Abstract
Jumping spiders (Salticidae) are known both for their excellent vision and for the elaborate visual displays they use to mediate intraspecific interactions. Despite appearing well adapted for visual exchange of information, several correlative studies have suggested that jumping spiders, including Servaea incana, may not visually assess opponent size during agonistic interactions. To more directly examine whether jumping spiders are able to visually assess opponent size, we examined how males of S. incana respond to videos of agonistic displays from various sized conspecifics. Videos of small and large spiders were manipulated so that each opponent exemplar was presented at four sizes that spanned the range of natural variation. Tendency of live spiders to display at and approach videos were related to both their own size and the final size of the video opponents, but not the original size of the video opponents. Small spiders were less likely to display towards large opponents than small opponents whereas large spiders were more likely to display towards large opponents than small opponents. S. incana jumping spiders appear to possess the sensory ability to visually assess opponent size, but their slow visual system and the dynamic behaviour of the opponents during contests may reduce opportunities for visual assessment to the point where individual size-associated tendencies come to dominate decisions of persistence, escalation and retreat.
Significance statement
To limit the costs of fighting, animals may assess their opponent’s fighting ability to decide when to withdraw from contests. Alternatively, animals may withdraw from contests when they reach a cost threshold, regardless of the ability of their opponent. Studies with live interactions suggest that jumping spiders rely on the latter strategy, despite their use of ritualised displays and excellent vision. Using video playback techniques, we demonstrate that Servaea incana males are able to visually assess their opponents during contests. The probability of displaying towards and approaching a video opponent depended upon both a spider’s own size and the size of the video opponent. However, an interaction between these factors suggests that there may be limited opportunity for assessment in live interactions and that the costs and benefits of opponent assessment may depend on an animal’s own fighting ability.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arnott G, Elwood RW (2009) Assessment of fighting ability in animal contests. Anim Behav 77:991–1004
Arnott G, Elwood RW (2010) Startle durations reveal visual assessment abilities during contests between convict cichlids. Behav Process 84:750–756
Bednarski JV, Taylor P, Jakob EM (2012) Optical cues used in predation by jumping spiders, Phidippus audax (Araneae, Salticidae). Anim Behav 84:1221–1227
Brandt Y, Swallow JG (2009) Do the elongated eye stalks of Diopsid flies facilitate rival assessment? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 63:1243–1246
Briffa M (2008) Decisions during fights in the house cricket, Acheta domesticus: mutual or self assessment of energy, weapons and size? Anim Behav 75:1053–1062
Briffa M, Elwood RW (2009) Difficulties remain in distinguishing between mutual and self-assessment in animal contests. Anim Behav 77:759–762
Brown WD, Smith AT, Moskalik B, Gabriel J (2006) Aggressive contests in house crickets: size, motivation and the information content of aggressive songs. Anim Behav 72:225–233
Carducci JP, Jakob EM (2000) Rearing environment affects behaviour of jumping spiders. Anim Behav 59:39–46
Caro TM (1995) Pursuit-deterrence revisited. Tree 10:500–503
Clark DL, Uetz GW (1990) Video image recognition by the jumping spider, Maevia inclemens (Araneae: Salticidae). Anim Behav 40:884–890
Clark DL, Uetz GW (1992) Morph-independent mate selection in a dimorphic jumping spider: demonstration of movement bias in female choice using video-controlled courtship behaviour. Anim Behav 43:247–254
Constant N, Valbuena D, Rittschof CC (2011) Male contest investment changes with male body size but not female quality in the spider Nephila clavipes. Behav Process 87:218–223
Crane J (1949) Comparative biology of salticid spiders at Rancho Grande, Venezuela. Part IV. An analysis of display. Zoologica 34:159–214
Cross FR, Jackson RR, Pollard SD (2008) Complex display behaviour of Evarcha culicivora, an East African mosquito-eating jumping spider. N Z J Zool 35:151–187
DeCarvalho TN, Watson PJ, Field SA (2004) Costs increase as ritualized fighting progresses within and between phases in the sierra dome spider, Neriene litigiosa. Anim Behav 68:473–482
Elias DO, Kasumovic MM, Punzalan D, Andrade MCB, Mason AC (2008) Assessment during aggressive contests between male jumping spiders. Anim Behav 76:901–910
Elwood RW, Arnott G (2012) Understanding how animals fight with Lloyd Morgan's canon. Anim Behav 84:1095–1102
