Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 70, Issue 5, pp 745–753

Behavioral repeatability of flour beetles before and after metamorphosis and throughout aging

  • Yonatan Wexler
  • Aziz Subach
  • Jonathan N. Pruitt
  • Inon Scharf
Original Article

Abstract

Behavioral repeatability is an important trait relevant to personality research and to behavioral ecology in general. We examined here the behavioral repeatability of two activity-related traits: movement and edge preference (proportion of time spent next to the test arena edge). We used the red flour beetle as our test species in order to determine whether repeatability changes throughout metamorphosis and aging and whether there are inter-sexual differences. Young adults moved more than larvae, but movement activity generally declined with age. Behavioral repeatability was high between two successive measurements for larvae and young adults, but did not persist through metamorphosis. These findings support most of the previous studies on insects and probably reflect the occurrence of phenotypic reorganization during metamorphosis. Neither of our predictions of an increase in behavioral repeatability throughout aging and of a higher repeatability of young adults than larvae held true, as repeatability levels estimates remained similar across ontogeny and aging. Similar to other studies on repeatability, estimates declined with the time interval between two pairs of measurements, suggesting an episodic physiological basis for the documented behaviors. Finally, we detected several inter-sexual differences. Females were more active than males and expressed a shallower decline in movement with aging. Female movement activity was also more repeatable, but female edge preference was less repeatable than that of males. We reason that such differences in repeatability may be driven by sex-specific selection pressures on behavioral tendencies.

Significance statement

We investigate several questions regarding behavioral repeatability in insects. The two main questions asked are (1) whether inter-individual behavioral differences remain consistent across larvae and adult stage, and (2) how repeatability changes throughout aging. The first question has been only rarely tested in insects that undergo a full metamorphosis. It has been recognized as a timely question and as an opportunity for researchers studying animal personality. Previous results regarding amphibians and insects that undergo partial metamorphosis were inconclusive. The second question is important, because studies rarely follow individuals throughout their lives. This is essential to understand the consequences of aging. We also report on differences between males and females, probably indicating on differences in motivation for activity and in patterns of aging. Finally, the question, how behavior changes with ontogeny, has been already recognized by Tinbergen as a basic one in animal behavior.

Keywords

Activity Behavioral consistency Centrophobism Dispersal Movement Tenebrionidae Tribolium castaneum 

Supplementary material

265_2016_2098_MOESM1_ESM.docx (164 kb)
ESM 1(DOCX 164 kb)

