Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 70, Issue 6, pp 951–961

Do personalities co-vary with metabolic expenditure and glucocorticoid stress response in adult lizards?

  • Hugo Mell
  • Rémy Josserand
  • Beatriz Decencière
  • Paulina Artacho
  • Sandrine Meylan
  • Jean-François Le Galliard
Original Article

Abstract

Stable differences in physiology among individuals may facilitate the evolution of consistent individual differences in behavior. In particular, according to the pace-of-life syndrome (POLS) hypothesis, individual variation in metabolic expenditure and stress physiology should be linked with exploration, aggression, or risk-taking behaviors. Previous studies have uncovered stable individual differences in metabolic expenditure and circulating glucorticoids in common lizards (Zootoca vivipara). We tested the correlations between standard metabolic rates (SMR), glucorticoid stress response, and behavioral traits (activity, aggressiveness, risk taking, and sociability) in males. In ectotherms, the thermal dependence of SMR should be included in the POLS hypothesis; we therefore measured SMR at three temperatures from rest to preferred body temperature. Activity, aggressiveness, and risk taking, but not sociability, exhibited significant, short-term repeatability, and little correlation was found between behavioral traits. The SMR of lizards with a low metabolism at rest increased faster with body temperature. The SMR at rest was negatively correlated with behavioral variation in sociability and activity but not with risk-taking behavior. In addition, the plasma corticosterone level after an acute handling stress increased slightly but not significantly with aggressiveness. We discuss alternative interpretations for these relationships and conclude that the link between inter-individual variation in physiology and behavior is trait-dependent in the common lizard.

Significance statement

Selection better promotes the evolution of consistent differences in behavior, or personalities, when they are coupled with differences in physiology. In adult common lizards, inter-individual differences in metabolic expenditure and glucocorticoid stress response are consistent and could play a crucial role in the maintenance of personalities. This study supported partially this hypothesis. We found that more sociable and active personality types had a lower metabolic expenditure, while more aggressive personality types tended to have a higher physiological stress response. At the same time, physiology was not correlated with individual differences in risk-taking behavior and drove little part of behavioral variation. The coupling between personalities and physiology appears to be trait-dependent, suggesting that behaviors may be relatively free to evolve independently from physiology.

Keywords

Locomotion Metabolism Corticosterone Temperament Personality Reptiles 

Supplementary material

265_2016_2117_MOESM1_ESM.docx (20 kb)
ESM 1(DOCX 20 kb)