Elwood RW, Arnott G (2013) Assessments in contests are frequently assumed to be complex when simple explanations will suffice. Anim Behav 86:e8–e12
Enquist M, Leimar O (1983) Evolution of fighting behavior: decision rules and assessment of relative strength. J Theor Biol 102:387–410
Faber DB, Baylis JR (1993) Effects of body size on agonistic encounters between male jumping spiders (Araneae, Salticidae). Anim Behav 45:289–299
Fawcett TW, Mowles SL (2013) Assessments of fighting ability need not be cognitively complex. Anim Behav 86:e1–e7
Forster LM (1979) Visual mechanisms of hunting behavior in Trite planiceps, a jumping spider (Araneae, Salticidae). N Z J Zool 6:79–93
Forster LM (1982) Visual communication in jumping spiders (Salticidae). In: Witt PN, Rovner JS (eds) Spider communication: mechanisms and ecological significance. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 161–212
Hardy ICW, Briffa M (2013) Animal contests. Cambridge University Press, New York
Harland DP, Jackson RR (2002) Influence of cues from the anterior medial eyes of virtual prey on Portia fimbriata, an araneophagic jumping spider. J Exp Biol 205:1861–1868
Harland DP, Jackson RR, Macnab AM (1999) Distances at which jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae) distinguish between prey and conspecific rivals. J Zool 247:357–364
Harland DP, Li D, Jackson RR (2012) How jumping spiders see the world. In: Lazareva OF, Shimizu T, Wasserman EA (eds) How animals see the world: comparative behavior, biology, and evolution of vision. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 133–164
Hasson O (1991) Pursuit-deterrent signals: communication between prey and predator. Tree 6:325–329
Hasson O (1995) A fly in spider's clothing: what size the spider? Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 261:223–226
Hill DE, Otto JC (2011) Visual display by male Maratus pavonis (Dunn 1947) and Maratus splendens (Rainbow 1896) (Araneae: Salticidae: Euophryinae). Peckhamia 89:1–41
Hsu Y, Lee SP, Chen MH, Yang SY, Cheng KC (2008) Switching assessment strategy during a contest: fighting in killifish Kryptolebias marmoratus. Anim Behav 75:1641–1649
Jackson RR (1987) Comparative study of releaser pheromones associated with the silk of jumping spiders (Araneae, Salticidae). N Z J Zool 14:1–10
Jackson RR, Harding DP (1982) Intraspecific interactions of Holoplatys sp. indet., a New Zealand jumping spider (Araneae: Salticidae). N Z J Zool 9:487–510
Jackson RR, Wilcox RS (1990) Aggressive mimicry, prey-specific predatory behaviour and predator-recognition in the predator–prey interactions of Portia fimbriata and Euryattus sp., jumping spiders from Queensland. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 26:111–119
Jackson RR, Nelson XJ, Sune GO (2005) A spider that feeds indirectly on vertebrate blood by choosing female mosquitoes as prey. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:15155–15160
Jennings DJ, Gammell MP (2013) Contest behaviour in ungulates. In: Hardy ICW, Briffa M (eds) Animal contests. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 304–320
Jennings DJ, Gammell MP, Carlin CM, Hayden TJ (2004) Effect of body weight, antler length, resource value and experience on fight duration and intensity in fallow deer. Anim Behav 68:213–221
Jenssen TA, Decourcy KR, Congdon JD (2005) Assessment in contests of male lizards (Anolis carolinensis): how should smaller males respond when size matters? Anim Behav 69:1325–1336
Keil PL, Watson PJ (2010) Assessment of self, opponent and resource during male-male contests in the sierra dome spider, Neriene litigiosa: Linyphiidae. Anim Behav 80:809–820
Kotiaho JS, Alatalo RV, Mappes J, Nielsen MG, Parri S, Rivero A (1998a) Energetic costs of size and sexual signalling in a wolf spider. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 265:2203–2209
Kotiaho JS, Alatalo RV, Mappes J, Parri S, Rivero A (1998b) Male mating success and risk of predation in a wolf spider: a balance between sexual and natural selection? J Anim Ecol 67:287–291
Land MF (1969a) Structure of retinae of principal eyes of jumping spiders (Salticidae: Dendryphantinae) in relation to visual optics. J Exp Biol 51:443–470
Land MF (1969b) Movements of retinae of jumping spiders (Salticidae: Dendryphantinae) in response to visual stimuli. J Exp Biol 51:471–493
Maynard Smith J, Parker GA (1976) The logic of asymmetric contests. Anim Behav 24:159–175
McGinley RH, Prenter J, Taylor PW (2013) Whole-organism performance in a jumping spider, Servaea incana (Araneae: Salticidae): links with morphology and between performance traits. Biol J Linn Soc 110:644–657
McGinley RH, Mendez V, Taylor PW (2015a) Natural history and display behaviour of Servaea incana, a common and widespread Australian jumping spider (Araneae : Salticidae). Aust J Zool 63:300–319