References

  1. Alcalay Y, Barkae ED, Ovadia O, Scharf I (2014a) Consequences of the instar stage for behavior in a pit-building antlion. Behav Proc 103:105–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alcalay Y, Ovadia O, Scharf I (2014b) Behavioral repeatability and personality in pit-building antlion larvae under differing environmental contexts. Behav Ecol Socibiol 68:1985–1993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bajer K, Horváth G, Molnár O, Török J, Garamszegi LZ, Herczeg G (2015) European green lizard (Lacerta viridis) personalities: linking behavioural types to ecologically relevant traits at different ontogenetic stages. Behav Proc 111:67–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bell AM, Hankison SJ, Laskowski KL (2009) The repeatability of behaviour: a meta-analysis. Anim Behav 77:771–783CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Bengston SE, Pruitt JN, Riechert SE (2014) Differences in environmental enrichment generate contrasting behavioural syndromes in a basal spider lineage. Anim Behav 93:105–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Besson M, Martin JR (2005) Centrophobism/thigmotaxis, a new role for the mushroom bodies in Drosophila. J Neurobiol 62:386–396CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Biro PA, Stamps JA (2010) Do consistent individual differences in metabolic rate promote consistent individual differences in behavior? Trends Ecol Evol 25:653–659CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Boulton K, Grimmer AJ, Rosenthal GG, Walling CA, Wilson AJ (2014) How stable are personalities? A multivariate view of behavioural variation over long and short timescales in the sheepshead swordtail, Xiphophorus birchmanni. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 68:791–803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brodin T (2009) Behavioral syndrome over the boundaries of life—carryovers from larvae to adult damselfly. Behav Ecol 20:30–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brodin T, Lind MI, Wiberg MK, Johansson F (2013) Personality trait differences between mainland and island populations in the common frog (Rana temporaria). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 67:135–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brommer JE, Class B (2015) The importance of genotype-by-age interactions for the development of repeatable behavior and correlated behaviors over lifetime. Front Zool 12:S2CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Campbell JF, Runnion C (2003) Patch exploitation by female red flour beetles, Tribolium castaneum. J Insect Sci 3:20CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Carere C, Drent PJ, Privitera L, Koolhaas JM, Groothuis TGG (2005) Personalities in great tits, Parus major: stability and consistency. Anim Behav 70:795–805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Carere C, Maestripieri D (2013) Introduction: animal personalities: who cares and why? In: Carere C, Masteripieri D (eds) Animal personalities: behavior, physiology, and evolution. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, USACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chapman RF (2013) The insects: structure and function (5th ed.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  16. Colomb J, Reiter L, Blaszkiewicz J, Wessnitzer J, Brembs B (2012) Open source tracking and analysis of adult Drosophila locomotion in Buridan’s paradigm with and without visual targets. PLoS ONE 7:e42247CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Dahlbom SJ, Lagman D, Lundstedt-Enkel K, Sundström LF, Winberg S (2011) Boldness predicts social status in zebrafish (Danio rerio). PLoS ONE 6:e23565CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Dammhahn M, Almeling L (2012) Is risk taking during foraging a personality trait? A field test for cross-context consistency in boldness. Anim Behav 84:1131–1139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dangles O, Pierre D, Christides JP, Casas J (2007) Escape performance decreases during ontogeny in wild crickets. J Exp Biol 210:3165–3170CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. David M, Auclair Y, Cézilly F (2012) Assessing short- and long-term repeatability and stability of personality in captive zebra finches using longitudinal data. Ethology 118:932–942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dingemanse NJ, Both C, Drent PJ, Van Oers K, Van Noordwijk AJ (2002) Repeatability and heritability of exploratory behaviour in great tits from the wild. Anim Behav 64:929–938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ducatez S, Legrand D, Chaput-Bardy A, Stevens VM, Fréville H, Baguette M (2012) Inter-individual variation in movement: is there a mobility syndrome in the large white butterfly Pieris brassicae? Ecol Entomol 37:377–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dzieweczynski TL, Hebert OL (2013) The effects of short-term exposure to an endocrine disrupter on behavioral consistency in male juvenile and adult Siamese fighting fish. Archiv Environ Contam Toxicol 64:316–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fedina TY, Lewis SM (2007) Female mate choice across mating stages and between sequential mates in flour beetles. J Evol Biol 20:2138–2143CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Fisher DN, David M, Tregenza T, Rodriguez-Munoz R (2015) Dynamics of among-individual behavioral variation over adult lifespan in a wild insect. Behav Ecol 26:975–985CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Grim T, Samaš P, Hauber ME (2014) The repeatability of avian egg ejection behaviors across different temporal scales, breeding stages, female ages and experiences. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 68:749–759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Grotewiel MS, Martin I, Bhandari P, Cook-Wiens E (2005) Functional senescence in Drosophila melanogaster. Ageing Res Rev 4:372–397CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Gyuris E, Feró O, Barta Z (2012) Personality traits across ontogeny in firebugs, Pyrrhocoris apterus. Anim Behav 84:103–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Halle S, Nowziki A, Scharf I (2015) The consequences of parental age for development, body mass and resistance to stress in the red flour beetle. Biol J Linn Soc 115:305–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Halliday WD, Blouin-Demers G (2014) Red flour beetles balance thermoregulation and food acquisition via density-dependent habitat selection. J Zool 294:198–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hedrick AV, Kortet R (2012) Sex differences in the repeatability of boldness over metamorphosis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 66:407–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Herde A, Eccard JA (2013) Consistency in boldness, activity and exploration at different stages of life. BMC Ecol 13:49CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Howe RW (1962) The effects of temperature and humidity on the oviposition rate of Tribolium castaneum (Hbst.) (Coleoptera, Tenebrionidae). Bull Ent Res 53:301–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ishizaki M, Watanabe T, Moriya S, Tabuchi K (2011) Diurnal locomotion activity of adult rice bug, Leptocorisa