References

  1. Andrews RM, Pough FH (1985) Metabolism of squamate reptiles—allometric and ecological relationships. Physiol Zool 58:214–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Artacho P, Nespolo RF (2009) Natural selection reduces energy metabolism in the garden snail, Helix aspersa (Cornu aspersum). Evolution 63:1044–1050CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Artacho P, Jouanneau I, Le Galliard J-F (2013) Interindividual variation in thermal sensitivity of maximal sprint speed, thermal behavior, and resting metabolic rate in a lizard. Physiol Biochem Zool 86:458–469CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Artacho P, Saravia J, Ferrandière BD, Perret S, Le Galliard J-F (2015) Quantification of correlational selection on thermal physiology, thermoregulatory behavior, and energy metabolism in lizards. Ecol Evol 5:3600–3609CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Baugh AT, Schaper SV, Hau M, Cockrem JF, de Goede P, van Oers K (2012) Corticosterone responses differ between lines of great tits (Parus major) selected for divergent personalities. Gen Comp Endocrinol 175:488–494CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Baugh AT, van Oers K, Naguib M, Hau M (2013) Initial reactivity and magnitude of the acute stress response associated with personality in wild great tits (Parus major). Gen Comp Endocrinol 189:96–104CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bell AM, Hankison SJ, Laskowski KL (2009) The repeatability of behaviour: a meta-analysis. Anim Behav 77:771–783CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Biro PA, Stamps JA (2010) Do consistent individual differences in metabolic rate promote consistent individual differences in behavior? Trends Ecol Evol 25:653–659CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (1998) Model selection and inference: a practical information-theoretical approach. Springer Verlag, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Careau V, Garland TJ (2012) Performance, personality and energetics: correlation, causation and mechanism? Physiol Biochem Zool 85:543–571CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Careau V, Thomas D, Humphries MM, Réale D (2008) Energy metabolism and animal personality. Oikos 117:641–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Careau V, Bininda-Emonds ORP, Thomas DW, Réale D, Humphries MM (2009) Exploration strategies map along fast–slow metabolic and life-history continua in muroid rodents. Funct Ecol 23:150–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Careau V, Gifford ME, Biro PA (2014) Individual (co)variation in thermal reaction norms of standard and maximal metabolic rates in wild-caught slimy salamanders. Funct Ecol 28:1175–1186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Carere C, Groothuis TGG, Möstl E, Daan S, Koolhaas JM (2003) Fecal corticosteroids in a territorial bird selected for different personalities: daily rhythm and the response to social stress. Horm Behav 43:540–548CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Chessel D, Dufour A-B, Thioulouse J (2004) The ade4 package—I—one-table methods. R News 4:5–10Google Scholar
  16. Cockrem J (2007) Stress, corticosterone responses and avian personalities. J Ornithol 148:169–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Coppens CM, de Boer SF, Koolhaas JM (2010) Coping styles and behavioural flexibility: towards underlying mechanisms. Philos T Roy Soc B 365:4021–4028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cote J, Clobert J (2007) Social personalities influence natal dispersal in a lizard. Proc R Soc Lond B 274:383–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cote J, Clobert J, Meylan S, Fitze PS (2006) Experimental enhancement of corticosterone levels positively affects subsequent male survival. Horm Behav 49:320–327CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Cote J, Dreiss A, Clobert J (2008) Social personality trait and fitness. Proc R Soc Lond B 275:2851–2858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cutts CJ, Adams CE, Campbell A (2001) Stability of physiological and behavioural determinants of performance in Arctic char (Salvelinus alpinus). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 58:961–968CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dauphin-Villemant C, Xavier F (1987) Nycthemeral variations of plasma corticosteroids in captive female Lacerta vivipara Jacquin: influence of stress and reproductive state. Gen Comp Endocrinol 67:292–302CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. de Fraipont M, Clobert J, John-Alder H, Meylan S (2000) Increased pre-natal maternal corticosterone promotes philopatry of offspring in common lizards Lacerta vivipara. J Anim Ecol 69:404–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dingemanse NJ, Wolf M (2010) Recent models for adaptive personality differences: a review. Philos T Roy Soc B 365:3947–3958CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fitze PS, Cote J, San-Jose LM, Meylan S, Isaksson C, Andersson S, Rossi J-M, Clobert J (2009) Carotenoid-based colours reflect the stress response in the common lizard. PLoS ONE 4:e5111CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Garamszegi LZ, Gábor M, Herczeg G (2012) A meta-analysis of correlated behaviours with implications for behavioural syndromes: mean effect size, publication bias, phylogenetic effects and the role of mediator variables. Evol Ecol 26:1213–1235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Groothuis TGG, Carere C (2005) Avian personalities: characterization and epigenesis. Neurosci Biobehav R 29:137–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Koolhaas JM, Korte SM, de Boer SF, van der Vegt BJ, van Reenen CG, Hopster H, de Jong IC, Ruis MAW, Blokhuis HJ (1999) Coping styles in animals: current status in behavior and stress physiology. Neurosci Biobehav R 23:925–935CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Koolhaas JM, de Boer SF, Coppens CM, Buwalda B (2010) Neuroendocrinology of coping styles: towards understanding the biology of individual variation. Front Neuroendocrin 31:307–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Landys MM, Ramenofsky M, Wingfield J (2006) Actions of glucocorticoids at a seasonal baseline as compared to stress-related levels in the regulation of periodic life processes. Gen Comp Endocrinol 148:132–149CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Le Galliard J-F, Le Bris M, Clobert J (2003) Timing of locomotor impairment and shift in thermal preferences during gravidity in a viviparous lizard. Funct Ecol 17:877–885CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Le Galliard J-F, Ferrière R, Clobert