McGinley RH, Prenter J, Taylor PW (2015b) Assessment strategies and decision making in male–male contests of Servaea incana jumping spiders. Anim Behav 101:89–95
Mesterton-Gibbons M, Heap SM (2014) Variation between self- and mutual assessment in animal contests. Am Nat 183:199–213
Mesterton-Gibbons M, Marden JH, Dugatkin LA (1996) On wars of attrition without assessment. J Theor Biol 181:65–83
Morrell LJ, Backwell PRY, Metcalfe NB (2005) Fighting in fiddler crabs Uca mjoebergi: what determines duration? Anim Behav 70:653–662
Nelson XJ, Jackson RR (2006) A predator from East Africa that chooses malaria vectors as preferred prey. PLoS One 1:e132
Nelson XJ, Jackson RR (2012) The discerning predator: decision rules underlying prey classification by a mosquito-eating jumping spider. J Exp Biol 215:2255–2261
Nelson XJ, Jackson RR, Li D (2006) Conditional use of honest signaling by a Batesian mimic. Behav Ecol 17:575–580
Prenter J, Taylor PW, Elwood RW (2008) Large body size for winning and large swords for winning quickly in swordtail males, Xiphophorus helleri. Anim Behav 75:1981–1987
Reby D, McComb K, Cargnelutti B, Darwin C, Fitch WT, Clutton-Brock T (2005) Red deer stags use formants as assessment cues during intrasexual agonistic interactions. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 272:941–947
Reddon AR, Voisin MR, Menon N, Marsh-Rollo SE, Wong MYL, Balshine S (2011) Rules of engagement for resource contests in a social fish. Anim Behav 82:93–99
Reddon AR, Balk D, Balshine S (2013) Probing aggressive motivation during territorial contests in a group-living cichlid fish. Behav Process 92:47–51
Reichert MS (2014) Playback tests and studies of animal contest dynamics: concepts and an example in the gray tree frog. Behav Ecol 25:591–603
Richman DB, Jackson RR (1992) A review of the ethology of jumping spiders (Araneae, Salticidae). B Brit Arachnol Soc 9:33–37
Roberts JA, Taylor PW, Uetz GW (2007) Consequences of complex signaling: predator detection of multimodal cues. Behav Ecol 18:236–240
Rudin FS, Briffa M (2011) The logical polyp: assessments and decisions during contests in the beadlet anemone Actinia equina. Behav Ecol 22:1278–1285
Smallegange IM, Sabelis MW, van der Meer J (2007) Assessment games in shore crab fights. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 351:255–266
Stuart-Fox D (2006) Testing game theory models: fighting ability and decision rules in chameleon contests. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 273:1555–1561
Taylor PW, Elwood RW (2003) The mismeasure of animal contests. Anim Behav 65:1195–1202
Taylor PW, Hasson O, Clark DL (2001) Initiation and resolution of jumping spider contests: roles for size, proximity, and early detection of rivals. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 50:403–413
Taylor AR, Persons MH, Rypstra AL (2005) The effect of perceived predation risk on male courtship and copulatory behavior in the wolf spider Pardosa milvina (Araneae, Lycosidae). J Arachnol 33:76–81
Tedore C, Johnsen S (2013) Pheromones exert top-down effects on visual recognition in the jumping spider Lyssomanes viridis. J Exp Biol 216:1744–1756
Tedore C, Johnsen S (2015) Visual mutual assessment of size in male Lyssomanes viridis jumping spider contests. Behav Ecol 26:510–518
Tibbetts EA, Lindsay R (2008) Visual signals of status and rival assessment in Polistes dominulus paper wasps. Biol Lett 4:237–239
Tibbetts EA, Mettler A, Levy S (2010) Mutual assessment via visual status signals in Polistes dominulus wasps. Biol Lett 6:10–13
Tsai Y-JJ, Barrows EM, Weiss MR (2014) Pure self-assessment of size during male–male contests in the parasitoid wasp Nasonia vitripennis. Ethology 120:816–824
Wagner WE (1992) Deceptive or honest signalling of fighting ability? A test of alternative hypotheses for the function of changes in call dominant frequency by male cricket frogs. Anim Behav 44:449–462
Wells MS (1988) Effects of body size and resource value on fighting behaviour in a jumping spider. Anim Behav 36:321–326
Zurek DB, Nelson XJ (2012) Hyperacute motion detection by the lateral eyes of jumping spiders. Vis Res 66:26–30
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Maria Castillo-Pando and Vivian Mendez for their assistance in the laboratory and Alan Taylor, Peter Petocz and Renata Morelli for their assistance with the data analysis. RHM was supported by an Australian Postgraduate Award.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by M. Elgar
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McGinley, R.H., Taylor, P.W. Video playback experiments support a role for visual assessment of opponent size in male-male contests of Servaea incana jumping spiders. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 70, 821–829 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-016-2103-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-016-2103-5