–62Google Scholar
  29. Macedonia JM, Brandt Y, Clark DL (2002) Sexual dichromatism and differential conspicuousness of the common collared lizard (Crotaphytus collaris) from Utah and New Mexico, USA. Biol J Linn Soc 77:67–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Marshall KLA, Philpot KE, Stevens M (2015) Conspicuous male coloration impairs survival against avian predators in Aegean wall lizards, Podarcis erhardii. Ecol Evol 5:4115–4131CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Martín-Vallejo J, García-Fernández J, Pérez-Mellado V, Vicente-Villardón JL (1995) Habitat selection and thermal ecology of the sympatric lizards Podarcis muralis and Podarcis hispanica in a mountain region of Central Spain. Herpetol J 5:181–188Google Scholar
  32. Medel RG, Jimenez JE, Fox SF, Jaksic FM (1988) Experimental evidence that high population frequencies of lizard tail autotomy indicate inefficient predation. Oikos 53:321–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Muth A (1977) Thermoregulatory postures and orientation to the sun: a mechanistic evaluation for the zebra-tailed lizard, Callisaurus draconoides. Copeia 1977:710–720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nakagawa S, Cuthill IC (2007) Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists. Biol Rev 82:591–605CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Norris KS (1967) Color adaptation in desert reptiles and its thermal relationships. In: Milstead WW (ed) Lizard ecology: a symposium. University of Missouri Press, Columbia, pp 163–229Google Scholar
  36. Olsson M, Stuart-Fox D, Ballena C (2013) Genetics and evolution of colour patterns in reptiles. Semin Cell Dev Biol 24:529–541CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Oufiero CE, Garland T Jr (2007) Evaluating performance costs of sexually selected traits. Funct Ecol 21:676–689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pérez i de Lanuza G, Font E (2015) Differences in conspicuousness between alternative color morphs in a polychromatic lizard. Behav Ecol 26:1432–1446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pérez i de Lanuza G, Font E, Carazo P (2013) Colour assortative mating in a colour polymorphic lacertid lizard. Behav Ecol 24:273–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pérez i de Lanuza G, Carazo P, Font E (2014) Colours of quality: structural (but not pigment) coloration informs about male quality in a polychromatic lizard. Anim Behav 90:73–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Powell GL, Russell AP (1985) Field thermal ecology of the eastern short-homed lizard (Phrynosoma douglassi brevirostre) in southeastern Alberta. Can J Zool 63:228–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rand AS (1964) Inverse relationship between temperature and shyness in the lizard Anolis lineatopus. Ecology 45:863–864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sannolo M, Mangiacotti M, Sacchi R, Scali S (2014) Keeping a cool mind: head-body temperature differences in the common wall lizard. J Zool 293:71–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sinervo B, Lively CM (1996) The rock-paper-scissors game and the evolution of alternative male reproductive strategies. Nature 380:240–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Stuart-Fox D, Moussalli A (2009) Camouflage, communication and thermoregulation: lessons from colour changing organisms. Philos T Roy Soc B 364:463–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Stuart‐Fox DM, Moussalli A, Marshall NJ, Owens IPF (2003) Conspicuous males suffer higher predation risk: visual modelling and experimental evidence from lizards. Anim Behav 66:541–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Swallow JG, Hayes JP, Koteja P, Garland T Jr (2009) Selection experiments and experimental evolution of performance and physiology. In: Garland T Jr, Rose MR (eds) Experimental evolution: concepts, methods, and applications of selection experiments. University of California Press, California, pp 301–352Google Scholar
  48. Teasdale LC, Stevens M, Stuart-Fox D (2013) Discrete colour polymorphism in the tawny dragon lizard (Ctenophorus decresii) and differences in signal conspicuousness among morphs. J Evol Biol 26:1035–1046CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Tomkins JL, Kotiaho JS, Lebas NR (2005) Phenotypic plasticity in the developmental integration of morphological trade-offs and secondary sexual trait compensation. Proc R Soc Lond B 272:543–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tuttle MD, Taft LK, Ryan MJ (1982) Evasive behaviour of a frog in response to bat predation. Anim Behav 30:393–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Vercken E, Massot M, Sinervo B, Clobert J (2007) Colour variation and alternative reproductive strategies in females of the common lizard Lacerta vivipara. J Evol Biol 20:221–232CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Guillem Pérez i de Lanuza
    • 1
  • Miguel Ángel Carretero
    • 1
  • Enrique Font
    • 2
  1. 1.CIBIO Research Centre in Biodiversity and Genetic Resources, InBIOUniversidade do Porto, Campus Agrário de VairãoVila do CondePortugal
  2. 2.Cavanilles Institute of Biodiversity and Evolutionary BiologyUniversity of Valencia, APDO 22085ValènciaSpain

Personalised recommendations