J (2005) Effect of patch occupancy on immigration in the common lizard. J Anim Ecol 74:241–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Le Galliard J-F, Paquet M, Cisel M, Montes-Poloni L (2013) Personality and the pace-of-life syndrome: variation and selection on activity, metabolism and locomotor performances. Funct Ecol 27:136–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Le Galliard JF, Paquet M, Mugabo M (2015) An experimental test of density-dependent selection on temperament traits of activity, boldness and sociability. J Evol Biol 28:1144–1155CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Legendre P, Legendre L (1998) Numerical ecology. Developments in environmental modelling, vol 20. Elsevier Science, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  36. Lendvai AZ, Bόkony V, Chastel O (2011) Coping with novelty and stress in free-living house sparrows. J Exp Biol 214:821–828CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. López P, Hawlena D, Polo V, Amo L, Martín J (2005) Sources of individual shy-bold variations in antipredator behaviour of male Iberian rock lizards. Anim Behav 69:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mallard F, Le Bourlot V, Tully T (2013) An automated image analysis system to measure and count organisms in laboratory microcosms. PLoS ONE 8:e64387CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Martins TL, Roberts ML, Giblin I, Huxham R, Evans MR (2007) Speed of exploration and risk-taking behavior are linked to corticosterone titres in zebra finches. Horm Behav 52:445–453CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Mathot KJ, Dingemanse NJ (2015) Energetics and behavior: unrequited needs and new directions. Trends Ecol Evol 30:199–206CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. McEvoy J, While GM, Sinn DL, Carver S, Wapstra E (2015) Behavioural syndromes and structural and temporal consistency of behavioural traits in a social lizard. J Zool 296:58–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Meylan S, Dufty AJ, Clobert J (2003) The effect of transdermal corticosterone application on plasma corticosterone levels in pregnant Lacerta vivipara. Comp Biochem Phys A 134:497–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Nespolo RF, Franco M (2007) Whole-animal metabolic rate is a repeatable trait: a meta-analysis. J Exp Biol 210:2000–2005CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Nespolo RF, Lardies MA, Bozinovic F (2003) Intrapopulational variation in the standard metabolic rate of insects: repeatability, thermal dependence and sensitivity (Q10) of oxygen consumption in a cricket. J Exp Biol 206:4309–4315CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Niewiarowski PH, Waldschmidt SR (1992) Variation in metabolic rates of a lizard: use of SMR in ecological contexts. Funct Ecol 6:15–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Øverli Ø, Sørensen C, Pulman KGT, Pottinger TG, Korzan W, Summers CH, Nilsson GE (2007) Evolutionary background for stress-coping styles: relationships between physiological, behavioral, and cognitive traits in non-mammalian vertebrates. Neurosci Biobehav R 31:396–412Google Scholar
  47. Pinheiro JC, Bates DM (2000) Mixed-effect models in S and S-plus. Statistics and Computing. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Réale D, Reader SM, Sol D, McDougall PT, Dingemanse NJ (2007) Integrating animal temperament within ecology and evolution. Biol Rev 82:291–318CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Réale D, Garant D, Humphries MM, Bergeron P, Careau V, Montiglio PO (2010) Personality and the emergence of the pace-of-life syndrome concept at the population level. Philos T Roy Soc B 365:4051–4063CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ricklefs RE, Wikelski M (2002) The physiology/life-history nexus. Trends Ecol Evol 17:462–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rodriguez-Prieto I, Martin J, Fernandez-Juricic E (2011) Individual variation in behavioural plasticity: direct and indirect effects of boldness, exploration and sociability on habituation to predators in lizards. Proc R Soc Lond B 278:266–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sih A, Bell AM (2008) Insights for behavioral ecology from behavioral syndromes. Adv Stud Behav 38:227–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sih A, Bell A, Johnson JC (2004a) Behavioral syndromes: an ecological and evolutionary overview. Trends Ecol Evol 19:372–377CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Sih A, Bell AM, Johnson JC, Ziemba RE (2004b) Behavioral syndromes: an integrative overview. Q Rev Biol 79:241–277CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Stapley J, Keogh JS (2004) Exploratory and antipredator behaviours differ between territorial and nonterritorial male lizards. Anim Behav 68:841–846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Steyermark AC (2002) A high standard metabolic rate constrains juvenile growth. Zoology 105:147–151CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Veenema AH, Meijer OC, de Kloet ER, Koolhaas JM, Bohus BG (2003) Differences in basal and stress-induced HPA regulation of wild house mice selected for high and low aggression. Horm Behav 43:197–204CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Wilson DS, Clark AB, Coleman K, Dearstyne T (1994) Shyness and boldness in humans and other animals. Trends Ecol Evol 9:442–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wingfield JC, Ramenofsky M (1999) Hormones and the behavioral ecology of stress. In: Palm PHM (ed) Stress physiology in animals. Biological Sciences Series. Sheffield Academic Press, Sheffield, pp 1–51Google Scholar
  60. Wolak ME, Fairbairn DJ, Paulsen YR (2012) Guidelines for estimating repeatability. Methods Ecol Evol 3:129–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wolf M, McNamara JM (2012) On the evolution of personalities via frequency-dependent selection. Am Nat 179:679–692CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hugo Mell
    • 1
  • Rémy Josserand
    • 1
  • Beatriz Decencière
    • 2
  • Paulina Artacho
    • 3
  • Sandrine Meylan
    • 1
    • 4
  • Jean-François Le Galliard
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.iEES Paris, UMR 7618 Université Pierre et Marie Curie, CNRSParisFrance
  2. 2.Centre de recherche en écologie expérimentale et prédictive (CEREEP-Ecotron IleDeFrance), UMS 3194Ecole normale supérieure, PSL Research University, CNRSSt-Pierre-lès-NemoursFrance
  3. 3.Instituto de Ciencias Ambientales y Evolutivas, Campus Isla TejaUniversidad Austral de ChileValdiviaChile
  4. 4.ESPE de ParisUniversité Sorbonne Paris IVParisFrance

Personalised recommendations