chinensis (Hemiptera: Alydidae), at different ages, measured by actograph and video camera. Appl Entomol Zool 46:135–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ismail MZBH, Hodges MD, Boylan M, Achall R, Shirras A, Broughton SJ (2015) The Drosophila insulin receptor independently modulates lifespan and locomotor senescence. PLoS ONE 10:e0125312CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Kortet R, Hedrick A (2007) A behavioural syndrome in the field cricket Gryllus integer: intrasexual aggression is correlated with activity in a novel environment. Biol J Linn Soc 91:475–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kralj-Fišer S, Čandek K, Lokovšek T, Čelik T, Cheng RC, Elgar MA, Kuntner M (2016) Mate choice and sexual size dimorphism, not personality, explain female aggression and sexual cannibalism in raft spiders. Anim Behav 111:49–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kralj-Fišer S, Schuett W (2014) Studying personality variation in invertebrates: why bother? Anim Behav 91:41–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Martin JR (2004) A portrait of locomotor behaviour in Drosophila determined by a video-tracking paradigm. Behav Proc 67:207–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Moretz JA, Martins EP, Robison BD (2007) Behavioral syndromes and the evolution of correlated behavior in zebrafish. Behav Ecol 18:556–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Müller T, Müller C (2015) Behavioural phenotypes over the lifetime of a holometabolous insect. Front Zool 12:S8CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Nespolo RF, Franco M (2007) Whole-animal metabolic rate is a repeatable trait: a meta-analysis. J Exp Biol 210:2000–2005CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Niemelä PT, Vainikka A, Hedrick AV, Kortet R (2012) Integrating behaviour with life history: boldness of the field cricket, Gryllus integer, during ontogeny. Funct Ecol 26:450–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Park T (1934) Observations on the general biology of the flour beetle, Tribolium confusum. Q Rev Biol 9:36–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Preacher KJ (2002) Calculation for the test of the difference between two independent correlation coefficients [Computer software]. http://quantpsy.org
  46. Ridgel AL, Ritzmann RE (2005) Insights into age-related locomotor declines from studies of insects. Ageing Res Rev 4:23–39CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Scharf I, Braf H, Ifrach N, Rosenstein S, Subach A (2015) The effects of temperature and diet during development, adulthood, and mating on reproduction in the red flour beetle. PLoS ONE 10:e0136924CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Schuett W, Dall SRX (2009) Sex differences, social context and personality in zebra finches, Taeniopygia guttata. Anim Behav 77:1041–1050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Shukitt-Hale B, Casadesus G, Cantuti-Castelverti I, Joseph JA (2001) Effect of age on object exploration, habituation, and response to spatial and nonspatial change. Behav Neurosci 115:1059–1064CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Shuranova Z, Burmistrov Y, Abramson CI (2005) Habituation to a novel environment in the crayfish Procambarus cubensis. J Crustac Biol 25:488–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sih A, Bell A, Johnson JC (2004) Behavioral syndromes: an ecological and evolutionary overview. Trends Ecol Evol 19:372–378CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Simon AF, Liang DT, Krantz DE (2006) Differential decline in behavioral performance of Drosophila melanogaster with age. Mech Ageing Dev 127:647–651CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Simon P, Dupuis R, Costentin J (1994) Thigmotaxis as an index of anxiety in mice. Influence of dopaminergic transmissions. Behav Brain Res 61:59–64CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Sinn DL, Gosling SD, Moltschaniwskyj NA (2008) Development of shy/bold behaviour in squid: context-specific phenotypes associated with developmental plasticity. Anim Behav 75:433–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Socha R, Zemek R (2000) Locomotor activity in adult Pyrrhocoris apterus (Heteroptera) in relation to sex, physiological status and wing dimorphism. Physiol Entomol 25:383–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sokoloff A (1974) The biology of Tribolium: with special emphasis on genetic aspects, vol 2. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  57. Sweeney K, Gadd RDH, Hess ZL, McDermott DR, MacDonald L, Cotter P, Armagost F, Chen JZ, Berning AW, DiRienzo N, Pruitt JN (2013) Assessing the effects of rearing environment, natural selection, and developmental stage on the emergence of a behavioral syndrome. Ethology 119:436–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tremmel M, Müller C (2013) Insect personality depends on environmental conditions. Behav Ecol 24:386–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Truman JW, Riddiford LM (2002) Endocrine insights into the evolution of metamorphosis in insects. Annu Rev Entomol 47:467–500CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Van Allen BG, Bhavsar P (2014) Natal habitat effects drive density—dependent scaling of dispersal decisions. Oikos 123:699–704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Van Dongen WFD, Maldonado K, Sabat P, Vasquez RA (2010) Geographic variation in the repeatability of a personality trait. Behav Ecol 21:1243–1250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Via S (1999) Cannibalism facilitates the use of a novel environment in the flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum. Heredity 82:267–275Google Scholar
  63. White CR, Schimpf NG, Cassey P (2013) The repeatability of metabolic rate declines with time. J Exp Biol 216:1763–1765CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Wilson ADM, Krause J (2012a) Metamorphosis and animal personality: a neglected opportunity. Trends Ecol Evol 27:529–531CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Wilson ADM, Krause J (2012b) Personality and metamorphosis: is behavioral variation consistent across ontogenetic niche shifts? Behav Ecol 23:1316–1323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Young AM (1970) Predation and abundance in populations of flour beetles. Ecology 51:602–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Zajitschek F, Hunt J, Zajitschek SRK, Jennions MD, Brooks R (2007) No intra-locus sexual conflict over reproductive fitness or ageing in field crickets. PLoS ONE 2:e155CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  68. Zar JH (1999) Biostatistical analysis (4th ed). Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USAGoogle Scholar
  69. Ziegler JR (1976) Evolution of migration response: emigration by Tribolium and the influence of age. Evolution 30:579–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yonatan Wexler
    • 1
  • Aziz Subach
    • 1
  • Jonathan N. Pruitt
    • 2
  • Inon Scharf
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Zoology, Faculty of Life SciencesTel Aviv UniversityTel AvivIsrael
  2. 2.Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine BiologyUniversity of CaliforniaSanta BarbaraUSA

Personalised recommendations